Markus

It was quite useful reading, found some interesting details about this topic. Thanks.

Honolulu Blue is a great color. I was angry when they jacked around with it a couple of years ago. (Hint: crap of a different color is still crap.) I believe that they went back to the correct blue this season, although it may still have the black trim.

I can understand having an alternate uniform, although if you have history, it ought to be either a throwback look or a new color scheme, not both. I don't understand the need to change colors every couple of years - I guess jersey sales must be a big draw, although I can't say I know anyone personally who's ever said "Gee, now my jersey is the wrong color, I have to buy a new one."

It's too late for the Browns to put a logo on their helmets.

I like the Arizona helmets. I don't think a stripe would look good on them. I don't mind stripes in general, although they ought to be full stripes, not the kind that tail off to a point.

Yes, the Padres' camo uniforms were awful. The Canucks have worn a number of bad jerseys - I think their current ones have a logo that looks like the Sharks' logo. The Islanders' fish-sticks-logo uniforms were bad. Of course, the newer teams have quite a challenge - although there aren't a lot of NHL teams with a long history, IMHO, the ones that do all have classic uniforms, so it's hard to compete with that.

NBA uniforms can be really bad. I think Cleveland has had 10 color schemes in two years.

I liked the Astros' sunset uniforms, but I suspect I was alone in that. Oakland's old green-and-gold was nice.

I better stop before I get any farther into it-was-better-in-the-'70s. :)

I've liked the Bengals' helmets for a long time, and I'm not a Bengals fan.

I also like the Buccaneers' old creamsicle uniforms. I think that uniform gets a bad rap because the team's play was mostly dreadful in them.

oh great I got sucked into replying to an old thread by the spammer.