Writers of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

Most Recent FO Features

SmithGen13.jpg

» Scramble for the Ball: The Best Losers

Tom and Mike perform the ritual "complimenting of the Loser League team names," pile on Marty Mornhinweg, and actually find a scenario where starting Geno Smith is a good idea.

31 Jan 2013

Word of Muth: Super Bowl Preview

by Ben Muth

It is Super Bowl week, and everyone knows that means absurd amounts of hype, hype backlash, and backlash to the hype backlash. We all find it exhausting, but we go along with it because it’s harmless and we’re two months away from talking ourselves into watching a San Jose Sabercats game. Mark Grieb is still playing arena football! So, to celebrate this last week of real football (three offensive linemen is not real football), let’s look at both offensive lines this week and how they’ll match up with the opposing front seven.

Let’s start with the Ravens offense, since I haven’t been covering them all year like I have the 49ers. The big story with Baltimore’s offensive line is the late-season shuffle that saw Bryant McKinnie come in at left tackle and Michael Oher slide over to the right tackle spot. The interior lineup from left to right is Kelechi Osemele, Matt Birk, and Marshal Yanda.

Individually, Yanda is pretty clearly their best offensive lineman. Last year, I broke down the Ravens’ playoff loss to the Patriots and came away unimpressed with the perennial Pro Bowler. A few Baltimore fans said he was playing hurt in that one, and that I should look at another game. It took a year, but I finally did. I came away seeing why he is so highly regarded this time.

If the Ravens are going to have success running the ball on Sunday, it’s probably going to have to be behind Yanda. He’s the only Ravens lineman that generates consistent movement in the running game.

Unlike Mike Iupati, Yanda doesn’t move guys with just brute strength. Yanda generates his power by how quickly he gets off the ball. He does a great job of exploding out of his stance and delivering a blow to knock defenders off-balance in the running game. At times, it almost looks like he’s offsides because of how much quicker he is than everyone else at the snap.

The best example of his quickness at the snap is when the Ravens run an outside zone towards Yanda and he has to reach a three-technique. A good example of this was the first play in the divisional round game against Denver.

The Ravens are lined up in a strong right formation. The Broncos are lined up in a 4-3 under with the Sam linebacker (Von Miller) walked up on the line of scrimmage. Yanda’s job is to reach the 4I (inside shade of the tackle) over Oher (RT).

Because the defensive end is lined up on Oher’s inside shoulder, he helps Yanda just a bit before releasing to the second level. What Oher wants to do here is keep his own shoulders square, so he can come off on a scraping linebacker, while turning the shoulder of the defensive end.

He does both brilliantly on this play. Oher basically stiff-arms his way through the down lineman, getting a noticeable turn of the defender's shoulder with just one arm. That allows Yanda to fit his helmet perfectly on the outside number of the defender. This is exactly what this combination block should look like.

With his head outside, Yanda can begin trying to drive the defender vertically now. That’s exactly what he does. In fact, he almost drives his man into the linebacker that Oher ends up blocking.

Of course, while all this great work has been happening on the front side, McKinnie has barely gotten out of his stance on the backside. McKinnie was late off the ball, and then proceeded to move like a guy whose foot had fallen asleep.

Look at that picture above, every other Ravens lineman has their head on the play side of their man. Bryant McKinnie is three yards behind his man and unlikely to catch up to him with the added weight of the X of Great Shame.

By the time Ray Rice gets to the line of scrimmage, Yanda has driven his man four yards off the ball. In fact, you’ll notice that the defensive end is now behind both linebackers who started off the ball. Getting driven four yards off the line of scrimmage has to be a demoralizing way to start a playoff game if you’re a defensive lineman.

After Yanda, the best Ravens lineman is probably the center, Birk. The veteran played well in both games I watched (at New England and Denver), but particularly showed well against the Patriots. He doesn’t generate the kind of movement that Yanda can, but he has great footwork and always has his head in the right place. He might also be Baltimore's best pass blocker. Watching him this postseason, it is hard to believe that he’s a 15-year veteran.

The other elder statesman of Ravens line has not played as well, but there are plays where McKinnie looks like his old self. He can still throw a strong punch in pass protection and is good at passing off games and stunts with Osemele, which is something that will be vital against San Francisco.

The issue with McKinnie is that there are plays where it seems like he doesn’t have a single fast-twitch muscle in his body. I mean, the guy just doesn’t move -- at all -- on certain plays. There was one play against the Patriots where Rob Ninkovich was lined up wide and ran right past McKinnie, to a spot eight yards in the middle of the backfield. McKinnie couldn’t lay a hand on him. Luckily, the interior of the line held up and allowed Joe Flacco to step up and avoid Ninkovich.

I imagine with McKinnie and Osemele being matched up with Justin and Aldon Smith on the left side that the Ravens will send as much help as possible that direction. That will put a lot of pressure on right tackle Oher, who I think is the non-Flacco key to Baltimore’s success on Sunday.

If Oher played like he did against New England, Baltimore will move the ball against San Francisco. In the AFC Championship, the former first-rounder was confident all game long. He was aggressive on play-action passes, used his hands well, generally took the action to the defense, and even pulled on a couple of successful traps. Hell, he looked like a guy who would have a book written about how light and quick his feet were.

Against Denver, however, he really struggled. He was behind most of his blocks in the running game. In the passing game, he set too softly and punched tentatively. As a result, Miller was constantly around Flacco even if Oher was between them. Oher is the Raven I’ll be watching the closest on Sunday.

I’ve seen much more of the 49ers offensive line than I have of the Ravens, since I’ve been covering them every third week since the beginning of the season. I think they are the best unit (not just offensive line, any unit) in football, and I don’t think Baltimore’s front seven matches up very well against them.

Watching the Ravens play, the only guy in their front seven that really jumped out to me is Haloti Ngata. The huge defensive lineman from Oregon played great against Denver and well against New England. He’s been banged up all year, but certainly looks healthy now and could cause problems for any offensive line, even San Francisco’s. I, for one, am really looking forward to the plays he’s lined up over left guard Iupati, seeing as they may be the two physically strongest players in the league.

The problem for Baltimore is that I don’t see anyone else causing problems for San Francisco in one-on-one situations. Terrell Suggs doesn’t look like the same guy this year after returning from his torn Achilles. It doesn’t look like he can beat anyone off the edge anymore, so offensive tackles are just sitting on bull rushes and inside moves. Joe Staley has struggled at times in pass protection this year, but it is usually against speedy rushers who threaten him around the edge and counter inside. I don’t see Suggs being able to do this.

Even worse for the Ravens is that, even at 60 percent. Suggs is still their best pass rusher. Paul Kruger may have destroyed whatever the Colts were marching out at right tackle in the first round, but he did next to nothing against Sebastian Vollmer last week. And let me tell you: Anthony Davis is a lot closer to Vollmer than a banged-up Winston Justice.

I have seen people bring up last year’s Thanksgiving game as a reason why Baltimore might fare better than I’m predicting, but I don’t see many similarities in the trenches. San Francisco’s offensive line has gotten significantly better. They replaced the woeful Adam Snyder with the very good Alex Boone. That change alone is a dramatic upgrade. Then you take into account the massive improvement from Iupati and Davis, and it’s an entirely different unit.

The one advantage the Ravens defense has is they are well-coached and have an extra week to prepare for a unique offense. They’ll have a plan to account for the quarterback as a runner and any additional gaps San Francisco creates with shifts and pullers. Let’s take a look at how Atlanta tried to slow down Colin Kaepernick and the San Francisco read-option.

The 49ers were in a strong right pistol formation. They were running a zone read with fullback Bruce Miller coming across the formation and leading on the weak inside linebacker. The Falcons were in a 3-4 over, which means their down linemen were shaded a half man towards the strength of the formation.

The outside linebacker stays wide and comes a little up field, so Kaepernick hands the ball off to Frank Gore. Atlanta’s inside linebacker recognizes the play immediately and begins to fill the gap that the insertion of Miller will create. He wants to come down and fit right off the double team, forcing Gore to bounce it outside towards the unblocked defender.

Speaking of the double team, it is a beauty. Look at how low Staley’s pad level is, and even better than that is the arch in his back. When you run block, you want to thrust your hips forward to deliver as much power as possible. Because you’re bent over when you do make contact, this action arches your back and makes it look like you have a bow up your ass. Whenever you hear someone talk about bringing your hips, this is what they mean.

Because the double team has washed the three-technique all the way to the hash (and to the ground for that matter), the inside linebacker has to fight to get inside of Miller’s block. You can see that he’s starting to turn his shoulders towards the sideline and punch with his outside arm. This is called "wrong-arming," and it’s the best way to get underneath a potential kick-out block. This is a nice job by the defender here.

Also notice Davis (circled), who used a huge club technique to swat his man to the ground. It doesn’t really affect the play much, but shows how strong the right tackle is.

Because the inside linebacker was able to get back inside, he forced Gore into the unblocked defender. This is exactly how Atlanta drew it up. But because the three-technique got his ass kicked, the distance between the inside linebacker and the outside linebacker was too wide. That means the outside linebacker had to chase Gore and dive at his legs, eventually bringing him down after a gain of nine.

That’s what makes San Francisco’s running game so tough. Even when everyone plays the right gaps, in a sound scheme you still have to stand up to something like an Iupati/Staley double team, or make a one-on-one tackle on Gore.

Posted by: Ben Muth on 31 Jan 2013

19 comments, Last at 02 Feb 2013, 6:15pm by LionInAZ

Comments

1
by Will Allen :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 1:44pm

There is some satisfaction, for this Vikings fan, in seeing McKinnie get The X of Great Shame, but it is diluted by the observation of how effective Birk still is, due to the fact that I still believe that if the Vikings had kept Birk in 2009, instead of handing the job to a then-unready John Sullivan, they would have won home field advantage, easily beat the Saints in the NFCCG, and then won the last game of the year. In a brilliant coaching move, of course, the Chiller continued to indulge Lardo McKinnie, while purposelessly alienating a consummate professional like Birk. I've been a secondary Niners fan for a few years now, but the major reason I'll be happy, no matter the outcome, is to see a career like Birk's, late round pick from the Ivy League, obtain ultimate success.

I still am flabbergasted that McKinnie has been as effective in pass protection as he has been for the last month. I guess getting game checks for three months, as he got rid of the 40 pounds of blubber he showed up with in July, has paid off, even if he still looks like a giant tree sloth out of his natural habitat on some plays.

8
by Gus (not verified) :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 6:11pm

It's really helped that McKinnie and Birk are both playing well as pass blockers, as the Ravens' O-Line was much better in the run game and rather mediocre against the pass in the regular season.

I'd a little surprised that Mr. Muth didn't mention this about SF - aren't they a much better run blocking line as well?

9
by Gus (not verified) :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 6:11pm

Er, not AGAINST the pass. They were mediocre in pass PROTECTION.

10
by Independent George :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 7:38pm

What was the salary situation? From what I've seen, Sullivan is now playing extremely well, and seems to have been a good long-term move.

12
by Will Allen :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 11:31pm

Sure, by 2011 Sullivan was playing at a high level. Unfortunately, he played at a pretty low level prior to that, and in 2009, when they were going all-in with a 39 year old qb at 20 million a year, having a guy who wasn't ready playing at center may well have cost them a title. They could have made something work in 2009, at the expense of 2010, which they were pretty much mortgaging anyways. It was essentially penny-wise, pound-foolish.

2
by dpierre23 :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 2:03pm

SMH Bryant McKinnie. If Justin Bannan is replaced with any DE/OLB, that play is blown up in the backfield.

At least he's a good pass protector thanks to his 36" arms and general girth. His gravitational pull helps prevents sacks.

3
by A_man (not verified) :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 2:12pm

Just need ooone more decent game out of him. Desperately hoping he doesn't turn back into a pumpkin.

Also desperately hoping the Ravens aren't planning on signing him and relying on him for LT next season.

4
by Kal :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 2:40pm

I love the giant X of shame.

Though I always read it in the voice of Dug from the movie Up. "I do not like the X of shame".

5
by Danny Tuccitto :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 3:43pm

I love all of our content, obviously, but The X of Great Shame is currently my favorite thing on FO. Incredibly envious that Rivers gets to find out who got it before I do.

6
by DEW (not verified) :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 3:46pm

It was almost unfair to make Green Bay play SF in the divisional round. Hard for Rodgers to concentrate off the field on making offensive adjustments, studying photos and so on while he was looking out at the SF offensive line like a kid at a toy store before Christmas.

7
by theslothook :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 4:09pm

Ben,

I'm curious, but what kind of overall impact would having adam snyder still playing for boone do to the rest of the line? Ie- to field a truly excellent offensive line led team(at least offensively), is it a requirement that none of your 5 starters be a poor player? And what if you had just three great o linemen and two poor ones?

11
by RickD :: Thu, 01/31/2013 - 8:49pm

Here's a serious question. Why does network TV coverage pretty much ignore line play? Since Madden retired, I cannot think of one commentator who talks about it with any kind of regularity.

14
by Dean :: Fri, 02/01/2013 - 10:31am

Two reasons.

First, because the overwhelming majority of fans simply watch the ball on any given play. Their attention spans have been atrophied by text messages and video games to the point where expecting them to look at something other than the ball is just too much to ask. The casual fan doesn't WANT to be smart. They just want to escape their droll lives for a couple hours and maybe revel the glee of yelling "wham" a couple times.

Second, because even if the announcers did want to talk about line play, most of them didn't play line, never coached line, and aren't qualified to discuss it. Not to mention that they'd have producers jawing in their ears about the first point above.

We already take the presence of Ben for granted!

19
by LionInAZ :: Sat, 02/02/2013 - 6:15pm

Third: it's hard to say much about line play without having the all-22 view in front of you.

13
by CBPodge :: Fri, 02/01/2013 - 9:43am

Ben, a somewhat random question that is only tangentally linked to the column: how hard is the transition from playing right tackle to left guard, as Osemele has done? Is it sort of a case that if you're a fairly big right tackle that isn't quick enough to deal with speed rusher, you should be able to move inside to guard and make use of your strength (run blocking) while minimising your weakness (blocking speed rushers)? Or are blocking at guard and blocking at tackle such different things that they require different skill sets, and you can't really project from one to another?

15
by Dean :: Fri, 02/01/2013 - 10:35am

I'm not Ben, but my understanding is that moving from the left side to the right or vice versa is the same as a left handed person trying to write with their right hand. Every move, the punch, the footwork, etc. is its mirror opposite. If you're somewhat ambidextrous, it ought to be fairly easy. If you're not, it's more of a challenge. If you're like me and just non-dextrous, well, prepare for the X of Shame.

Hopefully Ben can go into more detail than I can.

17
by Eric Nielsen (not verified) :: Sat, 02/02/2013 - 3:33am

Nah it's no way that hard. It's not super easy but it's not nearly as hard as learning to throw or hit a baseball from the other side.

The most important things like body level and positioning are the same. The core strength that lets you keep that unnatural position when freaks are trying to dance all around you is the same. Scooping somebody from the outside in on one side is not much different then scooping somebody from the inside out on the other. Most punches are two handed so they aren't much different from one side to the other.

The biggest changes are which foot kicks and which foot slides, and getting used to doubling with the tightend on the right as opposed to doubling with the left guard on the left. It's not nothing, but it's not like learning to walk again.

18
by Eric Nielsen (not verified) :: Sat, 02/02/2013 - 3:47am

I'll defer to Ben if he chimes in, but I think the challenge at guard is a lot more cerebral then at tackle. Especially in pass pro, if you can identify the proper block(**NOT TRIVIAL**), and are strong and over 300 lbs, you can probably qualify as a guard. Any actual mistakes can usually be covered up by the center or a play-actioning back. Also you are not usually going up against the defenses speed/passrush demon.

To be good, a tackle needs to be able to smother the defenses best pass rusher. Not just most of the time, but 25-30 times a game. Preferably solo. It's obviously a lot harder to find people who can do that. That's why they get paid more.

16
by Eric Nielsen (not verified) :: Sat, 02/02/2013 - 3:25am

Don't got much to say except that this is a great column. Thanks for focusing on the fatties who actually determine way more NFL games then people pay attention to.