16 Jan 2009
In this ESPN Insider feature, Doug Farrar looks at how Donovan McNabb performed before and after the Cardinals game that marked the Eagles turnaround. (Insider subscription is required.)
8 comments, Last at 20 Jan 2009, 4:13pm by tuluse
Offensive line problems highlight the needs in the NFC North ... except in Chicago, which is kind of unsettling to think about.
Comments
Re: Eagles Began Turnaround With Arizona
I think it's somewhat misleading to divide McNabb's season into pre- and post-benching periods. Most accounts that I've read, including this one, make it sound like he had been struggling the whole season prior to the benching, but this really isn't the case. As Aaron pointed out in the NFC championship preview, McNabb's slump lasted all of two games (actually a game and a half due to the benching). He played well for the 9 games before that and for the 7 games since.
My view is that we don't need the benching or anything other event to explain how he played afterward. That's more or less his normal level of play. He had a couple of bad games, like all quarterbacks do on occasion, the only difference being that his coach decided to make a drastic move in the middle of one of them.
Re: Eagles Began Turnaround With Arizona
My view is that we don't need the benching or anything other event to explain how he played afterward. That's more or less his normal level of play. He had a couple of bad games, like all quarterbacks do on occasion, the only difference being that his coach decided to make a drastic move in the middle of one of them.
Agreed. Granted, his DVOA was really bad in a couple of mid-season games, and most of his best performances in the year came post-benching, but it's really more of a "media-loves-a-storyline" thing than anything else.
Re: Eagles Began Turnaround With Arizona
I agree. Benching McNabb had more to do with the typical Philadelphia crisis-of-confidence in McNabb than overall poor performance from him. He's a good quarterback and he had a brief slump.
Re: Eagles Began Turnaround With Arizona
I don't quite think that's true. I think Reid benched him for a perfectly valid reason - he was struggling. He had every reason to struggle, too - his wife delivered twins ~two-three weeks later.
He even admitted later that he was distracted during that period. He said he tried to have it not impact his performance on the field, but come on.
I dunno why everyone points to the benching as the reason for McNabb's turnaround rather than his wife giving birth. Most of the players on the team (Dawkins, Westbrook) refer to the twins being born rather than the benching as the reason for why McNabb seems more "focused."
Re: Eagles Began Turnaround With Arizona
Established quarterbacks in the NFL do not typically get benched because they struggle for a game and a half. For comparison, here are Peyton Manning's numbers from weeks 10-11 last season: @SD 34 of 56 328 yds 2 TD 6 INT(!), vs KC 16 of 32 163 yds 0 TD 1 INT. Roughly the same point in the season that McNabb's "struggle" occurred and arguably worse. Had Tony Dungy benched Manning, would you say he had a perfectly valid reason for doing so?
Re: Eagles Began Turnaround With Arizona
IIRC, Manning's DVOA remained high in that San Diego game. Also most of the picks weren't his fault.
Re: Eagles Began Turnaround With Arizona
I think one of the reasons that it felt like more of a slump, was that Philly hadn't dominated, at least not to the point expected, Seattle and San Fran. Both of those games felt like escapes, or at least near disasters, and the Giants loss did not help things. Throw in two bad games, and you have what feels like a full blown slump. If anything, the "I didn't know you could tie" thing made it feel that way.
Looking back objectively, he's actually had a very good season, even in the conventional stats sense (minus those two games of course), but it sure didn't feel like it then.
Re: Eagles Began Turnaround With Arizona
Only in Philadelphia can a 26-7 win feel like an escape or a near disaster.
Post new comment