Football Outsiders content published by ESPN
PDF VERSION NOW DISCOUNTED OVER 30%
Click here to buy PDF version.
Click here to buy PDF version
Official Account: @fboutsiders
Scott Kacsmar: @FO_ScottKacsmar
Ben Muth: @FO_WordofMuth
Aaron Schatz: @FO_ASchatz
Vince Verhei: @FO_VVerhei
-- plus --
Bill Connelly: @SBN_BillC
J.J. Cooper: @jjcoop36
Cian Fahey: @Cianaf
Brian Fremeau: @bcfremeau
Tom Gower: @ThomasGower
Andrew Healy: @AndHealy
Rivers McCown: @RiversMcCown
Chad Peltier: @CGPeltier
Matt Waldman: @MattWaldman
Rob Weintraub: @robwein
26 Sep 2008
Check out how splits and stats are affecting each matchup on Sunday, including how some trends from 2007 are carrying over to 2008.
Posted by: Bill Barnwell on 26 Sep 2008
2 comments, Last at
29 Sep 2008, 1:46am by
Note: Continued lack of failure by Orton is not guaranteed in the continental United States or Alaska.
Clearly, all Orton needs to do is make it to the Pro Bowl, where he's guaranteed to succeed!
Does specific-down performance really mean anything? I mean, the reason an outlier of third-down performance is likely to correct itself the following year is because (I thought) it was an artifact of a smaller sample size than other downs. Meaning, it's a fluke, and the unit in question isn't actually "better" on those plays, but just luckier/unluckier.
I'd love to see a down performance comparison between the first and second halves of the season, which is the litmus test that shows fumble recoveries are random. Does being disproportionately great on second down in the early goings correlate to the same performance later on?
The Vikings need offensive line help, while the Bears, Lions, and Packers have significant defensive concerns.
See All XP | NFL XP | College XP
© Football Outsiders, Inc. // Site powered by Stein-Wein // Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties