Articles from around the Web
PDF VERSION NOW DISCOUNTED OVER 30%
Click here to buy PDF version.
Click here to buy PDF version
Official Account: @fboutsiders
Scott Kacsmar: @FO_ScottKacsmar
Ben Muth: @FO_WordofMuth
Aaron Schatz: @FO_ASchatz
Vince Verhei: @FO_VVerhei
-- plus --
Bill Connelly: @SBN_BillC
J.J. Cooper: @jjcoop36
Cian Fahey: @Cianaf
Brian Fremeau: @bcfremeau
Tom Gower: @ThomasGower
Andrew Healy: @AndHealy
Rivers McCown: @RiversMcCown
Chad Peltier: @CGPeltier
Matt Waldman: @MattWaldman
Rob Weintraub: @robwein
21 Sep 2010
Adam Caplan reports on Twitter that Texans tackle Duane Brown has been suspended for four games by the NFL.
Posted by: Bill Barnwell on 21 Sep 2010
16 comments, Last at
24 Sep 2010, 6:06am by
From same feed: NFL confirms Duane Brown suspended without pay for four games for violating the NFL policy on performance enhancing substances.
My texans are turning into the saints or something.
Another one of our athletes overworking themselves!
Seriously, though, at what point does this become something fishy in the Texans locker room and not just cases of individual athletes? Just asking...
When there's evidence that there's something fishy in the Texans' locker room? Two people on a squad doesn't seem terribly fishy to me. Certainly it seems reasonable to expect that there would be teams with more than one person juicing even if they hadn't conspired together. If I were to make a guess, I would guess that every locker room has at least two guys in it on PEDs.
The only things that is fishy is how bad HOU is at hiding it. Wait, what...?
grarda placentula (placentula, is that a placenta with 8 legs?)
My purely speculative guess on the number of players in the average NFL locker room using PEDs is somewhere in the 50-53 range. So I wouldn't call 2 players getting caught fishy at all, more like regression toward the mean.
Yeah, I mean assuming that some benefits are derived from using PEDs, surely if one or two players are using then others are almost obliged to follow if they want to compete on a level playing field? In the end nobody is any better off, but if everyone is clean then there will always be the incentive for somebody to cheat. So the only equilibrium status is for everyone to cheat.
Of course the way to prevent this would be to test rigourously, and punish severely. I don't really know how rigourously the NFL tests its players, but they certainly don't seem too interested in severely punishing the ones they catch.
Caught once = 4 game suspension, twice = year suspension, thrice = lifetime suspension.
That seems severe enough to me.
I think the scale of punishments is fine; problem is that I suspect the tests don't really work well enough to catch a large proportion of users even if the regime were more rigourous. There really probably isn't a solution.
Great. This happens this week. Why couldn't he have been suspended a week ago before playing the Redskins? No wonder the Texans won, since their left tackle was cheating!
I thought the same thing initially, but then realized that the Redskins probably would have found some other way to lose that game.
Easterbrook would be so proud!
*caught* cheating. The Redskins players who were cheating too haven't been caught yet, so that is much different ;)
Or two weeks ago! Not that Schaub threw that many passes, but maybe the run game is slowed and Freeney starts his hittin' and strippin' routine a week early....
Actually, I'm pretty happy they didn't let him go a whole season like they did Cushing. (unless he failed the test last December....)
Indications seem to be that the team knew about the coming suspension some time in August, when they brought Ephraim Salaam and Charles Spencer in for a workout. They've now added Salaam to resume his role as the swing tackle while Butler starts.
Will Adrian Peterson leave Minnesota for a warmer climate in 2015?
See All XP | NFL XP | College XP
© Football Outsiders, Inc. // Site powered by Stein-Wein // Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties