EPC: Earnest Graham

6/10/2008

by Doug Farrar

Is a running back who has enjoyed one good NFL season worth a multi-year, multi-million-dollar contract?

If you ask the Atlanta Falcons, a back who hasn’t even had one good full NFL season is worth a six-year, $34.5 million deal. That’s what Michael Turner, LaDainian Tomlinson’s former backup, got from Arthur Blank’s team based on a few long runs and the temptation of potential. In San Francisco, Frank Gore got a four-year, $28 million extension in March of 2007 after leading the NFC in rushing in 2006, his second year in the NFL.

Entering 2007, the Tampa Bay Bucs thought that Cadillac Williams, the fifth overall pick in 2005, would be the team’s feature back. Unfortunately, Williams tore his patellar tendon in the fourth game of the season. While Williams went off to surgery and rehab, left to wonder if the negative perceptions about the rest of his career would ring true, the Bucs turned to Earnest Graham, an undrafted fifth-year veteran out of Florida. Released twice in his rookie season of 2003, the 5-foot-9, 225-pound Graham spent most of the next four seasons on the practice squad. He didn’t start a game until October 14, 2007, and carried the ball a grand total of 52 times for 215 yards from 2004 through 2006. But when Michael Pittman suffered an ankle injury in early October last year, Graham went from committee member to full-time workhorse.

It was Graham’s productivity, along with the efforts of two seemingly ageless players in Jeff Garcia and Joey Galloway, that joined up with a newly resurgent defense to make the Buccaneers the 2007 NFC South champs. This won them a date on their home field in the wild card round with the eventual Super Bowl champion New York Giants. In Graham’s mind, his 898 regular season yards and 10 touchdowns on 222 carries (not to mention 49 receptions) have earned him a new contract in the same hemisphere as Gore and other elite backs. Before we discuss how feasible that is (his current 2008 base salary stands at $605,000), let’s take a look at his work against the Giants’ formidable front seven in a 24-14 playoff loss that saw the Tampa Bay offense seriously hampered by Joey Galloway’s shoulder injury. Specifically, we’ll look at Graham’s work in the first-quarter drive that produced the game’s first touchdown.

On the first drive of the game, Graham carried the ball twice — falling forward into a scrum for two yards on Tampa Bay’s first offensive play, and gaining four yards to the left behind the excellent blocking of fullback B.J. Askew and right guard Davin Joseph, who pulled left and walled off linebacker Reggie Torbor on the outside. On the second drive, Jon Gruden asked Graham to pound that rock, and this is the drive that deserves our focus.

Second-and-10 from the Tampa Bay 46 (6:56 remaining)

The second drive began with a notable event — Jeff Garcia overthrowing Joey Galloway. Garcia’s not known for his rocket arm, and Galloway is still regarded as one of the fastest receivers in the NFL. (In the booth, Troy Aikman talked about how he could not have possibly overthrown Galloway during their brief time together on the 2000 Cowboys.) This was the first of many indications that something was wrong with No. 84.

On the next play, the Bucs lined up in an I-formation, with Askew as the blocking back. Garcia, Askew, the entire Tampa Bay offensive line, and nearly every Giants defender headed left, leaving an enormous cutback lane for Graham to exploit. This he did, as Joseph held up tackle Fred Robbins in the middle of the field, and Robbins, linebacker Gerris Wilkinson, and tackle Justin Tuck got lost in the backwash. Tuck tried to take Graham down with what basically amounted to an ankle tackle, which will not happen in this lifetime. If you’re going to bring Earnest Graham down, you need a very good angle and/or some help. Graham was tackled after 11 yards by free safety Gibril Wilson. I liked Graham’s quickness on the cutback on this play, his ability to see exactly when the hole opened up and his quickness in making the decision.

First-and-10 from the New York 32 (5:30)

After an 11-yard pass from Garcia to Michael “You Can Take Me off the Milk Carton Now” Clayton, Garcia handed off to Graham again from an I-formation with Askew in front. Graham headed right up the middle, and center John Wade was the pointman on this play. Wade snapped the ball to Garcia and was then on tackle Barry Cofield immediately, driving Cofield to the left and away from the play. This allowed Askew to occupy the lane and engage middle linebacker Antonio Pierce long enough for Graham to fly by Pierce and pick up seven yards. It took two defenders — Wilkinson and Wilson — to bring Graham down on this play. Graham likes to get as low to the ground as possible at first contact, and he’s very good at falling forward for that extra yard.

Second-and-3 from the New York 25 (4:50)

The Bucs lined up single-back, with two tight ends — Alex Smith at the line to the right, and Anthony Becht in the left slot. Becht motioned presnap to the right side backfield for additional blocking assistance, as Torbor was blitzing that side. Becht took Torbor out of the play, as Graham headed inside after right guard Arron Sears pulled right and bounced both safeties — Wilson and James Butler — outside. The play was also made possible by Joseph pushing Robbins into the next county at the line. Osi Umenyiora slipped inside to make the tackle after Graham traveled a bit less than three yards. This led to a third-and-inches that was converted by a Garcia quarterback sneak.

First-and-10 from the New York 20 (3:42)

I-formation, and the play headed right, with Graham behind Askew. Askew took on Torbor between the right guard and right tackle, but that didn’t matter much, because Michael Strahan absolutely abused right tackle Jeremy Trueblood on this play. Strahan had Trueblood dead to rights from the word go, getting under his pads and pushing him out of the play before Askew could get out of the backfield. By the time Askew was dealing with Torbor, Strahan had already turned back around and was almost ready to take care of Graham. Where Graham’s power is especially advantageous is on a play like this, where an elite defensive player hasn’t quite adjusted his body back to the play, and therefore can’t get the perfect angle on the back. Graham got one yard out of a play that should have been zero or a loss.

Second-and-9 from the New York 20 (3:08)

This was the first play in which you really got a chance to see Graham’s straight-line speed. Tampa Bay lined up in an interesting formation, a tight-I with Michael Pittman and Graham in the backfield, and tight ends Alex Smith and Jerramy Stevens aligned right. Stevens was off-tackle and Smith was right slot. Presnap, everything changed, as Smith motioned from right to left slot, Stevens went wide right, Pittman motioned up to the right slot, and Galloway stayed wide left. The play went from a right-side power, two-back formation to a four-receiver set with Graham alone in the backfield. The Giants adjusted to this by moving Butler back into coverage from about five yards off the line, and moving Torbor back from a read blitz to cover. The linebacker splits went from two yards to about five, and Webster backed off Galloway after coming up to play press.

Graham headed upfield through center at the snap as if he was shot out of a cannon, and caught a little dink pass from Garcia about five yards upfield. Graham was given even more relief by Garcia’s pump-fake, which had Antonio Pierce hesitating just enough for Graham to get free of Pierce as he was heading slightly left. By the time Pierce recovered to make the tackle, Graham was down at the Giants’ six-yard line. I give most of the credit for this 14-yard gain to whoever called the play — whether it was Gruden off the playsheet or Garcia at the line. The Bucs fooled the Giants defense and determined the outcome. But I also liked Graham’s quickness before and after the catch.

First-and-Goal from the New York 6 (2:28)

Three outstanding blocks made this play go, as the Bucs lined up tight-I with Askew at fullback. First, Askew’s block on Wilson, who was coming up to blitz on the Giants’ left side, allowed Graham to release to the right inside. Second, Davin Joseph’s block on Pierce, three yards downfield, kept Graham moving. Third, Alex Smith was walling off Wilkinson to Graham’s left, which gave Graham a free lane. Because of the excellent blocking around him, the attempted tackles by Robbins and Justin Tuck did not have the desired effect. Graham was able to fall forward a good four yards after initial contact, down to the one-yard line.

Second-and-goal from the New York 1 (1:53)

Touchdown Buccaneers, as Graham got low again, slipping under the tackles and behind Joseph’s pulling block. With 1:49 left in the first quarter, Tampa Bay went up 6-0. Graham touched the ball six times on the touchdown drive, five times on the ground, and gained 41 of the 54 yards it took to lead the game.

The Bucs wouldn’t lead for long, as the Giants scored 24 unanswered points before a late touchdown pass from Garcia to Alex Smith made the game look a bit closer at 24-14. New York had begun one of the greatest and most improbable postseason runs in NFL history, but we’re going to stay behind with Gruden’s team and ask a few questions.

First, why did Gruden abandon the run when it was working? After that first successful drive, Graham only carried the ball 11 more times, and the Giants didn’t have more than a seven-point lead until Lawrence Tynes kicked a 25-yard field goal with five minutes gone in the third quarter. Joey Galloway’s shoulder injury left Garcia without his primary weapon at full strength, and after possessing the ball for almost ten minutes in the first quarter, the Bucs never again had it for more than 6:40 in a quarter, and could barely manage five minutes in the second and fourth quarters. The Giants’ 2007 defensive line will go down as one of the best in recent history, but Graham and his teammates were absolutely making inroads against it.

In the drive at the end of the second quarter after the Giants tied the score, a two-yard run by Graham was followed by eight straight Garcia passes and an eventual punt. Tampa Bay’s next drive saw Graham take the ball on the ground five times for 23 yards. That drive ended when Garcia was intercepted by Corey Webster at the goal line on a pass to Galloway. After that, it was too late.

Second, could an upswing for the Tampa Bay offensive line be right around the corner? This was the NFL’s youngest line in 2007. Tackles Jeremy Trueblood and Donald Penn are coming into their third NFL seasons, as is guard Davin Joseph (who impressed me most of all in this game), while guard Arron Sears was a rookie in 2007. The acquisition of center Jeff Faine from New Orleans makes a strong position even stronger, as the Saints finished first in the NFL in Adjusted Line Yards up the middle despite Deuce McAllister’s season-ending injury.

You may notice that in discussing Graham in this article, I’ve talked as much about the offensive line. That’s in part because I believe that’s always the ratio that should be used when talking about running backs, but also because I was so impressed with the blocking Graham had going for him. Tampa Bay’s line finished sixth in the NFL in Adjusted Line Yards last season — the 4.49 yards per play average was almost half a yard better than the actual rushing yards per play. With two young guards showing great potential, and one of the best centers in the league now on board, the numbers could be even better in 2008.

The quality of blocking leads to the big question: Is Earnest Graham worth an All-Pro payday? It depends on how you value running backs. I tend to value backs based on their versatility, durability, and dependence on their offensive line. Graham is a fairly versatile player as a power back — beyond the obvious between-the-tackles action, he’s a good receiver and he has a bit of side-to-side escapability (the phrase that kept going through my head was “Jamal Lewis Lite”). His durability is not a concern to this point, because he hasn’t played much outside of his 2007 season, though backs that make their bones between the tackles generally have short shelf lives.

Graham is, however, a back who needs a great line to make things happen. He’s got decent burst at the start of a play and through his cuts, but he’s far more about bowling people over than he is about making them miss. In my mind, this makes him more a component back than a feature back. I would be more likely to have Graham in a rotation as a power option, paired with a smaller, shiftier back. Now that the Bucs have given Askew a new contract (a very wise move, based on what I’ve seen) and brought Warrick Dunn back in the fold, Graham’s carries will almost certainly decrease from the 19.6 he averaged as a full-game starter in 2007. It’s not that this doesn’t make him valuable, but it’s tougher to argue that you’re worth Frank Gore money when you’re not taking on a Frank Gore workload. Then again, with Mike Martz now running San Francisco’s offense, the “Frank Gore Workload” concept could be taking a serious hit as well. The concept of running back workload seems to be changing around the league, which is certainly a good thing — for the first time since 2001 and for only the third time in the last ten seasons, no back is in line for the Curse of 370.

If Graham can recreate his 2007 production in 2008, he’ll be in a much better position to ask for that kind of money. For now, stringing more than one good season together is the order of the day.

posted 6-10-2008 at 11:29 AM by Doug Farrar || Every Play Counts ||

35 Comments »

1. I just want to be the first to say that the Bucs are going to the superbowl. You heard it here first!

   :: bgrimm420 — 6/10/2008 @ 11:35 am

---





2. nice work Doug, excellent analysis of a guy that many in both the real and fantasy worlds are having a hard time pegging.

   Is Graham’s very high Kubiak projection based on him receiving the same number of carries per game as last year, and if so, does your belief that his carries will shrink a little this year hurt that projection?

   Allow me please to also voice a pet peeve…
   “…as the Giants scored 24 unanswered points before a late touchdown pass from Garcia to Alex Smith made the game look a bit closer at 24-14.”
   Now if those 24 Giant points were indeed unanswered, wouldn’t the final score have been 24-7? Wasn’t the Buc TD pass an answer?

   :: jimmo — 6/10/2008 @ 12:04 pm

---





3. Then again, with Mike Martz now running San Francisco’s offense, the “Frank Gore Workload” concept could be taking a serious hit as well.

   I know this isn’t the main topic, but I disagree with this statement; Gore is a heck of a receiver, and Martz had no problems passing to Marshall Faulk when he had Holt & Bruce as wideouts, much less… er, who are SF’s receivers again?

   :: Independent George — 6/10/2008 @ 12:21 pm

---





4. Maybe some Bucs fans can help–what is Cadillac’s status for ‘08? PUP list till week 8?
   Re: #2 I understand the pet peeve, but I think the idea is that the Giants scored 24 unanswered while the game was in the balance, and that the Bucs scored a late TD when the outcome was no longer in doubt. Yes, technically it’s an “answer”, but does it really matter when the other team is already celebrating the victory?

   :: Joseph — 6/10/2008 @ 12:46 pm

---





5. Re #1
   So am I, if the Titans make it. Will the Bucs be going through the secondary market, too, or can all players buy tickets directly? I should remember from the Tice thing, but don’t.

   Interesting piece, Doug, thanks. I’ve long thought the games Graham missed in 2001 cost the Gators a berth in the national championship game, and he really impressed me when I saw him in the preseason (yeah, I know) in 2005. To me, he’s just another example of the truism you can find a decent running back on the street. I think you’re probably right it might not have been wise to give him the big contract, but I can’t figure out Gruden at all.

   :: NewsToTom — 6/10/2008 @ 1:07 pm

---





6. Gore is a heck of a receiver, and Martz had no problems passing to Marshall Faulk when he had Holt & Bruce as wideouts, much less… er, who are SF’s receivers again?

   Arnaz Battle and…uh…Isaac Bruce. Plus you got Vernon Davis, if he can ever stay healthy.

   Maybe some Bucs fans can help–what is Cadillac’s status for ‘08? PUP list till week 8?

   He supposedly (stop me if you’ve heard this before) way ahead of schedule. He can jog and stuff, but I doubt he can cut yet. He says he intends to play this year, but my guess is that he’ll start on the PUP and then get put on IR.

   As for Graham, I thought he was terrific last year, but he’s 29. I figure he can continue this kind of production for maybe 3 years, tops. I’d like to see the Bucs offer him a 3-4 year extension laden with incentives if he plays well. Like the article says, he always falls forward, and he never, ever fumbles (0 last year).

   :: Quentin — 6/10/2008 @ 1:15 pm

---





7. While adding Dunn is definitely going to take some touches away, don’t count out Michael Bennett either. He came in during the middle of the season last year, so he hadn’t had a chance to really learn the playbook (and because that was compounded with his trouble knowing the blitz pickup responsibilities as well, his play time was limited).

   However, Gruden still was able to design a few plays that targeted Bennett, and he was able to create some splash 20+ yard plays and I believe a couple of TDs. Word from camp (for what that’s worth too) is that Bennett is much more comfortable with the playbook, so using both Dunn and Bennett in the speed RB role shouldn’t be a surprise.

   :: Stereochemistry — 6/10/2008 @ 1:55 pm

---





8. Re #2, 4: I’m with jimmo on this important issue. Far too often people use ‘unanswered’ when they mean ‘consecutive’. Unanswered points are scored last.

   :: Bjorn Nitmo — 6/10/2008 @ 2:16 pm

---





9. Great analysis, Doug. Another feather in FO’s cap (which is by now, a chief’s head dress).

   Jimmo, regarding your pet peeve, I think the word “before” (an implied version of “until”) is the key there. Think of a basketball game: “They didn’t score before/until five minutes into the game.” is a perfectly reasonable statement, right? It does not mean they never scored and doesn’t remotely imply it–the until is the key word. So “unanswered… before/until X happened” works fine for me. “Brian Billick was thought of as an offenseive guru before he went to Baltimore.” It implies two states of being with the turning point being the move to the Ravens. I was hungry before that third burrito. I was sad before I got married. I had ten fingers before taking that job on the assembly line…. Pretty sure there is an implied CHANGE of circumstance there. That work for you?

   :: Bobman — 6/10/2008 @ 2:21 pm

---





10. I don’t really think that the Giants’ run defense was anywhere near as good as their pass defense so I question why they’ve been used as the test for Graham. However if your point was to prove that Gruden should have run more against a team with a brutal pass rush, lots of corners and with problems at linebacker then I wholeheartedly agree. The Bucs should have run more. . . and so should the Pats.

    Re: Gore’s contract - I can vaguely remember looking quite closely at this when it was signed and it was a decent deal for both sides, Gore got some up front money that he really needed as a 3rd round pick (who was paying his mother’s medical bills) but the niners were protected if Gore proved to be injury prone.

    Re 1: You could be right, though they have a few contract issues to get sorted and could have trouble with their defensive tackles. Most of the media have not taken enough account of adding Antonio Bryant, he’s a decent receiver and similar in style to Galloway. Don’t get me wrong, the guy’s an utter tool but he can play and their line looks like it has the potential to be one of the better young units in the game. They have a profusion of talent at most of the offensive skill positions and if you can assume that Kiffin will always have the defense sorted then they look to have a good chance. New Orleans should be good though and the Panthers could be as well so we can’t crown their asses yet. However it does appear that Atlanta are royally screwed (can anyone think of more than six players on the whole team that are any good at all?)

    Re 6: They also have Bryant Johnson who has been a decent number three for the Cardinals. He failed to beat out Fitzgerald or Boldin for the starting job but that’s not the biggest criticism of a receiver.He’ll start at split end for the niners. There’s Jason Hill too, the 3rd round pick from last year, who looks to be a better fit for Martz’s scheme than whatever Hostler was running last year. And last and well, least is Lelie.

    :: Karl Cuba — 6/10/2008 @ 2:42 pm

---





11. “Unanswered” probably should be “consecutive”.

    #10 — The relatively unheralded performance of New York’s run defense, in relation to all the the kudos for their pass rush, was exactly why I thought it would be a good test for the purpose of this article. The Giants ranked 10th in Defensive DVOA against the run, and the front seven finished third in Defensive Adjusted Line Yards.

    :: Doug Farrar — 6/10/2008 @ 4:19 pm

---





12. I’m with #10. Now the Giants are good? They were, according to the expert analysis, the “worst ever to play in the superbowl”. Why the sea change? What happened?

    :: TomB — 6/10/2008 @ 4:34 pm

---





13. Re 12:

    I know I’m being baited but I’ll answer you anyways. Firstly, the Giants were never called the worst team to play in the Superbowl, they were called the worst team to win a Superbowl. There is a pretty big distinction there. Secondly, even if they were the worst team to play in a Superbowl, they weren’t the worst team to make the playoffs, and just making the playoffs implies a team is pretty good. Finally, run defense is pretty much just a test of a teams front seven, (although if the secondary is good at tackling, it helps) and the Giants were considered to have the best defensive line in football, even by FO.

    :: Tom — 6/10/2008 @ 4:49 pm

---





14. He’s got decent burst at the start of a play and through his cuts, but he’s far more about bowling people over than he is about making them miss.

    He doesn’t really run people over. He may be a “power” back, but he’s not exactly a bruiser. He never makes you wince while sending defenders flying about like bowling pins. He can be tough to bring down if you down if you don’t have a proper angle, like you said, but if you square up on him he’s not likely to run through you. He’ll churn for another couple of yards, but he’ll go down. His best move is really his stiff arm, which is why he’s so tough to bring down without hitting him head-on. Just about all of his long runs were the result of him getting to the side of a tackler and pushing them away with the stiff arm. I think this non-bruising, non-flashy but still effective style is why he was overlooked for so long.

    :: Quentin — 6/10/2008 @ 6:35 pm

---





15. not to belabor the point, especially after Doug has already responded, but Bobman, you lost me. “Unanswered” is pretty unambiguous and I don’t really believe “before/until” conveys the same meaning. None of your examples are the same really, as something being “unanswered.” But of course I won’t that hold that against you as you’ve entertained me far too many times on this board.

    In basketball, they say “Team A is on a 12-0 run”. In football, using this example, the Giants scored the next 24 points or, the Giants scored 24 straight points until the Bucs finally answered… or whatever.
    Sorry again all, back to football…

    :: jimmo — 6/10/2008 @ 6:55 pm

---





16. #13 I think this is what you were referring to.

    :: Tom — 6/10/2008 @ 8:58 pm

---





17. My bad. This was it.

    :: Tom — 6/10/2008 @ 9:04 pm

---





18. The definition (click my name) of unanswered is “scored in succession during a period in which an opponent fails to score. i.e. scored 20 unanswered points in the last quarter”

    The period runs from “1:49 left in the first quarter” to the “late touchdown pass from Garcia to Alex Smith”.

    I think its “pretty unambiguous” that what has been written is correct.

    :: Jimmy in Oz - Hawk Fan — 6/10/2008 @ 9:06 pm

---





19. can’t argue with Merriam-Webster I guess (though I like my link better-”with no scoring in return by an opponent”). Why bother with “unanswered” at all if it really means (in the context of sports) “not answered until it is answered?”

    So in my stubborn mind it remains unambiguous. Unanswered = not answered; unanswered != not answered until answered.

    :: jimmo — 6/10/2008 @ 9:39 pm

---





20. Re 11, 12, 13: I should have been clearer, I didn’t think that the Giants had a bad run defense, rather that it was their pass defense that was truly awesome (though I’m a little dubious about ALYs)

    :: Karl Cuba — 6/11/2008 @ 12:28 am

---





21. Jimmo, I think the use of ‘unanswered’, while a tautology, is a literary device to emphasise the Giants’ scoreboard dominance from the “With 1:49 left in the first quarter, Tampa Bay went up 6-0″ to the rest of the game.

    Wikipedia (click me) says “Superficially these expressions may seem tautologous, but they are stylistically sound because the repeated meaning is merely a stylized way to express a single concept.”

    phew!

    :: Jimmy in Oz - Hawk Fan — 6/11/2008 @ 1:13 am

---





22. “Consecutive” sounds wrong to me because it seems imply that the points were scored in succession, when you can have a team score ten unanswered points by running back the opening kickoff for a touchdown and then kicking a field goal with six seconds to go in the fourth quarter, as long as they keep the other team from scoring at all in between.

    :: David — 6/11/2008 @ 1:46 am

---





23. It’s the middle of the dry season for football news and we’re focusing on semantic distinctions. Something is very wrong here.

    Regarding the “power option” and “bruising back” references, I find it a stretch to use this terms to describe a 5′9″ Buc. These terms should be reserved for the second coming of the A-Train. Alstott was a player who applied slobber-knocker hits to defensive backs. He’d hit safeties like they owed him child-support.

    Quentin was accurate in assessing Grahams strength by using the stiff-arm. His Heisman pose is his money move.

    Unrelated, I’ve searched unsuccessfully to find the video of the old Alstott-Dunn “touchdown vulture” commercial. If anyone can find that, post a link.

    Go Buc’s.

    :: BucKai — 6/11/2008 @ 7:55 am

---





24. Great Article, who cares about the definition of “unanswered” you answered a couple of FF questions I had.

    :: Rocky the Philly Eagle — 6/11/2008 @ 8:23 am

---





25. too bad when alstott applied one of those “slobber knocker” hits he immediately would have to stop and look for the ball. I think ol’ “butter fingers” alstott averaged a fumble about 1 out of every 5 carries.

    :: jumpin jahosofat! — 6/11/2008 @ 10:08 am

---





26. I know this is a biased post here. But I remember reading the last offseason how Denver’s running backs weren’t really very good other than Davis and Portis.

    I am curious if that is a sign to the line or decreasing quality of line play? Prolly a mix of both, but the thing about Graham being so dependent on the line made me curious.

    :: Joro — 6/11/2008 @ 10:16 am

---





27. So when did Gruden’s offenses go from Coryell-like to Shanahan-esque? I find it interesting that a guy who was lauded (or derided) for his complex passing attack is now 6 years into his tenure with a team and his offenses’ greatest successes have come in the ground game.

    Good article Doug.

    :: Joe T. — 6/11/2008 @ 10:19 am

---





28. #25 32 career fumbles out of 1,664 touches is not quite 1 in 5.

    Perhaps you meant games instead of carries. In that case you were very close.

    He averaged one fumble every 4.9375 games.

    :: BucKai — 6/11/2008 @ 10:48 am

---





29. #15 Jimmo, Suddenly I start thinking of a Seinfeld episode in which George is almost offered a job. The employer says something like, “We have an opening and you’re the perfect man for the job. Of course…” and the the phone rings and we never find out what happened after the “of course…”
    Doug’s fix works better than my inferences.
    Later,

    :: Bobman — 6/11/2008 @ 11:42 am

---





30. Just looking at the play-by-play - removing the drive at the end of the first half that was mostly a 2 minute drill, and everything after the score is 7-24, i count 8 rush plays, 11 pass plays. Does that count as abandoning the run?

    :: ST — 6/12/2008 @ 12:03 am

---





31. Re 30:

    I hardly call having 4 minutes left a 2 minute drill. Especially since they still had all three of their timeouts.

    :: Tom D — 6/12/2008 @ 12:30 am

---





32. Eli Manning baby!!!

    I just thought I’d throw his name in here because I know it makes the hair stand up on the back of these FO guys’ necks.

    Heh…Eli “SBMVP” Manning.

    How’d he do against the Bucs defense? Just a bunch of short stuff. He was askeared to throw it deep!!!

    :: Maryland Giant — 6/12/2008 @ 6:40 am

---





33. It sounds like Graham is basically the anti-Shaun Alexander.

    :: pitchinfromPDX — 6/12/2008 @ 6:43 pm

---





34. this article got old a week ago. can we get some new content here?

    :: jeesh — 6/17/2008 @ 6:54 am

---





35. looks like he didn’t get Frank Gore money after all

    :: ryan — 6/30/2008 @ 1:25 pm

---

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Your names and email address are required --- it's part of an effort to reduce comment spam -- but your email address won't be displayed.

If you create a comment, but it doesn't display, that's probably because it didn't pass through our spam filter (make any references to erectile dysfunction medication?), and is living in Comment Limbo Land. Please don't try to post it 14 more times -- try again once, and if it doesn't go through, then send an email to webmaster-at-footballoutsiders.com and let us know. Mentions of ED drugs, poker games, and anything you get email spam about will likely cause your comment to be held for moderation.

Please respect our discussion threads by refraining from the following:

1. comments about politics
2. ad hominem attacks on other commenters
3. posts designed to promote another website
4. thread-hijacking, particularly by turning threads that are not about Tom Brady or Peyton Manning into arguments about Brady vs. Manning
5. discussing Spygate except in the Irrational Spygate Argument Thread.

Such comments may be deleted.

If you want to reference a link, put it in the URI field (go Rams!). Please don't put the 'less than' sign in the comment text -- it's seen as the beginning of an HTML tag, and that just messes everything up.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>