Are Bengals' Blunders a Sign of Super Bowl Hangover?

Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow
Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow
Photo: USA Today Sports Images

NFL Week 1 - The last time we saw the Cincinnati Bengals play a football game, their heads were hung mourning a heartbreaking Super Bowl loss to the Los Angeles Rams. Their offseason plan was simple: rework the offensive line. The Bengals front office went all-out trying to protect Joe Burrow, bringing in veteran linemen Ted Karras, Alex Cappa and La'el Collins through free agency and rookie guard Cordell Volson through the draft. In total, four new starting linemen were brought in to provide added protection to Joe Burrow after he was sacked a league-leading 51 times in 2021.

There's no better way to stress-test that new-look offensive line than by going against the reigning Defensive Player of the Year T.J. Watt and the rest of the Pittsburgh Steelers defense. The result felt all too familiar: the same 23-20 final score as the Super Bowl, the same amount of sacks (seven) taken by Burrow, and the same result.

Same as it ever was.

The first play of the game set the tone for both the Bengals offense and Steelers defense, at least for the first half. On a simple four-man rush, Cameron Heyward got home and sacked a scrambling Burrow looking to extend the play. The very next snap, Watt nearly made it back-to-back sacks, forcing Burrow to get the ball out quickly to Tyler Boyd on a comeback route. That's when Minkah Fitzpatrick hawked the pass and returned it to the house for the first score of the game.

The Steelers put both Burrow and the new Cincinnati offensive line to the test in this game, disguising both their coverages and defensive fronts with pre-snap motion of their own. Pittsburgh would line up with Fitzpatrick back as the lone safety back in a Cover-1 look, then drop two defensive backs into Cover-2 at the snap while Fitzpatrick lurked over the intermediate middle of the field. The Steelers defensive front employed similar levels of trickery, constantly moving their linebackers back and forth, feigning pre-snap blitz looks or delaying their rushes.

On Burrow's first fumble of the game, Pittsburgh shows a 4-2 front with Terrell Edmunds (34) hanging back 8 yards off the line of scrimmage. Edmunds creeps up to the line just before snap to signal the safety blitz, forcing Volson (67) to engage him and giving Alex Highsmith (56) the one-on-one assignment against Jonah Williams (73). The Steelers then send two additional linebackers on a delayed blitz, sending seven total pass-rushers. Burrow, seeing two linebackers, a safety, and a defensive tackle making their way upfield, tries to make a play. He just doesn't account for Highsmith off his blindside, getting home to make the strip on Burrow's outstretched arm.

Looking at the boxscore for this game—seven sacks allowed, a 12.2% adjusted sack rate, and five turnovers by your quarterback in a loss—would, in most cases, be an abject failure for a team who shared the same offseason goals as the Bengals. While it's not what the Bengals hoped for out of the focal point of their offseason, Cincinnati's offensive line did not suffer the total regression that seemed to show on paper. Next Gen Stats clocked Burrow with an average time to throw of 2.7 seconds, an improvement over last year by one one-hundredth of a second. Against one of the best defensive fronts in the NFL in their first game together, the Bengals may as well chalk that up as a minor victory.

Part of the numbers the offensive line allowed are a result of whom they must protect at quarterback. Burrow has a penchant for trying to make the most out of a play, for better or for worse. In most cases, it's what makes Burrow an elite quarterback, flashing the highly sought-after ability to make something out of nothing. In other cases, though, you get anomalous results like this: big sack totals and high turnover rates.

Where the Bengals offensive line actually struggled is in the run game. Cincinnati finished Sunday with 2.92 adjusted line yards (31st), a 32% stuffed rate (31st), and a 20% success rate on rushing attempts (32nd). Pittsburgh was able to shut them down with their standard front seven, as well. According to NFL Next Gen Stats, Joe Mixon faced the third-lowest rate of eight or more defenders in the box in Week 1. Take away his lone 31-yard breakout and he finished with 26 rushes for 51 yards, good for 1.96 yards per carry.

I spend so much time talking about half this game because the other side of the ball for Pittsburgh was pretty pedestrian. It's a testament to their defense that Pittsburgh walked away with 23 points and the win. Aside from the Fitzpatrick pick-six, Pittsburgh's scoring drives in regulation started at the Cincinnati 34 yard-line, the Pittsburgh 41, and the Cincinnati 45. That last possession is credit to a 20-yard punt return by Gunner Olszewski, but for the most part Pittsburgh's offense was served scoring opportunities on a silver platter by their defense. The Steelers translated their defense's first three turnovers into 17 of their 26 points. Their longest offensive drive of the day was a 59-yard touchdown drive started off a T.J. Watt interception near midfield.

Speaking of which, losing Watt is such a major blow to this defense. The force multiplier created by Watt's presence cannot be understated. He necessitates a second blocker, opening up opportunities for others on the Steelers defensive line to wreak havoc. Finishing the afternoon with a sack, three tackles for loss, two pass breakups, and an interception, Watt picked up right where he left his DPOY season off. With Watt seeking alternate opinions on his elbow, the timetable on his pectoral injury ranges anywhere from one month to the rest of the season, spelling the difference between a significant yet short-term dip and the premature end to what could have been a top-five defense.

Mitchell Trubisky's 5.1 yards per pass attempt was the third-lowest average of any starting quarterback during the opening weekend, while his 55.3% completion rate was fifth-worst. Pittsburgh seems to have an exceptional receiving corps with Diontae Johnson, Chase Claypool, and Pat Freiermuth at the helm, but this team is led by its defense. Trubisky does add an element of mobility not seen in Pittsburgh since Ben Roethlisberger was young and spry, but the end result was a handful of avoided sacks and three scrambles for 9 yards. If Trubisky is just an early season stopgap while Kenny Pickett gets acclimated to the pros, so be it, but the offensive capabilities of this team are capped until the changing of the guard happens.

By the VOA

VOA OFF DEF ST TOT
PIT -18.1% -31.2% 3.8% 16.9%
CIN -32.4% -22.5% -7.4% -17.3%

No "Where the Game Swung" for our opening weekend of action, so we go straight to "By the VOA."

Both the Bengals and Steelers' offenses ranked in the bottom 10 of offensive DVOA, but Cincinnati's plummet is mostly fueled by their shocking first half. Cincinnati posted a -78.9% offensive VOA before halftime, with four of their six drives ending in turnovers. Pittsburgh's fourth-best defensive VOA propels them into the top 10 of our team rankings by total VOA.

Burrow finished Week 1 with the worst game of his career, at least from an efficiency perspective. His four interceptions and five turnovers are both career highs, and his -156 YAR is the lowest of his career thus far.

Based on our upgraded Post-Game Win Expectancy formula, we would expect Cincinnati to win this game 61% of the time. The Bengals may have had a lower total VOA, but they ran way more plays than the Steelers (94 to 59 not counting spikes/kneels) and the Steelers had more penalties (nine to five including declined and offsetting).

WHO DEY?

This certainly is not the result any Cincinnati Bengals fan was hoping for in the team's first game since February, but I am not ready to declare this the beginning of a Super Bowl (appearance) Hangover. If anyone can speak to that, it's prize heavyweight fighter and star of The Hangover Mike Tyson, who once wisely said, "Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth."

The first two quarters were the Steelers collectively punching Burrow, the offensive line, and the Bengals offense in the mouth. For the rest of the game, Burrow was skittish in the pocket. There were certainly times when, had Burrow remained in the pocket in the face of incoming pressure for another half-second, he could have made a play to an open receiver. Burrow and the Bengals offense found a way to beat the Steelers' coverage with crossing routes. This below pass to Tee Higgins helped Cincinnati get into field goal range for their first points of the afternoon.

Not all of the interceptions thrown by Burrow were his fault, either. Pittsburgh did an excellent job pressuring Burrow into mistakes, just as they did on the second play of the game that resulted in a Fitzpatrick pick-six. Others, though, were out of Burrow's hands. One was ripped from the arms of Boyd as he fell to the turf. Another was less Burrow's fault and more earned by Watt, who leapt above right tackle Collins to pick Burrow off at the line.

Sometimes, things don't bounce your way. Just ask Evan McPherson. McPherson finished 52-for-54 on extra points in his rookie season and had never missed a field goal attempt inside 40 yards. One of the heroes of Cincinnati's miraculous playoff run had both occur on back-to-back kicks in this game (due in part to the struggles of backup long snapper Mitchell Wilcox).

The Bengals could have won this game on three separate occasions. Aside from the two misses by McPherson, Cincinnati should have reviewed a would-have-been touchdown grab by Ja'Marr Chase with just over two minutes left to go in regulation. The Bengals actually hurried to the line to get a play off before the two-minute warning to their own detriment, missing the opportunity for officials to review the catch in their favor.

An early upset with multiple opportunities to win does not feel like a harbinger of things to come the way the Rams' Thursday night loss to Buffalo seems to be. It took five turnovers, seven sacks, and two missed game-winning kicks to take down this Cincinnati team. Should there be tweaks? Absolutely, but the Bengals defense finished with a top-10 performance by VOA standards, and Burrow needed the worst efficiency game of his career to lose in overtime.

There's no need to sound the alarms for Cincinnati just yet, but the Bengals have officially received their wake-up call that the rest of the AFC North is ready to play this year.

Comments

16 comments, Last at 20 Sep 2022, 2:06pm

#1 by TimK // Sep 13, 2022 - 5:49pm

If this is timed from the video, doesn’t the frame rate of the video have some say in the meaningful resolution that can be obtained? Been wondering this about a number of the Next Gen Stats for a while. Do they have extra ‘hawkeye’ style cameras around set up specifically for stats measurement, and do they film at a higher than broadcast frame rate to improve replay fidelity?

 

 

Points: 0

#2 by Cale Clinton // Sep 13, 2022 - 9:43pm

Never really thought of that! Admittedly, it’s a one-year average vs. a one-game sample size, but almost all the QBs in Week 1 had a TTT down to the hundredth of a second.

Dan Orlovsky posted a video on Twitter today from the MNF game, happened to notice that he was watching it in NGS. So if that’s the same film they use to make those stats, his did look a little sharper than the film I watch. Way less motion blur on players. 

Points: 0

#5 by David // Sep 14, 2022 - 7:54am

I just fell into a wiki rabbit hole looking for an answer to this question. I’m pretty sure that the answer is that the timing to hundredths of a second is a lie. The source data is capturing a whole image 25 times per second. That is as accurate as the data can possibly be (I.e. .04 of a second). The reduced blur and improved sharpness of the image that you comment on is an artefact of the compression algorithms and the playback mechanism being used, not an improved source.

As such, the improvement of 0.01 seconds in time to throw is not meaningful.

Points: 0

#6 by Muldrake // Sep 14, 2022 - 8:28am

As I understand it, they aren't timing to the hundredth of a second, they're just showing the calculation of the average to the hundredth.

Points: 0

#10 by David // Sep 14, 2022 - 1:58pm

Only, unless you can tell me better, hd broadcasts are still shot at a refresh rate of 25Hz. The hdtv is refreshing at 60 Hz, but the signal in between is limited to 25fps, so that’s all they shoot at. The tv refresh rate seems to just reduce flicker…

Points: 0

#11 by Pat // Sep 14, 2022 - 3:24pm

Pretty darn sure the NFL games are recorded in at least 60 Hz. There was an article regarding the end-zone steadicam-type shot that referred to this, and here also suggests the standard game is at 1080p 60 Hz due to processing bandwidth (at the time at least).

Points: 0

#12 by KnotMe // Sep 14, 2022 - 4:56pm

Going from 25 FPS to 60 would look pretty bad for action so I'm pretty sure they shoot in 60 fps at least. Quite possible even higher so slow motion looks good and to help the replay team. 

Even the cinematic camera can go to 120 FPS according to this.

https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/fox-cbs-and-espn-deploy-new-sony-cameras-for-sports

120 would be my guess, which would get you to 100ths of a second

Points: 0

#15 by Pat // Sep 15, 2022 - 9:39am

It's not really the camera that's the limitation there, it's the video pipeline - all of the post-processing steps. 60 fps broadcast methods haven't been around that long, so it makes sense that at some point pretty quickly they would drop down to lower refresh rates. That's what's mentioned in the linked article above.

Points: 0

#9 by Aaron Brooks G… // Sep 14, 2022 - 11:03am

If the video is interpolated, you can sometimes time an event to twice the frame rate (if you're lucky).

Points: 0

#3 by alex.michel // Sep 13, 2022 - 10:08pm

How bad is the loss of TJ Watt for Pittsburgh as a fantasy Defense?

Points: 0

#7 by ImNewAroundThe… // Sep 14, 2022 - 9:10am

Yeah lost Watt but they're going home to play the Patriots and not on the road vs Jamarr/Burrow/Higgins/Boyd who they dominated. 

 

Points: 0

#4 by mehllageman56 // Sep 13, 2022 - 11:21pm

Adjusted line yards aren't up yet.  I can take your word that Cinci was 31st, but I was hoping to discover where the Ravens and the Jets ranked.

Points: 0

#13 by KnotMe // Sep 14, 2022 - 5:40pm

Isn't a super bowl hangover usually just regression to the mean? (you need luck to get to a SB, so it's not that surprising that it runs out).

Seems especially true in the Bengals case. (Can't find their SB odds anymore but they wern't great IIRC). They should still be a good team however.  

Points: 0

#14 by RickD // Sep 15, 2022 - 12:15am

I wouldn't say "Super Bowl Hangover" so much as "isn't it still the preseason?"  A few teams were definitely not ready for the coin toss Sunday.  Cincy, Green Bay, Rams, Patriots, and Cowboys all looked lost.  (Jets, too, but that's not news for them.)  I expect the Rams, Bengals, and Packers all to rebound.  

Points: 0

#16 by sabrown5 // Sep 20, 2022 - 2:06pm

This article was very well written and gave a lot of insight into exactly what went wrong for the Bengals in week one. The video and film analysis was very informative and highlighted the collapses in the Bengal's revamped offensive line and Joe Burrow's questionable decision-making. It was also helpful to look at advanced stats to see just how bad the Bengals week one offense was and learning those analytics gave the Bengals a 61% chance to win that game contextualizes the loss and rightfully raises some concerns.

Points: 0

Save 10%
& Support Cale
Support Football Outsiders' independent media and . Use promo code CALE to save 10% on any FO+ membership and give half the cost of your membership to tip Cale.