Football Outsiders content published by ESPN
PDF VERSION NOW AVAILABLE
Click here to buy PDF version.
Click here to buy PDF version
Official Account: @fboutsiders
Scott Kacsmar: @FO_ScottKacsmar
Ben Muth: @FO_WordofMuth
Aaron Schatz: @FO_ASchatz
Vince Verhei: @FO_VVerhei
-- plus --
Bill Connelly: @SBN_BillC
J.J. Cooper: @jjcoop36
Cian Fahey: @Cianaf
Brian Fremeau: @bcfremeau
Tom Gower: @ThomasGower
Rivers McCown: @RiversMcCown
Chad Peltier: @CGPeltier
Matt Waldman: @MattWaldman
Rob Weintraub: @robwein
01 Aug 2013
Training camp injuries have already begun to take their toll; who are the five skill players at each position that their respective teams can't afford to lose?
Posted by: Rivers McCown on 01 Aug 2013
13 comments, Last at
13 Aug 2013, 10:05am by
There was no XP for it, so I'm putting it here. Luke Ingram was just waived. Any thoughts on the long term implications for the league?
Umm... I don't get it. I assume there's some sarcasm or criticism buried in there, but I don't get it.
Are you going to do this for non-glory positions?
No Insider here, so all that loaded was Aaron Rodgers. I have to assume that the most truly irreplaceable players in the NFL are basically Rodgers, Manning, Brees and Brady, and then maybe Calvin Johnson, maybe. I mean, really, take the top 10 teams and how many of them are winning more than 9 games with their backup QBs (obviously only the Patroits, right???)
I'm fairly high on Mallett but I don't see him winning 10 games with the weapons they have right now and that defense. Brady can probably make that receiving corps work, don't think Mallett can.
Really? Links to insider page. Don't do that. Mention in the link it is an insider article.
Welcome to FO. When the title says "ESPN:", it's an Insider article.
They do the top 5 for every skill position on offense. So it's not just QBs.
Rodgers, Brees, Peyton Manning, Cam Newton, Kaepernick. Brady is left off due to Mallet's presence.
AP, Doug Martin, Jamaal Charles, Darren McFadden, MJD
Calvin Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Andre Johnson, Steve Smith, Dwayne Bowe
Gronk, Tony Gonz, Vernon Davis, J Graham, Fred Davis. it's insane that Witten is not on this list and Davis is-- yes the Cowboys have TE depth, but so much of what they do offensively relies on Witten.
Yes, they rely a lot on Witten. but he's not young and Bryant may have finally matured.
On the other hand, I find it more incredible that they put McFadden ahead of Ray Rice or Arian Foster.
You serious? How does Bryant's emergence replace Witten's role in the offense? Unless Bryant is going to start functioning as an F-back and an in-line blocker on some plays. Seems unlikely.
The Texans' offense saw little dropoff when Ben Tate replaced Foster the past couple years, and Kubiak's scheme can likely succeed with other backs (although maybe not to quite the same degree). As for Ray Rice...not sure on the logic there, you'd have to read the Insider article. I'd guess it's based around the Raiders' lack of other viable weapons in their offense.
How would that NOT apply to the Ravens, now that Boldin and Pitta are gone?
Again, not my article, you'd have to take it up with Football Outsiders. I'm just passing along the information, and had an objection on Witten's omission. Maybe they think more of Bernard Pierce as a viable fill-in starter than you do.
I really appreciate your post. It gives an outstanding idea that is very helpful for all the people on the web. Thanks for sharing this information and I'll love to read your next post too!
How dramatic was Jay Cutler's improvement from the first half to the second against San Francisco?
See All XP | NFL XP | College XP
© Football Outsiders, Inc. // Site powered by Stein-Wein // Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties