RSS Feed
PDF NOW HALF PRICE
JUST $6.00!
PDF version now over 50% off at $6.00.
Printed version now on sale for $22.95.
ALSO AVAILABLE
Click here to buy PDF version
.Click here to buy print version.
05 May 2009
ESPN INSIDER: Ten Rookie Starters
This week's ESPN Insider feature is a look at ten rookies who profile as potential immediate starters at the NFL level.
7 comments, Last at 12 Jun 2009, 4:06pm by Richard
Most Recent FO Features
» Four Downs: NFC West
Minor weaknesses dot these teams. Except for Arizona, which needs to bring in more help to really run Bruce Arians' offense.
Comments
Re: ESPN INSIDER: Ten Rookie Starters
why does aaron curry keep getting passed over/overlooked in these sorts of articles?
Re: ESPN INSIDER: Ten Rookie Starters
Why does anyone bother to subscribe for ESPN INSIDER?
Re: ESPN INSIDER: Ten Rookie Starters
Don't you automatically get Insider if you subscribe to their Magazine?
Re: ESPN INSIDER: Ten Rookie Starters
Couldn't you guys just give us a list of the ten guys (without analysis) and then let us have the compulsorary argument?
Re: ESPN INSIDER: Ten Rookie Starters
"no"
(the espn insider contract guy)
Seriously. Whoever signed up for any insider service to get news must be out of their skull.
Re: ESPN INSIDER: Ten Rookie Starters
No kidding. What's the point of posting links to articles that most of us can't read?
Re: ESPN INSIDER: Ten Rookie Starters
Amazingly, we have the same people complaining about ESPN Insider articles on seemingly every ESPN Insider post. I'll just cut and paste this from the last time we had this discussion.
We've never had Premium articles on the site -- that is to say, we've never said "Hey, sign up for Premium and we'll write exclusive articles for you!" Premium members have had access to the Premium database, the gambling odds, and the 24-hour fantasy service. Never any articles that the rest of our readers couldn't read.
In addition, the majority of these articles are articles that would not have been written otherwise -- not because they weren't worth writing or because they weren't interesting, but because they weren't subsidized. As they're now being subsidized, we welcome the opportunity to write more frequently and produce more content.
We link these articles so that people who are ESPN Insiders can read them and know that they're on ESPN. We make it clear that they're Insider articles so that those people who aren't Insiders can know to steer clear.
Post new comment