Writers of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

Most Recent FO Features

FolesNic12.jpg

» 2014 KUBIAK vs. ADP: The Overrated

Where does KUBIAK differ most strongly from public opinion, and which players are most likely to disappoint their owners in the upcoming fantasy football season?

02 Jan 2014

Film Room: Aaron Rodgers

by Cian Fahey

Ever since the Pittsburgh Steelers won the Super Bowl back in 2005, the distribution of seeds of Super Bowl champions has changed. Before the Steelers won that year, an incredible 12 of the previous 14 winners had entered the playoffs as either a one or a two seed. The Steelers were the first six seed in NFL history to lift the Lombardi trophy. Since then a lower seed winning the Super Bowl has occurred frequently

In 2010, the Green Bay Packers became only the second six seed in NFL history to win the Super Bowl. Since the Steelers in 2005, only twice has a one or two seed won the Super Bowl. This dramatic change has affected our anticipation of the postseason.

Recent playoff runs from lesser teams have given lower seeds more to believe in. No matter how much a team has struggled during the regular season, they still feel that they can win in January and February. Even teams that are decimated with injuries have plenty of evidence that suggests they can step up against healthier opposition.

Last season, the Baltimore Ravens defied the odds and lifted the Lombardi trophy. The Ravens had plenty of injuries and weaknesses that were exploited during the regular season, but they still overcome the Colts, Broncos, Patriots and 49ers in the playoffs. Joe Flacco rightfully got a huge amount of credit for the playoff run, but he was just he was just one of many Ravens to perform at a much higher level in the playoffs than they did during the regular season.

The sample size is so small in the playoffs that it doesn't take much to build momentum. One big performance or one emotional event can push a team to unforeseen heights. When that team has a quarterback playing to his potential, then you've got the makings of an upset.

Flacco's performances from last year are fresh in the mind. As are Eli Manning's performances in both of the Giants' Super Bowl runs. While Ben Rothlisberger’s Super Bowl performance in 2005 was sub-par, his play during the remainder of the playoffs was exemplary.

That all being said, the level of Aaron Rogers' play during the Packers 2010 Super Bowl run is unrivaled.

The Packers endured a horrible season in 2010. They lost many key players to injury for the season and entered Week 17 still fighting to make the playoffs. Victory over the Chicago Bears got them a six seed. From there, Rodgers enjoyed one of the most impressive stretches of quarterback play in NFL history. He routinely cut defenses apart with perfect poise and execution. Even when the opposition played him perfectly, he still was successful. It was Rodgers' way of announcing himself as one of the NFL's elite quarterbacks.

Rodgers has continued to be an elite quarterback since then and he was enjoying an excellent season this year until he was injured in Week 9. He broke his collarbone on his non-throwing shoulder and was kept out until Week 17. In Week 17, the Packers needed a victory against the division-rival Bears to make the playoffs. It was a familiar situation for all involved.

The Packers shouldn't have even been in that position. Just as in their last Super Bowl-winning season, injuries to key players on both sides of the ball have really hurt them. Key players such as Jermichael Finley, Bryan Bulaga and Casey Hayward were all ruled out for the season early on, while Clay Matthews has been in and out of the lineup and isn't expected to be back for the postseason.

Yes, the Packers did beat the Bears and won the NFC North, but that's not really notable. What's notable is whether Rodgers looked like the player who could take over the playoffs and turn the Packers into this season's surprise underdog. Before Rodgers broke his collarbone, he was enjoying a very impressive season. It wasn't his greatest, as inconsistency in his mechanics was affecting his accuracy, but he was still covering up for a poor offensive line and executing a well-crafted offense from Mike McCarthy.

These charts do not include throwaways, spikes, balls tipped at the line of scrimmage or passes that are interpreted as wide receiver-quarterback miscommunications.

As the above chart shows, Rogers was very accurate though his accuracy wavered on some of his deep throws. Typically throughout his career Rodgers has been an outstanding deep passer. He was still a very good deep passer before his injury, but just not up to his usual standards. Instead, he established the offense with shorter throws that fit into the quick passing offense that McCarthy appeared to be encouraging.

With such dangerous weapons as Jordy Nelson, James Jones, Randall Cobb, and Finley on the field, Rodgers didn't need to force the ball down the field for the Packers to enjoy big plays. After the injury, neither Matt Flynn or Scott Tolzien could really replicate what Rodgers had been doing on the field. With some luck and great effort from the rest of the team, the Packers survived without Rodgers, but just barely. Expectations for his return in Week 17 were ambiguous. He had been out longer than expected, so there was genuine concern whether he was fully healthy or not.

Rodgers had two questions to answer in Week 17. Could he get the team to the playoffs? How optimistic should they be once they got there? The first is easily answered: he got them to the playoffs. The second requires closer attention.

There was clearly some rust. However, if you were looking for reasons to be optimistic as a Packers fan in Week 17, Rodgers gave you plenty. McCarthy continued to focus on quicker passes to the outside to set up the offense. As you'd expect, Rodgers could easily make those throws and he did so with routine effort. However, it was his downfield throwing that really stood out.

There were some passes that could have been placed slightly better, but it would still be a stretch to call them inaccurate. He did miss his receivers on occasion, once notably when Nelson was open in the end zone and Rodgers pushed the ball too high for him to go and get it. But on the whole, Rodgers showed the velocity and accuracy that is his norm.

For all of the positive plays he made, the negatives must be addressed first. Rodgers threw two interceptions early. That must have had onlookers worried in the first half, but in a sense they would inevitably be blessings in disguise because they showed that Rodgers wasn't doubting himself when he rebounded.

Early in the first quarter, Rodgers had driven the offense down the field to the red zone. At the goal line, the Bears had a free rusher off the edge so the veteran quarterback was quickly flushed into the right flat. As he extended the play across the field, tight end Andrew Quarless extended his route from a curl over the middle so that it worked back to the pylon. As Rodgers let the ball go to where he was running, Quarless stopped to move back inside again. That allowed the defender to catch an uncontested pass.

The first interception was definitely not on the quarterback, but the second appeared to be his fault.

There was some evidence of rust in Rogers’ play. Rodgers has proven his accuracy over many seasons. One of the strongest aspects of his accuracy is his ball placement. Rodgers routinely puts the ball in perfect spots for his receivers to make hands catches without breaking stride. It is a huge contributing factor that allows his receivers to create yards after the catch.

On the second interception, the pass does hit Nelson's hands, but it is high, hard and behind in a situation that didn't call for that kind of pass. Nelson was running into huge space and Rodgers wasn't under much pressure in the pocket. His timing was off and he rushed the throw in a situation when he didn't need to rush the throw. That is the kind of play a player who hasn't been playing regularly makes.

Even though there were some negative plays, Rodgers had many more impressive plays that highlighted why the Packers are going to be a dangerous team to face this weekend.

On just his second pass attempt of the game, Rodgers diagnoses a blitz before the snap. He initially gets the defense to show their intentions with a hard-count early in the play-clock. That hard-count makes the slot cornerback jump forward and he eventually moves down so he is next to the defensive line. When the slot cornerback does that, the safety to his side of the field rotates down towards the line of scrimmage and the other safety rotates to the middle of the field.

Rodgers walks up to his center and points out the new blocking assignment before turning to Eddie Lacy and instructing him on what his new assignment is. This isn't the type of play that Tolzien or Flynn would have made in his absence.

After the snap, Rodgers shows off outstanding poise and awareness as he goes through his progressions despite the incoming pass-rush. He trusts his blockers to handle their assignments, and he complements their work with subtle movements in the pocket. Rodgers initially looks to his left where Quarless is running in-field, however he sees that Julius Peppers drops into space so the quick throw won't be available. After working to the other side of the field and finding no pass he felt comfortable with, he came back to Quarless who kept working in his route to find space by the sideline for a nine-yard completion.

Throughout the game, Rodgers showed off his mental aptitude and physical prowess. He didn't appear to be as comfortable as he normally is, but he was almost as effective.

He should only get better with more time on the field. Considering just how talented he is and how talented the Packers offense is around him, that could be terrifying for the rest of the field in the NFC. From Weeks 1-8, the Packers had 46.0% passing DVOA, which ranked fourth in the NFL during that period. With Rodgers out during Weeks 9-16, that dropped to -15.0%, which ranked 26th. And yet, over the course of the year, Eddie Lacy has helped the Packers' run offense to rank third in DVOA. Rodgers has never had a running game as good as the one he has now. Over the past three seasons, the Packers have ranked 13th, seventh, and 10th in rushing DVOA, but the Packers' efficiency running the ball came in part because teams were focused on stopping Rodgers and all of his weapons. This year, Lacy has proven that he can be the focal point of the offense and still have huge success.

Posted by: Cian Fahey on 02 Jan 2014

22 comments, Last at 03 Jan 2014, 1:07pm by Jimmy

Comments

1
by Jimmy Cephalopathy (not verified) :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 1:27pm

Re: the running game, a continuing source of frustration is McCarthy repeatedly going back to those dumb stretch plays and outside pitches that even the Bears run D stuffed. When you spread teams out and force them to go smaller and faster, the inside counter is what works, and is what has worked for the Packers this year. I understand that the stretch play helps set up the naked boots that can be very effective, but still.

7
by Techvet (not verified) :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 3:35pm

Actually, the frustration is that McCarthy doesn't go to Starks more, but maybe we'll see more of him in the playoffs.

2
by Anonymousdeqdfew (not verified) :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 1:34pm

Can't believe you haven't done a film room on Philip Rivers as he presents the most interesting case of any QB.

3
by ebongreen :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 2:07pm

FWIW, there was a second receiver (Boykin, I believe) on INT #1 at the back of the end zone for whom I believe Rodgers was aiming his throw. Conte came off Quarless and undercut the ball for the pick as it was airborne.

4
by Cian Fahey :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 2:52pm

If he was trying to find that other receiver, it was one of his most inaccurate passes of the season. Makes more sense that he was looking for Quarless.

9
by archibaldcrane (not verified) :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 3:44pm

I thought he was going for Boykin too, and just simply didn't see Quarless's defender. He would've had Boykin if the Quarless's defender didn't flash in front.

11
by Ryan :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 4:06pm

An interesting glimpse into your film study. Occam's Razor here. Looked like he was going to Boykin; says he's targeting Boykin after the game. Yes, it was really that bad of a throw and decision.

12
by tuluse :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 4:39pm

I normally love your work, but I think you're having a Phil Simms moment right now.

The pass was heading straight for Boykin in the back of the endzone, and Conte just cuts underneath it.

13
by Jimmy :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 4:46pm

Not to mention that if Rodgers had thrown to the short man Anderson is going to be all over it.

14
by Cian Fahey :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 5:02pm

I think it was underthrown. I am by no means stating that I am right, just saying what I saw.

It would be interesting if Rodgers was trying to take all the blame considering all the drama from the offseason about that very issue.

17
by jonnyblazin :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 10:20pm

I'll back up Cian and say I thought the pass was to Quarless when I saw it live. If he continues his route its probably incomplete because the defender had good coverage, but maybe Quarless makes the catch. The one thing he couldn't do was stop his route, the QB has to trust his receivers there to keep going.

22
by Jimmy :: Fri, 01/03/2014 - 1:07pm

Even if everything you and Cian are saying is true it is still either; a crappy throw or scrappy decision. Either way it is on Rodgers and it is a mistake. There wasn't an open receiver in the area but there were plenty of defenders. Why are folks bending over backwards to defend what is crappy QB play any way you look at it.

18
by Packer Pete (not verified) :: Fri, 01/03/2014 - 8:46am

I'm convinced the throw was for Boykin and was a poor throw. First, Conte was all over Quarles. Rodgers would have anticipated Quarles coming to a quick halt to shed Conte. Packer receivers do this routinely in the end zone. Secondly, following the pick, Rodgers body language was not directed in any manner towards Quarles for doing an unexpected move. Rodgers had thrown a low ball towards the mid-depth of the end zone hoping Boykin, who was fairly tightly covered, could come back to the ball. Rodgers' reaction was surprise that Conte appeared from nowhere to snag the ball.

5
by Perfundle :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 2:56pm

Regarding getting the defense to show their intentions with a hard count: if the offense can switch their playcall after seeing the defensive formation, why can't the defense as well? Can't the defense have a backup in case the offense sniffs out the first one? Sticking with a blitz that the offense now knows is coming doesn't seem like a good idea against smart QBs.

8
by Cian Fahey :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 3:41pm

It's something better defenses do.

19
by Packer Pete (not verified) :: Fri, 01/03/2014 - 8:55am

The problem to changing defenses is that the defense doesn't know the snap count. After the hard count shows the defensive intentions to the QB, the defensive signal caller has only 2 to 4 seconds before the real snap count to make adjustments and must signal this change to players spread sideline to sideline and to players facing away from him. A confused, mismatched defense is a likely result.

20
by Perfundle :: Fri, 01/03/2014 - 10:12am

A good point, and we do see the QB changing the protection by going it over with each linemen. But we also see the QB shouting "kill kill kill" to immediately change to the backup playcall, so the defense should have something similar that doesn't involve protracted signaling.

21
by tuluse :: Fri, 01/03/2014 - 11:15am

The Bears did have one neat play, where Conte showed a blitz, and Rodgers saw it and called an audible. So the Bears started yelling out their own audible and Conte backed off. Then he came on a blitz anyways.

I always like the double bluff.

6
by Jimmy Cephalopathy (not verified) :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 3:15pm

Rodgers specifically said in his postgame that he was going for Boykin. He mentioned not seeing Conte come off Quarless until it was too late.

10
by Cian Fahey :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 4:04pm

Didn't see that. Thanks.

15
by Paul Ott Carruth (not verified) :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 5:18pm

The play in which Rodgers gets the defense to show its intentions is an example of a fire zone blitz. It is a 3 under 3 deep zone defense. You'll notice that Briggs is responsible for covering Nelson in the middle of the field (#3 player). Peppers is responsible for the SCIF (Seam/Curl/Flat)....aka Bronco player. The safety (Conte) who has rotated down to the trips side of the formation is also a SCIF/Bronco player to that side. Both corners are playing a bail technique to drop to their deep firezone 1/3 on the outside. Great adjustment by Quarless to recognize the coverage scheme.

16
by Nathan :: Thu, 01/02/2014 - 7:00pm

Say it loud, he's back and proud.

I see what you did there.