Which team has consistently been the biggest loser when it comes to draft-pick trades? Exactly the team you'd expect.
20 Sep 2009
by J.I. Halsell
In my August 26 entry, entitled "Uncapped Leverage," I discussed the change in the accrued season requirement in order for players to be eligible for free agency, from four seasons to six seasons. This change is mandated by the Collective Bargaining Agreement to take effect in the uncapped year, currently slated for 2010. As I discussed in my earlier column, this tremendously hinders free agency from the players’ perspectives by forcing them to wait longer for their much anticipated second pay day. The uncapped year obviously presents players and clubs with an environment without a salary cap or team salary minimum; this environment has been discussed extensively in the media. Another aspect of the uncapped year, however, that has received very little coverage in the media. It's called the Final Eight Plan, and this change mandated by the Collective Bargaining Agreement completely alters the rules of free agency for clubs.
As it is today with a salary cap, when free agent season begins in March, all 32 clubs have the opportunity to acquire unrestricted free agents (UFA) in an open, competitive market. In an uncapped year of 2010, the Final Eight teams in the 2009 playoffs, meaning those teams participating in the Divisional round in both the AFC and NFC, will be limited in their ability to acquire free agents in the offseason after their post-season run.
The four clubs that make it to the Conference Championships in 2010 can sign the following three types of UFAs:
Regarding this one-for-one UFA replacement, the contracts signed by the UFA replacement player must fall within the following parameters:
For the four clubs that lose in the Divisional round, they can sign the same three types of UFAs as the clubs that advanced to the Conference Championships. However, these four clubs may also sign one UFA for a first year salary of more than roughly $6 million and any number of UFAs for first year salaries of no more than approximately $4 million. The $6 million and $4 million amounts are approximations because they will be determined by projected Total Revenues in the uncapped year.
Let's say the Arizona Cardinals lose in the Divisional round of the 2009 playoffs, and they subsequently lose their kicker, Neil Rackers, via free agency to a contract that has a first year value of $3 million. Under this scenario, the Cardinals could sign a replacement UFA to compensate for Rackers’s departure. This replacement UFA does not have to be a kicker and their first year salary cannot exceed $3 million. Moreover, the replacement UFA’s contract cannot provide for annual increases in excess of $900,000 in order to comply with the 30 percent provision. Additionally, in free agency, the Cardinals would be able to sign the other types of UFAs available to Divisional round clubs.
Another rule applied to the Final Eight clubs is a prohibition on those clubs from trading for UFAs they otherwise would not be eligible to sign as a result of the rules of the Final Eight Plan.
The Final Eight Plan takes the NFL from an "even playing field" model of free agency to an uneven playing field that is designed to work in favor of the 24 clubs that do not make it to the Divisional round, in an attempt to keep some level of competitive parity in an uncapped world. Essentially, the Final Eight Plan, among other things, places a salary cap on free agency for the final eight clubs, despite the absence of a league-wide salary cap. It’ll be a brave new free agent world in the 2010 uncapped year; things should be very intriguing if we get to that point.
Follow J.I. Halsell on Twitter @SalaryCap101
10 comments, Last at 24 Sep 2009, 7:55pm by Kyle.Brostowitz