Writers of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

30 Sep 2010

Week 4 Open Discussion Thread

Talk about the Week 4 games here!

Posted by: Bill Barnwell on 30 Sep 2010

316 replies , Last at 10 Oct 2010, 12:49pm by TimK

1
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Pack66 (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:58am

Sooooo....I heard Mike Shanahan has become really predictable when it comes to playing RBs.

2
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by JIPanick :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:16am

What a lousy time not to have a TV. If anyone happens to see a final word on Steven Jackson's status for the day, would you do me and my fantasy team a favor and let me know about it?

Go Broncos!

3
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dales :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:47am

ESPN reporting he's active.

4
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by JIPanick :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:55am

Excellent. Thanks.

6
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 12:19pm

If you have the internet, you have more access to info than you would from the TV anyway...

8
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by JIPanick :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 12:27pm

Yeah, but sometimes they aren't quick enough with getting the "game time decisions" out online.

5
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Samoan__Rob (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 12:17pm

Pierre Thomas is out and Saints are big favorites over the Panthers. Steven Jackson is active but may share carries with K Darby. Ladell Betts is starting for the Saints. Some like Ivory better as a goal line back.

Do I pick up and start Ladell Betts over S Jax or Darby?

9
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Samoan__Rob (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 12:31pm

For the record I'm going w/Betts over Ivory, Wynn, S Jax and Darby... and Ricky Williams. but it's probably just cuz the FO math loved him in yrs past.

159
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:47pm

Did anybody know that Thomas wasn't going to play? That was news to me, and I left him in my fantasy lineup. Ugh.

7
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Lvess :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 12:24pm

SJax's situation sounds an awful lot like he'll go for 6-10 carries and a few targets in the 1st half then sit out most of the 2nd. Just my gut. FWIW, I'm benching him.

10
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Yaxley :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 12:47pm

I agree, I'm benching him for the same reasons. Knowing my luck, he'll have 4 TDs this week, but right now he seems too risky to use.

11
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:08pm

Aw crap. Steeler/Ravens and the Cretin's commentating.

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

12
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:12pm

Delightful.

James, mind if I ask how you watch games over there? My wife is in London for work, stuck in the hotel, which only gets channel 4. The usual sites we can use in the states to get feeds online are all blocked from UK access. Is there a way you know of to watch the games online?

Thanks.

20
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:29pm

The night game's on Channel 4. The earlier slots are broadcasting on SkySports 3, which features possibly the worst studio team ever to cover the sport. Monday Night Football is on ESPN UK.

I'm not aware of any legal way to watch the NFL online in the UK without actually subscribing to Sky Player (the price of which is extortionate) or the NFL GamePass (which is expensive but more worth the cost).

32
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:54pm

Yeah, her hotel has 4 but not SkySports, and she can't go to a pub. A pub won't have the Colts game anyway, which is what she wants.

Anyone know if the DirecTV online thing works out of the country? Because her family is a sunday ticket subscriber. Or do you need a separate package for that?

53
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:36pm

I don't know if the DirectTV online thing (which is called NFL Sunday Ticket To-Go) works out of the country. But it is an "extra" to the regular NFL Sunday Ticket package. So you have to subscribe to NFL Sunday Ticket To-Go to see the games online.

26
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:45pm

I watching on sky-hence I'm stuck with the Cretin

13
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:14pm

Oh good, it's Pink month.

It amazes me that the NFL is so careful about their brand and all kinds of little nit-picky uniform rules, but then they let teams wear these hideous pink shoes and gloves all month.

The cause is good, but paint the field pink, use pink instead of orange for the markers, and have a patch or armband or something. Everything else just looks godawful.

15
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Sidewards :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:16pm

I disagree strongly. I think the highlights look great on most uniforms. Also, the hats the coaches wear.

16
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:20pm

Well then. You have bad taste.

Seriously, though. It looks fine with some teams, of course, depending on their color schemes. But it's outright awful on others, like the 49ers. Or especially the Seahawks. Pretty gross for both teams in the Superdome right now.

Actually, if I was in charge of Seattle I'd just replace the bright green with the bright pink for a week. There's not much of it in the uniforms, just thin stripes. Then everything would still match (or in other words, actually be uniform)

(Replacing the orange with pink for the Bengals wouldn't make their uniforms any less awful either.)

14
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:16pm

I really do not like the gaudy pink the teams and refs are wearing. It's just horrible to look at. Breast cancer awareness? How about the NFL does something for animal rights awareness??? That would be far more appropriate.

204
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by ChrisZ (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:12pm

Maybe because NFL viewers care more about breasts than animals?

17
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Rocco :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:21pm

Was that a Randle El sighting?

18
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:22pm

getting back to actual football... amazing catch by Randle El.

Bad kicking all over so far.

Flacco still looks like he's unwilling to step into his throws. I'd bet money he's nursing some nagging injury.

19
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Sidewards :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:24pm

Or Zorn trying to fix him. Either way, it's bad for this year.

21
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Rocco :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:29pm

Nice of Clark to not lead with his head for a change.

22
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:34pm

In the NFL, Mario Hagan + Ryan McBean can sometimes school Chris Johnson...

23
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:36pm

TD Ravens and nice drive. Good run by McGahee to finish it

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

24
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:36pm

Denver's o-line is getting DESTROYED by Tennessee's d-line. It's bad.

25
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by zzyzx :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:38pm

So the Seahawks didn't bother to challenge a fumble early in the game that would have given us the ball deep in STL territory but we did challenge whether Hasselbeck threw an incomplete pass before being sacked... a change of all of 3 yards.

37
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:14pm

Then he wastes another challenge on an interception return. Neither play seems very likely to be overturned.

27
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:46pm

The 49ers are up 14-0 thanks to a blocked punt. Time travelers are now going back a few weeks to find out where the hell these people were.

28
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:51pm

Bradford is having a lot of passes sail on him, and passes when he has the time and pocket to set his feet.

29
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:51pm

Tennessee's D-coordinator just drew a fine from the league (hopefully), after the TV cameras show him flipping off the refs after they made a good offsides call on his defense.

31
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:54pm

Denver goes shotgun, empty backfield on a 3rd and 1, but gets bailed out on a questionable roughing the passer penalty. How far are we from seeing a "roughing the passer" called when the QB still has the ball in his hands?

In a Redskins game earlier in the year (either vs Rams or Texans, I can't remember) a Redskins defender got called for unnecessary roughness for tackling the ballcarrier, who had the ball in his hands and was still standing up. Ridiculous!

30
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:53pm

Eddie Royal catches a TD from Kyle Orton, proving that Eddie Royal still exists.

34
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:58pm

He set up the TD the previous play, taking a quick screen for 16 yards.

33
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 1:57pm

Just saw a replay of the Calvin Johnson TD for Detroit. Did anyone else cringe when he tossed the ball in the air in celebration immediately after he caught it? That loos dangerously close to being called incomplete like in week 1.

35
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:01pm

Astounding pass blocking and pocket awareness by Pittsburgh and Charles Batch. An excellent execution for "Football Follies".

36
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:10pm

WTF was that call against Harrison ?

after last week's inexcusable Hochuli fail, now this?

he needs to be fired.

------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

38
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by zzyzx :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:20pm

On third and a short one, the Hawks just ran a picture perfect halfback option. Gutsy call but it worked.

39
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by zzyzx :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:21pm

...and then there was a fake FG that didn't even come close.

40
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:23pm

Seahawks-Rams has been really fun from a aggression standpoint. Three 4th down attempts so far, the last one being a fake field goal.

Sadly none of them have converted: dropped pass, penalty, and no one was tricked by the fake FG.

41
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:24pm

So in week 4, the Redzone channel has worked all of 2 weeks so far for me. Thanks Comcast.

And they don't even have it in HD.

44
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:27pm

Real NFL fans watch this

http://www.directv.com/cms2/sports/nfl/SuperFan/lg__Game_Mix.jpg

-----------------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

47
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:29pm

Maybe if I grew a few more sets of eyes.

89
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by ChaosOnion (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:35pm

And a larger television.

92
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:40pm

just an HD projector and screen ?

---------------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

42
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:26pm

Denver inexplicably calls a timeout with 28 seconds left in the half before kicking a field goal... why would they do that without letting the clock run down? They handed Tennessee 3 free points for no reason. Mind-boggling.

43
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:26pm

Fail time management by the Rams there. Should have called the TO immediately and taken a shot at the endzone.

Actually, they should have taken 2 shots and not thrown a 9 yard crossing route.

45
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Q (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:28pm

Green Bay's Defense has turned Shaun Hill into Peyton Manning

51
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:30pm

Shaun Hill actually interests me less than what this might mean about Cutler. Or maybe the GB D is having a bad day.

52
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:34pm

It probably means the Lion's offensive line is better than the Bear's.

That or the Green Bay coaches instructed their corners to stop grabbing receivers who beat them.

54
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:36pm

Must be this is a crew that actually calls things like DPI.

I have that game on without sound in a second screen. It looks to me like Hill just has a lot of time to let guys get open.

57
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:42pm

The crew on Monday night did a fine job calling DPI, the Packers just kept committing it, and kept getting caught.

62
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:48pm

True.

I guess they didn't want to risk a repeat of that this week so they backed off?

The plays I've noticed have been zones, actually. I don't see any CBs just getting outright beat man to man. (But again, not really paying attention.)

46
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:28pm

Cool NFL films piece on George Blanda being shown on Sky.

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

48
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:29pm

Calvin Johnson with a TD catch on a jump ball near the end of the first half. Which predictably led to more discussion by Thom Brennaman and Brian Billick of the play from week 1 against the Bears.

49
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:30pm

Brian Billick called Jason Hanson a "young man."

I suppose all football players are young when you're 56 years old like Billick.

50
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:30pm

LOL @ Matt Ryan

LOL even more at the Announcer tards.

---------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

55
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:37pm

McGahee got LIT UP!!!!!!!!!!

---------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

56
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:38pm

Silverback blew him the FARK up !

LMAO.

--------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

58
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:45pm

Shaun ellis tookk off r. fitzparitcik's pants during sack

60
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:47pm

I'm glad I don't get that game.

59
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:47pm

I wonder how many success points a 1st down that moves the ball back 5 yards is worth.

61
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:47pm

That was a weird unsportsmanlike contact call on the Rams receiver I can't spell.

63
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:50pm

I've actually seen that before. You are not allowed to spike the ball after a non-TD play.

64
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tripvm :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:53pm

Broncos kick coverage burned again.

65
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tripvm :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:54pm

Followed by a good return by Thomas.

66
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:55pm

Sanchez underthrows Braylon Edwards, who has no choice but to stop and let Drayton Florence run into him. Florence really doesn't have any other option, but since he doesn't turn around it's an easy DPI call to put the Jets at the 2.

I won't make the argument that it's not DPI, but it seems like every game there's a call or two like that where a terrible throw gets bailed out. The offense doesn't really deserve those yards. I wish there was a way to stop rewarding bad throws.

67
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 2:58pm

On "The Amazing Adventures of Alex Smith's Job Security", Alex Smith throws his secomd interception of the game.

69
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:03pm

Shouldn't that be misadventures?

125
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:32pm

It should be, if it wasn't for the fact that it's amazing that Smith still has a secure job. At least at this point in time...

However (thanks to a Mr. Derek Anderson), I shall now christen it "The Misadventures of Inadequate Quarterbacks at The Starting Position".

68
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:02pm

Bad INT from Flacco

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

70
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by t.d. :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:03pm

So I wonder if JaMarcus Russell is still one of the most similar comparables to Mark Sanchez.

82
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:21pm

Not unless Sanchize is overthrowing targets by 10 years.

71
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:07pm

Tardrians and Omar Tardlin need to go.

Epic farkin fail.

-------------------------

Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

72
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:08pm

Thom Brennaman: You are an idiot. There is no such thing as a "forward lateral." The correct term is "illegal forward pass."

78
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:13pm

Thank God I'm watching the games in mute; which game was that?

80
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:18pm

Lions-Packers.

265
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by young curmudgeon :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:29pm

Wow, are you sensitive or what?!? I realize that the term is now "illegal forward pass," but for many years it was called "forward lateral." Do you similarly sling terms like "idiot" around when someone calls it "offsides" instead of "encroachment" or "backfield in motion" instead of whatever the hell they're calling it now? Does it give you a warm feeling when they announce "unimpeded to the quarterback"? If you'll notice, the old terminology was clear and fairly 'everyday', while the new phrases are no more descriptive, but are expressed in language that is more grandiloquent. If that is to your taste, you are welcome to it, but to attack someone who slips back into the old phrasing from time to time as an "idiot" seems like a ridiculous overreaction.

266
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by young curmudgeon :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:30pm

And besides, "Backfield in Motion" was a cool song. Try to write one as good that's called "False Start Before the Snap."

73
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:08pm

I'm really surprised Brandon Fletcher wasn't flagged for holding or DPI there. He was basically in constant contact with the receiver the whole play.

74
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:08pm

Jeff Reed is not automatic. That's his second miss of the game.

77
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:13pm

it's windy, it's Heinz field, he's got a ever-weakening leg. he's got roid rage, and an ever dwindling sense of confidence.

I sense some destroyed restrooms tonight.

--------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

198
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by PTORaven :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 8:04pm

not with a bodyguard waiting out front

75
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:10pm

The Bills are terrible.

137
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:48pm

Water is wet. Your turn.

141
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:00pm

So is Jersey Shore.

76
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:10pm

If you need to punish yourself, the Niners-Falcons game is being called by Stockton, Mora and Davis.

79
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:14pm

The devolution of Carson Palmer continues.

LMAO

-----------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

81
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:21pm

I saw that Steve Smith was walking slowly off the field and then was carted to the dressing room. Anyone see how he got hurt?

85
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:25pm

He got his panties in a knot.

83
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:23pm

Fabian Washington would've had a pick there but he got scared (justifiably) of Ngata. Ha.

84
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:24pm

who wouldn't , big boy called for ball.

------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

86
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:26pm

"Good coverage on Mike Wallace," says Phil Simms, as the replay clearly shows him wide open in the end zone.

88
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:31pm

Hole-in-Zone was all over him on that play. :)

87
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:31pm

Steven Jackson has the 2nd most rushing yards for the Rams ever.

90
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:36pm

The Packers look awful today. The Lions will probably find a way to lose this game (because that's what they do), but they have really been more impressive than Green Bay.

91
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:37pm

This 49ers drive has back breaking turnover written all over it.

95
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:51pm

Said backbreaking turnover being a Matty Ice interception, only for the interceptor to fumble it. Atlanta better thank Tebow for their second chance.

97
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:52pm

That was killer. Pretty bad pass by Ryan.

I don't see what Tebow has to do with this.

101
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:56pm

After everything he accomplished in college, he cemented his status as one of the "football gods".

93
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:46pm

Seahawks self-destructing now. Some defender took his helmet off in celebration after stuffing Jackson, 15 yard penalty.

On the Rams side, up 14 with < 5 mins left, maybe it's time to rest your start runningback with a sore groin.

94
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:48pm

Matt Ryan picked off by Nate Clemens, who runs it back inside the 10 and then fumbles the ball and the Falcons recover.

96
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by coboney :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:51pm

I can't see the game but it sounds like (and from the stat box) that my 49ers and the falcons are each trying to give the game over... and failing t doing so well.

98
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:53pm

It does have a bit of that feel.

Falcons marching back down the field now, nearly in FG territory.

115
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Just Another Falcons Fan (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:14pm

To be fair, it was a really nice strip by Roddy White. If Clemens had just gone down though, the game was over.

99
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:54pm

Omar Tardlin's terrible game management/clock management and trust in the prevent loses the game at the end.

fark this idiot

----------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

100
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by CoachDave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:56pm

At what point do Lions fans drive to NYC and picket the NFL offices?

You can't get jobbed by the refs more than the Lions are @ GB today.

Yes, Detroit has had some foot-shooting dumb penalties, but when Charles Woodson is molesting wideouts and the penalties are 13 vs. 3 it's gone beyond "home field advantage".

103
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:58pm

Complaining about the ratio of penalties assumes that both teams have in actuality committed about the same amount of penalties. Which of course is not always the case.

102
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 3:58pm

What's cooler than being Joe Cool?

104
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:00pm

FOX switches to Panthers-Saints in time to see a laser strike by Clausen, wow. That throw was breathtaking.

105
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Joe T. :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:01pm

Re: Ravens/Steelers - they flagged #57 for holding on the Steelers' final punt. Looked to me like it was in the endzone, but the announcers didn't go into it all (Simms, go figure). I thought holding in the endzone was a safety? Anybody else see it and can enlighten me?

200
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by PTORaven :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 8:11pm

i was wondering the same thing. i think this was within the final 2:00, so it should have been a booth review. ravens maybe get another apology this week. the officiating wasn't great in the game, but at least it didn't favor any one side.

106
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:02pm

Panthers try to run to set up a shorter FG and lose yards.

107
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:03pm

Then Clausen gets sacked. So anti-climatic.

108
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:04pm

And then takes forever to get that play off, even if it was complete the game was over.

109
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:04pm

What the hell were the Panthers doing? Even if that pass were completed, the clock would have run out before they could have lined up for another play or a field goal attempt.

110
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:06pm

When did Les Miles take over the Panthers?

111
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:09pm

And Tennessee probably just lost the game on a 49-yd DPI call to put the Broncos at the 1. Denver needs a TD, but assuming they score Titans won't have time to.

114
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:13pm

The Broncos then scored, so Tennessee would get the ball with about 1:30 to go, but they fumbled the kickoff return, so Denver has the ball, up 3, with 1:31 to go.

130
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by narticus :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:38pm

Special Teams snafus cost the Titans at least two of their first three games last season. Titans ST started the Steelers game this year allowing a kickoff return for a touchdown and then fumbled when the Steelers kicked off - a return TD and ST turnover in a game they only lost by one score. Today, down three with more than a minute-and-a-half, two timeouts, and strong wind at the their back, the Titans had another special teams turnover, costing themselves any real chance of a comeback. How does Alan Lowry still have his job?

147
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:29pm

Special teams didn't cost the Titans the game. The Titans scored on a 98-yard kickoff return where the returner wasn't even touched earlier in the game. Also, the ST turnover at the end of the game was a really tough play on a funny bounce of the ball--I don't think you can fault their coach for that at all. It's just one of those plays, I don't think there was anything they could have done. Their ST looked good overall if you ask me.

If you're looking for someone to blame, I'd put it on their OC Heimerdinger. They had several nice gains in the 1st quarter on misdirection plays where the Broncos entire defense bit--then they proceeded to call ONE misdirection play for the rest of the entire game. Whoever is calling plays for them needs to be sacked immediately, he is not taking advantage of the talent on that offense at all.

282
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 1:14am

"....a really tough play on a funny bounce."

You are not supposed to let kickoffs bounce. That's a live ball. Also, it's an oblate spheroid that is not going to take a true bounce in any sense. A good returner catches the ball in the air and never lets it bounce. If the regular return man is too deep, one of the up men is supposed to catch it.

That was absolutely a fail by the Titans' special teams.

116
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:15pm

Poster beat me to it.

112
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Just Another Falcons Fan (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:12pm

Falcons make the 43 yard FG to eke out a win they didn't deserve.

117
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:16pm

To be fair, it was the 49ers...

118
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by coboney :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:20pm

That hurts as a 49er fan to read that... and have to agree.

Calling us awful is probably about the best you can do. I guess that means we're currently fighting forthe #1 pick now ?

283
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 1:17am

The 49ers are not in the running there. There are a good handful of teams that are clearly worse. (Lions, Bills, Raiders... ok, at least three.)

The 49ers have a solid defense but they really suffer on offense from having an inadequate QB.

113
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:13pm

Classic Addai there, jumped side to side like 3 times without moving forward.

119
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:25pm

Garrard scores a TD with an option keeper. Awesome.

120
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by mickeyribs :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:25pm

Great line by Buck "First it was Hobbs, and now it's Calvin"

121
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:25pm

David Garrard wants in on Indy's run D (or lack thereof).

123
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:30pm

Helps when they don't call obvious holding.

Brackett would've had him [a mere 8 or so yards downfield] but was blatantly held. No call.

The tackling was piss poor on that drive.

122
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:29pm

Continuing on "The Misadventures of Inadequate Starters at the Quarterback Position", Derek Anderson responsibly throws a pick.

124
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:31pm

TOUCHDOWN REDSKINS!!!!!

126
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:33pm

Aikman said that Jacksonville has a "pretty average offense." Okay Troy...

127
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by DrunkenSuperman :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:34pm

Fred Davis completely misjudges a perfectly catchable ball and McNabb gets blamed. Some things don't change...

128
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:35pm

Troy Aikman: Philly fans aren't booing the opposition, they're booing their own team.

Somehow that is supposed to be better.

129
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:36pm

TOUCHDOWN REDSKINS AGAIN!!!! CHRIS COOLEY WOOHOO!!!!!!

131
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:39pm

Why did the Eagles trade that McNabb guy?

132
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:41pm

I'm going to get a real kick out of it if the Redskins can crush the Eagles with McNabb having a huge game.

133
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jovins :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:43pm

Is there a reason Arian Foster doesn't have any carries?

I wasn't aware that he was hurt. And I thought he was still starting.

142
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jay (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:08pm

looks like a disciplinary action. not a big fan, need his pts today

134
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:43pm

Ugh, horrible tackling by the Redskins there.

135
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:47pm

a) #50 is Wheeler
b) Clint's last name is SESSION.

Fouts is unbearable.

136
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:48pm

It surprises me that more of Vick's passes aren't tipped at the line.

138
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:52pm

Vick hurt, Kolb in. This is too much.

140
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:59pm

He's heading to the locker room. So much for "The Michael Vick Experience, Part II" (for now).

146
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:22pm

Switching to Kolb has to be a good thing for the Eagles at this point.

Did you see the play Vick got injured on? He got sandwiched between two defenders squarely hitting both of his shoulders at the exact same time--OUCH. The human body isn't designed to take forces like that.

164
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:54pm

Yeah. I got hurt watching that.

139
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 4:57pm

People not named Derek Anderson have scored for the Cardinals.

143
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:13pm

Kolb drops the snap, manages to pick it up, and gets the pass batted at the line.

As comic book guy would say: ugliest. play. ever.

292
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by the cat in the box is dead (not verified) :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 7:16am

Yeah, that was horrendous. Kolb's starting to look like a prime candidate for the journeyman QB/solid backup career path. Of course, he's got time to change that, if he gets the opportunity, but it's looking a little more likely right now.

144
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:18pm

Are Aikman and Buck even paying attention to the game?

145
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:19pm

The Redskins have the worst tackling defense I've ever seen. Fortunately, Eagles ballcarriers keep running directly into defenders.

149
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:30pm

The Eagles and Colts are giving them a strong run for that title...

296
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Mr Shush :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 8:38am

What I take from this exchange is that neither of you watched very much of the 2005 Texans. I don't blame you. Wish I hadn't either.

148
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tornadot :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:29pm

Maroney is SLOW. If he keeps this up, NE can take him back.

153
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:40pm

They can have him NOW. Bad RBs set up 2nd and 9. Maroney sets up 2nd and 14. And I wish I was kidding. The blocking was horrible today, I'll grant him that, but my goodness he's awful.

174
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tornadot :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:31pm

I didn't want to appear like one of those knee jerk reaction types...but yea, now would be good.

156
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:44pm

Maroney looked worthless all game. For some reason, McDaniels gave him the ball instead of Buckhalter on the clock-killing drive and he nearly fumbled it back.

158
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Treima6 (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:45pm

Belichick has practically built his career on snookering teams out of their draft picks. This just happens to be another example of that.

Of course, he's also developing a reputation for blowing those draft picks on the Shawn Crables and Chad Jacksons and Laurence Maroneys of the NFL...

284
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 1:22am

...and the Richard Seymours and Vince Wilforks and Tom Bradys and Logan Mankins and Jerod Mayos and...

For a team that is allegedly a terrible drafting organization, the Pats seem to manage to win a lot of games.

150
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:35pm

Eagles are demonstrating their 2 minute prowess.

154
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by ChaosOnion (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:43pm

Apparently it takes Kolb 15 second to run from the sideline to the huddle.

293
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by kamchatka (not verified) :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 7:58am

I love how the announcers spent ten minutes lambasting the officials and making up gross miscarriages of the playclock, until they realized the Eagles just hadn't bothered to get back to the line.

This was an eminently winnable game. Andy Reid - who I respect immensely otherwise - needs to have his mom pin a stopwatch to his lapel before he leaves the house on gameday.

151
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:35pm

LMAO @ the Beagles .

---------------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

152
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:40pm

Have you ever made a post that added something to the conversation? Anything at all?

155
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:43pm

Have you had your ever had your manpon changed ?

---------------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

157
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:45pm

It would be nice though if you explained WHY you were "LMAO." Just saying that without an explanation is rather useless.

162
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:52pm

"Just saw a replay of the Calvin Johnson TD for Detroit. Did anyone else cringe when he tossed the ball in the air in celebration immediately after he caught it? That loos dangerously close to being called incomplete like in week 1."

yeh, we need more stunning insight like this jicamas to clementines comparison, since you know, in week one he went to the ground, and on this play , he was standing up the whole time.

keep chiming in with far superior level of insightful commentary (which of course misinforms the reader who isn't watching the game/highlight by making it seem he went to the ground).

not my fault if nobody else here has Sunday Ticket and watching all the games, besides, it was 90 minutes into a Beagles game, 99% chance clock management is the issue.

---------------------
Men are more ready to repay an injury than a benefit because gratitude is a burden and revenge a pleasure.

168
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:04pm

Nice Ad Hominem. But you still didn't explain what you were talking about. Apparently it had something to do with clock management but I must be an imbecile for not being able to read your mind. I guess it probably doesn't even matter.

160
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:48pm

Smith performs highway robbery on Peyton Manning and Dallas Clark by intercepting Manning after Clark dropped a pass while taking a nasty hit.

165
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:58pm

It was Eldridge.

161
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Treima6 (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:48pm

There goes Manning's flawless opening to the season. Just threw it into double coverage to Brody freakin' Eldrich for some reason and ALMOST got it in, but the Jaguars deflected it, then returned it 49 yards.

166
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:59pm

He did get it in. Eldridge was open. The throw was about a foot off the mark and a guy like that doesn't have the hands/experience the other guys do to make the catch.

Kind of a miraculous shoestring catch by Smith.

163
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by FireOmarTomlin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:53pm

. accidental double post.

167
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 5:59pm

Aikman and Buck don't like a call at the end of the 2nd quarter, and Fox brings in Mike Pereira who explains that the refs actually did call it correctly. After halftime, Aikman and Buck are STILL talking about how they don't understand the call! Ugh. Those two are just stupid.

169
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:07pm

The next time Pereira says the refs were wrong will be the first.

186
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jon Silverberg (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:58pm

Robert Morse in "How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying..." Pereira does it the company way...

285
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 1:28am

Aikman was actually blaming the refs for a delay of game penalty that the Eagles took. And it's not like he referred to the clock or anything. He just said that the refs must have screwed it up. No explanation, no nothing.

I live in the DC area. The locals here despise Aikman and wonder how he gets assigned to pretty much every single Cowboy game on Fox. And when the Cowboys have a bye week, he gets the NFC East matchup between the Eagles and Redskins. We think he hates the Skins more than the Eagles, and needs to find ways to deny that anything good or righteous should go the way of the Redskins.

When the delay of game call was made, we tried to figure out exactly what Aikman was saying. We first thought he was making fun of Reid, who is notorious for bad clock management. But no, to our shock Aikman actually blamed the refs. This is the first time I've ever heard any commentator blame the refs for a delay of game call.

Really, it reminds me of the Geico caveman criticizing the whistle to start the second half.

290
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 3:06am

100% agreed about Aikman. I absolutely abhor FOX for torturing us like this. And Aikman does seem to hate the Redskins, more than the Eagles or anyone else, yet Fox continues to stick him in there...

On the bright side, their "A" camera team did get some really nice shots tonight.

170
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:14pm

Can anyonwe explain what the Jaguars are doing to limit Manning? Vick was cutting that defense up not long time ago...

171
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:22pm

Red zone turnovers, no big plays, and limiting possessions with long slow drives by both teams. Colts have 6 possessions so far, with 2 touchdown drives (11 plays each), 2 three-and-outs, and 2 drives to the red zone that ended in turnovers (1 fumble by Wayne fighting for the first down, and 1 interception off a dropped/broken up pass).

172
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:27pm

Not drafting a defensive end in the first round if the NFL Draft works wonders...

173
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:29pm

Hmm... D. Anderson benched. Max Hall in for the Cards.

176
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:32pm

*Checks pulse*

For some reason, I am not shocked at this turn of events.

175
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:32pm

If there was any chance of another QB controversy this week in Philly, Kevin Kolb is putting it to rest. Only injury will keep Vick out next week.

177
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:32pm

Kolb scrambles on third down, gets hit from behind, fumbles (eagles recovers). Boo bird at the Linc.

178
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Q (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:42pm

Manning sure was lucky to not throw his 2nd INT

179
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by B :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:42pm

I just got home. Why is Kolb in for the Eagles?

181
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by JIPanick :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:45pm

Cuz the dummies traded McNabb.

Or did you want "Vick hurt, shoulder"?

182
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by B :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:46pm

I forgot to specify, I just got home today, not I just got home after waking up from a year-long coma. Thanks for the explanation that covers both possibilities.

183
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by JIPanick :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:48pm

Actually, I may by wrong about the shoulder. If someone else says something different believe them and not me.

180
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:45pm

Vick injury - rib and chest.

185
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:57pm

Reid decided to go with a short, ineffectual passing game. Kolb is executing it perfectly.

295
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by kamchatka (not verified) :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 8:08am

I don't think the sideline routes were really all that stupid - they DID manage to move the ball up the field more effectively than any of his attempts at longer throws earlier. Especially in the face of a not-bad effort by the Skins secondary.

It's just a pity Kolb couldn't push the ball farther earlier, and that either he or the coaches pissed away a relatively easy TD by trying to read through the works of Proust during a single time out.

184
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 6:48pm

It doesn't matter who QB Eagles is; the Redskins will pressure him and destroy the pocket around him, but can't manage to actually bring him down before he scrambles for 10 yards. I guess the difference is Kolb scrambles for 10 where Vick might have scrambled for much more.

187
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Q (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:03pm

Wow a 59 yard game winnrer

188
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by BJR :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:04pm

59 yard field goal!

189
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by BJR :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:11pm

That false start is absolutely unforgiveable

190
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:15pm

Carlos Rogers drops a game-clinching interception. Raise your hand if you're surprised.

191
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:20pm

Not only does Mike Shanahan get a win, but it has to end with the ball in DeAngelo Hall's hands? Boo.

192
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:23pm

I almost had a heart attack as an Eagles receiver gets both hands on a hail-mary in the end zone, but can't hold on. Thank goodness--that was too close.

The Redskins now own first place in the NFC East!

193
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Semigruntled Eagles Fan (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:23pm

How does Avant drop that pass? I mean, I've seen plenty of clutch drops by Eagles receivers over the years, but seriously - he gets an uncontested Hail Mary, and drops it? Ugh.

199
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by BJR :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 8:06pm

Are you serious? I mean sure, he got both hands to the ball and could have made the play, but uncontested? That's a ridiculous description of events.

A failed Hail Mary at the end was not the primary reason the Eagles lost that game......

202
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Semigruntled Eagles Fan (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 8:59pm

I'm not saying the Eagles deserved to win the game, but given that no Redskins player laid a hand on Avant or the ball, uncontested is a valid description of the play. (Granted, it was a jumping attempt, so going to the ground somebody could have hit him, but nevertheless, he dropped the ball without any direct contact from the defense).

294
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by kamchatka (not verified) :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 8:02am

He had two defenders between him and the ball. It sailed between their hands and landed in his, and the only reason THAT happened was a pretty immense stroke of luck on Kolb's part.

Whoever sold the Eagles on the idea that Kevin Kolb was a better fit in the NFL than McNabb had better start polishing their résumé.

194
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by mvhuber :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:31pm

We have now confirmed why Kevin Kolb got canned.

195
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by DaveWY (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:54pm

Maybe I've missed the explanation. But why was Woodson's interception where he dove into the endzone, hit the group and the ball popped out ruled OK, but Calvin Johnson's endzone catch in week 1 ruled no good?

197
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Southern Philly :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 8:00pm

Because he had completed the catch and established possession well before he got to the end zone. Once he crossed the plane, the play was over. Johnson hadn't established possession yet.

196
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by DaveWY (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 7:55pm

I mean hit the ground of course

201
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 8:43pm

Awesome misadventures in punting in New Jersey.

And does Jay Cutler get danger money? Because that O-line is rubbish

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

203
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:03pm

Wow, it's quiet around here. Cutler just threw a terrific WTF? pick

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

205
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:12pm

The Second Coming of Favre continues.

(Note: I typed this in the wrong window at first and it would have made no sense to anyone here as I first wrote it. I decided to clarify instead of just deleting it.)

206
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Q (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:19pm

Are the Bears going to have every ball bounce straight to them this year?

207
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Treima6 (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:20pm

Cutler is trying to make Derek Anderson and Kevin Kolb look downright competent in comparison.

212
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:26pm

Although to be honest the worst thing about this game isn't Cutler, it's the fact that the Giants only have 3 points.

208
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:21pm

The Bears are making the Giants defense look like a Giants defense. Which is new this year.

209
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by JIPanick :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:22pm

I don't have access to a TV, but the play-by-play says Cutler fumbled on three consecutive dropbacks?

216
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Ambientdonkey :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:27pm

Apparently he thinks he can hold the ball for 9 seconds per drop.

210
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Q (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:23pm

Every play he is being blind sided by the Giants D Line

211
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:24pm

If Cutler leaves the Meadowlands alive I'll be very impressed.

215
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:27pm

If the Giant's punter makes it out alive I'll be impressed

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

213
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:26pm

Awesome quote by Seubert.

Michaels joked about the changing pronunciation of his name, saying if he got a penalty or did something bad it'd be pronounced a different way. Seubert answered "if I get a penalty, call me Chris Snee."

Preposterous punt. 14 net yards. The Giants should be ahead by 17 or more in this game, but they're leaving the Bears in it. Not good.

214
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:27pm

Maybe I scared everyone off of posting tonight ;)

217
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:28pm

OK, my viewing experience and knowledge of football is enhanced by "night vision" how, exactly?

218
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Ambientdonkey :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:31pm

For the love of god why won't this idiot throw the ball?

236
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by ChaosOnion (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:44pm

Because if he threw the ball every time he got sacked he would 4 INTs instead of 8 sacks.

219
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Ambientdonkey :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:31pm

double post

220
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:31pm

OK, I get the fact that the Bears have a bad line, but Cutler, really needs to get rid of the ball. Seven sacks, and it's not half-time yet, and at least 3 of them were on Cutler.

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

224
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Ambientdonkey :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:35pm

I would say 5 are on Cutler.

221
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:34pm

Bears O giving the game to the Giants; Giant's O trying to give it back.

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

222
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:35pm

That looked like either a legit incomplete pass or a tuck rule at worst.

223
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:35pm

Great from Cris Collinsworth:

"someone put a tent over this circus"

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

225
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:38pm

Manning fumble, Cutler sack. Sheesh.

226
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:38pm

Off the top of my head, I think the record for sacks in a game is 12 by the Bears against the Lions in the last game of the 1984 season. The Giants are going to obliterate that record (and Jay Cutler) tonight.

229
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by JIPanick :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:40pm

I think we just ended a sequence of six Cutler sacks in six Cutler dropbacks...

232
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:41pm

By halftime if the Bears get the ball back...

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

244
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:50pm

PFR says 14, but it's from 1952, so I'm not sure how reliable it is.
If you skip that one, the record is 12, which has been done seven times--three times by the Bears. Twice by the Cowboys, too. And, unsurprisingly, the only team to be victim to it twice is the Lions.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny/6MeEU

256
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:12pm

So six more sacks - which looks ridiculously possible - and the Giants set a new sack record even if the '52 one is good? And the NFL, as far as I can tell, lists 12 as the max for a game, five times dating back to '66. http://static.nfl.com/static/content/public/image/history/pdfs/Records/A... page 9 or page 17.

So I'm not sure what's official here.

263
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:16pm

I would bet that the nfl.com stats are official.

Normally, the PFR guys say that they don't have "reliable" sack data before 1969. However, it's also only in the context of measuring the statistics of individual quarterbacks that I remember them saying it. I also don't know what it means to say you don't have "reliable" sack data--does it mean the data is incomplete, or that you get conflicting data, or what?

281
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Scott C :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 12:47am

Sacks were not an official stat until ~1963 IIRC.

They were measured before but like other unofficial stats, with poor consistency and some missing data.

286
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 1:32am

Much later than that - 1982.

Legend has it that Deacon Jones would clearly hold the sack record if anybody had been counting during his career.

288
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Semigruntled Eagles Fan (not verified) :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 1:47am

Team sacks were a tracked statistic well before sacks for individual players, IIRC.

231
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by CathyW :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:41pm

This is starting to remind me of the 12-sack game the Giants pitched against the Eagles in 2007 (?). Ay carumba - Winston Justice was like a turnstile out there.

ETA: Yep, 2007. http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/21072362/

227
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:40pm

apparently that last play before the punt became sack #9. Hilarious.

What's the record for sacks in a half?

Quick, Eli, turn the ball over so they can hit Cutler some more.

228
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:40pm

While you can't see the coverage from the TV, I fail to believe that no-one is open on any of these plays. -9 passing yards and 9 sacks is awesome. If Cutler can't throw, who's on the bench?

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

234
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:43pm

That would be Todd Collins on the Bears' bench. I'm not entirely sure that would improve things.

250
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:59pm

EDIT: Todd Collins, according to the actual depth chart. I guess Caleb Hanie got demoted.

I watched Hanie play in college at Colorado State, and never would have guessed he would be an NFL prospect. Shows what I know, I guess.

277
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by tuluse :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:36pm

Hanie looks really good every preseason, and Mel Kiper was in love with him for whatever that's worth.

He got demoted because he got hurt this year and they didn't have a chance to evaluate him with the new offense.

230
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Ambientdonkey :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:41pm

How about a some first down runs. And if Cutler can't bring himself to throw the ball away before running out of bounds in the backfield, how about benching him. I feel like I'm watching Henry Burris again.

233
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:42pm

Are all these sacks due somewhat to the constant vertical routes? Does the Martz playbook not include any mid-range crossing stuff?

235
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:43pm

If the Bears are going to win this game, it looks like it will take a defensive or special teams TD. Maybe both. We know the Bears can do this and have done this before in prime time - when the Bears were who we thought they were. Will the Giants let 'em off the hook?

237
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by InTheBoilerRoom :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:44pm

Martz is just as responsible for this nonsense as Cutler and the O-line. He needs to stop calling plays having the WRs running routes 20 yards down field. At this point everything should be 3 step drops and short routes. But this is Martz we're talking about...

Pretty much everyone associated with the offense is responsible for this stupidity.

287
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 1:34am

Martz called a godawful game.

Long after it was established that the Bears could not give more than 2 seconds of pass protection, and long before the game was out of reach, Martz continued to push the same button: pass, pass, pass, pass, pass.

Matt Forte? Ignored.

238
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:46pm

Bears get it back inside thier own 10. If the Giants get this right, they'll break the sack record AND get the safety

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

239
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:48pm

A short route? And a completion? To a tight end? I think maybe Lovie decided to take over the offense.

241
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:49pm

Martz just staged a coup. sack number 9 follows the first down.

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

242
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:49pm

Nevermind, sack #9. I don't have anything to say any more.

240
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by CathyW :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:49pm

Okay, is that 9 or 10?

243
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:50pm

9. They scratched one off

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

247
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by CathyW :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:52pm

This is just terrible. I think I could protect Cutler better, and I'm 5'3" and weigh about 119 lbs. Good lord.

249
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:54pm

Not if Cutler keeps refusing to throw the ball you couldn't

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

251
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by CathyW :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:59pm

True.

297
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Human Spider :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 12:03pm

I'm 6'4' and 180 pounds, and I think I could've gotten a sack on Cutler.

245
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:50pm

Officially #9, the last #9 got marked down as incomplete eventually.

246
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:52pm

Well the good thing about all the sacks is that now the Giants are just looking for Cutler - so the running game's getting working, ish.

248
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 9:52pm

I have no idea how the Bears aren't already beaten. 3-0 is a travesty

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

252
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by CathyW :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:01pm

I'm still trying to get the horrible taste of that Eagles game out of my mouth. Although I was happy that McNabb played okay - not his best game, but he definitely didn't need to bring his "A" game today.

253
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:04pm

The Giants have long had the habit of playing down to the opponent's level and letting them hang around in games they should win by double digits.

The 07 NFC title game is a great example. They should've won that game by 2 scores in regulation, but it took the Favre brain fart to hand the game back to them.

Whoops, this was a reply to James.

At least this time it isn't stupid penalties prolonging drives and leading to points.

254
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:09pm

Whoa--Collins taking over. I have to admit, this development does surprise me.

255
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:10pm

Collins is in, and while part of me just feels bad for Cutler, part of me is hoping he threw a world-class hissy fit and refused to play the second half, sparking a massive controversy and fun as hell headlines here in Chicago.

259
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:13pm

Commentators saying Cutler is officially out for now, possible/probable concussion.

257
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by James-London :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:12pm

3 & out for the Giants, and no Cutler. Is he hurt, or like Achilles, skulking in his tent?

EDIT: Concussion for Culter. Anyone else thinks he's lucky it's not worse?

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

258
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:13pm

Concussion, apparently, and now a limited playbook for the confused as hell Collins. Looks like no amount of bad Eli can cost them this game. 3 points will likely be enough.

260
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:14pm

If this game ends 3-0 that will be horrible. There's no excuse for it. At least the last 3-0 game happened in a hurricane!

262
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Marko :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:15pm

As I said above, the Bears may have to win this game with a defensive or special teams TD. So some amount of bad Eli could cost the Giants if he throws a pick 6.

261
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by B :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:14pm

Todd Collins, the best drink named NFL quarterback since the White Russian.

289
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by SFC B (not verified) :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 2:32am

The drink is a Tom Collins. Gin, soda water, sugar, lemon.

However a Redskins fan apparently called his bourbon and ginger ale a Todd Collins.

So the Todd Collins was inspired by confusion over Todd Collins and Tom Collins.

264
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Jonadan :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:22pm

With Collins in, the Bears offense is suddenly looking competent. Not good - they still can't get a 1st down - but competent. Competent in a might-get-a-FG-eventually way. Is Cutler that bad? But he'd actually been looking okay this year. So I'm just really confused.

271
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Alexander :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:09pm

I'm fairly certain its because Cutler had too much confidence at the beginning of the game and got sacked alot. Then after getting sacked alot he had too much hot feet and didn't look downfield enough.

Also the Giants DLine is probably getting tired.

267
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Perrin (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 10:49pm

It looks like Collins isn't using a mouthpiece. Is that even legal? Let alone, impossibly stupid in a game where the other team sacked your QB nine times in the first half?

268
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by David_I (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:00pm

What's the book on Jacobs going ballistic tonight?

269
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Perrin (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:03pm

Maybe he'll throw Tom Coughlin into the stands.

270
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by B :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:06pm

Ok Chicago, the good news is your defense got a turnover. The bad news is now you have Todd Collins starting a drive on your 1 yard line.

272
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Dave :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:12pm

What a god awful throw by Eli and great play by Nicks to set up that clinching touchdown.

273
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:19pm

I went to school right by Caleb Hanie for at least a little while (I graduated in 2006). Since him succeeding would funnel football players over to CSU instead, I will root for him.

275
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:24pm

I graduated from Colorado State in 2005! Pleased to meet you, sir.

276
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:28pm

Interesting! My best friend went to CSU. He graduated in 2009, but he actually started in 2003, so he would have been there.

I realize my comment could have meant several schools--I went to CU.

279
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by The Ninjalectual :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:47pm

My brother and girlfriend both graduated from CU in '06 and '07, so I feel no animosity toward Boulder at all. In fact it bothers me to see so many people from either school actually disliking the other town/school/football team. I feel the Buffs are my home team too, and I root for them in all their games except the one vs. CSU every year. The Mile High Showdown is one of my favorite football games, but I wonder if some fans take the shit talking too seriously and forget that we're all friends after it's over... so I'm glad to see someone else hoping Hanie gets a shot in the NFL.

280
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Shattenjager :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:55pm

I honestly hate college football (long explanation that I don't have time for), so I never got into the animosity.

274
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by jonnyblazin :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:21pm

GOOD JOB CALEB

278
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by ChaosOnion (not verified) :: Sun, 10/03/2010 - 11:42pm

I think we need an injury countdown sometime this week. I have completely lost track of the high ankle sprains, concussions and knee injuries to key football players.

291
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Basilicus :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 3:56am

The joys of being a Bears fan are endless.

298
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by Rocco :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 9:03pm

Gotta love it when the camera pans to a coach after his team gives up points- good shot of Belichick mouthing "god-dammit" after Bess scored.

299
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by B :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 9:25pm

Apparently the Patriots are trying to test Mike Reiss's run to win theory. If they have 20 runs in the first half, that's like a guaranteed victory, right?

300
Re: Week 4 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Mon, 10/04/2010 - 9:26pm

Just tuned in to the 2nd quarter of the Pats-Dolphins game. Seems like the Pats read today's article about running the ball. They are running and running and running. We're close to halftime and neither Welker nor Moss has even been targeted yet.

I do wish the offense would be a bit less schizo.

Topic Locked