02 Jul 2009
The always-excellent Stampede Blue has been running a series of features on Finding The Winning Factors, isolating statistics and their relationship to winning. Today's feature is on Drive Success Rate.
9 comments, Last at 03 Jul 2009, 3:54pm by Whelk
Aaron Schatz pores over all the FO stats to break down Sunday's matchups. Do they agree with the oddsmakers and lean Patriots, or do they agree with the general public and lean Giants?
Comments
Re: Finding The Winning Factors
That series is a good exploration of what correlates to wins, and since this particular entry is using one of my favorite FO concepts, DSR, I'm giddy.
Thanks for linking it in XP.
Re: Finding The Winning Factors
Why do people tend to overlook the "Points Scored greater than Points Conceded" statistic as a good indicator of teams winning matches?
Re: Finding The Winning Factors
Because it's too macroscopic. Factors that provide a greater number of samples (performance per down, per drive) and which are more repeatable and consistent are often more useful.
Re: Finding The Winning Factors
More than macroscopic it's just results based.
It doesn't tell you anything about how or why a team won. It's just as interesting as saying wins and losses correlate 100% to wins.
Re: Finding The Winning Factors
@Bright Blue Shorts:
How very Madden of you. "The key to winning is to score more points than the other team..."
Re: Finding The Winning Factors
because it ignores "They Wanted It More" and "Swagger".
Re: Finding The Winning Factors
I remember in the nineties when ESPN used to show hockey, they had Barry Melrose on in between periods, and he was asked what does team X need to do to comeback and win the game, and Melrose said, 'They need to score more goals and not give any up.' Great moment in Barry Melroseness.
Re: Finding The Winning Factors
And then he got another chance to coach, and apparently that was still the extent of his understanding of what makes a team win.
Re: Finding The Winning Factors
Don't want to crash the Colts' lovefest on the DSR page, but another way to look at the DSR stats is to examine the difference between a team's Offensive and Defensive DSR's. Patriots had the largest difference (6.2), Colts a close second (5.7). I think the Steelers were third (5.3). These three teams (with 6 SB winds among them since 2001) stand out from the rest. The next closest were the Eagles (3.4), Denver (2.9), and Ravens (2.4). It makes sense; teams that do the best job of bettering their opponents drive success rates are likely to be the most successful. I suppose other stats could be useful, such as: number of games that a team bettered it's opponents DSR's; average minimal difference score that predicts wins; etc. Giants had a 1.1 differential; I guess the 2007-2008 season was the "perfect storm" scenario for them. Interesting set of stats.
Post new comment