08 Jun 2010
This week's ESPN feature analyzes Jim Kelly's claim that the Bills need to take a quarterback that isn't from California by comparing the performance of quarterbacks with warm weather backgrounds and cold weather backgrounds in both cold and warm games.
35 comments, Last at 15 Jun 2010, 2:03am by tuluse
Eli Manning and Tom Brady were nearly equal in value in the Super Bowl. One of them had to lose. What effect will that have on their legacies? Plus, the best players of Super Bowl XLVI and the game's DVOA ratings.
Comments
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Here's a list of Hall-of-Fame or potential Hall-of-Fame QBs (some of which I had to dig up from last's week MMQB comments section) who have played in warm weather backgrounds, along with the teams they played for in the parenthesis:
- Troy Aikman, West Covina, CA/Henryetta, OK (Dallas Cowboys)
- Sammy Baugh, Temple, TX (Washington Redskins)
- Terry Bradshaw, Shreveport, LA (Pittsburgh Steelers)
- Tom Brady, San Mateo, CA (New England Patriots)
- John Elway, Grenada Hills, CA (Denver Broncos)
- Brett Favre, Gulfport, MS (Green Bay Packers, New York Jets, Minnesota Vikings)
- Dan Fouts, San Fransisco, CA (San Diego Chargers)
- Bobby Layne, Santa Anna, TX (Chicago Bears, New York Bulldogs, Detroit Lions, Pittsburgh Steelers)
- Archie Manning, Drew, MS (New Orleans Saints, Houston Oilers, Minnesota Vikings)
- Eli Manning, New Orleans, LA (New York Giants)
- Peyton Manning, New Orleans, LA (Indianapolis Colts)
- Warren Moon, Los Angeles, CA (Edmonton Eskimos, Houston Oilers, Minnesota Vikings, Seattle Seahawks, Kansas City Chiefs)
- Carson Palmer, Fresno, CA (Cincinnati Bengals)
- Aaron Rodgers, Chico, CA (Green Bay Packers)
- Bart Starr, Montgomery, AL (Green Bay Packers)
- Y.A. Tittle, Marshall, TX (Baltimore Colts, San Fransisco 49ers, New York Giants)
- Bob Waterfield, Van Nuys, CA (Cleveland/Los Angeles Rams)
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Uh... Carson Palmer? Eli Manning? Aaron Rodgers? It would help your case to just leave guys like that out of the discussion.
Also, I believe that part of Kelley's idea is that California makes a man soft and weak by virtue of not only its climate, but its culture. Plus, Louisiana is not exactly a comparably pleasant environment - you'll be soaked in sweat doing any athletic activity almost all year round because of the mind-boggling humidity. I say strike those players from the Gulf Coast (and Southern Alabama)
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
I don't think Carson Palmer or Eli Manning are getting in the HOF without buying a ticket.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Crapping on Eli is so two years ago. One more ship and he's in.
Of course Kelly is much tougher than any QB from sissy California. He's been living in drunkenhazeland for the last thirty years.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Just to be clear, I wasn't crapping on Eli (who I think has many virtues as a QB) or even Palmer or Rodgers - I was just saying, it would be very premature to discuss any of them in terms of HOF credentials. And it would also generate pointless controversy. ahem.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Thinking that Eli isn't a HOF quarterback is crapping on him now?
Yeah he's good, but he's not HOF good. He's more like the level of Drew Bledsoe.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
The whittled down list:
Troy Aikman, West Covina, CA/Henryetta, OK
- Tom Brady, San Mateo, CA
- John Elway, Grenada Hills, CA
- Dan Fouts, San Francisco, CA
- Warren Moon, Los Angeles, CA
- Bob Waterfield, Van Nuys, CA
(It felt internally incoherent to leave in Texas, a notably difficult environment)
Still, not a bad list, by any stretch of the imagination.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
I think it's also important to note whether or not these guys played in cold weather in college.
From your list, these guys all often played in cold/difficult weather in college:
Brady - Michigan
Fouts - Oregon
Moon - Washington
But even someone like Aikman, Elway, or Rogers, who were raised in California and played their college ball in California, probably had to play in cold weather against teams like Oregon, Oregon State, Washington, and Washington State (especially Wazzu, Pullman has miserable weather). Like most blanket statements, saying a QB can't make it in a cold weather town simply because he's from California is stupid.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Yeah, but if you want to pick where they played college ball, Kelly himself went to Miami, no? Along with fellow good QB Bernie Kosar and the NFL's worst good career stats compiler, Vinny Testaverde.
And yes, Pullman is miserable 24/7/365, for 4.5 billion years and counting....
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Nitpicks: You left out the fact that Brett Favre started his career with the Atlanta Falcons. And it's "Granada Hills" for Elway, not "Grenada Hills."
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
*smacks forehead*
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Good list but you could also add Drew Brees
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
And here's a list of cold-weather QB's in the conversation to considered to be the best of all time:
Otto Graham
Johnny Unitas
Joe Montana
Graham was in the Navy. In the off-season, Unitas was a steel-worker. Brady carries a man-purse and a lap-dog, while Peyton makes commercials.
It's gonna be a long two more months...
(I also like the Eagles)
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
I suspect Jim Kelly would concede that either Tom Brady or John Elway would have been successful in Buffalo.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
In the above list, a few of the warm weather guys played for cold weather teams. Elway came back from games in the Mile High Stadium, Moon played in Canada, Layne played his whole NFL career above the Mason-Dixon line, and the last time I checked, Green Bay and Foxboro were nowhere near California's temperature during the football season.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
I was pretty sure I knew the conclusion before reading the article, but it's nice to know that the numbers back it up.
OTOH, I think being used to playing in the cold weather may give one a psychological advantage--whether one has the physical talents to use that advantage is another story.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
I also think it might be worth looking at the impact on young quarterbacks. If Mark Sanchez turns out to be a productive pro QB, I'd expect him to be good in the cold. But he sure as hell looked freaked out by the cold last year.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Sure didn't look like it at Cincinatti.
Think before you blindly follow the flimsy media narrative. The Bills game was a single data point. The cold (or more probably the wind) might have played a part. Or it could simply have been a case that a rookie quarterback had a bad day, which should surprise no one.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Give us a break, loneweasel. What, Sanchez had 1 good game in the cold? Whipety whee.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
And the quantity of evidence that he was "freaked out by the cold" was?
Yep, one game.
Learn to read before joining a thread.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
loneweasel is objectively correct here.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Sanchez stank all year, in all kinds of weather. But especially cold and windy.
And mind your manners.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
All quarterbacks stink when it gets windy.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Yeah, but he had both his best AND worst games in the cold. So, loneweasel is right. One game to serve as proof in either direction. The media narrative said he would struggle in the cold. It all checks out to me.
Additionally, Rich is right, too. QB's generally play worse in the wind.
Nothing to see here...
(And I'll try to mind my manners in the future?)
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
I didn't mean you, chemical. I was replying to the "you can't read, get out of here" post.
In any case, I'm not saying Sanchez can't or won't handle the cold. In fact, I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter where you're from, you eventually get used to it -which is why warm-weather teams play poorly in the cold, and cold-weather teams play well, even if they grab their players from the same places.
It just seemed pretty wild to me to defend a players' cold-weather performances in such a strong tone ("think before you blindly follow...") when even his warm weather performances were pretty poor.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
1) Don't like my tone? Tough.
2) It was a direct refutation of the assertion that Sanchez was "freaked out by the cold". It is trivially obvious that there is not sufficient data to say definitively one way or another. He's a rookie who played maybe four "cold" games in his life. How you could interprete it as my attempt to say that Sanchez was good in cold weather I cannot tell. Intentional obfuscation or objective inability to read? Either way you add nothing to the debate.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
You speak of adding to the debate. You really think your personal attacks add anything at all? You seem to think of yourself as a rational and objective individual, and yet you spend at least a sentence each post attacking the poster you disagree with. Does that seem like a valid form of argumentation to you?
As far as the argument, all I'm saying is that Sanchez looked freaked by everything last year, and that his only defense against any argument made against his play so far cannot be an argument itself, but going out there next year and actually playing well... both in the cold and everywhere else. That's what I found outlandish about your refutation of the original poster.
But hey, feel free to continue to rip me if it pleases you.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
"But hey, feel free to continue to rip me if it pleases you."
Please don't encourage him.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Well, there's five minutes of my life I'll never get back.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Statistically, you know, Jim Kelly is right a mere .000036% of the time.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Excuse me, that's .0000036%.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
I dunno if this constitutes proof, but there were 9 NFL scouts at the Fairbanks vs Nome conference championship game last season.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
"All quarterbacks stink when it gets windy."
LOL except Michael Vick and Vince Young.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
I feel compelled to add in Jim Sorgi and.... (struggling to think of another guy who never started to make my joke funnier... failed.)
When it's windy, he just holds on the clip board extra tight.
Re: ESPN: Is Jim Kelly Right?
Kurt Kitner, king of the wind.
Post new comment