Minor weaknesses dot these teams. Except for Arizona, which needs to bring in more help to really run Bruce Arians' offense.
09 Dec 2009
by Brian Fremeau
Florida punted midway through the third quarter of last weekend’s SEC Championship Game, trailing by 13 points but still within striking distance for a comeback. The Crimson Tide then embarked on a 17-play, 88-yard drive culminating in a Mark Ingram touchdown run, eroding nearly 10 minutes of game clock, and snuffing out the potential for a miracle finish by the Gators. Javier Arenas’ end zone interception of Tim Tebow officially christened the victory on the next series, but the Alabama offense delivered it. Is there any doubt that it was the most important drive of the year in college football?
It wasn’t strictly the longest possession of the year, per se, but it may have been the most impressive. Out of the more than 17,000 offensive possessions in 2009, there were six FBS drives of at least 20 plays, and 68 of at least 17 plays. (Way back on Oct. 6, Arizona State had a 22-play, 94-yard scoring drive against Oregon State, albeit in meaningless garbage time -- and in a losing effort). There were only 23 drives of at least 17 plays that resulted in a touchdown. Only 14 such drives belonged to the victor in the game and only 10 of those took place in the second half. Four of those drives are classified as the final or penultimate non-garbage possession of the game.
| Longest game-clinching non-garbage touchdown drives in 2009 | ||||||
| Team | Opponent | Plays | Yards | Time of Poss |
Opp FEI | Opp Def FEI |
| Alabama | Florida | 17 | 88 | 8:47 | 2 | 17 |
| Georgia Tech | North Carolina | 17 | 76 | 8:20 | 25 | 7 |
| Texas Tech | Oklahoma | 18 | 80 | 7:02 | 22 | 8 |
| Texas A&M | New Mexico | 17 | 88 | 6:15 | 111 | 95 |
Florida faced 117 opponent non-garbage possessions this season, and 49 percent of those lasted only three plays or fewer. Before the game-clinching drive in the SEC championship, Florida had only given up two non-garbage touchdowns all season on opponent drives that began at or inside the opponent’s 20-yard line. Only 15 out of 79 opponent drives that began at or inside the opponent’s 30-yard line resulted in a score of any kind against Florida this season -- six of these drives were produced by the Crimson Tide offense on Saturday. In terms of game-specific Offensive FEI -- efficiency adjusted for opponent -- Alabama had the single best offensive game of the 2009 college football season.
Compare that to Texas, who faced an almost impenetrable Nebraska defense on Saturday night, eking out a victory in the final harrowing seconds to clinch a spot in the BCS championship game. Colt McCoy and Texas’ offense took the field 16 times in the game, twice as many non-garbage opportunities as Alabama, but only managed 13 points. Against Nebraska and Oklahoma, the two best defenses the Longhorns faced in 2009, Texas’ offense never could find their rhythm. An average offense against an average defense would have expected to score more than 66 points with Texas’ starting field position in those two games -- Texas scored only 29 total points.
For their part, the Longhorns’ defense dominated their side of the ball in those games, setting up Texas for enough short field position situations to knock in a few clutch field goals and pull out victory in the end. But with a championship tilt against the nation’s best defense looming, the Longhorns are going to need to figure out how to jumpstart their offensive attack. Otherwise, workhorse Mark Ingram and the ball-hogging Crimson Tide will roll to a national championship victory.
The principles of the Fremeau Efficiency Index (FEI) can be found here. Like DVOA, FEI rewards playing well against good teams, win or lose, and punishes losing to poor teams more harshly than it rewards defeating poor teams. Unlike DVOA, it is drive-based, not play-by-play based, and it is specifically engineered to measure the college game.
FEI is the opponent-adjusted value of Game Efficiency (GE), a measurement of the success rate of a team scoring and preventing opponent scoring throughout the non-garbage-time possessions of a game. Like DVOA, it represents a team's efficiency value over average. Strength of Schedule (SOS) is calculated as the likelihood that an elite team would win every game on the given team's schedule to date. SOS listed here does not include future games scheduled.
Only games between FBS teams are considered in the FEI calculations. Preseason projections are not a factor in the current calculations. Current FEI ratings are a function of results of games played through December 5th.
FEI ratings for all 120 FBS teams are now listed in the stats page section of FootballOutsiders.com. Click here for current ratings; the pull-down menu in the stats section directs you to 2007 and 2008 ratings.
| Rank | Team | FBS W-L |
FEI | Last Wk |
GE | GE Rk |
SOS | SOS Rk |
OE | OE Rk |
Off FEI |
OFEI Rk |
DE | DE Rk |
Def FEI |
DFEI Rk |
FPA | FPA Rk |
| 1 | Alabama | 12-0 | .330 | 1 | .289 | 4 | .137 | 26 | .288 | 25 | .502 | 7 | -.658 | 3 | -.677 | 1 | .524 | 28 |
| 2 | Florida | 11-1 | .260 | 2 | .258 | 6 | .124 | 21 | .330 | 21 | .374 | 14 | -.434 | 14 | -.377 | 17 | .547 | 14 |
| 3 | Texas | 13-0 | .245 | 3 | .352 | 2 | .461 | 93 | .398 | 15 | .397 | 9 | -.666 | 2 | -.451 | 11 | .560 | 6 |
| 4 | Oregon | 10-2 | .245 | 5 | .191 | 11 | .132 | 25 | .415 | 13 | .509 | 6 | -.340 | 21 | -.368 | 20 | .502 | 59 |
| 5 | Virginia Tech | 9-3 | .240 | 4 | .205 | 10 | .110 | 14 | .203 | 31 | .326 | 18 | -.449 | 13 | -.432 | 13 | .558 | 8 |
| 6 | Cincinnati | 11-0 | .239 | 6 | .266 | 5 | .288 | 59 | .898 | 1 | .523 | 5 | -.115 | 42 | -.233 | 31 | .510 | 47 |
| 7 | Georgia Tech | 10-2 | .228 | 9 | .112 | 25 | .154 | 30 | .511 | 9 | .707 | 1 | .265 | 95 | .027 | 66 | .507 | 54 |
| 8 | TCU | 11-0 | .212 | 7 | .347 | 3 | .465 | 94 | .268 | 27 | .194 | 30 | -.673 | 1 | -.423 | 14 | .569 | 4 |
| 9 | Ohio State | 10-2 | .207 | 8 | .218 | 7 | .291 | 60 | -.012 | 59 | .163 | 35 | -.655 | 4 | -.577 | 4 | .558 | 10 |
| 10 | Miami | 8-3 | .203 | 10 | .102 | 29 | .142 | 29 | .179 | 33 | .337 | 16 | -.163 | 36 | -.369 | 19 | .516 | 37 |
| 11 | Iowa | 9-2 | .202 | 11 | .119 | 24 | .193 | 37 | -.169 | 85 | .068 | 52 | -.546 | 7 | -.599 | 3 | .512 | 44 |
| 12 | Arizona | 7-4 | .196 | 15 | .090 | 33 | .100 | 10 | .054 | 45 | .207 | 28 | -.213 | 33 | -.332 | 22 | .525 | 26 |
| Rank | Team | FBS W-L |
FEI | Last Wk |
GE | GE Rk |
SOS | SOS Rk |
OE | OE Rk |
Off FEI |
OFEI Rk |
DE | DE Rk |
Def FEI |
DFEI Rk |
FPA | FPA Rk |
| 13 | Oregon State | 7-4 | .188 | 12 | .128 | 22 | .124 | 23 | .331 | 20 | .329 | 17 | .106 | 70 | .006 | 62 | .548 | 12 |
| 14 | Stanford | 8-4 | .187 | 13 | .134 | 20 | .138 | 28 | .539 | 8 | .669 | 2 | .358 | 103 | .232 | 92 | .562 | 5 |
| 15 | Pittsburgh | 8-3 | .187 | 16 | .168 | 16 | .365 | 74 | .328 | 22 | .274 | 20 | -.111 | 43 | -.258 | 28 | .534 | 22 |
| 16 | Penn State | 9-2 | .181 | 17 | .217 | 8 | .394 | 81 | .256 | 29 | .190 | 31 | -.644 | 5 | -.543 | 6 | .512 | 45 |
| 17 | LSU | 9-3 | .179 | 18 | .136 | 19 | .070 | 4 | -.080 | 72 | .091 | 46 | -.412 | 15 | -.453 | 10 | .543 | 15 |
| 18 | Boise State | 12-0 | .179 | 14 | .403 | 1 | .599 | 114 | .579 | 6 | .074 | 50 | -.458 | 11 | -.364 | 21 | .578 | 3 |
| 19 | Clemson | 7-5 | .169 | 19 | .098 | 30 | .118 | 18 | -.048 | 66 | .165 | 34 | -.221 | 32 | -.387 | 16 | .548 | 13 |
| 20 | USC | 8-4 | .167 | 20 | .057 | 43 | .090 | 8 | .057 | 44 | .234 | 25 | -.229 | 30 | -.251 | 29 | .502 | 58 |
| 21 | Texas Tech | 7-4 | .150 | 21 | .170 | 14 | .222 | 47 | .322 | 23 | .380 | 13 | -.377 | 17 | -.208 | 33 | .512 | 43 |
| 22 | Oklahoma | 6-5 | .148 | 22 | .131 | 21 | .201 | 41 | .028 | 49 | .038 | 57 | -.530 | 8 | -.544 | 5 | .507 | 52 |
| 23 | Arkansas | 6-5 | .137 | 23 | .091 | 32 | .054 | 1 | .415 | 14 | .382 | 12 | .011 | 59 | -.147 | 39 | .519 | 34 |
| 24 | Nebraska | 9-4 | .131 | 33 | .179 | 13 | .227 | 48 | -.141 | 81 | -.212 | 93 | -.577 | 6 | -.472 | 8 | .552 | 11 |
| 25 | North Carolina | 6-4 | .124 | 24 | .029 | 50 | .123 | 20 | -.271 | 96 | .014 | 61 | -.360 | 19 | -.529 | 7 | .481 | 85 |
This is the final regular FEI update of the year, but we'll be back in a couple of weeks with bowl previews.
9 comments, Last at 11 Dec 2009, 5:33pm by beargoggles
Comments
Re: Week 14 FEI Ratings
Great analysis, and confirms my understanding that it was the offense more than the defense that won the game for the Tide.
Re: Week 14 FEI Ratings
Nice work Brian. I'm curious if this Championship game has the biggest FEI gap in the BCS era (or as long back as FEI goes).
Re: Week 14 FEI Ratings
So Cincy's SOS is twice as impressive as TCU's. Confirms my general feeling.
Re: Week 14 FEI Ratings
My general feeling is different. I don't think Cincinnati's schedule is that much tougher than TCU's.
In general, I think FEI overrates both the Big East and the ACC. Someone had a nice theory last week about how the ACC might be "fooling" FEI, and I think a similar reasoning would apply to the Big East. Cincinnati is the Georgia Tech of the Northeast.
Re: Week 14 FEI Ratings
Maybe I missed this in an earlier article, but the SOS, GE and FPA look pretty similar for TCU and Texas. What is it that creates the FEI separation?
Re: Week 14 FEI Ratings
And if Ciny is undefeated against a significantly harder schedule than both...?
Re: Week 14 FEI Ratings
Another angle to look from is yards/play ( http://www.godismyjudgeok.com/CFB_Rank_091209.php ). Here, too, Texas is simply not as good as Alabama or Florida.
I would dispute that Texas really had that weak of a schedule--in looking through the lens of adjusted yards/play, they played the 20th-best schedule.
How exactly are the adjustments for strength of schedule added to the rating, and how are the offensive and defensive ratings combined? I am very surprised to see the top teams so relatively weak--Florida is only 14th on offense and 17th on defense? How are they then ahead of Texas, whose (adjusted) ranks are 9th and 11th? The math seems a little peculiar.
Re: Week 14 FEI Ratings
I've been kind of watching the Pac-10 ratings all year and have a SOS question. UCLA's SOS is rated the toughest in the Pac-10 at 7, USC is 8 and Washington is 9.
Washington played the same schedule as UCLA except:
Wash: 17 LSU, 26 ND, 42 UCLA, 100 Idaho
UCLA: 30 Tenn, 50 Wash, 75 Kansas St., 106 SD St.
Plus Washington got an extra pac-10 home game.
Assuming the road games vs. ND and Tenn wash, and the home games vs. Idaho and SDSU even out, and playing each other evens out (though all three were rated slightly tougher for UW), that means that Washington's extra home game was worth more than the difference between hosting KSU and LSU.
If you take away the WSU game (UW got them at home, UCLA on the road), where assumedly the home/road didn't matter much for SOS, it boils down to UW getting USC and Arizona at home and UCLA getting ASU and Washington at home (with UW getting UCLA and ASU on road and UCLA getting USC and Arizona on road).
For Husky fans, not only does that LSU vs. K-State schedule difference mean that the hated Neuheisel gets to take his team to a bowl, and our beloved Sarkisian doesn't, it doesn't even get us a better FEI SOS number! Footballoutsiders.com has never let me down like this before....
Re: Week 14 FEI Ratings
Maybe FEI is smart enough to know the difference between UCLA playing Cal and UW playing BadCal. ;)
You're right that doesn't make sense. Who's responsible for UW nonconference death marches of recent years, anyway? Willingham?
Post new comment