08 Nov 2011
The Patriots offense is in trouble, and the biggest component is the team's inability to stretch the field.
15 comments, Last at 10 Nov 2011, 2:32pm by Karl Cuba
Offensive line problems highlight the needs in the NFC North ... except in Chicago, which is kind of unsettling to think about.
Comments
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
Is AGS about a big upset from the week or just how 1 team was able to beat another team? I used to think Option A but assume Option B since NYG is above NE in DVOA
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
They use Vegas lines to determine upsets not DVOA
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
And for some reason, this question has been the first comment on a number of AGS this season.
AGS is partly about making advanced stats look smart, so it's likely to feature a team that DVOA favors and Vegas or common wisdom does not.
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
There's also the "sex appeal" factor. Dolphins-Chiefs was essentially one bad team beating another. Giants-Pats was a Super Bowl contender suffering a surprising home loss. Especially to casual fans, that sells more Insider subscriptions.
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
For Comparison sake, is their an offense that is good at throwing deep but doesn't score alot of points.
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
The Cowboys are currently 4th in success rate on deep balls, but 19th in points scored.
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
That's because they suck in the Red Zone. Whether it's luck, or scheme, or personnel, they've been very bad when they get within the 20.
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
So, they indeed are "an offense that is good at throwing deep but doesn't score alot[sic] of points."
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
I had expected Dolphins over Chiefs....
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
Is a pass of 15 yards really deep, it's more intermediate isn't it? I would have thought 20+ yards to be deep and even then I'd want a bomb category as well.
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
A few things:
1) The NFL play-by-play sorts passes into "deep" or "short," with 15 yards the cutoff line. We can go in manually and sort them using whatever distance we want, but it takes a little longer.
2) When you start going over 20 or over 25 yards, you start to run into sample size issues, especially in half a season.
3) The average "deep" pass went 24.9 yards past the line of scrimmage. The median "deep" pass went 21 yards past the line of scrimmage. So it's not as if the data is dominated by 16-yarders.
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
Cheers Vince,
1) OK then that's entirely understandable. (which make my other comments seem pedantic but Im OK with that, it's FO)
2) I would have expected the sample size to reduce dramatically, it's a quick, short passing league.
3) Doesn't the combination of your points 2 & 3 mean that the mean and median averages would climb if you modified the criteria to a 20+ yard pass?
How long has the NFL measured 15 yards as deep? If predates the mid-70s then that yardstick could be out of date.
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
Doesn't the combination of your points 2 & 3 mean that the mean and median averages would climb if you modified the criteria to a 20+ yard pass?
Presumably the removal of all the 15-19 yard pass plays would inherently cause the mean and median to increase, no?
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
Yeah. By definition, if you remove the smallest numbers from any set of data, the mean and median will rise.
Re: ESPN AGS: Giants over Patriots
OK, I meant that it would climb precipitously.
Post new comment