Our final preview of Football Outsiders Almanac 2009 gives you a peek at some of the player comments and fantasy football projections.
03 Nov 2006
by Mike Tanier
Two weeks ago, we examined how teams are using multi-tight end sets in the running game. As promised, we'll take a look at the passing game this week.
After spending a few weeks studying game tapes, I'm impressed by the diversity of two-tight end packages that appear in the NFL. Teams like the Chargers, Cowboys, Colts, and Patriots have devised countless formations based around a simple personnel grouping: two tight ends, two receivers, and a running back.
Graphing all of the variations would take hours and make this page scroll down forever: the two tight ends can line up on the same side or on opposite sides of the offensive line. Similarly, the receivers can be split or aligned to one side. Various types of "trips" formations can be designed using two tight ends and a receiver or two receivers and a tight end. Of course, receivers like Antonio Gates often line up in the slot, while the Cowboys sometimes use their tight ends as fullbacks. The formations sometimes seem as unique as snowflakes.
| Figure 1: Split Tight End Formation |
![]() |
Let's take a closer look at two alignments that have cropped up frequently during tape study. Figure 1 shows a formation that the Chargers and Cowboys frequently use. The initial alignment floods the left side of the formation with three eligible receivers, and no one split wide at the far side of the field. But pre-snap, the right tight end splits wide. Suddenly, what looked like a balanced run-pass formation looks much more like a passing formation. Defenses that place a safety over the right tight end as a force defender can be set up for a mismatch using this shift; most safeties cannot cover Gates or Jason Witten in space.
| Figure 2: Ace Tight Formation |
![]() |
Figure 2 shows another formation that several teams are using. This one has also worked its way into video games in recent years, where it is called "Ace Tight." It looks like a vanilla formation, with the tight ends and receivers split, but notice how close the receivers are to the offensive line. They are practically wingbacks, just a few yards to the left and right of the box. The receivers in this formation are in great position to block for counters and off-tackle runs, but that's not why Ace Tight is gaining popularity. These "tight" receivers are in great position to attack the weaknesses in two-deep coverage schemes. One receiver's route options are shown in the diagram. A cornerback aligned head-up on the receiver is vulnerable to a corner route, while a cornerback with a wider split (one who may have zone responsibilities) is vulnerable to a hitch. The tight formation gives the receiver extra room to run after he makes his break on the corner route or other sideline routes. In a few paragraphs, we'll see how the Patriots use this principle to isolate tight end Ben Watson against a safety.
One common theme you will see in the figures that follow is that defenses frequently use two-deep coverage schemes to combat two-tight end formations. The threat of a deep seam route forces defensive coordinators to play it safe against players like Gates and Watson. In fact, while we won't see any completed seam passes in this week's diagrams, we'll see how the threat of the seamer opens up other options for the multi-tight end offense.
Let's start reviewing game footage by analyzing a fairly standard play: a double-cross route combination designed to match up a great wide receiver (Terrell Owens) against a linebacker in zone coverage.
| Figure 3: Cowboys T.O. Drag |
![]() |
The Cowboys face third-and-5 inside the red zone in the first quarter against the Titans. They break the huddle and align in an unbalanced formation with three of their best receivers flooding the right side (Figure 3). Terry Glenn is closest to the sideline, with Owens in the slot. Both receivers are one yard off the line of scrimmage, allowing Jason Witten (right side) and Anthony Fasano (left) to line up as true tight ends. Marion Barber is the Cowboys running back; Drew Bledsoe is the quarterback. The Titans respond with their nickel personnel package and a two-deep zone look.
Pre-snap, Glenn goes in motion across the formation. The Titans shift accordingly. Their right cornerback (remember, he's on the offensive left side) moves from a force position outside Fasano's shoulder to a split position over Glenn. The two defensive backs on the offensive right side shuffle until one is outside Owens' shoulder and the other occupies the space between Owens and Witten. The defensive adjustment confirms a Cover-2 pre-snap read. Glenn's motion was also designed to disrupt any likely Titans blitz packages. The force cornerback was a likely blitzer in the original formation, but by changing the number of eligible receivers on each side of the ball, the Cowboys forced the Titans to wave off any possible blitzes (though judging from the tape, the undermanned Titans weren't planning anything fancy on this play).
Figure 3 shows the route combination. Let's examine each player's role. Glenn and Witten run the deep routes: Glenn a post into the end zone and Witten a seamer. Both routes are crucial. Glenn not only commands the attention of the safety to his side, but he also influences his cornerback to run with him up the stem of his route. His route essentially clears two defenders. Witten gets a fast, clean release to the outside. The nickel defender to his side takes a deep set before trading Witten off to the safety. The combination of deep routes creates a great deal of space underneath.
Fasano, after chipping a defender on his release, runs a crossing route at a depth of about eight yards. He's probably the fifth read on this play. He has two jobs: to influence his linebacker to take a deep set, and to "rub" anyone chasing Owens in man coverage. On this particular play, the Titans are playing straight zone, but this play would be even more effective against them if they opted for a man-under scheme: Glenn would take his cornerback all the way to the end zone while Fasano wiped out Owens' defender.
Owens, after an initial move outside, runs a very shallow drag below the linebacker level. Drag routes are designed to allow receivers to cross through multiple zones until they find a soft spot. On this play, there are many soft spots. Barber's shallow hitch freezes the middle linebacker. Fasano pulls linebacker Patrick Sirmon deep and toward the middle of the field. Owens times his cross well, running at about 3/4th speed so that Fasano, Barber, and Glenn have time to stretch their zones. Bledsoe also demonstrates good timing: Owens is running too shallow a route to pick up a first down without gaining some yards after the catch, so Bledsoe waits until Owens is just to the left of Sirmon before leading the receiver with the throw. Sirmon reacts, but he lacks the speed to bring Owens down before he turns the corner. Owens races for a first down before Sirmon and Hill drag him out of bounds.
In the previous example, the Titans attacked the Cowboys' base two-tight end set with a five-man secondary. This was due both to the down-and-distance situation and the strength of the Cowboys receivers. Most defenses use their standard personnel grouping against a two-tight end, two-receiver package, though they may move a linebacker or two up to act as down linemen.
But what happens when the offense shifts into a three-tight end look? Again, the defense's reaction varies, depending on the down, the distance, and the opponent.
We generally think of a three-tight end formation as a running formation. But the Patriots are unpredictable when they switch to a three-tight end package. Opponents who would normally switch to a 4-4 or 5-3 defense (replacing a cornerback with an extra lineman or linebacker) are reluctant to do so against the Patriots. This benefits the Patriots' running game, but Bill Belichick's assistants are very clever about using multiple tight ends as weapons in the passing game as well.
| Figure 4: Patriots 3-TE Corner |
![]() |
Diagram 4 shows a play that the Patriots used to gain 35 yards against the Bengals. The Patriots lined up on first-and-10 in a three-tight end set: Daniel Graham is on the right side, Ben Watson is on the left, and David Thomas is on the wing over Watson's shoulder. Watson is such a receiving threat that the Bengals don't dare switch to a run-stopping personnel package. Instead, they line up in a base 4-3, with Tory James in the force position. For clarity, only three defenders are shown in the diagram: James, safety Kevin Kaesviharn, and linebacker Landon Johnson.
The pre-snap read suggests two-deep zone coverage. What makes this formation so effective is that it creates a lot of open space on the left side of the field. James is pinched close to the line of scrimmage, giving him a lot of space to defend in the flat. Kaesviharn is in a typical deep set, but his first responsibility on a typical play from this formation is to defend the deep seam route by Watson. The Patriots have a different plan: they are going to attack the left sideline. Most teams don't have multiple tight ends with the speed to execute this play effectively, but the Patriots have three tight ends who can run deeper routes.
Both Thomas and Watson get clean releases at the snap. Graham stays in to provide pass protection. Running back Laurence Maroney runs a flat route while Thomas and Watson run parallel stem routes. At about 15 yards, Thomas runs an out route while Watson breaks for the corner. The receiver to the right side, unfortunately, is invisible on the television replays; let's just have him run a fly route.
The flat route by Maroney forces James to take a shallow drop. James also reacts to Thomas' out route and finds himself in a no-man's land between two receivers. Johnson is also influenced by Thomas' route, leaving Watson to Kaesvahirn. The Bengals safety has no outside help when Watson runs his corner route, Watson has room to get separation because of the tight formation, and Tom Brady has time to allow the play to develop because of the six-man protection. The result is a big gain.
The Patriots mix in their three-tight end look on early downs. The Cowboys only use it in traditional short-yardage situations. But opponents must fear the receiving threat of a player like Witten, even when they are trying to stuff a power run. Diagram 5 shows a third-and-short formation used by the Cowboys against the Titans. Witten is the wing to the left side. Fasano is next to him. Third-stringer Ryan Hannam is on the right of the formation. Glenn is the lone wide receiver. Marion Barber is the running back.
| Figure 5: Cowboys Flanker Out |
![]() |
The Cowboys are a no-nonsense offense in short-yardage situations: they generally run the ball. But when they do pass, it's usually a play-action throw to Glenn. The Titans appear reluctant to switch to a run-stopping personnel package on this play. They move two linebackers and a safety to the line of scrimmage to create a seven-man front, but their only concession to third-and-short is an extra safety. Three Titans linemen play head-up against the center and guards to stuff any short runs, but safety Chris Hope and the Titans linebackers are close to the tight ends in the event that they must drop into pass coverage.
(Note: the deep safety cannot be seen on the television replay, so he may actually be a cornerback).
The Cowboys do elect to pass on this play. Fasano and Hannam stay in to block, Witten runs a short curl, and Barber's initial steps suggest a run off-tackle. Bledsoe executes an uninspiring fake, but the rest of the play-action, particularly the two blocking tight ends, is convincing. The Cowboys want to trap Tennessee's linebackers and safeties in run support, and they succeed: Glenn is isolated in man coverage against safety Lamont Thompson. This is exactly the matchup the Cowboys wanted. Thompson must react to the possibility of a deep pass, so he keeps Glenn in front of him as Glenn runs a sideline route for 12 yards. Glenn may have had an option on his route: if Thompson tried to jam him or got caught up in the run action, Glenn may have gone deep.
Let's finish up with a brief look at empty sets and shotgun sets using two tight ends. We'll take our examples from Chargers game tape. We think of the Chargers as an I-formation running team, but coordinator Cam Cameron uses lots of two-tight end sets to exploit the strengths of Antonio Gates (a great receiver) and Brandon Manumaleuna (a 280-pound extra tackle with pretty good hands).
| Figure 6: Chargers Empty Backfield |
![]() |
Figure 6 is taken from my game notes from Week 1 game against the Raiders. The initial formation included LaDainian Tomlinson at running back, Eric Parker split left, another receiver (probably Keenan McCardell) in the slot, Gates as the right tight end, and Manumaleuna in the wing to Gates' right. Before the snap, Tomlinson motions to the right sideline, creating an empty backfield. The Raiders were in man coverage on this play, and a safety followed LT to his new position. At the snap, Tomlinson runs a fly to clear the defense, Gates runs a seamer, and Manumaleuna slips into the flat. The receivers to the far side run a post and a cross. On this play, Philip Rivers froze the Raiders linebackers by watching Gates at the start of the play, then flipped to Manumaleuna for a modest gain. Once again, the threat of a long pass up the seam created an opportunity for a productive throw underneath.
Last week against the Rams, the Chargers attempted a similar play from the same formation. Gates ran a hook route in this version of the play, and Rivers' first read was to Parker running the post against man coverage. But the Rams blitzed a safety and recorded an easy sack. It was a bold call by Rams coordinator Jim Haslett, and it demonstrates the kinds of adjustments defenses can make based on film analysis.
| Figure 7: Tomlinson Sideline |
![]() |
Gates' versatility allows Cameron to use his two-tight end personnel grouping in a variety of game situations -- even the two-minute offense. Against the Rams last week, the Chargers effectively used their two-tight end package while driving just before halftime. Figure 7 may be a little busy, but the concept is simple. Gates is the tight end split to the left side. Manumaleuna is the motion H-back who motions into the backfield. Cameron has built a three-wideout, two-back look out of a very different personnel package.
The Rams are in a 3-3-5 defense, and the pre-snap read is a blitz by the right linebacker. You would expect Manumaleuna to stay in the backfield to block, but instead he chips the blitzing middle linebacker and runs an angle route. Gates, one of the game's best decoys when not actually catching the ball, runs a fly route (Travis Fisher, the Rams' best cornerback, covers Gates on this play). But most of the action occurs on the right side, where McCardell runs a drag route, taking cornerback Fakhir Brown with him. The Rams are in man coverage, and linebacker Dexter Coakley is no match for Tomlinson, who runs a sideline route and makes a catch for a six-yard gain.
The interesting thing about the shotgun formation used by the Chargers on this play is that it can easily be turned into a max-protect alignment. Opponents just cannot guess by the personnel grouping or the pre-snap set exactly what the Chargers are planning.
While studying multi-tight end sets, I saw tight ends playing fullback, tight ends running deep posts, tight ends catching screen passes, and tight ends catching option passes from running backs. I saw the Eagles use a three-tight end personnel grouping. I saw the Ravens in a two-tight end, two-back package on third-and-long (I don't recall if that was before or after Jim Fassell was fired).
Basically, multi-tight end sets are everywhere, and they are being used in every possible situation. And as colleges keep churning out tight ends who are as big as fullbacks and as fast as wide receivers, offensive coordinators will keep scheming to use these athletic specimens as all-purpose weapons.
A few years ago, the second tight end was a glorified right tackle who only played in short-yardage situations. Now, players like Fasano and Manumaleuna are key components in their team's offenses. They block, they run routes, and they sprint up the pipe on a deep route just when you least expect it.
Somewhere, Don Warren is smiling.
35 comments, Last at 07 Nov 2006, 2:47pm by mediator12
Comments
First
Thank you Mike, terrific article and terrific series!
Just a note, Dan Henning is the offensive coordinator for the Panthers, not the Chargers. I believe Cam Cameron is in charge of the Chargers' offense.
Thanks for the great work, Mike! The TDZ series is definitely a feather in FO's cap.
4. Seriously. My favorite Part.
Plus it shows something: A whole bunch of good teams are running multi tight end sets right now.
There are plenty of good tight ends coming out of college, and not very much demand. The good teams have noticed, the bad ones havent. Seems like a usual thing: Finding cheap, versatile weapons helps teams win.
I just have one question. How often do the Craters use multiple TE sets?
Seriously, though, nice article, these explanations really help me, a person who never played football beyond the sandlot level of complexity, understand what is going on in an NFL game.
What can I say except that these articles almost always blow me away. I love it. This is what is so fantastic about FO.
This is the absolute greatest thing that F.O. does. It's just incredible, awe inspiring and awesome, in fact, I almost had an orgasm half way through the article.
Hey Mike - Great job as always. A fellow Eagles fan wonders, when did the Birds use a 3-TE set? How did it work out? Thanks.
The Cameron-Henning thing is fixed. I have a problem with keeping coordinators straight.
The Eagles used 3-TE a few times against the Jags last week. They were using Schobel as a motion tight end with Bartrum and Smith also in the game.
See the Eagles' offensive output from that game to determine how well it worked!
#8 pretty much beat me to it.
How did you do those diagrams? Why type of program do teams do to diagram their plays?
Great Article. But it's an excellant chance to ream on the terminology of positions. Is a player labeled by his media guide credentials or by the position on the field. How can a TIGHT end be split? Doesn't that make him a SPLIT end? I realize that if we see Antonio Gates we recognize him as a TE because that's what he is called. But if he's not playing that position, he isn't a tight end. If a centerfielder in baseball plays shortstop for an inning, we don't call him a centerfielder right? Just pointing it out as I think it makes following some articles difficult if the terminology changes.
The Cameron-Henning thing doesn't look fixed to me.
"Figure 7 may be a little busy, but the concept is simple. Gates is the tight end split to the left side. Manumaleuna is the motion H-back who motions into the backfield. Henning has built a three-wideout, two-back look out of a very different personnel package."
Re: 13
With all the pre-snap motion, that's impractical for the purposes of diagramming a play. A better analogy would be that is a shortstop chases a ball into the outfield he's doesn't all of a sudden become an outfielder.
13.
I think we're talking more about player capabilities than where theyre lining up.
(IE a 6'0 190lb slot reciever vs a 6'4 260lb TE, who aren't that far off as far as speed goes)
With the quality of tight ends comming out of school right now, you're basically sacrificing a tiny bit of speed to gain 60lbs, 3-6 inches of height, and a much better blocker (vs a WR).
When a TE runs a streak, or a fly, he has to be treated exactly like a WR (covered by the same guys), but he also is a much more effective blocker. The TE gives you flexibility that a WR doesnt.
I don't know where the right place to say this is, but I really like the new banner at the top!
Completely unrelated, but Benjy should fix the box so that it doesn't cover up Gil Thorpe in the banner. I want to save it for posterity.
Pretty nice article, too.
zip super job noticing that. I'd never have. And it IS funny. Mike, excellent piece as usual.
Anybody know what happened to Marcus Pollard, one of the earlier hoopsters converted to TE, after he went to Detroit? I could look him up but wondered if anybody knew off ther top of their head (i.e. injured, retired, still there and missing Indy, etc.).
Hey, did anybody realize that the Pats are hosting the Colts this weekend? I just heard it... what, was it a surprise game or something--one of those TV schedule switched ones--because this is the first I've come across it. Might be a good one....
Bobman: Pollard had one mediocre year in Detroit. I think he is still playing for the Lions, actually.
15
Excellent point. I guess what I'm trying to say is that if we aren't labeling a player with a position based on where they are in the field, what is it based on? We all recognize Antonio Gates and Ben Watson as TE even if they're split but if they play the majority of their plays split, can we still legimately call them TE? And what about players who switch positions. We don't still consider Hines Ward or Randell El as quarterbacks playing WR even though they played QB in college. Why do we still consider Gates a TE if he's playing split?
Thanks, Ferg. I suspect he'll be one of those guys who signs for one-day then retires a Colt--they took some moderate risk to develop him from practice squad into a top TE for a few years (pro-bowler if not for Gonzalez in KC) and he was well liked, but a little old and expensive for what they had planned. One of those locker room leaders who was usually a reliable quote for the papers too.
Bobman
More specifically about Pollard: This is his second year with Detroit and he had forgettable season last year. He got kind of caught up in the whole Harrington/Garcia QB shuffle and didn't get a chance to produce. This season, he seemed to have lost his starting job in camp to Casey Fitzsimmons but he got hurt and now Dan Campbell is making all the catches for the TE's. I'm not sure if he's playing much but I don't think Martz's offense is extremely TE friendly.
This article was the shiznit. I especially founf the diagrams to be informative.
Thanks to all.
sorry fr DrunK
post.go Eags!!!!! Back on the winning tack for week 10. and more winning to foloww that
#24 pretty much beat me to it.
Come to think of it, the Patriots may have two great TEs, but think about the TE combos the Colts have had in recent years - Kent Dilger and Marcus Pollard, Pollard and Dallas Clark, Clark and Ben Utecht/Hartsock. It doesn't seem like those TEs helped them against the 3-4 before, so why is everyone talking about BB assembling the kryptonite for his own defense?
#15: A much better analogy would be a SS running clear into CF before the pitch. That is essentially what's happening with a motion to the slot: that SS is no longer performing the duties of a SS, but rather the duties of a LF, and he's performing that function for the duration of the play. On his card it'd probably read something like SS/OF, but if he started doing it regularly, he'd probably be announced in the lineup as an OF (probably something goofy like SCF), rather than as a SS, because he would rarely be playing at short.
Re: #26
Because the Colts don't use the three-tight-end set much and actually prefer the three-wideout setup. We've seen Dallas Clark play much more slot than usual this year, and I'd be curious to see if they start using more motion from him in the upcoming weeks.
16, 21: Players are defined by their common uses, not every position they ever line up at. The effectiveness of Gates as a SE is related to the rarity; teams use defensive packages planning for a TE and face another split instead. Or, while Gates's position in the formation is SE, his roster position and standard field position is as a TE.
#13
A problem with your analogy is that SS and CF play defense, while TE and SE play offense. Your analogy needs to work more on the level of, "Why is he called a batter when he's actually bunting?"
Antonio Gates, Tight Split End
Someone's going to need to work on that.
23 and 26,
Pollard wasn't all that good with Indy. He had a tendency to blow routes and drop balls at key times. It seemed to me that Manning would get more frustrated with him than anyone else. And I wasn't very impressed with him as blocker.
I suspect that no other team will likely get much production out of any of the current crop except Clark.
29 has the value of using a TE as a SE on any given play.
The Defenses in this league are geared to Down, distance, tendency, and personnel. When making play calls, the DC's can no longer incorporate TE's the way they used to, so now they go by the first three more often than not.
Some of the more creative defensive schemes I have seen have produced a Big Nickle type package where the Nickle DB is replaced with a Cover Safety instead of a diminutive CB. Denver started using this against Gates and Gonzalez and have been extremely successful in containing the inherent mismatches they create for CB's covering giant TE's. It was one of the reason's they led the NFL in TE DVOA the last two years.
This year they still play the big Nickle, but it has been less effective against TE's in the new Zone scheme Larry Coyer has designed. The TE's are not Covered Man to man as much and are usually open underneath the zones by design.
Losing Sam Brandon to an ACL will force Curome Cox to fill a Big role in the upcoming Division games versus Gates and Gonzalez.
My question is how is all this motion and shifting going to affect free agency and player mobility. For example, in a couple of years Ben Watson is going to be an unrestricted free agent. His snaps are played all over the place, at TE, at SE, and sometimes as a wing or even a fullback. What happens if the Patriots try to franchise him. For what position do they offer the top 5 salaries for. The Patriots would probably insist on TE but what if his agents try to make it WR or even RB. Could be a source of discontention.
It's taken me a while to get round to reading this, but frankly, it was well worth the wait. Awesome stuff you don't get anywhere else.
Benjamin,
For all intents and purposes, Ben Watson is a TE. However, he does fill other roles in the offense on certain plays, just like a lot of players do. Football is about flexibility and matchups and the best coaches exploit matchups from week to week. One week, he may take more snaps at the SE position or FB position, but he is primarily a TE from a snaps point of view.
I could be wrong, but I think that part of the collective Bargaining agreement is based on number of snaps at a position for Franchising a player.
The OL is where this is normally a problem. What is a OL plays more snaps at OT than OG in a season where OL injuries have occurred. Does he have a case to be paid like an OT or OG since he will move back to OG next year? Certainly a point of contention if a player gets franchised?
However, the new CB agreement has given less credence to the Franchise and transition tags.
Post new comment