Writers of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

Most Recent FO Features

HackenbergChr15.jpg

» SDA: From Death Valley to Happy Valley

While Saturday won't give us an answer to which is the best one-loss team, it is still a big week for conference races across the country.

03 Sep 2012

Officiating Minicamp: Part III

by Mike Kurtz

Principles of Penalty Enforcement

While game management and officiating mechanics are useful, the real meat of an official's job is the recognition and enforcement of penalties. With 22 players running, blocking, and engaging in all manner of actions common to the game, there are a ton of possible infractions in a dozen different spots all over the field. Two factors keep the officials on track: specialization and position.

What do I mean by specialization? While every official is able to call and enforce any penalty in the book, some penalties are far more common for certain positions than others. For instance, the back judge is unlikely to throw many flags for roughing the passer, as he is far away from the pocket and likely to have his eyes on the action downfield. The various officials are so experienced at their positions, in fact, that the calls common to that area of the field are more muscle memory than conscious rules interpretation. This allows the officials to attend to their other duties while still keeping watch for infractions.

Position is a similar concept: the idea is that an official is responsible for calls in the field zones for which they are responsible (I covered these zones in Part I and Part II). This philosophy is backed by the concepts that an official must have a clear view of the infraction to call it, and the farther from the action an official is, the less likely he'll have a clear view of the possible foul. Commentators (particularly former players) are actually rather clued-in on this concept, and even a casual viewer will pick up on Troy Aikman wondering why a flag came from across the field when there was another official right in front of the action. Each official has his keys for enforcement on each play, and those keys generally correspond to a number of players in a certain area of the field. By slicing the action into chunks, the crew can make sure all the action is covered.

The other major concern, of course, is how the possible penalty impacted the play. While few officials would admit it, there are some penalties (holding is the classic example) where borderline infractions occur on nearly every play. For something like holding, the choice to throw a flag is a snap decision by the covering official based on the foul's proximity to the point of attack, the angle of attack, and the flagrancy of the foul. A tackle block opening a lane for a runner is going to be called every time, whereas a hook against a defensive lineman when the ball is already 20 yards downfield is significantly less likely to draw a flag. Should that offensive lineman turn the hook into a twist and throw his opponent to the ground, however, the impact of the holding on the play is probably overshadowed by the need to enforce order on the game.

The Penalties

For each penalty, I will note the official primarily responsible (or simply most likely to throw a flag), the enforcement of that penalty, and a brief cheat sheet on what the officials are looking for on each infraction. Some will include information on the spot from which enforcement begins, which even has its own chapter in the official rule book. However, most fouls are penalized from the line of scrimmage, so general enforcement is simple. If an offensive foul occurs beyond the line of scrimmage but behind the succeeding spot (where the play ended), the offense is not given credit for the post-penalty yardage. Some penalties (most famously defensive pass interference) are enforced from the spot where the foul occurred. If the offense commits a foul behind its own goal line, the play is by rule a safety. If the defense commits a foul in its opponent's end zone, the spot for enforcement is the goal line. The umpire is responsible for measuring out the penalty and re-spotting the ball.

Roughing the Passer (12-2-8)

Covering Official: Referee.

Enforcement: 15 yards from the previous spot and an automatic first down. Disqualification if flagrant.

Roughing the passer is one of the most important penalties in the game and, alongside the other safety-related fouls, is one of the most strictly enforced. In fact, the official rulebook explicitly states that "[w]hen in doubt about a roughness call or potentially dangerous tactic against the quarterback, the Referee should always call roughing the passer." Oftentimes during a game the audience hears the commentators equivocating over whether a questionable play was "really" roughing the passer. What the broadcasters and most of the audience fail to realize is that, if there is a serious question, the play will be penalized as a matter of course. This leaves a tremendous burden on defensive players to ensure that nothing about their play even suggests roughing or any "potentially dangerous tactic," but football at all levels is keenly aware of the extreme risk carried by quarterbacks, and is training its officials to always err on the side of player safety.

That said, there are specific actions a defender can take against a quarterback, depending on what stage the play has reached. A defender may never:

  • Hit the passer while he is clearly "out of the play"
  • Hit the area below the knee of a passer, even if the initial contact occurred above the knee, unless he is blocked into the passer
  • Perform a forcible blow to the head or arm of the passer with his arm
  • Perform a forcible blow to the helmet of the passer using the defender's helmet, regardless of where the initial contact occurred

All of these guidelines are subjective, but it's a "you know it when you see it" sort of subjective. Remember: the league has decreed that any questionable activity that falls into these categories must be flagged, so these categories are quite broad in practice. The addition of language equating to "forcible" to the last two categories is a relatively recent rule change, and the only recent change that has favored defenders. In practice, the only legal hit on a quarterback is above the knee, without any contact between the players' arms and helmets. There are, however, special rules for plays during the "protected" period immediately following the release of the pass and preceding the passer being "out of the play." The basic rules for this protected period are:

  • A defender may only hit the passer through the defender's first step following the pass's release
  • A defender may not perform any "unnecessary" acts while hitting the passer
  • A defender may not "club" the passer's arm during a pass or immediately thereafter
  • A defender may not hit the passer's neck or head with any part of his helmet
  • A defender may not lower his head and hit any area of the passer with the forehead or crown of his helmet

Immediately after the pass has been thrown, the rules for contact with a passer become considerably more strict. The "two-step" rule, which used to be merely a rule of thumb, is now an official interpretation. The second prohibition, against unnecessary acts, is most commonly called for driving the quarterback into the ground after the pass has been thrown. The third entry is honestly not enforced, since a defender would have to blatantly be attempting to injure a quarterback in order for a club to be distinguishable from the defender merely attempting to knock the ball free. The final two are pure safety violations and as such are given zero tolerance, much to James Harrison's chagrin.

As a rule of thumb, if the passer's head gets hammered, it's a penalty. If the defender does anything other than what's required to perform the tackle, it's a penalty. If the defender leads with his helmet after the throw, it's a penalty. Applying those three basic tenets demystifies most roughing calls and safely removes us from the commentator morass of what "looks like" roughing.

Holding

Covering Official: Umpire, line judge, head linesman (offense); field judge, side judge, back judge (defense).

Enforcement: 10 yards (offense), 5 yards and an automatic first down (defense).

The most important concept to understand about holding is "close line play." This phrase is actually a decodification of the former NFL and current NCAA rules regarding the "free blocking zone" which covered players on the line of scrimmage and inside the tackles when the snap occurred. If the players are involved in "close line play," then there will be no foul for holding if the defender is being double-teamed, if the action is away from the point of attack, or if the ball has already been thrown downfield. The exception to this enforcement is if the hold is flagrant, especially if it results in a defender being thrown to the ground.

Despite its practical application, defensive holding is extremely similar to offensive holding. In both cases, the offending player is attempting to impede the progress of another player toward some goal (the ballcarrier on defense and the player's passing route on offense). The methods players use to illegally hold their opponents fall into six general categories:

  • Tackles
  • Takedowns
  • Pull and falls
  • Hook and restricts
  • Jerk and restricts
  • Grab and restricts

Note the importance of "and restrict" for hooks, jerks and grabs. It takes an extremely powerful and flagrant hook, jerk, or grab to actually obstruct a football player from his goal. What these maneuvers do, however, is make it much more easy for the player to restrict his target after hooking, jerking or grabbing him. Due to this dynamic, these moves are useful indicators that a restriction, and therefore a hold, is about to ensue. Recognition draws the official's eyes to the action and helps ensure he sees the entire restriction and therefore the holding penalty.

Let's look at a few of these in depth:

Tackles are self-explanatory. The only player that may be legally tackled is the ball carrier or a player simulating possession of the ball on a misdirection play. Sometimes defenders will attempt to tackle or submarine a pulling offensive lineman in an attempt to break up a running play, so actual tackles in line play are actually somewhat common.

Takedowns are basically tackles but with some play-acting involved. The player (almost always an offensive lineman, although occasionally a defensive back in the five-yard chuck zone) begins with what appears to be a legal block, then attempts to leverage his blocking angle or the other player's momentum and drive that player to the ground.

Pull and falls involve one player latching on to another player (usually a pass rusher) and attempting to use his weight to unbalance the other player and cause him to fall. If an offensive lineman is beaten on a bull rush, for instance, he would grab the defensive lineman's jersey and allow himself to fall, taking the defender with him. This creates the appearance of a defender tripping over a blocker who blew his block.

Hook and restrict primarily breaks down into two maneuvers: hook and turns, and armbars. Armbars are most famously employed by defensive backs, but they can occur anywhere on the field. Any time a player is thrown off a route in which he has priority (a pass rusher outside the body of an offensive blocker, for instance) by an arm extension slowing his progress -- even if there is no contact -- it is considered a hold. Hook and turns have some overlap with pass interference, and often involve a defensive back or receiver (whichever has been beat to the ball) hooking his arm around the body of the other player and tugging, causing the player to pivot and be thrown off his route.

Jerk and restrict is somewhat unique among holds in that it is an affirmative strategy rather than the result of a blocker being beaten. In order to "jerk" a defender, the blocker must have already initiated a legal block. Afterward, the blocker grabs his opponent's jersey while his momentum is stopped and jerks him to the side, usually away from the point of attack.

Grab and restrict is the classic holding technique; a player is beaten, and as his opponent runs by, he grabs or bear-hugs him. It is important to note that just grabbing isn't holding so long as the grab itself does not impede the other player. Holding in this scenario involves a grab which is maintained and impacts the path of his opponent.

The important axiom for holding (aside from jerk and restricts) is "if you're beat, you cheat." Look for dominant players who aren't drawing a double-team, a particularly small or inept blocker, or a slow or inexperienced defensive back. Watch how they react to their individual opponents. Oftentimes that opponent will blow by them and the player, with a mix of instinct and desperation, restricts or tackles the other player. This is why officials make it a point to know the playmakers on both sides of the ball before a contest, as those players are most likely to draw illegal conduct from the other side.

Pass Interference

Covering Official: Side judge, field judge, back judge (both offense and defense).

Enforcement: 10 yards from the previous spot (offense), Spot of the foul and an automatic first down plus 15 yards if the interference was a personal foul (defense).

The rule for pass interference is deceptively simple: "It is pass interference by either team when any act by a player more than one yard beyond the line of scrimmage significantly hinders the progress of an eligible receiver's opportunity to catch the ball." This rule implies, but does not set, a standard of intentionality to the interfering player's actions. This, to my mind, is the rule's downfall, and why it is the subject of so much controversy. Much like the definition and interpretations regarding the catch, the league has instead chosen to generate a large list of "allowed" activity, followed by a list of permitted exceptions to that activity. A player may not:

  • Come into contact with an opponent in a way that restricts the opponent's opportunity to make the catch, unless that player is "playing the ball"
  • Play through the back of an opponent in an attempt to knock the caught ball loose or defense the pass
  • Armbar, under any circumstances
  • Cut off the path of another player to the ball by making contact with him
  • Hooking and/or hooking and restricting
  • Pushing off, under any circumstances

"Playing the ball" is an extremely difficult concept to apply to real-time football action. In response, an official will usually attempt to replay the action slowly in his head to reconfirm the possible interference. The interpretation he employs is a combination of these specific categories and a heavy emphasis on the basic rule of interpretation, that a player who takes an unfair action in order to gain an advantage on a play has committed a penalty. Then, after confirming that the action did fall into one of the above categories and that the player gained some advantage by it, the official then has to rule on whether the contact he saw fell into a broad grouping of permissible, "incidental" contact:

  • Contact with the arms, hands or body when both players are competing for the ball or neither player is looking for the ball
  • Inadvertent tangling of the feet while both players are competing for the ball or neither player is looking for the ball
  • Contact that would be interference, but the pass is uncatchable

The exceptions are generally a more fine-grained version of the "advantage" analysis the official has already applied, but with the key difference that the official is ruling on the posture of the two players during the suspected interference. If both players are making a bona fide attempt to catch the ball, contact between the two is ignored, since both players have equal right to the football. Likewise, if two players are running neck-and-neck (one of the keys officials look for in these situations) and their legs become intertwined as they are both looking back to catch a pass, it was likely incidental contact and not interference. Conversely, if neither player is looking for the ball, the interfered-with team should not gain the advantage of a play they had no chance of converting; hence the exceptions for neither player looking for the ball, and for uncatchable passes.

The saving grace for this rule is the official interpretation that "[i]f there is any question whether player contact is incidental, the ruling should be no interference." That interpretation is key to many of the plays that have us as fans staring at the screen in bewilderment, wondering how the zebras could have missed it. The overwhelming likelihood is that the official didn't miss the contact, but had some doubt in his mind as to whether it was incidental. Pass interference is a serious sanction, especially on the defense. The league is determined to ensure that it is only called when the evidence of interference is crystal clear.

During the Season

Between positioning, play keys, and interpretations of the more controversial rules, we have a good starting point to more intelligently watch and comment on the officials' performances as they relate to game management and penalty enforcement. When you next see a flag, don't stoop to the commentator's level and start thinking about whether it "looked like" or "really was" a penalty. Instead, think about where the official is and what he can see, then apply the rules to what action unfolded on the field. By doing so, we not only gain a more sound understanding of penalty enforcement, but the strategic and technical choices employed by the teams and individuals players on every play.

I will periodically be posting XPs during the season to give reactions and explanations for important and controversial calls. Some of these will come from our weekly Audibles column, but I would love to address any questions or confusions encountered by our readers. Send any officiating or rules interpretation questions to the mailbag, and we'll make sure they get to me. Even if your question doesn't end up in an XP, I'll be sure to respond to them all.

Enjoy the season, and happy zebra spotting!

Posted by: Mike Kurtz on 03 Sep 2012

18 comments, Last at 05 Sep 2012, 2:47pm by Arkaein

Comments

1
by akn :: Mon, 09/03/2012 - 5:36pm

This is why officials make it a point to know the playmakers on both sides of the ball before a contest, as those players are most likely to draw illegal conduct from the other side.

The origin of superstar calls. While I understand the pragmatism of this practice, it takes away from professional objectivity. The nature of these calls necessarily involves subjective interpretation, but refs should be working to minimize it, not using it as a crutch to justify scouting.

2
by LionInAZ :: Mon, 09/03/2012 - 8:27pm

This is a nice summary of where most fans would have complaints, but it misses some subtleties.

1. Hitting the QB's facemask is not generally considered a blow to the head, a point that is not understood by everyone.

2
Obviously, cut blocks that make a defender fall are not considered tackles.

I am actually impressed by how well the officials call the pass interference rules, including the calls involving 'playing through the back'. If the officials have any problems, in my opinion it involves calling pass completions and penalties that are not called as often, such as illegal player downfield on pass plays or chop blocks.

Finally, I think the league restricts what can be reviewed on plays a little too much. For example, if they're going to review if a TD catch is good, why can't they review whether an infraction was involved as well?

3
by Nekked (not verified) :: Mon, 09/03/2012 - 8:28pm

"The final two are pure safety violations and as such are given zero tolerance, much to James Farrior's chagrin."

Did you mean James Harrison?

4
by wiesengrund (not verified) :: Mon, 09/03/2012 - 8:48pm

Interesting read!

I always wondered what the justification was for tipped passes not being able to draw pass interference? Any thoughts on that?

5
by LionInAZ :: Mon, 09/03/2012 - 9:20pm

If a pass is tipped, it's considered up for grabs, in the same sense that a fumble is up for grabs, except that a tipped pass has to be caught before it hits the ground.

6
by Intropy :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 3:02am

I don't know if it is the official reason, or whether there even is one. But consider the defender on a tipped pass. The defender is tasked with attempting to prevent the receiver from catching the ball by contacting the ball en route, usually very near the receiver or by contacting the receiver immediately after the ball reaches him. Both of these things require precise timing. If a ball is tipped the travel time changes, and a defender who was attempting to play the receiver is probably already committed to his course of action. Through no fault of his own he will now commit a foul.

8
by Mike Kurtz :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 11:40am

I responded to this last night, but for some reason my comment disappeared.

The pass is over when the ball comes into contact with an eligible receiver (any defender or an offensive player with appropriate numbering lined up in the backfield and/or outside the tackles). Once the pass is over, the special restrictions that a pass carries (eligibility and interference, mostly) end. After the tip, the ball is a loose ball until it is recovered or becomes dead when it goes out of bounds or hits the ground.

11
by NG5_ (not verified) :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 2:05pm

What if the ball hits an offensive lineman or ineligible receiver?

12
by NG5_ (not verified) :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 2:10pm

Scratch that. A reread makes me think "eligible receiver" means "legally on the field at the snap". How does this rule relate to pass eligibility? i.e. a lineman can be hit with the ball outright and it becomes eligible for him to catch it AFTER?

14
by Mike Kurtz :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 3:08pm

While moot (Illegal touching, 5 yards on the offense), the pass is still live after striking an lineman, so he couldn't, say, knock it out of the air for his buddy lineman to grab and advance. That would technically be two illegal touching penalties, and the defense would have their choice of which identical penalty to accept.

You're misunderstanding the concept of eligibility. All defenders are eligible to be the first person to touch a forward pass. For the offense, the only players eligible to be the first person to touch a forward pass are players in the backfield (offensive backs EXCLUDING a quarterback under center) and players on the line outside the tackles (tight ends and flankers) who are NOT numbered 50-79. An ineligible-numbered player may "report" as eligible prior to the play to the referee, and is eligible so long as he lines up in the backfield or outside the tackles.

17
by Intropy :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 9:34pm

Yes that's the right interpretation of the rules. I was just trying to explain why I think the rules are written that way.

7
by Intropy :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 3:14am

I think tackling any player you could reasonably anticipate being a ball carrier is permitted. You gave the example of a player simulating possession. Other examples would be a receiver who just missed a catch, a ball-carrier who just lost possession (forward pass, lateral, fumble, etc.), or a player touching but not in actually in possession of a loose fumble or kickoff.

I have a question about terminology. The article uses foul and penalty interchangeably as far as I can tell. I was under the impression that a player commits a foul, and an official assess a penalty. But a player can't commit a penalty, nor can an official assess a foul. Are they interchangeably or broken down some other way?

9
by Joseph :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 1:02pm

Probably just semantics. Technically, you're right.

16
by Bowl Game Anomaly :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 9:20pm

Technically you're right, but in this case "penalty" is short for "penalty infraction" which is a foul.

10
by Sergio :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 2:00pm

So... when are the DVOA ratings coming???

Sorry, just a bit anxious.

-- Go Phins!

13
by Bright Blue Shorts :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 3:05pm

If I read the Roughing The Passer rules correctly then two out of my three most memorable hits growing up watching football would have been flagged and likely have lead to ejection?

Lawrence Taylor broke Theismann's leg below the knee ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udZnptA5ViY&feature=related

Leonard Marshall hit that took Montana out of the 1990 NFC championship game would now be illegal because he led with his head ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZDSS9rw3x0&feature=related

I think Jim Hurt knocking the snot out of Montana in the 86 playoffs was legal ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORAE66ZsEH8 ... as Burt leads with his hands/forearm and his Montana in the ribs and there is maybe incidental contact with the throwing arm.

18
by Arkaein :: Wed, 09/05/2012 - 2:47pm

I think your reading is technically correct, but I doubt either player would be ejected even under today's rules.

With the LT hit, the tackle is made up high, and LT's arms stayed up high. Theismann's leg was trapped inadvertently by LT's leg, but I doubt an official would penalize this in practice. From a technicality standpoint you could argue that LT did not "hit" Theismann below the knee because it was not an impactful blow as much as a pinning and wrenching move.

As far as the Marshall hit, I think it's a bit questionable that he led with his head. The helmet definitely contacted Montana's pads, but the helmet did not seem to deliver the leading blow in my mind. Given the broadness of the rule today I could definitely see this being penalized, since it would take a very clear angle to determine the exact type of contact.

15
by zenbitz :: Tue, 09/04/2012 - 3:20pm

Sometimes defenders will attempt to tackle or submarine a pulling offensive lineman in an attempt to break up a running play, so actual tackles in line play are actually somewhat common.

I have never seen this called. Defensive holding on an Offensive Lineman?