Innovative Statistics, Intelligent Analysis
7/26: CLE WR, DET WR, WAS IDP
7/25: GB TE, HOU WR, KC RB/WR
* * * * *
The 2016 KUBIAK fantasy football projection workbook updates all preseason for only $20 -- or get it absolutely free with a $10 first-time deposit at FanDuel.com. Purchase it here!
Target release date: August 1
Top 35 quarterbacks charted for 2015 with scouting notes. PDF only $9.99
Click here to buy PDF version
Need help on FanDuel or DraftKings? Purchase a subscription from the website that specializes in daily fantasy.
13 Apr 2009
I've participated in both traditional and auction drafting leagues, and they both have their advantages and disadvantages. What do people think is the better draft method?
Posted by: tester on 13 Apr 2009
6 replies , Last at
10 Jul 2009, 6:40am by
I thought these were gonna be verified only?
or is it verified only to start threads?
or is your name actually "Who are you (not verified)"?
I'm all for traditional. Traditional you're trying to beat your opponents. Auction you're trying to beat the system.
Auction adds another level of complexity. An auction helps balance the team because no one person can afford all the best players. This works especially well in the smaller leagues.
I think that Auction is the truer test of projection and team-building skills. You can have every player you want as long as they all fit in your budget. There's also far more strategy in the Auction format (which is not to say there is NO strategy in a Snake Draft -- there certainly is.).
Auctions are a pain, though. Tough to set up; tough to get a group of 10-12 guys who are all on board with the complexity; timely to complete; harder to devise a fair keeper format, etc.
I love playing in both, but I think if I lost out on playing, the auction is what I would miss more. I would like to add another auction league to play in, one without keepers because of how skewed our values end up. The nice thing about snakes is how easily you can hop in and draft. I suppose that's part of the appeal of the auction - feeling even more of a sense of ownership after the more grueling process of filling your roster.
I do agree with above though about the keeper format. Our is you can keep up to five players at the prior year's cost plus $3, so rosters end up half-filled with the RB backups who broke out. It's nice in its own way (especially when you have some good ones locked up), but I would like to try other formats.
Once I did an auction, I've never gone back. I agree with all of the advantages mentioned. I'd also add that it's the "no excuses" format. Getting randomly assigned a draft position and having to wait upwards of 20+ picks limits your ability to truly pick your own team. With an auction, you have no one to blame but yourself for what you got. Plus it is just more fun to be involved in every player nominated versus mindlessly crossing names off a list until your turn is up.
© Football Outsiders, Inc. // Site powered by Stein-Wein // Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties