Minor weaknesses dot these teams. Except for Arizona, which needs to bring in more help to really run Bruce Arians' offense.
10 May 2004
by Aaron Schatz
Based on a couple of comments in the article on "failed complete" passes, here are three new tables for your analyzing enjoyment.
First, there were a number of requests to give the percentage of failed completes, rather than the total. This table gives that percentage based on total pass plays (including sacks) for each offense:
| 1st/2nd Down Partial Success |
3rd/4th Down Fail to Convert |
Zero Gain or Loss |
Total Failed Completes |
% of Pass Plays |
Yards | 1st/2nd Down Partial Success |
3rd/4th Down Fail to Convert |
Zero Gain or Loss |
Total Failed Completes |
% of Pass Plays |
Yards | ||||
| 1 | NYJ | 54 | 33 | 14 | 97 | 18.4% | 337 | 17 | SFO | 45 | 27 | 7 | 76 | 14.1% | 350 |
| 2 | SDG | 54 | 26 | 21 | 97 | 17.6% | 304 | 18 | CAR | 39 | 25 | 7 | 69 | 14.1% | 293 |
| 3 | DET | 57 | 35 | 12 | 104 | 17.3% | 385 | 19 | DEN | 44 | 21 | 5 | 70 | 14.0% | 337 |
| 4 | IND | 59 | 31 | 12 | 99 | 16.7% | 355 | 20 | ATL | 38 | 19 | 11 | 66 | 14.0% | 256 |
| 5 | ARI | 62 | 26 | 10 | 96 | 16.7% | 408 | 21 | PHI | 47 | 22 | 7 | 73 | 13.9% | 268 |
| 6 | GNB | 44 | 33 | 8 | 82 | 16.7% | 349 | 22 | OAK | 46 | 24 | 8 | 77 | 13.8% | 344 |
| 7 | TAM | 62 | 26 | 16 | 101 | 16.4% | 369 | 23 | HOU | 35 | 21 | 10 | 66 | 13.3% | 269 |
| 8 | CLE | 41 | 39 | 13 | 89 | 16.1% | 316 | 24 | NOR | 46 | 22 | 8 | 75 | 13.1% | 314 |
| 9 | DAL | 44 | 34 | 12 | 86 | 15.8% | 353 | 25 | MIA | 25 | 23 | 17 | 62 | 12.9% | 185 |
| 10 | KAN | 52 | 25 | 10 | 86 | 15.4% | 342 | 26 | NYG | 54 | 24 | 6 | 83 | 12.7% | 335 |
| 11 | NWE | 50 | 27 | 15 | 87 | 15.2% | 300 | 27 | MIN | 46 | 21 | 6 | 71 | 12.6% | 291 |
| 12 | STL | 55 | 27 | 18 | 97 | 15.0% | 335 | 28 | BAL | 27 | 27 | 5 | 57 | 12.5% | 263 |
| 13 | BUF | 47 | 30 | 7 | 81 | 14.6% | 369 | 29 | PIT | 39 | 25 | 8 | 71 | 12.4% | 325 |
| 14 | CHI | 47 | 26 | 9 | 81 | 14.5% | 354 | 30 | WAS | 40 | 23 | 5 | 67 | 11.7% | 286 |
| 15 | JAC | 46 | 27 | 7 | 79 | 14.4% | 335 | 31 | TEN | 31 | 26 | 5 | 61 | 11.5% | 284 |
| 16 | CIN | 51 | 21 | 8 | 80 | 14.3% | 358 | 32 | SEA | 35 | 11 | 9 | 55 | 9.7% | 195 |
Second, there was a request for the defensive numbers. Remember, the goal here isn't to discover the quality of each defense, but its shape:
| 1st/2nd Down Partial Success |
3rd/4th Down Fail to Convert |
Zero Gain or Loss |
Total Failed Completes |
% of Pass Plays |
Yards | 1st/2nd Down Partial Success |
3rd/4th Down Fail to Convert |
Zero Gain or Loss |
Total Failed Completes |
% of Pass Plays |
Yards | ||||
| 1 | OAK | 38 | 35 | 21 | 89 | 18.0% | 322 | 17 | KAN | 53 | 22 | 10 | 85 | 14.4% | 310 |
| 2 | IND | 46 | 24 | 15 | 82 | 17.3% | 328 | 18 | JAC | 40 | 23 | 15 | 76 | 14.2% | 302 |
| 3 | PHI | 55 | 32 | 20 | 101 | 16.9% | 357 | 19 | CLE | 44 | 22 | 10 | 74 | 13.9% | 297 |
| 4 | TEN | 51 | 42 | 9 | 98 | 16.7% | 466 | 20 | NYJ | 44 | 18 | 6 | 67 | 13.6% | 262 |
| 5 | PIT | 46 | 30 | 13 | 86 | 16.6% | 289 | 21 | STL | 42 | 26 | 9 | 75 | 13.6% | 333 |
| 6 | SDG | 51 | 34 | 6 | 90 | 16.3% | 448 | 22 | NYG | 41 | 25 | 13 | 76 | 13.4% | 323 |
| 7 | GNB | 61 | 31 | 10 | 101 | 16.3% | 379 | 23 | DAL | 35 | 32 | 7 | 70 | 13.4% | 283 |
| 8 | DEN | 55 | 25 | 9 | 87 | 16.2% | 330 | 24 | WAS | 36 | 24 | 9 | 68 | 13.3% | 252 |
| 9 | CHI | 48 | 36 | 7 | 88 | 16.2% | 351 | 25 | CIN | 40 | 21 | 10 | 70 | 12.9% | 296 |
| 10 | TAM | 45 | 30 | 11 | 82 | 16.0% | 298 | 26 | BUF | 41 | 21 | 12 | 70 | 12.8% | 233 |
| 11 | BAL | 49 | 30 | 15 | 92 | 15.9% | 384 | 27 | ARI | 35 | 27 | 3 | 65 | 12.5% | 349 |
| 12 | DET | 52 | 26 | 8 | 84 | 15.3% | 372 | 28 | SEA | 49 | 17 | 10 | 75 | 12.1% | 275 |
| 13 | ATL | 57 | 21 | 5 | 83 | 15.1% | 337 | 29 | HOU | 34 | 25 | 4 | 63 | 12.0% | 290 |
| 14 | CAR | 54 | 16 | 15 | 82 | 14.6% | 252 | 30 | NWE | 50 | 22 | 7 | 77 | 11.7% | 266 |
| 15 | SFO | 47 | 25 | 9 | 81 | 14.6% | 320 | 31 | NOR | 32 | 22 | 4 | 58 | 11.2% | 274 |
| 16 | MIA | 55 | 22 | 7 | 83 | 14.5% | 317 | 32 | MIN | 36 | 21 | 7 | 63 | 11.1% | 269 |
Yes, I'm sure many people are shocked to find the Patriots near the bottom of this list. Remember, of course, that before a pass can be a "failed complete" it has to be complete to begin with. Once I had thought about this a bit, the numbers made sense. Based solely on my subjective watching of every Patriots game last year (except Cleveland, the day my daughter was born) I don't remember a lot of short completions against the Patriots. Judged solely by the metric "number of times Aaron screamed at the television" it seems like every third down completion was a new first down, and the Pats would give up a couple of these before making their big third down stop or getting the interception. The low number of catches tackled for a loss would seem to jive with New England's weakness against passes to running backs discussed here.
Another number above that jumps out at you is probably the 42 third down catches against Tennessee that failed to achieve a first down. That's far and away the most in the league, but the Titans did face the most pass plays of any team in the NFL last year. Guess what: the gap is even wider when you look at the percentage of such catches on all third-and-long plays (defined as six or more yards to go):
| Team | % Failed Completes on 3rd-and-6+ |
Team | % Failed Completes on 3rd-and-6+ |
| TEN | 40.9% | SDG | 26.7% |
| ARI | 29.3% | BAL | 26.4% |
| CHI | 28.9% | PIT | 26.3% |
| OAK | 27.9% | HOU | 26.1% |
| PHI | 27.6% | DAL | 25.5% |
I'll leave the rest of the analysis, for the time being, to the readers. Feel free to go nuts in the discussion thread.
comments
Comments
Post new comment