I want to kill someone for the Chevrolet commercial they show during the games that involves drawing up a football play on screen . . . there are only 4 offensive linemen. It annoys me every time I see it.
300
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 5:57pm
I don't watch Chevrolet commercials as a matter of principle.
299
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 5:55pm
That was an awesome stop by the packrs punter.
303
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:00pm
Where's JAX @ TEN when you need it?
314
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by B :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:06pm
Tenesee is actualy winning that game, and Jax looks lost. Looks like the same Jax team that got destroyed by Seattle.
The only one I have is Shiancoe. Obviously, [Vikings QB] prefers me to you. I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing, but I'm leaning toward the latter.
(I'm hoping it's not a Rule 1 violation to make fun of his not knowing what the song was about--it has no relationship to his politics, so it shouldn't be.)
318
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by B :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:10pm
See, I view the song as ultimately uplifting. Sure the narrator's life sucks, but he's able to find happiness from living in the USA.
Since Childress is going to call the play they use, yes.
328
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:16pm
wow. I'm stunned they stopped that.
332
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:21pm
It was a great stand.
329
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by BoltsFanatic (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:19pm
Not much talk about the Raiders Bolts game. I'll give an update. It's fixing to be another Oakland blowout and Russell looks terrible once again, 21-7 right before the half.
334
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:22pm
I didn't realise any of that was ever in question?
Starting Vincent Jackson this week was the easiest fantasy decision I've made all season (starting Brady over Hasselbeck every week doesn't qualify as a decision).
"You keep saying that word. I don't think it means what you think it means."
:)
339
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by TomKelso :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:25pm
You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
340
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:26pm
Inconceivable!
336
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:23pm
And of course I started Rodgers in my FF league, thinking, he'll tear apart the vikings secondary. Well, I forgot the league subtracts 2 pts for each sack...
341
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Arson55 :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:26pm
Is there anyone here who can keep me updated on the Titans game? I'm curious about how Young is going to do.
I've got my eye on the box score, but is he actually looking as good as his stats show? I guess they're short completions, but they are completions.
I'm in Minnesota, so needless to say I'm stuck with the Green Bay Orgy. But, I've been paying some attention to that one online--at halftime Young is 11/13 for 87 yards and a TD and he has 8 carries for 26 yards.
342
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:27pm
Of course with Childress, anything is possible for this last two minutes...
344
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Arson55 :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:29pm
Is it sad that I'm tempted to watch the Raiders suck at the Chargers so I don't have to listen to announcers suck up to Favre?
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:29pm
I'm glad I'm not playing a drinking game where you have to drink everytime they drop the f-bomb.
349
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Theo :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:33pm
They are actually pretty much calling the game instead of going over the fact that HE played here for 45 years.
You can overdo it, and I think they're trying not to.
I hate to admit it, but I actually think Aikman handles [Vikings QB] better than just about any announcer. Maybe because he's the only one who has been that kind of iconic player to a franchise?
Captcha: penalized oboists
Whoa. I just hope Iva Davies isn't one of them--he is awesome.
The Question for the Ages: Is JaMarcus Russell actually worse than Spergon Wynn?
353
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:41pm
I'm troubled by a deeper question:
Is Derek Anderson actually worse than JaMarcus Russell?
356
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Arson55 :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:44pm
I have a hard time believing that anything could be worse than Russell.
360
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:46pm
So do I, but yeesh Anderson is horrendous.
361
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Theo :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:48pm
I had to see that guy play football for the Amsterdam Admirals... that guy could throw a 3rd quarter of football, but for the rest he was worthless.
Right now, they're poor CFL/UFL football QBs.
352
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:40pm
Jimmy Johnson: If the Packers had watched out pre-game show, they'd have known all they have to do is protect Rodgers.
354
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:43pm
I decided to play zelda during halftime. Twilight princess is an appropriate game, no?
358
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:46pm
LOL!
355
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by hythlodaeus :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:44pm
Crazy statline of the week:
Maurice Jones-Drew: 5 rush for 172 yards, 2 TD.
359
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by montanapanthersfan :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:46pm
I am troubled by the prospect that someone laced my keyboard with LSD and what I am watching is not actually real.
363
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:49pm
Meh, you're playing the Cardinals in November. Only difference to last year is they haven't sewn the division up yet. ;)
377
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by montanapanthersfan :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:11pm
We're also starting the league-leading turnover machine quarterback, though. Kind of expected a slightly different score.
380
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:13pm
Are they actually using him as a quarterback, or is he bidding to become the league's leading handoff machine? I actually expected Carolina to at least keep it close if not win outright as long as he was handing off repeatedly.
382
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by montanapanthersfan :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:15pm
At this point, it's purely handoffs. He's only had ten passes. However, Delhomme is the Jason Vorhees of football. He can strike at any time.
I don't think he really is that fast. He's very quick and elusive and he runs tough, but he's not Devin Hester-Randy Moss-Steve Smith (Car) type of fast.
Bernard Berrian is getting checked out. The Vikings appear to be trying to set a record for most people playing injured on one team.
367
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:55pm
And, TMQ writes "Game over" in his note book.
368
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Pat (filler) (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:55pm
W.T.F.?!? Favre makes an absolutely, completely textbook Favrian chuck the ball into triple coverage. Two out of the three guys in coverage run into each other, Harvin makes the catch and runs it into the end zone. Keystone Cops, indeed.
369
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:57pm
Break out the "Yakkety Sax" sound track.
371
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Arson55 :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 6:58pm
Going Raiders/Chargers to avoid Favre mentions backfired big time. That was painful stupid.
So, are the Packers actually this bad or is this just a bad game?
374
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:06pm
Their o-line is pretty bad due to injuries and Rodgers tends to hold on to the ball too long. The Packers looked good the last two weeks because they played the Lions and the Chiefs. Plus, the Vikings have a very good football team. The Saints, Eagles, and Vikings are probably the top three teams in the NFC right now.
Their TDs have come on 4 carries for 300 yards; other than that they have 23 for 99 yds.
402
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Arson55 :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:35pm
4 carries of 50 yards or more in one game? That's piss poor defense from both teams.
Plus, 99/23=4.3 yds/carry. Still not great defense.
456
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Yaguar :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 9:43pm
I think it was Butch Davis for the Browns, but it might have been some other coach vs some other RB - that he didn't think his run defense against Jamal Lewis's 295-yard day was so terrible, because if you took away the two 60+ yard TDs, they held him right at 5 yards per carry.
388
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by chemical burn :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:24pm
Arizona fans very loudly cheering the fact that Jake Delhomme is injured and in a lot of pain, even as the play is over and he's writhing on the ground. pretty disgusting...
389
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:25pm
ugh. these games always seem to come down to the last possession anyway, so what i should have done was wait and start watching during the fourth quarter.
391
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by B :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:26pm
Did you remember to start Chris Johnson? He's now got 220 yards and 2 TDs. On 20 carries.
392
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:27pm
Where has this Packers offense been? Watching the Favrecam?
After all, Chris Berman told us before the only reason the Jets have won any games this year is that [Vikings QB] was there last year, so perhaps Green Bay can only win games if they watch his dedicated cam.
A few weeks ago, when people were all jumping on the Jets bandwagon, Berman said, "They're winning now because [Vikings QB] was there last year. He tought them how to win."
Seriously.
Is saying that it will make the Packers win if they watch his cam any less logical? I don't think so.
404
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Arson55 :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:38pm
I shouldn't be surprised because Berman is one of the stupidest people to ever live, but damn, that's stupid.
To be fair to him, it was pretty obvious that they were supposed to fill some more time before a commercial and Tom Jackson just had nothing (and it was only the two of them), but I just can't forgive such a ridiculous statement.
Well . . . okay, never. I just don't want to pick on him. He played for my Broncos and he was good. Plus I love that he regularly says things like, "You couldn't pay me enough to play for the Raiders." Most talking heads, especially with Madden gone, don't properly respect the intensity of that rivalry.
Can't the announcers just say, "[Vikings QB] is good" instead of every time making the argument against a straw man that the Vikings are better off for having him?
409
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:47pm
I don't know. I think the Vikings are better with Favre.
And yet they keep "proving" every week that they're right--the Vikings are better. (And of course, they're really just proving every time that the Vikings are better this year than last year, not that it's due to the QB.)
411
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:48pm
...and I flip back just in time for the jennings td.
I don't believe so. I believe they whistle it dead because it's just an unsuccessful two-point conversion.
422
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Arson55 :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:55pm
I'm pretty sure this is right.
427
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:00pm
I'm 100% sure this is right. I've seen it happen, which was immensely entertaining.
414
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Mike Y :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:50pm
DHB and Louis Murphy just ran into each other, wiping each other out of a key play. Haha!
420
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Whatev (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:54pm
Ironically, Russell has actually been okay today. For all the times he's tried to shift blame for his craptacular performances to his receivers, this time it really is largely their fault.
415
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:50pm
Should have been a 2 point conversion, except Ryan suddenly loses his ability to catch a football.
And they pulled within 5 earlier and thought it was a better idea to kick the extra point (which I complained about) to get within 4, so why now is it a better idea to go for two? McCarthy, your lack of mathematical skills has left you dead to me.
423
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Dan :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:58pm
The replay shows that it was deflected by Kevin Williams' Popeye arms.
424
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Jovins :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 7:59pm
So I'm sitting with my girlfriend helping her with an essay instead of watching the Vikings-Packers game.
I go away for like 15 minutes to look over her essay, and I come back.
The score goes from being 24-6 to 31-26.
The Packers have suddenly improved their protection. I don't see any reason for it being so much better, but it has been. And then Rodgers has made a few plays by escaping and the Vikings coverage is, as always, pretty poor.
BS roughing call on Vikings' Ray Edwards and somehow Driver is down. I don't see anything getting bent or twisted wrong or anything but he's just sitting up now.
Now he's back in. And for the second straight week, we see someone decide the proper way to block Jared Allen is not to.
426
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:00pm
Damn, DD down?
431
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:04pm
Looks like he had the wind knocked out of him.
432
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by TomKelso :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:04pm
Kick Early , Go for it Late -- it's obvious McCarthy has read too much TMQ
433
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:04pm
Cmon, princess, one more TAINT, just for old time's sake...although if I'm going to go w/ the zelda analogy, that would make Rodgers Link, wouldn't it?
440
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:08pm
No such luck. Favre to Berrian. 38-26 Vikings.
435
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Ivarsson.se :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:06pm
Haven't GB burned their timeouts in ununsual ways this 2nd half?
436
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Jovins :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:06pm
And here comes Childress running the ball and playing for the field goal.
Sigh.
Just once, it might be nice to play to win the game rather than not to lose it.
Obviously, you misunderstand the genius that is Childress.
Or perhaps he is in fact, as he seems, a complete imbecile who has no business coaching a professional football team and the Eagles are still snickering with delight to be rid of him.
443
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Jovins :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:09pm
I'm still waiting for Childress to lose this game.
by SteveNC (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:11pm
Do you think GB gave up the long run to AP with about 5 minutes left on purpose? Maybe not, but I wonder if defenses ever give up a few extra yards at the end of the game to limit the other team's time of possession. (SF could've done that vs Indianapolis to have a better chance of getting the ball back.)
Of course, you have to hold them to a FG in that Min-GB situation for the strategy to work....
To be clear, that's not what I was saying when I posted--I meant they gave up on the run at the start of the second half.
I don't think they gave up on that one, but I think defenses do that. In fact, the Packers claim, whether it's true or not, that they did so in the Super Bowl against Denver. Since it took a few days before they started claiming that, I doubt the veracity of their claim (and it's going to be hard to do that, because you have to overcome all of your usual on-field instincts), but I would all but guarantee that it's done.
438
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:08pm
F.U. Princess.
441
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Ivarsson.se :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:08pm
Let's see, GB blitzes, MIN scores, TMQ writes game over in that lil' book of his?
445
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Arson55 :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:13pm
Pretty much goes to show that really any of us could do what he does, right?
All you have to do is read the column a couple of times and then anyone could, really. I loved TMQ the first time I read it (through FO), but then I continued to read it and see the same things over and over. It's kind of sad, because he obviously had some interesting thoughts once upon a time and then just gave up. And he throws in so many awful, unbelievably bad misunderstandings of science that it makes me cringe.
I have never heard someone suggest that [Vikings QB] quit hanging out in bars and "doing the things that a young adult likes to do" when he got married before. In fact, I've always understood it to be the case that he continued such acts for some time after he got married. Oh well, I suppose it's too much to ask that announcers recognize that no matter how good of a player he is, he's a deplorable person.
458
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by t.d. :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 9:57pm
Oh? I guess you have some kind of inside knowledge? This isn't Brandon Marshall we're talking about. What kind of personal insight do you have into the man?
So, can anyone who watched the Carolina-Arizona game explain what happened to Warner?
454
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by montanapanthersfan :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 9:10pm
My theory is that those of us who experienced it got teleported into some kind of vortex that was opened during Turnover Siesta I, last year, during the playoffs, and was only shut today.
459
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by wr (not verified) :: Mon, 11/02/2009 - 12:23am
He played a home game. Apparently the football gods have performed a logical
NOT on the Cards' psyche this year such that they rule on the road, and suck toads at home.
460
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Mr Shush :: Mon, 11/02/2009 - 1:19pm
It really was about as un-bad a performance as you can have while throwing five interceptions. From memory, one pass was tipped, one he was hit from the blindside as he threw, one was a slight overthrow on an ok decision where the safety made up an incredible amount of ground to get there, one was a screen where the LT made just enough of a half-assed block on Julius Peppers that he appeared right in the ball's flightpath at exactly the right time to jump up and grab it at full stretch, and one was a deep throw forced at the end of the game when a miracle was required for victory. I do think one reason Warner's INT numbers have always been high is that he carries on trying to win games when the chances of doing so are 1 in a thousand or less, where a lot of other guys (and coaches) would just give up. Also the Cardinals offensive line was getting killed all day.
453
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Dan :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 8:28pm
When the Panthers play the Cardinals, you never know who's going to throw 5 interceptions.
455
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Shane S. (not verified) :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 9:39pm
So, no sunday night game because of the world series?
457
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by Arson55 :: Sun, 11/01/2009 - 9:51pm
Lame, right? It would have been great to watch a random regular season Sunday night game beat the crap out of the World Series in the television rankings.
462
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
by MilkmanDanimal :: Mon, 11/02/2009 - 10:40pm
Elam misses. Clearly, a work of terrorists. Someone should write a novel about it.
I turned on the game just to see the score just in time to see that kick, so I immediately thought, "I must go make some sort of joke related to the book on FO."
I think I'm going to laugh every time I see, hear of, or think about Jason Elam for the rest of my life.
Well, I already did, but that's because my father is still insisting he's a first-ballot Hall of Famer; now, it's because of the book.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I want to kill someone for the Chevrolet commercial they show during the games that involves drawing up a football play on screen . . . there are only 4 offensive linemen. It annoys me every time I see it.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I don't watch Chevrolet commercials as a matter of principle.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
That was an awesome stop by the packrs punter.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Where's JAX @ TEN when you need it?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Tenesee is actualy winning that game, and Jax looks lost. Looks like the same Jax team that got destroyed by Seattle.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
The Vikings just marched down the field with absolutely no trouble.
Captcha: advertising blitzed
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Well, it looks like the Packers defense believes it only had to play one quarter. Vikings march down the field for a TD. 14-3 Vikings.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
In other news, Vince Young is 10/12 for 80 yards and a TD. I have to admit I'm sort of rooting for him.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I'm not, but that's because Kerry Collins won me my first ever fantasy championship basically single-handedly (the year Moss joined the Raiders).
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Vikings QB, if you're going to throw a td pass, at least throw it to adrian peterson, as he's the only viking i have on my FF team.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
The only one I have is Shiancoe. Obviously, [Vikings QB] prefers me to you. I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing, but I'm leaning toward the latter.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
At the kickoff, we can hear they're playing "Born in the USA" in the stadium--should you play such depressing/angry music at a football game?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
But it's patriotic, man! Never mind the words, he's singing about being USA through and through. Booyah!
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I didn't know you were Ronald Reagan!
(I'm hoping it's not a Rule 1 violation to make fun of his not knowing what the song was about--it has no relationship to his politics, so it shouldn't be.)
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
See, I view the song as ultimately uplifting. Sure the narrator's life sucks, but he's able to find happiness from living in the USA.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Explain the painful song-ending scream.
Without just saying, "Of course it's painful--it's Bruce Springsteen."
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I actually like Springsteen. Streets of Philadelphia is one of my favourite songs.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I meant just his voice, in particular his screaming. I'm not a fan of his anyway, but that's all I meant.
I actually do rather like "Streets of Philadelphia" as well as "Adam Raised a Cain."
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Green with a face plant trying to return the KO. High comedy.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
eff you, jared allen.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Packers offense trying to outdo their defense in sucktitude. Rodgers sacked, a short run, and a nearly intercepted pass on that series.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
MJD just went 80 yards for a TD and so he's only down to the Titans by 6.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
AD makes Nick Collins look pretty silly. Aikman still praises Collins.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I could have run through that hole they opened for AD. I have been road kill a second later, but still.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I couldn't have. But I've been timed in the 40 with a sun dial.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Actually, that was kinda my point. Satire doesn't come through in writing very well, sometimes.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
It could be worse. Satire doesn't come through on the internet very well, ever.
Well, not quite ever, but it's far more severe online - especially message boards.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
good lord.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
any doubt that the vikings get at least a 1st down if they go for it here?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Since Childress is going to call the play they use, yes.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
wow. I'm stunned they stopped that.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
It was a great stand.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Not much talk about the Raiders Bolts game. I'll give an update. It's fixing to be another Oakland blowout and Russell looks terrible once again, 21-7 right before the half.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I didn't realise any of that was ever in question?
Starting Vincent Jackson this week was the easiest fantasy decision I've made all season (starting Brady over Hasselbeck every week doesn't qualify as a decision).
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I think I cursed Green Bay by suggesting earlier that they were the lone remaining possible party-crasher of the Philly-New Orleans NFC title game.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Naw, the Packers o-line is made of human turnstiles. As much as I want the [Vikings QB] to lose, I think the Vikings are the better team.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Russell looks terrible? Inconceivable!
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
"You keep saying that word. I don't think it means what you think it means."
:)
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Inconceivable!
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
And of course I started Rodgers in my FF league, thinking, he'll tear apart the vikings secondary. Well, I forgot the league subtracts 2 pts for each sack...
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Is there anyone here who can keep me updated on the Titans game? I'm curious about how Young is going to do.
I've got my eye on the box score, but is he actually looking as good as his stats show? I guess they're short completions, but they are completions.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I'm in Minnesota, so needless to say I'm stuck with the Green Bay Orgy. But, I've been paying some attention to that one online--at halftime Young is 11/13 for 87 yards and a TD and he has 8 carries for 26 yards.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Of course with Childress, anything is possible for this last two minutes...
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Is it sad that I'm tempted to watch the Raiders suck at the Chargers so I don't have to listen to announcers suck up to Favre?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
No. I'm disappointed I had the early CBS game.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
What's more sad is that it's understandable.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I wish I had the choice.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I'm glad I'm not playing a drinking game where you have to drink everytime they drop the f-bomb.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
They are actually pretty much calling the game instead of going over the fact that HE played here for 45 years.
You can overdo it, and I think they're trying not to.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I hate to admit it, but I actually think Aikman handles [Vikings QB] better than just about any announcer. Maybe because he's the only one who has been that kind of iconic player to a franchise?
Captcha: penalized oboists
Whoa. I just hope Iva Davies isn't one of them--he is awesome.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
The Question for the Ages: Is JaMarcus Russell actually worse than Spergon Wynn?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I'm troubled by a deeper question:
Is Derek Anderson actually worse than JaMarcus Russell?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I have a hard time believing that anything could be worse than Russell.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
So do I, but yeesh Anderson is horrendous.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I had to see that guy play football for the Amsterdam Admirals... that guy could throw a 3rd quarter of football, but for the rest he was worthless.
Right now, they're poor CFL/UFL football QBs.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Jimmy Johnson: If the Packers had watched out pre-game show, they'd have known all they have to do is protect Rodgers.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I decided to play zelda during halftime. Twilight princess is an appropriate game, no?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
LOL!
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Crazy statline of the week:
Maurice Jones-Drew: 5 rush for 172 yards, 2 TD.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I am troubled by the prospect that someone laced my keyboard with LSD and what I am watching is not actually real.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Meh, you're playing the Cardinals in November. Only difference to last year is they haven't sewn the division up yet. ;)
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
We're also starting the league-leading turnover machine quarterback, though. Kind of expected a slightly different score.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Are they actually using him as a quarterback, or is he bidding to become the league's leading handoff machine? I actually expected Carolina to at least keep it close if not win outright as long as he was handing off repeatedly.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
At this point, it's purely handoffs. He's only had ten passes. However, Delhomme is the Jason Vorhees of football. He can strike at any time.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
No worries man. It's the bad Cardinals this week.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Harvin makes another big return. He's a scary returner.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Don't you mean scary fast?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I don't think he really is that fast. He's very quick and elusive and he runs tough, but he's not Devin Hester-Randy Moss-Steve Smith (Car) type of fast.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Bernard Berrian is getting checked out. The Vikings appear to be trying to set a record for most people playing injured on one team.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
And, TMQ writes "Game over" in his note book.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
W.T.F.?!? Favre makes an absolutely, completely textbook Favrian chuck the ball into triple coverage. Two out of the three guys in coverage run into each other, Harvin makes the catch and runs it into the end zone. Keystone Cops, indeed.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Break out the "Yakkety Sax" sound track.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Going Raiders/Chargers to avoid Favre mentions backfired big time. That was painful stupid.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
So, are the Packers actually this bad or is this just a bad game?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Their o-line is pretty bad due to injuries and Rodgers tends to hold on to the ball too long. The Packers looked good the last two weeks because they played the Lions and the Chiefs. Plus, the Vikings have a very good football team. The Saints, Eagles, and Vikings are probably the top three teams in the NFC right now.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I'm starting to think that Aaron Rodgers is Craig Morton
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Packers use a time out less than five minutes into the second half. It almost makes me cry when I see that happen.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Pat Williams has been playing well the last few weeks, but Kevin Williams still just doesn't look as good as previous years.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Bad fumble gives the Packers the ball in Vikings territory.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Packers capitalize with a TD! 24-13 Vikings.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
yep, mike mccarthy, field goals are gonna win you this game...although i guess you're only down 2 tds and...wait...
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
wow.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Rodgers throws a bullet into the endzone and now the Packers have a little bit of life.
Oddly, Todd Rundgren begins playing in the stadium.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Packers force a three and out and nearly intercept batted passes on consecutive plays.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Speaking of 2004, Ahman Green with a decent run.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Run after the catch, I mean, sorry.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
MJD- 7 carries, 179 yds, 2tds
C. Johnson- 20carries, 220 yds, 2tds
That has to be some ridiculous, bad defense.
I actually wish I was watching that.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Their TDs have come on 4 carries for 300 yards; other than that they have 23 for 99 yds.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
4 carries of 50 yards or more in one game? That's piss poor defense from both teams.
Plus, 99/23=4.3 yds/carry. Still not great defense.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I think it was Butch Davis for the Browns, but it might have been some other coach vs some other RB - that he didn't think his run defense against Jamal Lewis's 295-yard day was so terrible, because if you took away the two 60+ yard TDs, they held him right at 5 yards per carry.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Arizona fans very loudly cheering the fact that Jake Delhomme is injured and in a lot of pain, even as the play is over and he's writhing on the ground. pretty disgusting...
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
ugh. these games always seem to come down to the last possession anyway, so what i should have done was wait and start watching during the fourth quarter.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Did you remember to start Chris Johnson? He's now got 220 yards and 2 TDs. On 20 carries.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Where has this Packers offense been? Watching the Favrecam?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
After all, Chris Berman told us before the only reason the Jets have won any games this year is that [Vikings QB] was there last year, so perhaps Green Bay can only win games if they watch his dedicated cam.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Wait, what?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/10304388/NFL-on-FOX:-Follow-Favre-Bow...
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
A few weeks ago, when people were all jumping on the Jets bandwagon, Berman said, "They're winning now because [Vikings QB] was there last year. He tought them how to win."
Seriously.
Is saying that it will make the Packers win if they watch his cam any less logical? I don't think so.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I shouldn't be surprised because Berman is one of the stupidest people to ever live, but damn, that's stupid.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
To be fair to him, it was pretty obvious that they were supposed to fill some more time before a commercial and Tom Jackson just had nothing (and it was only the two of them), but I just can't forgive such a ridiculous statement.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
When does Tom Jackson ever have anything?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Well . . . okay, never. I just don't want to pick on him. He played for my Broncos and he was good. Plus I love that he regularly says things like, "You couldn't pay me enough to play for the Raiders." Most talking heads, especially with Madden gone, don't properly respect the intensity of that rivalry.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
So, are we going to have to hear all week about how Vince Young Just Wins Games?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
havner. again.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
This has been a great comeback so far, but why didn't they go for two?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
ok, so while i was playing zelda, the packers have been playing better. well, that's it, gonna just do that again for a while.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Thanks. I'll take all the help we can get. :-)
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Hmm. In one fantasy league, I benched Donovan McNabb in favor of David Garrard. That's looking like a Hall of Fame-level bad decision.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Yea, probably wasn't a good idea.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Garrard-5.76 points
McNabb-21.10 points
I think I'm going to lose by more than 15, but still . . . yuck.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Can't the announcers just say, "[Vikings QB] is good" instead of every time making the argument against a straw man that the Vikings are better off for having him?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I don't know. I think the Vikings are better with Favre.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Does anyone say differently, though?
And yet they keep "proving" every week that they're right--the Vikings are better. (And of course, they're really just proving every time that the Vikings are better this year than last year, not that it's due to the QB.)
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
...and I flip back just in time for the jennings td.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
And that was an amazing catch.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Rule Question - if a 2pt conversion is intercepted and returned for a TD, what happens?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
The two point conversion is unsuccessful.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I think it's two points for the defense, just like in college football.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I don't believe so. I believe they whistle it dead because it's just an unsuccessful two-point conversion.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I'm pretty sure this is right.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I'm 100% sure this is right. I've seen it happen, which was immensely entertaining.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
DHB and Louis Murphy just ran into each other, wiping each other out of a key play. Haha!
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Ironically, Russell has actually been okay today. For all the times he's tried to shift blame for his craptacular performances to his receivers, this time it really is largely their fault.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Should have been a 2 point conversion, except Ryan suddenly loses his ability to catch a football.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
And they pulled within 5 earlier and thought it was a better idea to kick the extra point (which I complained about) to get within 4, so why now is it a better idea to go for two? McCarthy, your lack of mathematical skills has left you dead to me.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
The replay shows that it was deflected by Kevin Williams' Popeye arms.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
So I'm sitting with my girlfriend helping her with an essay instead of watching the Vikings-Packers game.
I go away for like 15 minutes to look over her essay, and I come back.
The score goes from being 24-6 to 31-26.
Can anybody tell me what happened?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Green Bay discovered offense.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
The Packers have suddenly improved their protection. I don't see any reason for it being so much better, but it has been. And then Rodgers has made a few plays by escaping and the Vikings coverage is, as always, pretty poor.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
BS roughing call on Vikings' Ray Edwards and somehow Driver is down. I don't see anything getting bent or twisted wrong or anything but he's just sitting up now.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Driver is able to walk to the sideline and looks ok, so I guess we're at the mercy of the announcers (ACK!) to find out what's wrong there.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Now he's back in. And for the second straight week, we see someone decide the proper way to block Jared Allen is not to.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Damn, DD down?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Looks like he had the wind knocked out of him.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Kick Early , Go for it Late -- it's obvious McCarthy has read too much TMQ
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Cmon, princess, one more TAINT, just for old time's sake...although if I'm going to go w/ the zelda analogy, that would make Rodgers Link, wouldn't it?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
No such luck. Favre to Berrian. 38-26 Vikings.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Haven't GB burned their timeouts in ununsual ways this 2nd half?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
And here comes Childress running the ball and playing for the field goal.
Sigh.
Just once, it might be nice to play to win the game rather than not to lose it.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Obviously, you misunderstand the genius that is Childress.
Or perhaps he is in fact, as he seems, a complete imbecile who has no business coaching a professional football team and the Eagles are still snickering with delight to be rid of him.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I'm still waiting for Childress to lose this game.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Green Bay also seems to have given up on the run and, for them, that's probably a good thing.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
And now they obviously HAVE to pass.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Do you think GB gave up the long run to AP with about 5 minutes left on purpose? Maybe not, but I wonder if defenses ever give up a few extra yards at the end of the game to limit the other team's time of possession. (SF could've done that vs Indianapolis to have a better chance of getting the ball back.)
Of course, you have to hold them to a FG in that Min-GB situation for the strategy to work....
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
To be clear, that's not what I was saying when I posted--I meant they gave up on the run at the start of the second half.
I don't think they gave up on that one, but I think defenses do that. In fact, the Packers claim, whether it's true or not, that they did so in the Super Bowl against Denver. Since it took a few days before they started claiming that, I doubt the veracity of their claim (and it's going to be hard to do that, because you have to overcome all of your usual on-field instincts), but I would all but guarantee that it's done.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
F.U. Princess.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Let's see, GB blitzes, MIN scores, TMQ writes game over in that lil' book of his?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Pretty much goes to show that really any of us could do what he does, right?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
All you have to do is read the column a couple of times and then anyone could, really. I loved TMQ the first time I read it (through FO), but then I continued to read it and see the same things over and over. It's kind of sad, because he obviously had some interesting thoughts once upon a time and then just gave up. And he throws in so many awful, unbelievably bad misunderstandings of science that it makes me cringe.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Game over.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I have never heard someone suggest that [Vikings QB] quit hanging out in bars and "doing the things that a young adult likes to do" when he got married before. In fact, I've always understood it to be the case that he continued such acts for some time after he got married. Oh well, I suppose it's too much to ask that announcers recognize that no matter how good of a player he is, he's a deplorable person.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Oh? I guess you have some kind of inside knowledge? This isn't Brandon Marshall we're talking about. What kind of personal insight do you have into the man?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Because it's well-known that I've lived with Brandon Marshall for 15 years, yes, I see your point.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
So, can anyone who watched the Carolina-Arizona game explain what happened to Warner?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
My theory is that those of us who experienced it got teleported into some kind of vortex that was opened during Turnover Siesta I, last year, during the playoffs, and was only shut today.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
He played a home game. Apparently the football gods have performed a logical
NOT on the Cards' psyche this year such that they rule on the road, and suck toads at home.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
It really was about as un-bad a performance as you can have while throwing five interceptions. From memory, one pass was tipped, one he was hit from the blindside as he threw, one was a slight overthrow on an ok decision where the safety made up an incredible amount of ground to get there, one was a screen where the LT made just enough of a half-assed block on Julius Peppers that he appeared right in the ball's flightpath at exactly the right time to jump up and grab it at full stretch, and one was a deep throw forced at the end of the game when a miracle was required for victory. I do think one reason Warner's INT numbers have always been high is that he carries on trying to win games when the chances of doing so are 1 in a thousand or less, where a lot of other guys (and coaches) would just give up. Also the Cardinals offensive line was getting killed all day.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
When the Panthers play the Cardinals, you never know who's going to throw 5 interceptions.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
So, no sunday night game because of the world series?
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Lame, right? It would have been great to watch a random regular season Sunday night game beat the crap out of the World Series in the television rankings.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
Elam misses. Clearly, a work of terrorists. Someone should write a novel about it.
Re: Week 8 Open Discussion Thread
I turned on the game just to see the score just in time to see that kick, so I immediately thought, "I must go make some sort of joke related to the book on FO."
I think I'm going to laugh every time I see, hear of, or think about Jason Elam for the rest of my life.
Well, I already did, but that's because my father is still insisting he's a first-ballot Hall of Famer; now, it's because of the book.