Articles from around the Web
PDF VERSION NOW DISCOUNTED OVER 30%
Click here to buy PDF version.
Click here to buy PDF version
Official Account: @fboutsiders
Scott Kacsmar: @FO_ScottKacsmar
Ben Muth: @FO_WordofMuth
Aaron Schatz: @FO_ASchatz
Vince Verhei: @FO_VVerhei
-- plus --
Bill Connelly: @SBN_BillC
J.J. Cooper: @jjcoop36
Cian Fahey: @Cianaf
Brian Fremeau: @bcfremeau
Tom Gower: @ThomasGower
Andrew Healy: @AndHealy
Rivers McCown: @RiversMcCown
Chad Peltier: @CGPeltier
Matt Waldman: @MattWaldman
Rob Weintraub: @robwein
31 May 2013
After the draft, of course, not during it. Still, if you want to know what one of those boards looks like, here you are.
Posted by: Rivers McCown on 31 May 2013
14 comments, Last at
03 Jun 2013, 10:00am by
And the cowboys are, IMO, one of the teams more likely to agree with the talking heads on player grades.
Just goes to show you that when Mel Kiper says a team reached, hes making a wild ass guess.
"What a reach!" = "They have the audacity to disagree with me even though they have 10x more info than I do."
And yet, when there's a reach consensus in the media, more often than not the player does turn out like a reach rather than good value. Recent examples than come to mind are Tyson Jackson, Tyson Alualu, Jake Locker, Christian Ponder... On the flip side, teams are more right than wrong about players that drop. At least it seems that way to me.
As Mr. Sloan always says, there is no "I" in team, but there is an "I" in pie. And there's an "i" in meat pie. Meat is the anagram of team... I don't know what he's talking about
"Value" is an awfully tricky thing to gauge in real time. It's very easy to say "what poor value, he would've been available two rounds later!" But we'll never know if that's actually true. I think it's best to say that if a player was drafted in X round, that player's value at the time was that of an X-rounder. Tom Brady wasn't a first round value that slipped to the sixth round, he was a sixth round value at the time.
With exceptions the other way also. Dwight Freeney was a big reach that the Colts got panned for. But generally, I very much agree with you.
Their was an article (I think on this website) a few year ago comparing the actual draft position to an aggregate of the talking heads best available, and usually taking the BPA on the draftdinks' boards was the right selection.
There are as many examples the other way. Sebastian Vollmer, Russel Wilson, etc.
I'm probably wrong about droppers, now that I think of it, with Aaron Rodgers, Dez Bryant and others serving as counter examples. But Tom Brady and Russell Wilson have nothing to do with this. They both went where they were expected to go -Brady I don't remember much about, but I guess that's the point- and only became steals after they became stars.
But I still think consensus reaches usually don't pan out.
I've thought about this before, and if true, that would make sense to me. Think about the information content. If apick is determined to be a reach, the only information we have is that one team liked that player at the spot. But if a player falls, we have multiple picks with which he could have picked by the team at that spot or via trade and he wasn't.
So while we have Aaron Rodgers as an obvious counterexample, we seem to have many more Brady Quinns, Brian Brohms and Jimmy Clausens. I'd like to see someone look at it, but I'd bet that players who "fall" tend on average to play at the level of their draft position.
Good point, I hadn't thought about that.
Looks like pretty much a best-player-available approach after the 1st round trade-down, with a slight reach at #31 to take Frederick, their highest-rated remaining OL player.
Does it feel to anyone this time Jerry wanted this to leak on purpose? And you probably hit on the reason why.
Letting one draft board leak probably isn't that big a deal. But letting two leak would give a team a lot of information to do trend analysis with. At that point, they can probably make some fairly accurate predictions as to how a future draft board would stack up. If I'm worried about them picking my guy, I have a lot of information at my disposal to help me decide if I need to trade up, can afford to trade down, etc.
They've now let their 2010 and 2013 boards leak, so I guess we'll see if that is true.
That might be true, if it weren't Jerry Jones. It doesn't appear (at least my inferences from media reports) that Jones is very systematic or process-based in his scouting...the impression I get is that he sees a random football game on a Saturday and thinks, "Boy, that guy is fast" or "Wow, what a block", then makes a note to draft that player.
Of course, it is possible that this is completely wrong, but it seems to be the picture that is painted. As a result, I doubt too many other GMs try to predict what he's going to do.
The Vikings need offensive line help, while the Bears, Lions, and Packers have significant defensive concerns.
See All XP | NFL XP | College XP
© Football Outsiders, Inc. // Site powered by Stein-Wein // Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties