Where our work appears on mainstream media outlets
PDF VERSION NOW DISCOUNTED OVER 30%
Click here to buy PDF version.
Click here to buy PDF version
Official Account: @fboutsiders
Scott Kacsmar: @FO_ScottKacsmar
Ben Muth: @FO_WordofMuth
Aaron Schatz: @FO_ASchatz
Vince Verhei: @FO_VVerhei
-- plus --
Bill Connelly: @SBN_BillC
J.J. Cooper: @jjcoop36
Cian Fahey: @Cianaf
Brian Fremeau: @bcfremeau
Tom Gower: @ThomasGower
Andrew Healy: @AndHealy
Rivers McCown: @RiversMcCown
Chad Peltier: @CGPeltier
Matt Waldman: @MattWaldman
Rob Weintraub: @robwein
26 Sep 2009
Mike Tanier previews Sunday's games for the New York Times. Good luck finding a mention of Zeno's Paradoxes in any other NFL Preview piece this weekend, folks...
Posted by: Mike Tanier on 26 Sep 2009
7 comments, Last at
29 Sep 2009, 4:03am by
Bugsbunny, Zeno's Paradoxes... and good anaylsis. Great work as always Mike!
Once again sagacity meets hilarity in a standoff with no clear winner. I thought testudinal was even better than Zeno. Had Mr. Tanier taught math to Joe Flacco using Roman numerals, then perhaps he would have suggested that the Browns' offense might could use some good testudos in Baltimore on Sunday to go along with their testudinality. [See http://www.thefreedictionary.com/testudo]
The comment in the Broncos section about the Browns game being a late pull away and not a rout seems to me like a distinction without a difference. It also comes across as Just trying to find some way to denigrate the Broncos.
Have you really done research that suggests scoring your points in the first half is better than scoring them in the second?
I think it shows that the Broncos are a team with a whole new coaching staff and a lot of new players that takes some time to get into a rhythm whether they've turned a corner or not remains to be seen.
I think that pointing out that the competition wasn't really so stiff was sufficient.
As a Broncos fan, I am hopeful that the defense might actually have improved to bad this year.
Combine that with an offense that still has some weapons to have degraded to average/good and maybe the Broncos can be mediocre.
Your point about the Cleveland game is fair. After all, didn't the Broncos get outplayed in DVOA after week 1 by Cincy? And now they rank 7th in the league in DVOA? Doesn't that suggest that they outplayed Cleveland quite readily?
So, the fact that Denver pulled away late doesn't necessarily mean that Denver didn't significantly outperform a bad team.
I enjoyed the reference to Zeno's paradox.
On a side note, Jamarcus Russell is redefining Kurt Gödel's incompleteness Theorem.
"The comment in the Broncos section about the Browns game being a late pull away and not a rout seems to me like a distinction without a difference."
The broncos had a 6 point lead with 3 minutes and 45 seconds left in the game. That means it was close for most of the game, and up until that touchdown, a single fluke play could have won the game for the browns.
Thats a lot different than a game thats 27-6 halfway through the 3rd quarter.
I try not to be "factual accuracy over the intent of the post"-guy, but I feel the need to point out that the scoring in that game was concluded with 8:24 remaining. The last point at which the margin was 6 points was at the 12:18 mark of the 4th (according to the scoring summary on ESPN). Maybe scoring 14 unanswered points over the course of 4 minutes in the early 4th quarter still doesn't do it for you, and that's fine, but it is a whole different thing than scoring 14 unanswered with 3:45 remaining.
If anyone cares, I'm adding a link for easy fact-checking purposes:
Alright, I'm warning everybody: they're among us.
And I do welcome our new morphing overlords.
-- Go Phins!
Mike and Tom wonder why certain NFL teams are run by '50s Dad and commemorate the Falcons' epic meltdown.
See All XP | NFL XP | College XP
© Football Outsiders, Inc. // Site powered by Stein-Wein // Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties