Innovative Statistics, Intelligent Analysis
PDF VERSION NOW DISCOUNTED OVER 30%
Click here to buy PDF version.
Click here to buy PDF version
Official Account: @fboutsiders
Scott Kacsmar: @FO_ScottKacsmar
Ben Muth: @FO_WordofMuth
Aaron Schatz: @FO_ASchatz
Vince Verhei: @FO_VVerhei
-- plus --
Bill Connelly: @SBN_BillC
J.J. Cooper: @jjcoop36
Cian Fahey: @Cianaf
Brian Fremeau: @bcfremeau
Tom Gower: @ThomasGower
Andrew Healy: @AndHealy
Rivers McCown: @RiversMcCown
Chad Peltier: @CGPeltier
Matt Waldman: @MattWaldman
Rob Weintraub: @robwein
07 Sep 2010
Don't be that guy in your fantasy league who gets stuck deciding between Sammie Stroughter and Mohamed Massaquoi for his last starting wide receiver spot.
Posted by: Mike Tanier on 07 Sep 2010
11 comments, Last at
08 Sep 2010, 6:05pm by
The Other Ben Johnson
I thought the same thing, Raiderjoe.
I'm thinking the same as Raiderjoe . . . as a Bronco fan, I am frightened beyond words.
I also thought the same thing.
I thought it was going to be about the age at which WRs fell off a cliff...
My first thought was same as 1-4. My second assumption was the same as #5.
As for #3, you may not be welcome in your own hometown anymore. Maybe even your own house.
Personally, I think rather than cliff, that "gap" as in "the 60s missile gap" sums it up better, or gulf, chasm, canyon. If we want to stick with mountain terms, a crevasse or bergschrund would work nicely, but then again I've been reading a lot of mountaineering books recently.
I live in Minnesota now, by myself, so I'm probably safe.
OK, this is picky, but...
I noticed in the article it mentions the top 11 fantasy wideouts selected by our experts here. The last receiver listed is 'Steve Smith of the Giants'.
I don't know if that was supposed to be the NYG receiver, but when you click the link it opens up to the Carolina Steve Smith. And I'm pretty sure that he's a bit better option right now than the NYG Smith, as Hakeem Nicks is definitely going to be getting some catches, and the CAR Smith is all by his lonesome.
Am I right in assuming it was supposed to be written as the CAR Smith?
One other thing: Tainer puts Colston in the top 11 group, then keeps him on the list of other wideouts, and talks about him as if he was not in the group. I'm confused.
Ouch, my first draft was a keeper league, and my top two wideouts were Eddie Royal and TJ Housh. Got Mike Williams versions 1 and 2 and Davone Bess. Brady and AP better have ridiculous years to keep me out of the doghouse. Any advice on which of Nate Washington, Devery Henderson to pick up in lieu of my current crop of crap? League is 14-team keeper league with .25 PPR and standard yardage and TD totals.
I'm not sure about this. If you look at last year's fantasy points distribution within each position, QBs and WRs seem to go off linearly while it's RBs that go off logarithmically. That would mean that the difference between the RB1 and RB2 is much greater than the difference between RB2 and RB3, and so on until it evens out after the first 5 or 6 guys; whereas the difference between WR1 and WR2 is roughly the same as that between WR10 and WR11 (maybe a little bit larger, but overall it's roughly the same).
Any article about Fantasy drafting (or even regular drafting) that ignores trade value is pretty weak. While everybody else is worried about their WR1, snatch up the RBs and QBs. Problem solved.
Also: WRs hold value better than any other position. There's just more variance so you don't know where the production is going to come from. I say Thelma and Louise had it right. Load up on value at other positions and trade for a top-flight WR later if you need to.
Our new quarterback projection system thinks Tampa Bay (and everyone else in the first round) should stay away from Jameis Winston.
See All XP | NFL XP | College XP
© Football Outsiders, Inc. // Site powered by Stein-Wein // Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties