Writers of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

15 Jan 2010

Sunday Divisional Round Discussion

And talk about the Sunday games here!

Posted by: Bill Barnwell on 15 Jan 2010

300 replies , Last at 18 Jan 2010, 9:00pm by Ryan Carney

1
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 11:04am

Todays predictions: 2 more home team victories.

Minnesota will beat the Cowboys in a massive Favregasm.

The Jets played a nearly perfect game last week to beat the Bengals. I would love to see them pull that off again this week, but I don't think they can. The Chargers will score enough points to put pressure on Sanchez to actually play a little QB, and he'll struggle. Chargers win.

"Just look at that pumpkin."
-John Madden, looking at the moon.

2
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Will Allen (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 11:14am

I felt more confident in a Vikings team which was bettr thatn the opponent on the line of scrimmage, but terribly deficient at qb, than I do in a Vikings team which may have a slight edge at qb, or at worst is even at that position, but is likely to get beat on the line of scrimmage.

If the Vikings had managed to beat the Eagles last year, and the game was closer than many might imagine, I really liked their chances against the Cardinals, because they would not have had to honor defending the run at all. This year, even with really good qb play, the match-ups, in my opinion are not nearly as favorable.

3
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by SDfan :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 11:26am

Usually in this round, at least one road team pulls off the upset, and we're down to two games for it to happen... and I'm scared to death it will happen to the Chargers!! I know they are the better team, so as long as they don't beat themselves (case in point: Baltimore) I think they'll be ok. I'm torn over Cowboys-Vikings, because Brett gets it done at home but the Cowboys have a lot of momentum and are playing suffocating D. I guess we'll see!!

4
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul A (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 12:04pm

I hate the Cowboys with every fiber of my being. I am resigned to them winning by double digits.

6
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Jim B. (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 1:04pm

Well, look at the bright side - if the Cowboys win in this round, that just means it will be all the more humiliating if they get beaten badly in their rematch with the Saints in the NFC Championship game.

5
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by CuseFanInSoCal :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 12:53pm

I predict a reversion to normal division round results, where the home team wins 3 out of 4. Both logic and emotion are in favor of liking the Chargers and Cowboys this week (and the Colts and Saints yesterday). Or rather liking the Chargers (as a long-time San Diego resident) and hating the Vikings (as a long-time Packers fan).

Chargers 27, Jets 14
Cowboys 24, Vikings 21

7
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:08pm

Ugh. Third and short-- Dallas hasn't done well with this in the past. Oh-- but a clever trick pitch to the WR Austin. New wrinkle in the playbook?

8
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Mr Skinner :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:12pm

Cowboys looking worryingly competent with the ball at the moment, play calling on 3rd down has been good

9
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Mr Skinner :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:13pm

oops

10
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:16pm

Surprised they didn't challenge, but losing it at the 35 or so on a long third down isn't the end of the world.

11
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Rocco :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:18pm

The Vikes might want to avoid letting Ware come unblocked if they want to win. Just a thought.

12
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:21pm

So that Felix Jones guy is pretty good.

13
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by B :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:23pm

Cowboys with snap problems in the playoffs? Where have I seen this before?

14
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:24pm

Cowboys offense: Good, but sloppy...

15
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:24pm

Suisham: Sloppy

15
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Rocco :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:24pm

Somewhere, Redskins fans are smiling as Suisham pulls a 48 yard FG.

19
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Mr Skinner :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:26pm

Why go for the kick there given it's Suisham and you are converting short yardage? Terrible play call.

25
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Rocco :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:32pm

Who's their head coach? That explains it most times.

17
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:26pm

Also trying a 48 yarder on 4th and 1? Really?

18
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:26pm

Still 0-0, but worried about how easily Dallas has moved the ball thus far.

20
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:29pm

what the hell was that respot back by a ball length?

-------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

35
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:37pm

Guess I'm the only one who cared... or I'm more drunk than everyone else...

----------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

22
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:30pm

offensive line struggling but giving just enough time.

Favre unloads a beauty to Sidney Rice, hitting him in stride with a step for a long TD.

On replay that was just an awesome catch by Rice, he had to reach past the db to get it.

21
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:30pm

what was with the lack of even trying to tackle Rice there ??1?!??!

-----------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

23
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by miqewalsh :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:30pm

Aren't DBs allowed to actually bat the ball away and not just run alongside the WR?

24
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:31pm

I also thought they were allowed to turn and look for the ball, too.

26
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by young curmudgeon (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:32pm

After that touchdown, it is evident that the fellow playing quarterback for the Minnesota team is having fun out there. Whether or not he is "just" having fun remains to be seen.

27
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by The Powers That Be :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:32pm

Terrible play by Sensy. I don't think he realized Rice had the ball.

30
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Levente from Hungary :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:34pm

I agree. The replay before the commercial brake suggests that. His body language indicates he did not think the ball was there.

28
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:32pm

Beauty from Favre.

Danish commentors just had a (Peter) King sized Favre-gasm. The virus has spread to Europe...

31
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Mr Skinner :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:36pm

UK coverage is blaming Sensabaugh

32
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Levente from Hungary :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:36pm

I'm lucky watching original feed so no need to listen to the Hungarian guys.

29
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:34pm

On rice aTD, Sensabaugh look like drunk pulled from stands.

33
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:37pm

I thought "Sensabaugh" was a device used to detect quarterbacks who could also play DB and punt...

37
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:38pm

Wauw, well done, sir!

34
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:37pm

Ray Edwards having fun out there...

36
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:38pm

Romo scary guy to lok at. pupil and iris same color. Looks like china dol.

38
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:40pm

That comes from too much exposure to melange. His uncanny qb play is based on the weirding way.

62
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by velvetglove99 (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:26pm

Damn Kwisatz Haderach.

40
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:43pm

duplicate comment removed

39
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:42pm

This touchdown aside, I think the game is going Dallas' way. Romo has time aplenty to throw, they can drive at will. They only have to stop shooting themselves in the foot...

41
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:44pm

time for another missed FG?

---------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

42
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:44pm

guess not.
lol

------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

43
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:45pm

Suisam only misses the important ones.

46
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:48pm

and that's a win for Buehler. This being in a dome he should have no trouble doing this.

I don't suppose he can kick field goals...

47
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:49pm

Machine wins this one...

44
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Steve (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:46pm

Cowboys needed six out of that drive

They've outplayed the Vikings but are one play away from being down 14-3.

45
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:47pm

I like Wade's approach on defense. Be aggressive. If you stay back it's akin to accepting defeat. If you go down go guns blazing......

48
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:51pm

7th alltime dall-minensota playoff game

Think that is tied for 2nd altime. 8 times for rams-cwoboys

49
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 2:56pm

Favre on fire... he was flawless this drive.

50
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:00pm

Cowboys try a throwback on the return which loses 7 yards back to the 15. But the vikings get called for taunting, so they're out to the 30.

51
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:02pm

uh oh.... flozelle adams out. while he may have had his troubles, he had to be better than the backup.

First play after that Jared Allen stuffs a run in the backfield.

Second play... allen gets a fumble sack.

52
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DM (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:04pm

Did Jared Allen just do his stupid sack celebration while the ball was still live? What a clown.

53
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Rocco :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:04pm

Who on the Cowboys thought it would be a good idea to have Witten block Jared Allen solo?

54
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:06pm

DM:

He does that regularly. He did that against Green Bay while the ball was rolling after a Rodgers fumble. He is so desperate for attention he will ignore everything to celebrate any achievement.

I know that sounds like a sore GB fan, but it is just the facts. Everyone in the division knows it.

55
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:07pm

Just the fact. Yikes, terrible grammar

56
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:08pm

Would be a really ballsy time for a fake...

------------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

57
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by young curmudgeon (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:11pm

Anyone else think the Vikings' play calling was odd after the first and goal play? On second, the third that was negated by the delay call, and third, they ran very similar plays and none seemed to work all that well? I'd have liked to see one throw into the end zone somewhere on a goal-to-go sequence. Perhaps they'd seen something on film, but it sure looked unimaginative to me.

58
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:12pm

good hold by the dallas defense after the fumble. Minnesota, once it got inside the 10, never tried to attack the middle, everything was outside and wrapped up.

59
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:19pm

Vikings getting way too conservative with 1:40 left in the half, two runs into the line, 0 yards. now 3rd and 10.

60
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:22pm

Who thinks Favre audibled to that throw?

61
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:24pm

andrew:

I think it's understood that Number 4 ignores his head coach's instructions and does what he deems best.

Favre desperately wants a championship and isn't going to let the likes of Brad childress get in the way.

66
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:28pm

he got away with it but it was a stupid, stupid decision. Even if that throw to Harvin had been complete, the likely reward is nothing. He forced his defense to have to make some more plays. Yes, they did. But it doesn't excuse it.

67
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:28pm

wasn't there a game a few weeks ago where the vikes offense looked abysmal for 2-3 quarters then came alive when he who can't be names started calling the plays he wanted?

------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

68
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:39pm

Yep. I think you just have to take the entire package and understand that's what you're getting.

No matter how you look at it, this is better than T-Jack.

73
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:46pm

You'd think?
lol

63
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:27pm

Not sure Dallas can score again this game. Something like 30-3 seems like a likely final.

142
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Levente from Hungary :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:42pm

How did you get a hold of the tape in advance?

64
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:27pm

Wow, the level of incredibly bad clock management there is Andy Reid esque... oh wait, he's a product of that tree...

----------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

65
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by krauser (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:27pm

Is Shiancoe hurt? Dugan and Kleinsasser in on passing downs, including in the red zone.

69
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:40pm

perhaps he tripped over his dong...

-----------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

70
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:42pm

He's still out there. Dunno if its just a defensive scheme thing or what... maybe the cowboys read FO...

71
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:44pm

I'm going to be so happy when the cowboys are eliminated. Can't stand the FOX homerism anymore.

80
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:52pm

Really?

82
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:54pm

Yup.

119
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:27pm

So where's the "homerism"?

296
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 11:51pm

everybody knows that FOX is a cowboys station

72
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:45pm

sheez blatant hold on Harvin, grabbing jersey even, no call. results in 3 and out.

74
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:46pm

I think Childress senses his team has gotten lucky to this point. Boy is he on edge. This is more than just playoff nerves when you are complaining about an obvious man down field call.

76
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:48pm

I think its more the non-call on the Harvin hold....

75
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:47pm

penalty fest, vikings get false start, no call on harvin, inelligble downfield on great punt, then false start on next punt... vikings backed up to end zone.

77
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:51pm

The Cowboys need to pass only when necessary or on play action. No empty backfield. That has caused all the protection problems.

78
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:51pm

well running the ball for 10 yards a clip will slow down a pass rush....

79
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:52pm

By the way, IRC s*cks.

81
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:54pm

That kicker is pathetic.

83
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:54pm

Take him out back to the shed.

84
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:54pm

Nick Folk and the Redskins probably laughing it up somewhere....

87
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:57pm

The Redskins might be, but it's not like Folk got cut because he was awesome. If he were, he'd still be drawing a paycheck. If I got fired for sucking, I don't think I'd take much glee because my replacement was almost as bad as I was.

295
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 11:51pm

ohh well look who's a mature adult. do you want an award?

if I got fired, I would totally feel a sense of schadenfreude to watch my successor crash and burn too. perhaps that indicates that you weren't the problem in the first place.

85
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Rocco :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:55pm

Redskins fans are cackling at this point.

86
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul R :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:57pm

The Viking horn decal is coming off of Greenway's helmet. (#52)He's got kind of a Knights of Ni look.
Interesting. I thought those were painted on.

88
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by tonic889 (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:57pm

Somebody should really let Wade Phillips know that the reason why Suisham was a free agent was because he was worse than at least 31 other kickers. Going for 40+ yard field goals when you're down by 14 with a kicker who is no better than 32nd in the league is not an advisable strategy. And yet, he looks so surprised when he misses.

89
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:57pm

defensive hold on a running play?

90
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 3:58pm

Damn harvin is elusive.

91
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:00pm

Hey they mentioned Shincoe's name. on another false start.

How do you false start this much at home?

92
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:03pm

Great punt by Kluwe.

this is a critical point of the game for Dallas.

93
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:06pm

Barber is running. Jones is running a much better game, but this is their 'power' back... strange strategy.
Jones is 8/46
Barber is 8/14

94
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:07pm

Edwards is the DE of real value. If he's hurt that is huge.

I am convinced that Allen is now so obssessed with sacks the rest of his game has all but vanished.

97
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:12pm

I think you're being unfair. Allen does get a number of run tackles especially in backside pursuit. At least in interviews he claims his first priority is to stop the run.

He's not as one dimensional as Randle, for example.

101
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:15pm

He did earlier in the year. Then he had those big games against GB and lost all sense of responsibility.

He has been swept off the point multiple times the past month as he swims to get upfield.

95
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:10pm

Roughing the punter!!! Farwell!!!!'

oh, running into. yeah on replay right call. foot came down on him then he fell.

96
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Atul (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:11pm

how is that penalty still not removed?

i mean, its the stupid punters fault when he comes down on a player on the ground

i get if he totally lays him out or snaps his plant leg but cmon...he didnt even initiate the contact

98
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by young curmudgeon (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:14pm

Announcing follies! They're making a big deal of the Vikings accepting or not accepting the penalty...that was on the Vikings! In most football games, the team that is victimized by the penalty gets to decide whether or not to accept it.

294
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 11:49pm

yes but most football games don't have favre

99
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Anger...rising (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:15pm

Uh, Joe? The Vikings didn't decide to accept the penalty against themselves; they committed it and the Cowboys are the ones who accepted. On behalf of sports fans everywhere, I hope your dad's burning in hell for foisting you upon us.

100
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:15pm

Commentators keep saying that the penalty was declined by vikings (the running into kicker), then saying it was a bad call since they were further back. Thta penalty was on minnesota, Dallas option.

Meanwhile Vikings get another 3 and out. They've done nothing the second half so far. Favre missed a wide open Harvin on first down.

and commentators finally realize their mistake.

103
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:16pm

duplicate comment (second time its done that today)

102
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul R :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:16pm

Joe:
Vikings-purple jerseys
Cowboys-white jerseys

kthxbye

104
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by MilkmanDanimal :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:16pm

What was running earlier on the NFL network opposite the Vikings-Cowboys game?

Top 10 Gunslingers.

Gosh, I wonder who #1 turned out to be.

110
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:21pm

Plaxico Buress?

112
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:22pm

Zing!

114
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:24pm

hahahhaha

185
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:55pm

Burress not top gunslinge.r more like top gun fumbler. almost blew off own twig and berries.

113
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:23pm

Next:
Top 10 quarterbacks with their last name ending with ...avre.

117
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by MilkmanDanimal :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:26pm

Top 10 Quarterbacks Who Are Just Having Fun Out There While Playing For The Packers, Jets, And Vikings

105
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:18pm

If the Cowboys could stop getting in their own way this could be a game

106
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:19pm

...and then Romo starts to channel his inner Jay Cutler.

107
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:20pm

WORST.PICK.EVER

------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

108
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Anger...rising (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:20pm

The second replay makes it appear that Romo threw a no-look pass. My god.

109
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:21pm

Why are all the Cowboy routes avoiding the middle of the field? Everything seems to be on the edge.

111
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:21pm

At least all the Dallas haters can go back to their holes and shut up until the next time the Cowboys have a modicum of success (perhaps in a bit of irony, the haters always emerge the same time that the bandwagon fans come out)...

115
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul R :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:25pm

Based on available evidence of the 2009-2010 playoffs, the only competitive game appears to be the one played late on Sunday.
High hopes for Jets/Chargers.

125
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:31pm

Sample size! Sample size!

116
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:25pm

Vikings playing things pretty conservative, but given the situation think the 3 score margin is worth playing it safe.

Plus it would encourage Dallas to try another field goal for one of them.

118
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:27pm

If the Vikings hang on to win (and not assuming anything) I don't think any of this stuff would fly vs. the Saints.

ugh. Ray Edwards hurt.

120
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:29pm

Vikings defense is horrible vs. no-huddle hurry-up, or at least has been. Let's see how they do...

121
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:29pm

KENNNNEEEEEEDDDDYYYYY!. KEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEDDDDYYYY!

--------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

127
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:34pm

For someone widely considered a bust, Kennedy has turned into a competent backup, and I expect him to increasingly take over for Pat Williams as he gets older.

183
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by justanothersteve :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:53pm

Like Ryan Pickett of the Packers, he had to escape the Rams to realize his potential.

122
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:30pm

A defensive lineman fakes he goes into coverage and the offensive lineman falls for it?
Wow.

123
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:31pm

I cannot help but think the Saints line will do a better job. Payton certainly wouldn't keep going to Barber when Jones was ripping off 12 yard runs.

132
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Atul (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:37pm

not trying to be overly optimistic here, but people were saying that about the cowboys line too

140
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:40pm

The Cowboys line was doing fine in the first half. It was only after the game started to get away from them in the second half that things broke down.

This game really came down to a few plays, namely Romo's inexplicable fumbles early.

124
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Atul (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:31pm

that was an awesome move by williams

126
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:33pm

Harvin played running back in college didn't he?

129
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:35pm

He did for most of one year. But he still ran routes too...

168
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by peachy :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:26pm

He had more carries than receptions over his collegiate career (194 to 133) and the ratio increased each season (1.2:1, 1.4:1, 1.8:1.) So he was always more a running back than a receiver, though he was our best at both positions (there's a reason he was the #1 overall prospect coming out of high school.)

128
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DM (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:35pm

Thanks to Joe Buck for clearing up that Bud Grant isn't in the Rock and Roll HOF. I might need that for trivia night at my local pizzeria.

136
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:38pm

You still have no chance against Wayne "The Brain" McClain. Even if you get help from Carl...

130
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:35pm

Really? "That's Brett Favre" on a roll-out? Yeah, loads of Dallas homerism there.

131
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:37pm

Ballgame.

Sidney Rice.

134
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:38pm

It was ballgame at halftime...

139
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:39pm

This is Minnesota. They need a three touchdown margin to be safe.

133
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:37pm

... sign it isn't your day: you can't even commit pass interference when you're trying to....

-------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

135
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul R :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:38pm

Game over.

137
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by zzyzx :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:39pm

So 7 games into the playoffs, we still haven't had one second half lead change. Maybe it's being saved up for the Superbowl.

138
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by MilkmanDanimal :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:39pm

Now, now, Sidney, be nice, don't taunt your way into the end zone like that.

141
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:41pm

Is that what Jenkins was upset about? I couldn't see anything else....

143
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:44pm

Jerry Jones on the sideline.... think he's gonna can Phillips on the spot? Or just some of his staff....

146
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul R :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:45pm

jinx

144
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul R :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:44pm

Oh, great. Jerry Jones is on the sideline. Now the Cowboys will win for sure.

147
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:46pm

He looked pissed. I think he's about to squish the giant blueberry

------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

145
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:45pm

Throw it 3-4 yards short of the chains on 4th down?

LMAO

-----------

Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

148
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:49pm

Sigh why is Favre in there? Why is Peterson in there?

Let T-Jack and Young get some playing time.

Even if your goal is just to kill clock, give it to someone without a fumble history...

149
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:51pm

Apparently they were still in there so Favre could go for the end zone on 4th and 7 inside field goal range.

150
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Levente from Hungary :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 4:59pm

Tomlinson will have a hard time beating Peterson for worst RB DVOA of the weekend.

151
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:00pm

Awesome.

152
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DM (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:01pm

Running up the score is always acceptable when it's against the Cowboys.

STFU Brooking.

154
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:02pm

Yes, Dallas lost in a bad way. Get your rocks off and then STFU yourself.

156
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DM (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:04pm

I'm sorry your feelings were hurt.

No wait. I'm not.

160
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:07pm

Obviously. Which isn't surprising from you.

161
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DM (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:09pm

So you've completely judged me from one comment on a message board. Okay then.

Brooking was a class act in Atlanta. But the stuff he pulled after the Cowboys/Falcons game and his little temper tantrum in this one are embarrassing for a veteran like him.

166
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:17pm

Once you say that it's OK to run up the score on one particular team (and not just in general) then you've shown your colors and so obviously little things like "I'm sorry-- oh wait, no I'm not" is par for the course.

167
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DM (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:24pm

I never said running up the score against anyone wasn't OK. I said that running up the score against the Cowboys is extra-OK.

I don't know where all this anger is coming from on your part. You sound like a sore loser, which makes you a hypocrite for giving me crap for being biased.

170
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:29pm

Get a room.

172
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul R :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:34pm

C'mon, Theo. Everybody knows that winning an internet slap-fight is the true measure of a man.

173
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DM (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:36pm

It's true. I read it on the internet!

176
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:40pm

I thought it was internets. This may explain a lot. I withdraw my objection; let the score running-up begin!

175
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by MilkmanDanimal :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:39pm
153
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by MilkmanDanimal :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:02pm

Well, now, that was just unkind. The 24-point lead with two minutes left wasn't big enough?

155
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by ammek :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:03pm

Apparently, '3' is this week's '14'.

158
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Dan :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:05pm

3, 3, 14, 14, 14, 14, 45, ?

157
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:04pm

I look forward to Childress saying they needed the last touchdown because Dallas is always dangerous.

162
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:10pm

I struggle to believe in a league where a doofus like Brad Childress is the head coach of a championship contending team.

165
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by miqewalsh :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:14pm

Why not? Barry Switzer actually won a Super Bowl.

169
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:26pm

What gave you the impression Brad Childress was the coach of this team?

I think his role is closer to Chauffeur at this point.

159
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by an old ref (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:05pm

"If you don't like something, then stop it."--Joe Buck

Really? The same Joe Buck who soiled his Dockers when Randy Moss mimed mooning the crowd?

What a twatwaffle.

181
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Dave :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:48pm

Great word.

163
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by an old ref (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:11pm

Chris Myers: "Brett, may I fellate you now?"

Did anyone else think Favre looked like Skeletor in that postgame sideline interview?

164
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by bk (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:14pm

Ha! Did anyone think Romo looked like the fat kid from Goonies in the pocket?

171
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:32pm

I think both Favre and Childress said a lot about themselves as professionals with that last score. I could see a field goal. The class thing to do would be to take a knee.

Cue the "if you don't want them to score play better" crowd.

174
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:37pm

I don't like running up the score.
Then again, it was vs the dallas "even the best team in being overrated" cowboys.

177
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DoubleB :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:41pm

I just don't think there's running up the score in pro football. Maybe they wanted that play on film for New Orleans.

Dallas was still making every effort to win the game up to that point on offense. Why can't the Vikings do the same?

179
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:43pm

So how many times does a team go for the TD in that situation? Please, do tell....

182
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DoubleB :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:50pm

That's irrelevant.

Dallas had gone for it twice on 4th down and used all of their timeouts on defense after the last Rice TD that made it 27-3. Dallas easily could have punted with 4:00 or so left if they wanted to raise the white flag. They chose not to. So why do the Vikings have to limit their playbook in this situation?

184
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:55pm

I applaud not giving up, especially when things look dark for you.
But running up the score, by definition is only applied to the team that's ahead. Fighting it is courage. Giving up like they did yesterday is not.

186
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:56pm

C'mon, MN could have kicked the field goal. LIke is done any number of times by any number of teams.

These responses are just sad..............

191
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DoubleB :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:08pm

They could have done any number of things. You apparently have a problem with the choice that they DID make. I don't.

I didn't realize a difference of opinion was a "sad response."

195
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:12pm

I agree. It's in fact sort of lame to go for a TD on 4th and whatever when you're up by a 20+ in the waning minutes of the 4th. After all, there's no risk (even a pick-6 gives you the ball back with a double digit lead) and the reward is just stat-padding and, well, running up the score. I thought it was classless when New England did it a few years ago, and I think it was classless now.

180
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:47pm

Childres called for the kneedown, but Favre audibled out of it.

178
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:41pm

I hope Chargers 27-20.
I think Jets 20-17.

187
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 5:59pm

if cowobys cant handle having score run up on them, then maybe quit football now (whole temam retire tomororw, especially that bum Brooking)) and coach tee ball. everyone gets a tropy at end of year and everyone gets a hot dog after evey game

189
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul R :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:02pm

Yeah, but in the NFL, you can have hot dogs during the game!

190
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Sander :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:05pm

Cowboys should be able to handle it. But that doesn't make it a more classy play by Favre & Chilly.

192
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:09pm

not classy but why does it have to be?

194
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Jim B. (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:11pm

Cowboys and Jerry Jones deserve everything they get, and more. If you can't handle being scored on, learn to freaking play defense. What the hell happened to the best 3-4 front in the league?

199
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Sander :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:18pm

Sportsmanship is good form regardless of opponents.

They're not under any obligation to do so, I'd personally like them more if they did though, and I know many other people feel similarly.

202
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by bk (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:33pm

To conclude: Vikings win the game handily but get a C-minus for sportsmanship. Cowboys win the game but get an A+ for not running up the score. I'm sure that Jerry Jones is very happy.

203
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by bk (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:35pm

err... Cowboys lose the game....

210
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:02pm

If you lose the game, you can't, by definition, run up the score.

188
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by justanothersteve :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:01pm

After that graphic, you could just feel the miss coming.

193
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Jim B. (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:09pm

Ah yes, Tony Romo shows again why he has earned the name "Tony Choke-O". Easily one of the most overrated quarterbacks in the game.

I predict a record number of Romo jerseys show up at Goodwill this weekend only days after being purchased.

196
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:13pm

And speaking of class acts, Jim B. (not verified) shows up...

197
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Levente from Hungary :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:15pm

So far Tomlinson IS working hard to match Peterson's performance.

198
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:16pm

I've heard 2 pronouncements of the word "foul"
"Fowl"
"Fowel"

200
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:22pm

triple backs in the backfield, run option with a fullback. blown up. wow

201
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul R :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:24pm

The temperature on the field has dropped five degrees from all of the yellow flags waving around.

205
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:46pm

Maybe if enough flags fly, it will rain?

204
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Flounder :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:42pm

Phil Simms is such an idiot.

206
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:47pm

"elapsed time" !!!!!

lol
------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

213
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:14pm

I muted him, what did he say?

207
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Flounder :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:47pm

And judging by Phil's huge backtrack, I'm guessing someone in the production truck let him know what an idiot he is.

208
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Anger...rising (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 6:49pm

So "football move" has now been replaced by the equally-nebulous "lapsed time"? Can we not just agree that "possession + two feet down = completion" and be done with it?

209
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:00pm

Don't like the draw call.

211
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:11pm

Naw.
Not a very good call.

212
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Anger...rising (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:12pm

Jets doing their best impersonation of the Bengals with that letting-the-Chargers-get-out-of-bounds-when-they-had-no-timeouts business.

214
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Paul A (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:25pm

On the punt before the Chargers touchdown, the hands to the face occurred before the kick. So why did the Chargers get the ball?

215
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by miqewalsh :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:42pm

Just like last weekend. Three boring blowouts followed by a nail biter.

Although this week's nail biter requires you to drive nails into your forehead to stay awake.

216
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:48pm

This Jets offense isn't going to do anything.
I think a Jets defense TD is more likely than a jets offense TD.

217
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:50pm

Woooooooooooooooooooow. That was a pick.
But wasn't he down?

Damn.

218
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Rocco :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:50pm

Revis with his best Antonio Freeman impression.

219
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Jim B. (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 7:52pm

Revis is the best cornerback to ever play the game.

He's young and barring injury, he's only going to get better in the next five years.

220
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Rocco :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:01pm

I guess when you have no running game to speak of, it's really hard to move the ball against an excellent pass defense. Who knew that could come back to haunt the Chargers.

221
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Q (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:03pm

"Revis is the best cornerback to ever play the game."

Jim I would like to introduce you to Deion Sanders

222
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by an old ref (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:05pm

"Revis is the best cornerback to ever play the game."

Sweet mercy, is that the very definiton of hyperbole.

225
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Jim B. (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:20pm

Dude... he's 25 years old and he's the best cornerback of his generation so far. He's only going to get better in the next five years.

In all honesty, he's better than Deion already. He's a shutdown corner just like Deion but unlike Deion he's physical and tackles extremely well.

232
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by SolomonsLines :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:30pm

So was Namdi a year ago. I wonder who it will be next year.

247
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by justanothersteve :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:41pm

Better than Deion does not equate to best in NFL history. Not sure who's the best. Here's a few others to consider: Herb Adderley, Mel Blount, Mike Haynes, and Darrell Green.

273
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by an old ref (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:29pm

If I might add a few more:

Lester Hayes (bonus points for looking like Swamp Thing with the stickum)
Louis Wright
Emmett Thomas (you want physical play, check here)
Willie Brown
Champ Bailey (declining now, but awesome in his prime)
Namdi Asomugha (not his fault his organization sucks)
Night Train Lane (going back a long way, but hey)

291
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DGL :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 11:22pm

Dick LeBeau.

223
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:10pm

As a Colts fan who has admittedly only seen snippets of the game thus far, let me say: I am not remotely afraid of either of these teams.

224
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by bk (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:19pm

What about the....um... awesome running of Sproles & Tomlinson? Or the amazing passing attack of Sanchez??? Ah, I got nothin.

226
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:21pm

afraid would be a big word, but that Jets defense is pretty good.
I don't believe that their offense is going to get them past the Colts, and the Colts will beat them, but the point remains that that D is pretty good.

231
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:28pm

It's admittedly not bad, but Manning & Wayne weren't having any real problems with Revis before they were yanked.

Baltimore had a pretty darned nice defense too, good enough to make the Colts look tepid, but not good enough to win.

246
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:41pm

Having said that, I'd much rather play the Chargers, because if the Colts beat the Jets instead, everyone will dismiss them as pretenders.

Every playoff success the Colts have had, with the exception of the classic AFCC, has been preceded by MSM laudatory comments toward the other team, followed by post-mortem "Well, obviously that team stunk."

227
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:21pm

Has there ever been a kicker who lost his job because in the postseason he was awful? Meaning that during the season he was fine but come the playoffs just missed kick after kick?

230
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:27pm

I don't recall the exact timing of his dismissal, but Vanderjagt would seem to qualify.

245
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:40pm

we'll see tomorrow

292
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by are-tee :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 11:45pm

See "Brien, Doug" (NY Jets 2004 Kicker). Actually got cut right after the Jets drafted Mike Nugent in April 2005.

297
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Dennis :: Mon, 01/18/2010 - 12:05am

Of course the ironic thing with Brien was his second miss against Pitt was because Edwards settled for a longer field goal instead of trying to get closer, right after the Jets beat SD because the chargers did the same thing with Kaeding's attempt in OT.

298
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Jon Silverberg (not verified) :: Mon, 01/18/2010 - 12:22am

The way I remember it, Brien wasn't "awful in the post-season..." It was his kick that beat San Diego the week before in the Jets' first round win (when Kaeding first endeared himself to Jets fans...a Hall of Fame kicker against 31 teams, a bum when it counts against the J-E-T-S)...Brien missed kicks in the game at Heinz Field, the Jets lost, and that was enough for Jets management (has anyone but Jeff Reed ever kicked well in the January wind/cold at Heinz Field?)...so they went and drafted Nugent...20-20 hindsight: they'd have been better off putting their collective arm around Brien's shoulders, telling him "you're our guy, forget about the Pittsburgh game..." Nugent, while fairly accurate inside 45 in his first few years, had a weak leg (not enough touchbacks) and eventually started missing...a misfire as a high draft choice (Jets had no first round pick that year; they picked Nugent with their 2nd rounder, the 47th pick...the next 32 picks included pro bowlers Nick Collins, Vincent Jackson, Frank Gore and Justin Tuck...)...but hindsight is always 20-20...

228
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:23pm

Booom!

229
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Q (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:26pm

Imagine the Favre hype if it was a Vikings vs Jets Super Bowl. This game is looking like a classic Norv Turner effort

236
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:32pm

That's unfair given that the kicker has gacked twice plus the turnovers. The Chargers have moved the ball and given up one big play to the Jets offense.

233
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Packerpalooza (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:31pm

I ask again........

235
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by asaltz :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:31pm

Chargers could set a precedent right here.

234
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:31pm

Wow Suisham not the worst kicker today.

Didn't the Chargers get Kaeding's draft pick from the Jets?

248
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:42pm

Giants.
Manning -> Rivers, Merriman, Keading. From the top of my head.

256
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:48pm

+ Roman Oben

237
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by asaltz :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:34pm

The kicker position is special because, unlike other NFL positions, "you have to think about what you're doing." Amazing.

251
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Theo :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:44pm

"The only position with pressure, because you have to think about what you're doing. The other positions are read and react"

Whadda moron.

238
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by miqewalsh :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:35pm

So, I guess this year's rule is:

  • * Play inside, home team wins.

  • * Play outside, home team loses.

Good news for Saints and Colts fans!

240
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Levente from Hungary :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:36pm

Awsome.

241
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:38pm

Wait, how is the home team determined in the Super Bowl?

243
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:39pm

rotates

239
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Rocco :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:35pm

Hester got a fingertip on the punt. He needed to get an entire hand.

242
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:38pm

Wow even if Ryan loses the challenge (I belieeve he will), he wins because Jackson kicked the flag.

Never knew the coaches flag was also protected like a zebra...

244
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Tomczaked :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:40pm

Jackson seemed more playful than unsportsmanlike. Really want to flag him for that?

249
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Levente from Hungary :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:43pm

I want the Chargers to lose, but really, don't the refs have better things to do than making such calls?

260
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Sander :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:52pm

I don't know if they have to make that call, but I'm blaming Jackson there, he should never do that.

250
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:43pm

Will these playoffs finally put to rest the "momentum" myth? Please?

You'd think the Cardinals would have done it last year.

252
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by miqewalsh :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:46pm

It comes down to the special teams.

Can Kaeding honk on onsides kick?

254
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by miqewalsh :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:47pm

Never mind. Scifres to kick the onsides.

Jets recover anyway.

253
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:47pm

I thought Jackson was in. They scoed anyway, but that cost them around 20 seconds. Then again, were it not for that "roughing the flag" penalty they'd have scored two plays earlier.

Assuming the Jets can seal the deal, I still expect the Colts to easily hold court and face the Saints.

But can you imagine the storyline if we had the Jets vs. Favre?

255
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:47pm

Of course you onside kick. A first down wins the game for the Jets, be it at the 20 or the 40.

259
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Sander :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:51pm

If you kickoff and you make the stop and get it back on a punt, you're satisfied with a field goal. If you onside kick and they get it, they kick a field goal and you have to score a TD.

262
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:53pm

I don't think you try a 50 yard field goal in this situation. Well, they make it close enough that its about a 47 yarder.

Well it lets the Jets go for it, which I guess they wouldn't back on their own 29. so there is that.

257
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:49pm

Chargers stupid for not taking timeout before 2 minute warning. Yes, both ways you stop the clock twice. But one way second stop is at 2:00, other way second stop is past 2:00.

261
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:53pm

I agree 100% and don't see why people don't do this more. If you're in time trouble, stop the clock just before the 2 minute warning!!

284
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Inmate Number 4... :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:47pm

One reason not to do it: it opens up the playbook for the opponent. If the opponent is starting a play at 2:02, they know that the clock will stop following the play whether it's a run or pass, inside or outside. If the opponent is starting the same play after the two-minute warning, they have to make sure they call a play that will keep the clock moving (inside run), which makes it easier to defend. That predictability could be worth a couple seconds, seeing as the Jets needed a first down to win.

288
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by B :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:53pm

Is giving Shanchez the chance to throw the ball really a bad choice for San Deigo?

258
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Q (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:51pm

"Will these playoffs finally put to rest the "momentum" myth? Please?"

This will never happen since people are too swayed by recent events. Heck within 2 weeks Dallas went from a team everyone expected to lose in Week 17 to Philly to suddenly the NFC favorite

263
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by SOBL (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:54pm

trust your line and go for it.

264
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by andrew :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:55pm

If the Jets get the first down, Norv should have told his defense to let greene (or wheover it is) score. And Ryan should tell his guy to go down after the first down.

265
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by B :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:58pm

Interesting that how both the talented Chargers and Cowboys destructed with sloppy play and penalties. I'd say it's an example of how coaching matters. Norv is good gameplanner and playcaller, but his teams tend to be undisciplined.

275
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by t.d. :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:33pm

I was saying the same thing when New England blew it against Baltimore.

293
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Dennis :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 11:48pm

I agree. The Chargers killed themselves with penalties, and that is a direct result of coaching.

266
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Yaguar :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 8:59pm

Going for it was a good call, I think. 4th-and-a-foot tries are really, really hard to stop, and even if it had been stopped, Rivers didn't have great field position.

267
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by SOBL (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:06pm

with kaedings kicking, did anyone fear giving the chargers the ball back?

268
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:06pm

Greenberg is going to be absolutely giddy tomorrow on Mike & Mike....

269
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by devo (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:17pm
271
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:23pm

'Roid rage?

Despite his talent, it's hard to like Rivers.

270
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Alexander :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:18pm

Kaeding's night = proof kicking accuracy is random?

272
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by velvetglove99 (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:24pm

I'm not sure any one game is proof of anything, but I do agree that, on average, it is pretty random.

274
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Sander :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:30pm

I'd think it'd validate the importance of clutch kickers rather than emphasise randomness.

276
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by young curmudgeon (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:33pm

I think my over/under for getting totally sick of hearing about Rex Ryan is Tuesday. Yeah, yeah, I know, he's "refreshing," etc. Believe me, if you live anywhere near the NY metro area, his deification is going to be unbearable this week. Credit where due, but it's going to get out of hand very quickly.

If it's a Jets-Vikings "big game" (I'm not licensed by the NFL to use the other phrase), the hype machine is liable to explode. I'll be spending the party eating, talking to my friends, and maybe even (in desperation) watching the commercials. Sigh...

282
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by B :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:41pm

Tuesday of week two of the regular season, you mean? Sounds about right to me.

277
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Marko :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:37pm

I listened to part of the game on radio. Warren Moon needs to learn the players' names. He called Jacob Hester "Josh Hester" and he called Kassim Osgood "Kareem Osgood."

278
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Lance :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:51pm

Ever see "Super Trooper" where the guys pull over some poor dude and one of them tries to say "meow" nine times while giving someone a speeding ticket? I think football announcers have a similar game. They all put money in a pool, and then spend the season butchering as many names as possible. After the season ends, they get together and see who has done the worst job and he takes the pot. Special awards are given for particularly hilarious butchering.

279
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by MainerRaider (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 9:57pm

Um, WTF? Seriously, the Chargers blew it again? Do we need an advanced metric to explain this ludicrous loss to a team that went 9-7 and made the playoffs on a tiebreaker? Granted, with all of that snow on the field, it was hard to do much on offense; plus all of that crowd noise kept messing with Diego's o-line, hence all of the false starts. I guess what really did the Chargers in was that thick fog that obscured the goal posts.

281
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DavidL :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:28pm

The Chargers are held back once again by their high NORC, or Norvs Over Replacement Coaching. It's tragic, really.

285
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Inmate Number 4... :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:49pm

Is that related at all to the MORC that they suffered from before Norv arrived?

299
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by DavidL :: Mon, 01/18/2010 - 2:51pm

It's hard to say. There is some correlation between above-average NORC and high MORC, but it's in different directions - sometimes the NORC spikes first, sometimes the MORC does. I wouldn't feel right calling it statistically significant.

280
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by dk240t :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:21pm

I was once an advocate for taking the timeout just before the two minute warning...but if you do that (and it is less than 5 seconds over 2:00 on the clock), then that opens up the possibility that the offense can pass, since the clock is guaranteed to stop at the end of the play regardless.

I'm just saying. There is an advantage to waiting.

283
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by another non-Colts fan (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:42pm

That, and you have no recourse against a blown call on the play leading into the two-minute warning.

286
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Led :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:51pm

Before folks talk about how the Jets lucked into another victory (and no doubt it's lucky when a kicker misses 2 makeable kicks), note that the Chargers had 3 fumbles and recovered all 3.

287
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Jim B. (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:52pm

San Diego Chargers: Never has a team with so much done so little.

Or, San Diego Chargers: Most talented team in the past decade to never make it to the Super Bowl.

290
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by B :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:58pm

San Deigo, or Dallas?

289
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Jim B. (not verified) :: Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:56pm

Now, if the Jets can upset the Colts next week, the s*** is REALLY going to hit the fan for Polian and Caldwell. I mean, talk about egg on your face if they lose to the Jets, the same team they pulled their starters against in the game that broke their undefeated streak.

I mean, wow, talk about pressure to win.

300
Re: Sunday Divisional Round Discussion
by Ryan Carney (not verified) :: Mon, 01/18/2010 - 9:00pm

Jim B. There are several variables that contribute to San Diego's lack of success in the postseason. It seems as though the timimg has just never been quite right for them. In list form:
1. LT aging as Rivers Developed, if Rivers hit his prime on a Friday morning, LT got old that afternoon.
2. Colts, Pats, and Steelers. Too good for too long, plain and simple, there's only one trophy per year.
3. Merriman on and off the roids. Went from transcendant havoc-wreaker to roster gobbling, slow pursuing, no lateral quickness for his position liability. This was a huge blow to the defense. (17 sacks in 06, 12.5 in '07, 4 in '09) Imagine if Dallas lost DeMarcus Ware...same situation only Merriman is still there in body.
4. Nate Kaeding. This isn't the first time he's done this. They should've seen it coming. Playoff demons aren't excercised by making regular season kicks.
5. 2008 was a good situaion for them...a bit more mature, ready for some get back from New England, who proved in the Super Bowl they were ripe for a loss. Problem was LT was never fit to play and left in the first quarter, leaving his helmet and visor on the whole game presumably because he was visibly mad/upset after the 2007 debacle (LT HATES the Pats) and Rivers was playing on one leg (torn ACL, pretty ballsy). Tomlinson was never the same, and...
6. They wasted a year of Rivers, Gates, and Jackson's prime by relying on said old Tomlinson. You can say it's only one year, but this is football, windows are short.
7. Norv Turner replacing Marty. I'm not sure marty even needed to be replaced. Losing tight games to the teams they lost to are no firable offense, Replacing Schottenheimer with Turner is like going to the doctor and hearing "I cured your flu, but I gave you herpes, sorry".
8. (and most importantly) As this team evolves, the first thing we need to realize is that Rivers is 28. If we judged Favre, Elway, Montana, Young, Manning, and Kelly on their careers up to age 28, you'd be looking at a bunch of guys a lot like Rivers now, most actually less accomplished. Gates, Jackson, Cromartie, and many other components of that team aren't going anywhere. The best is yet to come.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
To skip this, please log in.