Writers of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

Most Recent FO Features

SmithSte01.jpg

» The Week In Quotes: August 29, 2014

This week: Josh Shaw lies, Steve Smith intimidates, Le'Veon Bell relaxes, Matt Simms dances, and Clint Trickett kisses and tells.

18 Oct 2012

Word of Muth: Late Movement

by Ben Muth

The Kansas City Chiefs played poorly against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Sunday. (Analysis!) They averaged a miniscule 2.7 yards per rush and a pitiful 4.7 yards per pass attempt. Looking at those numbers, it’s not surprising that the Chiefs failed to score an offensive touchdown for a second straight game. What might be surprising is that Kansas City’s offensive line actually played pretty well.

First, consider that Kansas City didn’t give up any sacks. Not only that, but Tampa Bay only had three quarterback hits. Two of those hits were not the fault of the offensive line: one where Tony Moeaki was beat by Daniel Te'o-Nesheim, and another where the Bucs brought more guys than the Chiefs could block. That’s a really impressive pass-protection performance no matter who you play. The running game wasn’t as good, but I think the credit for that should go to good game planning by Tampa Bay that forced some runs into impossible looks.

The biggest thing Tampa Bay did on defense was sneak extra men into the box late. They would come out in two high looks (both safeties 8-to-12 yards off the line of scrimmage) and creep a safety down as the cadence progressed. Because the in-box safety was arriving so late, he was usually unaccounted for, or accounted for by someone who had no chance of blocking of him. Let’s go to the tape.

The Chiefs came out in a single-back formation with two tight ends to the left. Just off screen to the left is Dexter McCluster (he’ll be important later). The Bucs are in a three-man front with two high safeties.

The play is a basic man blocking scheme. The Chiefs are double-teaming both defensive linemen to the play side and have good angles on the linebackers. But as the cadence progresses, you can see strong safety Mark Barron move down to about six yards off the line of scrimmage, right where the play is designed to go.

Dexter McCluster (still offscreen) is responsible for Barron, but he’s too wide to block Barron right now. At this point, Brady Quinn has two options: he can change the play, or he can motion McCluster into the line so he has a chance to block Barron.

Tony Romo actually did a ton of pre-snap motioning against the Ravens on Sunday. It seemed like he was bringing Dez Bryant, Kevin Ogletree, or Miles Austin into the line to block a safety every play. He did it so often that color man Brian Billick kept complaining about how long it was taking the Cowboys to get plays off. Well, if a team is giving you looks you can’t block, it’s the quarterback's job to do something about it instead of running negative plays. If that means you’re snapping it with two seconds on the play clock, so be it. Quinn never seemed to adjust to the defense’s pre-snap movements; he took more of a hands-off approach.

We see McCluster in the picture for the first time. You see he actually runs into Moeaki’s block. That’s because he’s coming as flat as possible to try to give himself a shot at cutting Barron off. The play would have been great if Barron wasn’t there; the Chiefs have the whole front seven blocked.

But Barron is there. And now he’s lifted Jamaal Charles off the ground and is about to drive him into the turf two yards behind the line of scrimmage with a perfect form tackle. Also highlighted is McCluster, with some body language that says "Oh sh*t!" It wasn’t McCluster’s fault really -- not a lot of guys could have gotten to Barron -- but you never want to see your man hit a teammate that hard.

It wasn’t just safeties that were confusing the Chiefs with late movement, Tampa Bay used their linebackers as well. Take this play, where the Chiefs are lined up in 11-personnel with the tight end aligned to the left. They have a run called, but because of the formation, they know they can only block six box defenders.

The Chiefs want to run single-back power to the left. The Bucs have seven guys in the box, which should kill the play. I’m guessing that Quinn considered Lavonte David (No. 54) far enough from the play to be a non-factor. (Teams that want to run, like the Chiefs, play a little looser with what counts as in or out of the box.) So they stick with the play. Notice that David is well outside of right tackle Eric Winston’s shoulder when the cadence begins.

By the time the Chiefs snap the ball, David has moved even with Winston’s shoulder. Not only that, but he’s got momentum going towards the play and is unaccounted for.

I’m not sure if center Ryan Lilja is to blame, or if it’s Quinn’s fault again. Lilja could make a squeeze call to Winston; that means he would come down and either reach the three-technique or cut him, allowing Lilja to go straight to David.

But it’s asking a lot for Lilja to see a linebacker that starts three yards outside the right tackle and creeps in late, especially when David times his stunt so perfectly. You’d like to see the quarterback change the play when he sees that seventh guy coming into the box, because he has a much better view.

Of course, that didn’t happen. The result of the play was David coming in unblocked for another two-yard loss on Charles.

Quinn was put in a tough situation. He hasn’t played in two years and is in his first season with the Chiefs. All he’s had a chance to see is basic preseason defenses and scout team guys run blitzes from a card. (A coach holds up a card with how the offense will lineup, and it tells the scout defense where to lineup and what they are supposed to do.) Those aren’t situations where you see a lot of pre-snap movement. As a result, Quinn was unprepared to make adjustments on the fly.

Enough about what Tampa’s defense did well, let’s talk about what Kansas City’s offensive line did well. A big reason Quinn had so much time to throw was that Kansas City was able to pass off twists in protection.

The twist Tampa Bay seemed to run the most was a TED stunt. It’s called a TED because the tackle goes first and end follows. The best way to block any twist is to slide protect into it, but you can’t go full slide all the time, so you have to be able to block them in man as well.

The key to man-blocking any twist is altering the course of the penetrator. In the TED stunt, the tackle penetrates and the end loops, so the defensive tackle is the key player. Here, left guard Jeff Allen gets a strong punch on the defensive tackle. He knocks the defensive tackle from his intended landmark (the left tackle's hip) to the left tackle's inside shoulder. That allows Brandon Albert a chance to step in and engage the defensive tackle within the framework of his body, as opposed to having to reach for the defender. It puts Albert in a much stronger position

Also, notice how Allen is balanced as he’s punching. A lot of guards have a tendency to chase defensive tackles rushing wide, but Allen stays with himself and only uses his hands to redirect the tackle. He isn’t too far over his feet.

As the defensive end comes around, Allen is able to pick him up without any problem. He even gets unnecessary help from (center) Lilja since the Bucs showed blitz and Quinn checked to a seven-man protection.

You may notice that Albert is in pretty bad body position here. Luckily that doesn’t matter because:

A) Quinn is already throwing the ball
B) He’s Brandon Albert. He’s always in weird positions, but almost always recovers from them.

If we kept the film rolling. you would see Albert recover almost immediately from this. Because that is what he does.

I wish I could add more about the things the Chiefs did well, but it was kind of a boringly-efficient performance. No one was dominant, but they all blocked their assignments and didn’t get shoved around. Albert and Winston (asides from one bogus hold) both looked good in the running the game, but other than that it was just yeoman’s work up front. Nothing exciting, but there are a handful of contenders (Bears, Packers, Seahawks, Cardinals) that would kill for this kind of performance from their offensive linemen.

So, in the immortal words of Brady Quinn, "Now I’m done."

Posted by: Ben Muth on 18 Oct 2012

12 comments, Last at 19 Oct 2012, 9:13am by Karl Cuba

Comments

1
by Dean :: Thu, 10/18/2012 - 11:24am

I'm not sure how big Barron is, but if the game plan involves having a gnat like McCluster block him, then you already have problems even before he gets out of position.

2
by tuluse :: Thu, 10/18/2012 - 12:01pm

Since Quinn is so inexperienced in this system, what could KC do to make the calls easier for him? Are there running plays they could call that would deal with an extra defender better?

3
by theslothook :: Thu, 10/18/2012 - 2:32pm

I suspect it falls on the qb to actually start making some throws so defenders don't just default stack the box so much. Its obvious to all that the chiefs want to run the football, but even the best run games can't be effective with the ankle weight of poor qb play.

Its kind of interesting to see, but Matt Cassel's career evolution is kind of like the opposite of eli manning's. His 2nd half performance with the Pats had him looking like a pro bowler/borderline all pro candidate. Since then, he descended to average/ could look good with the right people around him(think alex smith), to now where his skills have eroded to the point wheres he's interchangeable with guys like Brady quinn(ie- horrible liability every time they drop back to throw).

I suppose Vick since 2010 has followed a similar career trajectory.

4
by tuluse :: Thu, 10/18/2012 - 2:38pm

I would argue that Matt Cassel produced like a probowler, not that he looked like one.

6
by theslothook :: Thu, 10/18/2012 - 4:46pm

Im probably missing the point, what is the difference between those two statements besides semantics?

7
by tuluse :: Thu, 10/18/2012 - 5:13pm

Semantics can be important :)

He had the stats of a probowler, but he never actually looked the part to me. I was pretty sure away from the Patriots coaching and a motivated near-prime Randy Moss he was going to be barely adequate if that. I was shocked by the contract Pioli and the Chiefs offered him.

Contrast this with Donovan McNabb in say 2001, who had negative DVOA, but "looked" like a probowler and was in fact voted to the probowl.

5
by Jake (not verified) :: Thu, 10/18/2012 - 4:44pm

Love this stuff. Bits like this "He knocks the defensive tackle from his intended landmark (the left tackle's hip) to the left tackle's inside shoulder. That allows Brandon Albert a chance to step in and engage the defensive tackle within the framework of his body, as opposed to having to reach for the defender. It puts Albert in a much stronger position" are super informative at a detailed lever I'd never get from watching. My personal opinion is that a lot of the stat emphasis on this site is slightly dubious (how much of a typical DVOA article is explaining why they make no sense...) but this kind of verbal treatment is awesome.

8
by BJR :: Thu, 10/18/2012 - 8:09pm

Have just noticed that Tampa has the #1 ranked run defence by DVOA through 6 weeks. Nice to read a bit about why.

I'm aware that Tampa had some significant coaching issues last season. Even so, a jump of 40% in run defence DVOA since last year is quite remarkable.

9
by towishimp (not verified) :: Thu, 10/18/2012 - 8:32pm

Aside from the coaching improvements, there have been personel and health improvements, too. McCoy and Foster have been healthy all year. Roy Miller and Michael Bennett are playing better than they did last year. And replacing last year's safeties with Barron and Barber has definitely improved the defense.

10
by Podge (not verified) :: Fri, 10/19/2012 - 4:57am

I wish I could add some more specific comments about the things this column did well, but it was kind of a boringly-efficient column. Nothing dominant, but it completed all its assignments. Nothing exciting, but there are a handful of websites (SI, ESPN, FOX, CBS) that would kill for this kind of work from their columnists.

11
by James-London :: Fri, 10/19/2012 - 7:46am

+ 1

Phil Simms is a Cretin.

12
by Karl Cuba :: Fri, 10/19/2012 - 9:13am

Albert reminds me a lot of the former 49er lineman Derrick Deese, largely because of the ability to recover that Ben highlights. I can remember seeing Deese have an end swim past him only to spin around away from the defender, reset his feet and recover in time to push the end past the quarterback. You wouldn't and probably couldn't teach someone to do that but it was very effective, Deese had a a two year run without allowing a sack.

Perhaps it is due to them both having started out at guard and being moved to tackle because of their great feet, so they never really learned to orthodox technique at tackle.