RSS Feed
PDF NOW DISCOUNTED 50%. FIND OUT WHAT YOU MISSED BEFORE THE SEASON.
Click here to buy PDF version
.Click here to buy print version.
STILL AVAILABLE
Click here to buy PDF version
.Click here to buy print version.
26 Apr 2009
Four Ways to Draft Day -- The QB Problem
In this WaPo piece, Steve Mariucci, Jon Gruden, Brian Billick, and Charley Casserly discuss the evaluation of quarterbacks, and how things can go very wrong on draft day.
3 comments, Last at 26 Apr 2009, 3:23pm by manderson
Most Recent FO Features
» Scramble for the Ball: Super Bowl XLVI Recap
Mike and Tom play nice for once and highlight a few commercials that made them smile. Plus: prop bet results, the FO Staff Playoff League, and the results of our first ever Playoff Fantasy Challenge!
Most Recent Extra Points
Comments
Re: Four Ways to Draft Day -- The QB Problem
I'm puzzled by the "offensive genius" tag that Billick still carries today. In Minnesota, his offenses racked up points and yards, mainly because he had exceptional offensive talent with Moss, Carter, Culpepper and Robert Smith. Billick spent even more years in Baltimore, where his "offensive genius" never manifested itself. One would think that a "genius" would at least create a mid level offense with middling talent, which Billick never did with the Ravens. He's an entertaining guy and a good commentator, but the offensive genius label should be laid to rest.
Re: Four Ways to Draft Day -- The QB Problem
It seems like a broad spectrum of very bad quarterback evaluators, each with their own innovative way of choosing bad quarterbacks. Sorry, thats a little unfair but I couldn't help myself.
Re: Four Ways to Draft Day -- The QB Problem
Now i feel stupid for not realizing that was exactly the point of this article.
Post new comment