Writers of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

Most Recent FO Features

RiceSid07.jpg

» Sidney Rice: What Could Have Been?

Sidney Rice has retired. Is he the most random single-season DYAR leader ever? One-year wonder? Injury prone? We offer a career retrospective for the second-best wide receiver named Rice in NFL history.

13 Jan 2009

Confessions of a Football Junkie: That's a Wrap

by Russell Levine

It is probably fitting that the 2008 college football season ended in a pile of confusion. Sure, Florida grabbed the BCS crown, and finished atop the AP poll by a considerable margin. But in a year that ended with four different teams receiving first-place votes in the Harris poll, and three in the AP, it can hardly be said that Florida's championship is a definitive one. The muddled finish comes on the heels of a season that failed to deliver the classic games and memorable finishes that 2007 did.

In the end, it won't matter. Florida will be the team selling the championship t-shirts and the Sports Illustrated commemorative issues. It will be chalked up as another year that the BCS "did not work" by delivering a clear-cut, controversy-free title game. I put that phrase in quotation marks for a reason -- because I don't think it's accurate. The BCS is designed to select the nos. 1 and 2 teams in the nation by an agreed-upon formula. By definition, it "works" every year. The reason it doesn't "work" in the eyes of the public is that it has very little chance to. In any season in which there are more than two obvious candidates for the top two spots, the BCS will be viewed as having failed. In reality, it only succeeds in those years in which it gets lucky, the last being in 2005 when Texas and USC when wire-to-wire atop the polls and were the only two undefeated teams at the end of the season.

As that 2005 season fades further into the memory bank, it starts to look more and more like an outlier. Not only was the matchup controversy-free, but the participants delivered an incredible contest with a thrilling finish. Since then, we've had three years, three controversies, and three unsatisfactory games. Please don't tell me last Thursday's Oklahoma-Florida game was a classic just because it was close in the fourth quarter. It was a ragged game, plagued by four turnovers and 12 penalties, that never developed anything close to a rhythm. Competitive? Yes. Classic? Not by a long shot.

The fact that this year's championship was far from clean doesn't bother me. I'm more bothered by the preceding regular season, which was a far cry from a 2007 campaign that may have been the most memorable ever.

I've never hidden the fact that I'm not much of a playoff proponent. I'd much rather enjoy the 2007 season from start to finish -- messy BCS picture and all -- then have a ho-hum regular season capped off by three weeks of excitement. I have always accepted that the national champion of college football is a mythical title, one borne out of a century of bowl tradition that had nothing to do with crowning a champion. I don't mind that college football is different from every other sport in this regard, and I'm willing to argue titles from year to year with the caveat that we don't really know who the best team is most years (excepting 1997, of course).

In that regard, I don't find the BCS offensive. It does its best to create a college version of the Super Bowl. Sometimes you get Texas-USC and it feels like Super Bowl 42, more often you get Florida-Ohio State and it feels like Super Bowl 29, with the Steelers on the sidelines knowing that they were actually a better team than San Diego.

No, what bothers me about the state of college football is not the BCS -- it's what has happened to the regular season. When Michigan won its most-definitely-not-mythical national title in 1997, its non-conference slate consisted of Colorado, Notre Dame, and Baylor. While Michigan was always a team that traditionally scheduled hard, it was hardly alone in that regard. Today, almost no school plays that kind of schedule. Those that do are often considered foolish. Why risk taking yourself out of the BCS chase early with a big non-conference loss? Contending teams would rather treat the non-conference games like preseason games in the NFL and schedule four guaranteed wins, usually with all four games coming at home.

Memorable non-conference games have become so few and far between that the few that do get staged take on added meaning -- think Ohio State-Texas and Ohio State-USC in recent years.

The loss of non-conference schedule comes for several reasons, one being that conference titles are less valuable than they used to be as everyone seeks to contend for the larger goal of a BCS championship. Because of that, they don't want to risk a non-conference loss. Two, there is so much pressure to bring in revenues in the BCS conferences, to pay for the enormous coaching salaries and outsized support staffs, that the sport's Tiffany programs almost cannot afford to play a non-conference road game, which means very few home-and-home series between super powers.

If I'm encouraged by anything in this regard, it's that teams (at least Alabama, anyway) seem to be willing to play a neutral-site non-conference game at the beginning of the year. Alabama opened its 2008 season in memorable fashion by thrashing Clemson at the Georgia Dome, and will oppose Virginia Tech at the same venue this September.

With the added revenue streams available at a neutral site (namely, beer!) I think this is an idea that could take off. The TV networks aren't interested in airing crappy games any more than we are interested in watching them. I'd look for ABC/ESPN to push for more of these games in the future by making it financially worthwhile for the participating teams to take the scheduling risk.

In the end, maybe there will be something we take away from 2008, but we won't know for sure for some time. Maybe if in five years we're watching a four-, six-, or eight-team playoff, we'll be able to look back on 2008 and say that it was the tipping point for finally getting enough momentum to replace the BCS with something more effective. On the one hand, there is so much politics and so much money involved that I'll only believe a playoff exists when I'm watching an opening-round game. On the other hand, there is TOO much money for it not to happen eventually. If it happens in the next decade, perhaps Utah, for upsetting Alabama and further muddying the 2008 postseason, will get the credit.

No matter what happens, I won't be the one writing about it at FO. This column will serve as the swan song for me at Football Outsiders. It has been a great run, but life has gotten complex to the point that I can no longer devote the time and effort these columns, this site, or its readership deserve.

I have had a tremendous amount of fun writing for FO, and I remain grateful to Aaron for taking a chance on me back in 2003. As I gradually found my voice and morphed into "the college guy," I took pride in watching a college football audience grow at a stats-centric NFL site. I was thrilled to see Aaron add a couple of terrific college writers in Brian Fremeau and Bill Connelly, and I think the coverage of the college game is in good hands going forward.

Since I was never much of a stats guy (especially considering where I have been writing these past five years), I will leave you with some final numbers:

108: The number of Confessions of a Football Junkie columns hosted at FO.
84: Seventh Day Adventures.
37: Seventh Day Adventure podcasts.
19: Number of different guests to appear on an SDA podcast.
750: Number of games picked in SDA since 2004.
359-374-17: My final record picking games.
41-38-4: My final record on Fred Edelstein locks.
.490: Overall winning percentage of SDA picks.
.518: Overall winning percentage of Fred Edelstein locks.

(Ed. Note: We'll really miss Russell, because if not for him, we never would have had college football coverage on Football Outsiders. From an NFL perspective, we're also losing our only NFC South fan. We will be looking for at least one new college football writer, and perhaps more; if you are interested, keep checking out the site over the next few days and look for that announcement. -- Aaron Schatz)

BlogPoll Final Ballot

Rank Team Delta
1 Florida 2
2 Southern Cal 4
3 Utah 5
4 Texas 3
5 Oklahoma 3
6 TCU 7
7 Alabama 3
8 Penn State 3
9 Ohio State --
10 Oregon 2
11 Boise State 1
12 Georgia 5
13 Mississippi 8
14 Virginia Tech 4
15 Texas Tech 8
16 Oklahoma State 5
17 Missouri 3
18 Oregon State 1
19 Cincinnati 4
20 Iowa 6
21 Florida State 5
22 Michigan State --
23 West Virginia 3
24 Brigham Young 8
25 Tulsa 1



Dropped Out: Georgia Tech (No. 14), Boston College (No. 23), Northwestern (No. 24), Ball State (No. 25).

Posted by: Russell Levine on 13 Jan 2009

23 comments, Last at 14 Dec 2010, 2:56am by Digital Thermometer

Comments

1
by navin :: Tue, 01/13/2009 - 4:02pm

Thanks for your contributions Russell. Even though I'm an NFL fan first, I still love college football and enjoyed the opportunity to discuss the game with such a knowledgeable fanbase at this site, something that is really lacking online.

I'll also give you a pass on the Michigan references since it's your last column :)

2
by bradluen :: Tue, 01/13/2009 - 4:50pm

All the best, Russell.

3
by Doug Farrar :: Tue, 01/13/2009 - 4:51pm

Russell, it's been a pleasure. Only you would take the time to make sure that there was a "Tacopants" reference in that Chad Henne column I wrote. Your commitment to the college game you love has greatly enriched FO, and you will be missed.

4
by I'm verified! (not verified) :: Tue, 01/13/2009 - 5:01pm

Re: Non-conference football games

ND, Colorado and Baylor used to be good? At the same time?

I would imagine that ESPN/ABC, just like the colleges themselves, don't want to commit significant resources to hosting a game between 2 schools years in advance. It would take $$ to convince a UF and Texas to play in a neutral site (New Orleans?) and besides the 10 or so marquee programs with significant travelling fans, it would be difficult to raise $$ outside of the broadcast revenue.

5
by Bill Connelly :: Tue, 01/13/2009 - 6:13pm

Good luck to you, Russsell. It was a pleasure working with you this year.

6
by Derek (Brooklyn) (not verified) :: Tue, 01/13/2009 - 7:53pm

Russell,

You and your fans always made the college football coverage worth reading on the site. You will be missed.

7
by Rocco :: Tue, 01/13/2009 - 9:09pm

Russ:

So long, and thanks for all the fish.

8
by mm (not verified) :: Tue, 01/13/2009 - 9:13pm

I think you underestimate the amount of 'big' non-conference games that go on. Many teams that think they're regular contenders seem to schedule one big non-conference game (but rarely more than that). The problem is, teams go up or down after the time games are scheduled.

Florida plays Miami and Florida State every year, should they drop one of those and try and get Virginia Tech or Boston College (since they've done better in the same conference recently)?

Last year LSU demolished Virginia Tech and everyone wrote it off. But it turns out Virginia Tech would win the ACC championship. That's a pretty good non-conference game.

This year Oklahoma seemed to have a weak non-conference schedule. Still, looking at it now, playing Cincinnati (Big East champ) and TCU was much more impressive than Texas' non-conference schedule (since Arkansas collapsed this year).

Sure, there are teams that don't schedule teams that are even occasionally good (Texas Tech), but I think a lot of people are actually complaining that people from the SEC don't tend to play the PAC 10 or Big 10 much in the regular season, even though it makes much more sense for them to play an ACC or Big 12 team if they want a big non-conference foe.

9
by peachy (not verified) :: Wed, 01/14/2009 - 1:32am

Well, UF doesn't play Miami every year (as Miami fans constantly remind us); but you have an excellent point, nonetheless. Florida, Georgia and South Carolina all play in-state ACC rivals every year, and Kentucky plays Louisville. (I don't think Tennessee or Vandy have an every-season OOC opponent, at least partly because they are in-state rivals.) It's hardly UF's fault, for example, that FSU hasn't been quite the terror this decade it was last (when UF and FSU took turns derailing each other's national aspirations.) Not that I'm complaining, mind you...

16
by Joexxx (not verified) :: Wed, 01/14/2009 - 4:41pm

I find it funny how many of the anti-playoff people don't make the connection that a playoff would increase the amount of "good" non-conference games. If there is a playoff with a guaranteed spot for conference winners, the disincentive to play tough non-conference opponents goes away because a loss doesn't affect a team's chances for the national championship.

As for the revenue side, with 12 games, schools can still play 7 home games. And even if a school only played 6 home games, the TV revenue from a game like Florida-USC, LSU-Texas or Ohio State-Alabama would more than make up for it.

10
by t.d. :: Wed, 01/14/2009 - 2:13am

Always loved this column. You'll be missed.

11
by ammek :: Wed, 01/14/2009 - 4:21am

Thanks for many hours of pleasure, Russell. Your column stuck out on this site for the way it combined heart and head with a handsome turn of phrase. I don't follow college football at all but I always read Junkie. How's that for an epitaph?

12
by Doug English (not verified) :: Wed, 01/14/2009 - 8:36am

Just a quick post to agree with the above. I follow the NFL closely across several sites and channels, but yours are the only college articles I read really.

Hopefully you'll now have time to grieve for Michigan's shorcomings in the privacy you deserve.

13
by Dr. Atomic (not verified) :: Wed, 01/14/2009 - 11:40am

Sad to see you signing off, Russ. Good luck!

14
by Tom Gower :: Wed, 01/14/2009 - 12:53pm

Well, Russell, it's been real, aside from all the collective delusion.

Confessions and, particularly, SDA were the first places I ever commented regularly on FO, so thanks to you for doing those. Credit where credit is due, I also must admit I'm pretty sure you finished ahead of me in my attempt to beat you this year-an OU cover would've given me the tie, but those darn Gators...

I hope you'll still hang around the site some.

15
by The Blue Horseshoe :: Wed, 01/14/2009 - 2:59pm

Thanks for the SDA/CFJ duo, they and you will be missed.

17
by taxistan :: Thu, 01/15/2009 - 3:06am

Damn. When I read the head I thouight it was a wrap for the year. I follow both college and pro football, but the first article I ever read on FO was one of yours. Now I open FO every day since I promptly bookmarked the site after that article. If you are writing somewhere else I will find you?

18
by Russell Levine :: Thu, 01/15/2009 - 9:22am

Just wanted to take a second to say thank you to everyone that has posted such nice remarks. I'll still be around, reading, commenting on the college pieces and who knows, maybe even contributing an emeritus piece every now and then.

Oh, and Doug English: +100 cocktails to you, sir.

19
by melott (not verified) :: Fri, 01/16/2009 - 1:47am

'97 Baylor was described by Dave Roberts as 'the worst team in America.' He said this the week leading up to their home game vs. Nebraska. Dave Roberts, of course, was the head coach of Baylor.

20
by mateo (not verified) :: Sun, 01/18/2009 - 1:22pm

I don't know anything about anything, but I do think that it is great that malcolm gladwell has such a dedicated fan. Seriously, you ever looked at the smile on that man's face? He is a happy fellow.

21
by uggs outlet stores (not verified) :: Thu, 11/11/2010 - 2:44am

' uggs store over uggs for cheap true cheap uggs bthroom uggs outlet stores z ugg outlet pigkin, uggs boots e emu ugg boots transformati womens uggs fry cheap uggs on sale Autrli uggs on sale yellows cheap uggs of uggs online discover ugg boots us ugg boots sale ee uggs verify snow boots n cheap uggs about womens boots layer uggs outlet re boots on sale Autumn cheap uggs cn cheap ugg ever-so- emu boots " ugg boots sale d gucci outlet store - cheap ugg boots yer. cheap uggs cdec womens uggs But uggs for cheap M" emu ugg very uggs for sale cor cheap ugg boots containing uggs outlet stores fter cheap uggs for sale something uggs outlet stores sole uggs for sale ornges, uggs outlet stores cert uggs outlet "W ugg boots sale fd uggs outlet aren’t gucci store H ugg outlet W emu boots bck cheap uggs fer. black boots are uggs temperature uggs like uggs on sale mumentl cheap uggs up uggs on sale J ugg boots showerg uggs bed uggs outlet While cheap uggs significant cheap uggs introduce uggs outlet k uggs outlet stores with uggs slowly gucci 2011 Fll uggs outlet et uggs uch uggs for cheap t uggs outlet stores boot, uggs leaves uggs on sale u; uggs for sale Australian sheepskin boots dear uggs on sale pryg discount uggs If emu ugg gr uggs store fmilir uggs for sale ses, cheap uggs oe. cheap ugg boots p cheap uggs ome ugg boots not uggs for sale in gucci for sale , uggs store wpp cheap gucci thin uggs for cheap Suede, uggs online cp. cheap ugg boots rticle, uggs outlet sheepskin, uggs outlet store ges gucci online ctul winter boots however, cheap uggs out gucci bags winds, uggs l uggs outlet wht ugg outlet creeping gucci on sale cheap uggs outlet even gucci outlet dffe emu ugg boots drops uggs outlet ct cheap uggs 8-yer-old uggs outlet reu uggs for cheap .z seline uggs boots beutiful adirondack uggs boots ' ultra uggs boots J knightsbridge uggs boots 8-yer-old Sundance II uggs boots No ultra uggs tall boots fd classic uggs mini boots e elsey uggs boots ec classic uggs crochet boots k classic uggs short boots ct gissella uggs boots u knit uggs boots g: classic uggs tall romantic flower boots les ultra uggs short boots fsh classic uggs boots with classic uggs tall boots prdu. classic uggs cardy boots coly bailey button uggs boots wlk classic uggs tall stripe cable knit boots genuine classic uggs argyle boots

22
by strapping machine (not verified) :: Mon, 11/15/2010 - 10:23pm

This is my first time i visit here. I found so many entertaining stuff in your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! Keep up the excellent work. strapping machine
packaging machines
Shrink wrap machine
Shrink wrapper
strapping machinery
Shrink wrap machinery