by Aaron Schatz
By now we're used to DVOA giving an account of a game that's very different from conventional wisdom, and even at times very different from the final score. That was definitely the truth with two games in Week 11.
The Cleveland Browns had what seems like huge emotional win, beating the evil ex-Browns (a.k.a. the Ravens) in overtime. Despite this, the Browns actually drop a spot in the DVOA rankings. To the DVOA formula, this was effectively a tie against a bad team. We're all so used to thinking of Baltimore as good and Cleveland as bad that it is hard to see it this way, but how would you feel if the Giants had to scratch their way through overtime to beat the Texans? The difference in DVOA is roughly the same; only the perception is different.
On the other hand, you have the Broncos' 34-20 win over the Titans. That looks like a solid victory, not an overwhelming one -- but Denver gets a 96.0% DVOA, making this one of the top games of the season. Denver outscored the Titans despite running 23 fewer plays. All three Denver touchdown drives went 80 yards, and the Titans fumbled four times and only lost one. After two weeks without Albert Haynesworth, the Titans have gone from ranking as one of the top 10 defenses of the DVOA Era to not even ranking as the top defense of 2007. Even stranger, the number one pass defense is now Indianapolis. Raise your hand if you thought that the Colts defense would carry Peyton Manning through the regular season... yes, that's none of you.
Overall, the Broncos climb three spots this week, and the Titans drop five.
Of course, let's be honest -- all of this movement is dwarfed by the story of the season, which is New England's quest for the perfect season. By now everyone is probably sick and tired about talking about how dominant the Patriots are, but every week it gets more and more impressive.
* * * * *
Here are the Football Outsiders team efficiency ratings through 11 weeks of 2007, measured by our proprietary Defense-adjusted Value Over Average (DVOA) system that breaks down every single play and compares a team's performance to the league average based on situation in order to determine value over average. (Explained further here [1].) OFFENSE and DEFENSE DVOA are adjusted for opponent and consider all fumbles, kept or lost, as equal value. SPECIAL TEAMS DVOA is adjusted for type of stadium (warm, cold, dome, Denver) and week of season.
To save people some time, we request that you please use the following format for all complaints:
<team> is clearly ranked <too high/too low> because <reason unrelated to DVOA>. <subjective ranking system> is way better than this. <unrelated team-supporting or -denigrating comment, preferably with poor spelling and/or chat-acceptable spelling>
| TEAM | TOTAL DVOA |
LAST WEEK |
WEI. DVOA |
RANK | W-L |
OFFENSE DVOA |
OFF. RANK |
DEFENSE DVOA |
DEF. RANK |
S.T. DVOA |
S.T. RANK |
|
| 1 | NE | 73.7% | 1 | 74.2% | 1 | 10-0 | 51.3% | 1 | -16.9% | 3 | 5.5% | 7 |
| 2 | DAL | 39.0% | 3 | 38.4% | 2 | 9-1 | 30.3% | 2 | -9.2% | 7 | -0.5% | 16 |
| 3 | IND | 34.9% | 2 | 32.5% | 3 | 8-2 | 25.7% | 3 | -15.7% | 4 | -6.5% | 30 |
| 4 | GB | 28.4% | 5 | 28.9% | 4 | 9-1 | 18.7% | 4 | -7.1% | 9 | 2.5% | 10 |
| 5 | PIT | 25.4% | 4 | 21.3% | 5 | 7-3 | 7.4% | 11 | -21.1% | 1 | -3.1% | 23 |
| 6 | TB | 20.6% | 6 | 20.3% | 6 | 6-4 | 15.4% | 5 | -7.2% | 8 | -2.0% | 18 |
| 7 | SD | 14.4% | 7 | 16.3% | 7 | 5-5 | 2.7% | 15 | -4.0% | 12 | 7.8% | 2 |
| 8 | JAC | 13.5% | 8 | 14.5% | 8 | 7-3 | 12.1% | 9 | 2.7% | 17 | 4.1% | 9 |
| 9 | NYG | 9.9% | 11 | 11.9% | 9 | 7-3 | 7.0% | 12 | -5.8% | 10 | -2.8% | 22 |
| 10 | SEA | 9.4% | 9 | 8.1% | 11 | 6-4 | 1.8% | 16 | -1.8% | 14 | 5.8% | 6 |
| 11 | WAS | 7.5% | 14 | 7.8% | 12 | 5-5 | 0.9% | 17 | -5.0% | 11 | 1.6% | 13 |
| 12 | PHI | 5.9% | 13 | 2.5% | 14 | 5-5 | 13.9% | 6 | 3.6% | 19 | -4.4% | 29 |
| 13 | CLE | 5.4% | 12 | 8.3% | 10 | 6-4 | 12.6% | 7 | 15.9% | 29 | 8.7% | 1 |
| 14 | MIN | 4.0% | 15 | 3.8% | 13 | 4-6 | 3.8% | 13 | 1.8% | 16 | 2.0% | 11 |
| 15 | TEN | 2.7% | 10 | 0.7% | 16 | 6-4 | -11.5% | 25 | -18.5% | 2 | -4.3% | 28 |
| 16 | DEN | 1.8% | 19 | 1.0% | 15 | 5-5 | 11.5% | 10 | 10.9% | 24 | 1.3% | 14 |
| TEAM |
TOTAL DVOA |
LAST WEEK |
WEI. DVOA |
RANK | W-L |
OFFENSE DVOA |
OFF. RANK |
DEFENSE DVOA |
DEF. RANK |
S.T. DVOA |
S.T. RANK |
|
| 17 | ARI | -1.1% | 18 | -0.4% | 17 | 5-5 | -2.2% | 20 | -2.6% | 13 | -1.5% | 17 |
| 18 | CIN | -2.3% | 16 | -3.1% | 19 | 3-7 | 12.3% | 8 | 14.7% | 27 | 0.1% | 15 |
| 19 | BUF | -5.3% | 17 | -2.2% | 18 | 5-5 | -8.2% | 23 | 3.4% | 18 | 6.2% | 4 |
| 20 | KC | -9.1% | 24 | -7.5% | 20 | 4-6 | -19.7% | 29 | -14.0% | 5 | -3.3% | 25 |
| 21 | HOU | -9.4% | 23 | -12.3% | 22 | 5-5 | -0.8% | 19 | 10.6% | 23 | 2.0% | 12 |
| 22 | DET | -12.2% | 22 | -11.2% | 21 | 6-4 | -4.1% | 22 | 1.5% | 15 | -6.5% | 31 |
| 23 | BAL | -12.6% | 20 | -14.4% | 23 | 4-6 | -22.4% | 31 | -13.8% | 6 | -3.9% | 27 |
| 24 | NO | -17.8% | 21 | -14.5% | 24 | 4-6 | 3.7% | 14 | 17.6% | 31 | -3.9% | 26 |
| 25 | MIA | -18.3% | 26 | -18.8% | 27 | 0-10 | -0.6% | 18 | 15.4% | 28 | -2.2% | 19 |
| 26 | CHI | -18.5% | 28 | -17.5% | 25 | 4-6 | -20.9% | 30 | 3.7% | 20 | 6.2% | 5 |
| 27 | NYJ | -20.1% | 29 | -17.8% | 26 | 2-8 | -3.4% | 21 | 23.1% | 32 | 6.4% | 3 |
| 28 | ATL | -23.0% | 25 | -22.3% | 28 | 3-7 | -14.6% | 26 | 6.0% | 22 | -2.4% | 20 |
| 29 | CAR | -24.5% | 27 | -24.3% | 29 | 4-6 | -11.5% | 24 | 5.5% | 21 | -7.5% | 32 |
| 30 | STL | -34.2% | 30 | -32.0% | 30 | 2-8 | -19.0% | 28 | 12.0% | 25 | -3.2% | 24 |
| 31 | OAK | -34.3% | 31 | -34.0% | 31 | 2-8 | -18.6% | 27 | 13.2% | 26 | -2.5% | 21 |
| 32 | SF | -51.6% | 32 | -54.0% | 32 | 2-8 | -39.9% | 32 | 16.3% | 30 | 4.6% | 8 |
| TEAM |
TOTAL DVOA |
W-L |
NON-ADJ TOT VOA |
ESTIM. WINS |
RANK |
PAST SCHED |
RANK |
FUTURE SCHED |
RANK | VAR. | RANK | |
| 1 | NE | 73.7% | 10-0 | 71.6% | 10.0 | 1 | 4.5% | 9 | -2.0% | 18 | 2.8% | 32 |
| 2 | DAL | 39.0% | 9-1 | 36.3% | 8.1 | 3 | 3.1% | 10 | -3.0% | 20 | 8.5% | 22 |
| 3 | IND | 34.9% | 8-2 | 29.2% | 8.4 | 2 | 6.0% | 6 | -12.6% | 25 | 16.0% | 9 |
| 4 | GB | 28.4% | 9-1 | 32.4% | 7.4 | 4 | -0.4% | 17 | -14.5% | 28 | 8.2% | 23 |
| 5 | PIT | 25.4% | 7-3 | 34.0% | 6.3 | 7 | -6.5% | 27 | 4.0% | 13 | 30.3% | 1 |
| 6 | TB | 20.6% | 6-4 | 18.9% | 6.5 | 6 | -4.7% | 23 | -23.7% | 32 | 20.5% | 6 |
| 7 | SD | 14.4% | 5-5 | 6.2% | 5.6 | 13 | 7.7% | 3 | -12.7% | 26 | 27.9% | 4 |
| 8 | JAC | 13.5% | 7-3 | 12.1% | 6.7 | 5 | 1.6% | 16 | -2.6% | 19 | 7.2% | 26 |
| 9 | NYG | 9.9% | 7-3 | 11.1% | 5.8 | 9 | -0.5% | 18 | 13.4% | 7 | 5.8% | 28 |
| 10 | SEA | 9.4% | 6-4 | 21.0% | 5.6 | 12 | -11.4% | 32 | -17.9% | 29 | 13.8% | 12 |
| 11 | WAS | 7.5% | 5-5 | -5.5% | 5.3 | 15 | 10.1% | 2 | 9.9% | 9 | 8.9% | 20 |
| 12 | PHI | 5.9% | 5-5 | 3.8% | 5.8 | 8 | 2.5% | 13 | 21.8% | 2 | 15.9% | 10 |
| 13 | CLE | 5.4% | 6-4 | 3.2% | 5.7 | 10 | 1.8% | 14 | -18.0% | 30 | 8.7% | 21 |
| 14 | MIN | 4.0% | 4-6 | 4.0% | 5.6 | 11 | 1.7% | 15 | -12.6% | 24 | 20.1% | 7 |
| 15 | TEN | 2.7% | 6-4 | 4.6% | 5.1 | 17 | -2.2% | 21 | 1.7% | 16 | 16.0% | 8 |
| 16 | DEN | 1.8% | 5-5 | 0.4% | 5.3 | 16 | 5.3% | 7 | -10.6% | 23 | 28.4% | 2 |
| TEAM |
TOTAL DVOA |
W-L |
NON-ADJ TOT VOA |
ESTIM. WINS |
RANK |
PAST SCHED |
RANK |
FUTURE SCHED |
RANK | VAR. | RANK | |
| 17 | ARI | -1.1% | 5-5 | 5.2% | 4.5 | 20 | -6.8% | 28 | -22.3% | 31 | 28.1% | 3 |
| 18 | CIN | -2.3% | 3-7 | -0.5% | 5.4 | 14 | 4.8% | 8 | -14.1% | 27 | 3.0% | 31 |
| 19 | BUF | -5.3% | 5-5 | -16.2% | 5.0 | 18 | 12.7% | 1 | 4.8% | 12 | 10.2% | 17 |
| 20 | KC | -9.1% | 4-6 | -10.2% | 4.4 | 21 | 3.0% | 12 | -9.5% | 22 | 11.2% | 15 |
| 21 | HOU | -9.4% | 5-5 | -6.4% | 4.2 | 22 | -5.6% | 24 | 15.8% | 6 | 13.6% | 13 |
| 22 | DET | -12.2% | 6-4 | -5.2% | 4.9 | 19 | -2.1% | 20 | 21.0% | 3 | 21.4% | 5 |
| 23 | BAL | -12.6% | 4-6 | -8.8% | 3.7 | 25 | -7.3% | 30 | 27.9% | 1 | 8.1% | 24 |
| 24 | NO | -17.8% | 4-6 | -14.8% | 4.1 | 23 | -5.6% | 25 | -8.1% | 21 | 11.1% | 16 |
| 25 | MIA | -18.3% | 0-10 | -27.6% | 3.3 | 29 | 6.6% | 5 | 11.7% | 8 | 5.0% | 29 |
| 26 | CHI | -18.5% | 4-6 | -17.2% | 3.8 | 24 | 3.0% | 11 | 6.7% | 11 | 4.9% | 30 |
| 27 | NYJ | -20.1% | 2-8 | -24.3% | 3.4 | 27 | 7.1% | 4 | 18.7% | 4 | 9.0% | 19 |
| 28 | ATL | -23.0% | 3-7 | -13.8% | 3.3 | 28 | -7.0% | 29 | 2.4% | 15 | 7.7% | 25 |
| 29 | CAR | -24.5% | 4-6 | -20.9% | 3.4 | 26 | -2.0% | 19 | 2.6% | 14 | 14.3% | 11 |
| 30 | STL | -34.2% | 2-8 | -30.0% | 2.2 | 30 | -7.7% | 31 | 7.4% | 10 | 12.9% | 14 |
| 31 | OAK | -34.3% | 2-8 | -27.2% | 1.8 | 31 | -3.6% | 22 | 16.8% | 5 | 9.9% | 18 |
| 32 | SF | -51.6% | 2-8 | -42.7% | 1.3 | 32 | -6.2% | 26 | 0.4% | 17 | 6.9% | 27 |
| BEST TOTAL DVOA AFTER WEEK 11 |
BEST OFFENSIVE DVOA AFTER WEEK 11 |
WORST TOTAL DVOA AFTER WEEK 11 |
WORST OFFENSIVE DVOA AFTER WEEK 11 |
|||||||||||
| 2007 | NE | 73.7% | 2007 | NE | 51.3% | 2005 | SF | -55.9% | 2005 | SF | -41.3% | |||
| 1999 | STL | 46.4% | 2004 | IND | 45.0% | 2000 | CIN | -55.0% | 2007 | SF | -39.9% | |||
| 1998 | DEN | 43.5% | 2000 | STL | 38.7% | 2007 | SF | -51.6% | 2002 | HOU | -36.8% | |||
| 2002 | TB | 42.1% | 2000 | IND | 36.3% | 2005 | HOU | -49.5% | 2004 | MIA | -36.0% | |||
| 1996 | GB | 40.5% | 1998 | DEN | 34.3% | 1999 | CLE | -48.5% | 1999 | ARI | -35.9% | |||
| 2000 | TEN | 40.0% | 2005 | SD | 32.2% | 2004 | SF | -46.4% | 1997 | NO | -35.1% | |||
| 2004 | NE | 40.0% | 2005 | IND | 31.6% | 1998 | PHI | -44.3% | 2000 | CIN | -33.4% | |||
| 2001 | STL | 39.4% | 2004 | KC | 30.6% | 2000 | ARI | -44.0% | 2006 | OAK | -33.0% | |||
| 2007 | DAL | 39.0% | 2002 | KC | 30.4% | 2002 | HOU | -42.3% | 1998 | PHI | -32.6% | |||
| 2004 | PIT | 38.7% | 2007 | DAL | 30.3% | 2000 | CLE | -39.8% | 2001 | CAR | -31.4% | |||
In Audibles [4], Ned Macey asked about the Pats and the biggest-ever gap between the top two teams in DVOA. Here is a table of the top two teams in DVOA after Week 11 each of the past dozen years. This year is the biggest gap by far, of course. And just in case you think this is a case of reduced parity in recent years, notice that the smallest gap between the top two teams after Week 11 was... last year.
| YEAR | #1 TEAM | #1 DVOA | #2 TEAM | #2 DVOA | DIF |
| 2007 | NE | 73.7% | DAL | 39.0% | 34.7% |
| 1998 | DEN | 43.5% | DAL | 24.9% | 18.6% |
| 2002 | TB | 42.1% | OAK | 26.6% | 15.5% |
| 2003 | KC | 38.3% | TEN | 24.0% | 14.3% |
| 1996 | GB | 40.5% | DEN | 29.9% | 10.6% |
| 1999 | STL | 46.4% | JAC | 38.6% | 7.8% |
| 2000 | TEN | 40.0% | MIA | 34.1% | 6.0% |
| 2005 | IND | 36.8% | DEN | 33.3% | 3.5% |
| 1997 | SF | 34.9% | DEN | 32.1% | 2.8% |
| 2001 | STL | 39.4% | PHI | 37.6% | 1.8% |
| 2004 | NE | 40.0% | PIT | 38.7% | 1.3% |
| 2006 | CHI | 34.3% | SD | 33.9% | 0.4% |
How dominant are the Patriots compared to every other team of the DVOA Era? Only six other teams ever had a DVOA of 40% or higher after ten games. Five of those teams won the Super Bowl, with the 2000 Titans as the only exception. No team had ever been at 50% DVOA after ten games. The Patriots aren't just over 50% -- the Patriots have not had a single game with DVOA below 50%.
Remember, the Patriots are not the first team in recent memory to spur talk of a perfect season. The 1998 Broncos and 2005 Colts both started 13-0 before losing. The Pats' DVOA is almost twice as high as the DVOA ratings of those two teams after 10 games. Here's our first week-to-week chart of the 2007 season, but this time we're comparing the three teams that have gone 10-0 during the DVOA Era. These are the DVOA ratings for each individual game during those two 13-0 starts, plus the ratings for each Patriots game. I've noted the scores of some of the best and worst games. The Broncos actually won two games during their streak despite a DVOA under 0%. I didn't have space to add the scores of the worst Pats games -- their lowest ratings of the season were Week 1 against the Jets and Week 5 against the Browns.

The Patriots have played ten straight games with a DVOA rating above 55%. The 1998 Broncos and 2005 Colts, also undefeated after ten games, had only seven games over 55% combined. Wow.
As for the 49ers, well, what can you say? They make me sad. My acquaintance with people in the front office outweighs my Patriots rooting interests.
Housekeeping: Everything should be updated, including individual and team stats pages, the premium database [5], the playoff odds [6], and the Loser League [7].
(Playoff odds are now updated.)
For (short) comments on every team, remember to look for DVOA on AOL, every Wednesday. (This will be linked on the FO Goes Mainstream [8] page.)
Links:
[1] http://www.footballoutsiders.com/info/methods#dvoa
[2] http://www.footballoutsiders.com//info/glossary#estimated_wins
[3] http://www.footballoutsiders.com//info/glossary#variance
[4] http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2007/11/19/ramblings/audibles/5777/
[5] http://www.footballoutsiders.com/store/premium
[6] http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/playoffodds.php
[7] http://www.footballoutsiders.com/loser/results.php
[8] http://www.footballoutsiders.com/category/fo-goes-mainstream