Football Outsiders content published by ESPN
NOW DISCOUNTED 40%
Discounted for midseason; buy the PDF version here for just $7.50.Buy print version here for $22.95.
Click here to buy PDF version
Official Account: @fboutsiders
Scott Kacsmar: @FO_ScottKacsmar
Rivers McCown: @FO_RiversMcCown
Ben Muth: @FO_WordofMuth
Aaron Schatz: @FO_ASchatz
Danny Tuccitto: @FO_DTuccitto
Vince Verhei: @FO_VVerhei
-- plus --
Andy Benoit: @Andy_Benoit
Bill Connelly: @SBN_BillC
J.J. Cooper: @jjcoop36
Cian Fahey: @Cianaf
Brian Fremeau: @bcfremeau
Tom Gower: @ThomasGower
Matt Hinton: @MattRHinton
Mike Ridley: @TheMikeRidley
Mike Tanier: @MikeTanier
Matt Waldman: @MattWaldman
Rob Weintraub: @robwein
22 Nov 2009
This week's ESPN feature is a look at the Titans' relative chances of making the playoffs.
Posted by: Bill Barnwell on 22 Nov 2009
10 comments, Last at
24 Nov 2009, 7:33pm by
Who still believes in some kind of website model that doesn't give away content for free?? wtf?
Well, the entire newspaper business is desperately hoping they can charge for content. Free's great until you need your content provider to, y'know, provide original, meaningful content.
Hard to imagine what our democracy will look like in 10-20 years if the newspaper business can't figure out a way to turn a profit.
Most newspapers have only themselves to blame for the trouble they're in, the internet was just the proverbial straw.
Yea, I can't imagine the wars and financial troubles we'll blunder into without newspapers!
Plenty of free quality content out there Pay for this? NOT
The same people who believe in a business model where people exchange goods and services for money.
Enjoy the free stuff while you can.
I work in the industry of internet news and information. You cannot survive on advertising. There are too many sites out there, too many ad impressions, and not enough advertisers willing to pay.
If there were, newspapers would be thriving today without ever having charged a dime for their content.
Remember, paid subscribers are a qualified demographic. They are self-selecting. This makes them eminently more desirable to an advertiser, plus it gives the publisher a myriad of ways to reach a potential consumer.
While you may enjoy free content now, and be merely annoyed by the ads, it won't be long before most of the free content is crap and you will be putting up with more ads, less content and HAVE to pay.
Unless any of you have a business model that explains who news and information resources can make a buck to cover their costs without subscriptions, you're going to find that you have to subscribe. It's just a matter of time.
When you were willing to pay $55 for 1/2 of the New York Times to have it dumped on your driveway in the morning, why would you be pissed off about having to pay for online content? The only difference is the delivery system.
We are living in an interesting era of the growing pains of a new industry. I'm confident that things will eventually even out and we will pay about as much for our news and information as we used to. Right now, the scales are tipped way too far towards the consumer. They will slowly tip back, but the unsettling period of adjustment will probably continue for a while.
I work in the music business and there have been many adjustments made there. Most of the profit now is coming from live performances rather than recordings, which is exactly backward of what it used to be. I imagine the print media will find its own way to make a profit.
Maybe if the New Yorker could arrange for Seymour Hersh to come to my house once a week and fill me in...
-I only HAVE to pay if I HAVE to have the content.
-It's a lot easier to copy stuff from paid domains into free ones than it is to widely distribute photocopies of print articles. I'd imagine the music industry concurs.
Want to see what good middle linebacker play looks like? Watch this Alabama prospect work.
See All XP | NFL XP | College XP
© Football Outsiders, Inc. // Site powered by Stein-Wein // Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties