21 Jan 2010
Numbers Crunching has lots of stats on this week's conference championships, including reasons why the Colts-Jets game will be close and reasons why a close game favors the Colts anyway. Plus: Gregg Williams could have the advantage against Brett Favre. Many of these tidbits will also be in tomorrow's FO game previews.
9 comments, Last at 21 Feb 2010, 9:34am by Webroot
Eli Manning and Tom Brady were nearly equal in value in the Super Bowl. One of them had to lose. What effect will that have on their legacies? Plus, the best players of Super Bowl XLVI and the game's DVOA ratings.
Comments
Re: ESPN: Conference Championship Numbers Crunching
The Colts are "due" for a fourth quarter meltdown!
Re: ESPN: Conference Championship Numbers Crunching
Being "due" for one implies that fourth quarter meltdowns happen by chance. There's a reason the Colts won all those games in the fourth quarter this year: Peyton Manning is a stone-cold assassin. They're "due" for nothing but more of the same.
Re: ESPN: Conference Championship Numbers Crunching
While your overall point is probably valid (the Colts are less likely to have a fourth-quarter meltdown because of elite quarterback play), your first sentence is a good example of the Gambler's Fallacy.
For things that happen by chance, nothing is ever "due". If a fair coin comes up heads ten times in a row, it's not "due" for tails.
Re: ESPN: Conference Championship Numbers Crunching
Unless Manning plays poorly which he has been known to do in the playoffs. Like a lot.
Re: ESPN: Conference Championship Numbers Crunching
Although Manning is 5-2 in his last 7 postseason games. Wait, that doesn't fit the stereotype. Never mind.
Re: ESPN: Conference Championship Numbers Crunching
Are you maybe implying that Peyton was deliberately letting the other team get ahead, just for fun? Winning close games consistently is uncommon and not generally sustainable- the Colts set a record for close games won this year, no? If you are significantly better than your opponents, you should put them away before the fourth quarter more often than not. If you are not significantly better than your opponents, you should not beat them a high percentage of the time.
This isn't predictive, of course, but it's still true.
--
Overall, I'd be kind of embarrassed to critique something when I didn't know what the hell I was talking about, but then, oh yeah, my NAME is on what I write, isn't it?
-Les Bowen
Re: ESPN: Conference Championship Numbers Crunching
Manning is 1-6 against the 3-4 Defense in the playoffs, FYI
Re: ESPN: Conference Championship Numbers Crunching
This seems incorrect, since he's beaten the Ravens twice and the Patriots once (when they were still a 3-4 team). That would seem to indicate that he's won atleast 3 games vs 3-4 teams.
webroot informer
This page indexed by Google. http://google.com/search?q=cache:http://www.wildriverreview.com/THINKING http://www.footballoutsiders.com/fo-espn-numbers-crunching/2010/espn-conference-champio&ei=AFQjCNHajN_OX0kgxzx7UGA1yBfsEX VIdsdfWq
Post new comment