Audibles at the Line: Week 10

Audibles at the Line: Week 10
Audibles at the Line: Week 10
Photo: USA Today Sports Images

compiled by Andrew Potter

Each Sunday, the FO staff sends around emails about the games that each of us are watching. We share information about the games that the rest of the group might not be watching, ask questions, and keep everyone else informed about which games they might want to tune into (if they can).

On Monday, we compile a digest of those emails and produce this feature. By its nature, it can be disjointed and dissimilar to the other articles on the site.

While these emails are generally written with Audibles in mind, they do not represent a standard review of all the games each week. That means we aren't going to cover every game, or every important play. We watch the games that we, as fans, are interested in watching, so your favorite team's game might not be covered to your fullest desires or even at all. (If you are a Steelers or Patriots fan, you are probably in luck; if you are a Bills fan, not so much.) We have no intention of adding new authors solely to cover every game on a given Sunday, nor will we watch a different game from the ones that we're personally interested in watching just to ensure that Audibles covers every game.

Atlanta Falcons 16 at Cleveland Browns 28

Dave Bernreuther: I'm super excited for this one. Not just because of the game, but because by switching to Power Home Solar I'm saving tons of money, and the Browns are dancing again.

This is one of the least inspiring 1 p.m. slates I can remember, actually, and I'd find this to be among its most interesting games even if not for the fact that I'll definitely be making a Britton Colquitt joke every time he takes the field.

Scott Kacsmar: Julio Jones has three 1-yard touchdown catches in his career (one in each of the last three seasons). One today has given Atlanta a 10-7 lead. By my count, Julio's 933 yards before his first touchdown last week was the third-most in a season before a first touchdown in NFL history. Only beaten by 2001 Keyshawn Johnson (1,077 yards) and 1991 Al Toon (963 yards and zero touchdowns that season).

Buffalo Bills 41 at New York Jets 10

Bryan Knowles: The matchup between the Jets' backup quarterback and the fourth-string Bills quarterback might be the least enticing on the schedule. Buffalo has a historically terrible offense and haven't led in a month. So, of course, they score on their second play from scrimmage, because football is weird.

Dave Bernreuther: The Matt Barkley Bills going ahead 14-0 at the Jets on a fumble recovery touchdown is the most Jets thing ever.

This is worth mentioning:

Bryan Knowles: Dion Dawkins, the Bills starting left tackle, caught a touchdown pass to give the Bills a 24-0 lead over the Jets. That's embarrassing for the Jets, but I can spread that embarrassment across multiple teams:

Dawkins is now tied for the Bills' lead in receiving touchdowns. Zay Jones has one, Kelvin Benjamin has one, Jason Croom has one ... and now Dawkins has one. Again, he is the left tackle. Make tackles eligible!

Vince Verhei: Remember last week when I suggested Logan Thomas might be a better quarterback than Nathan Peterman? Thomas threw a pass today, a 15-yard gain to Robert Foster for a first down on a fake punt. I'd say the Bills staff must be readers, but based on pretty much everything they've done in 2018, it's clear that they are not.

Dave Bernreuther: I can't believe I missed a fat guy touchdown while I was typing about fat guy touchdowns.

LeSean McCoy just scored to give the Bills a 31-0 lead. Before halftime. On the road. Again. This is incredible.

Vince Verhei: Jets get a 55-yard field goal at the gun to make it 31-3 at halftime. Obviously, the big news is that the second veteran signed off the street this season has been by far Buffalo's best quarterback all year. Matt Barkley's numbers are modest -- 9-of-15, 146 yards, one touchdown, no sacks or interceptions -- but, again, Buffalo. I would have assumed this was the best game of his career, but he did throw for 300 yards a few times with Chicago in 2016. The 114.9 passer rating he has at halftime would be a career-high, and his first game over 100.0.

I also want to point this out on Buffalo's best offensive day of the year:

  • Undrafted free agent rookie Robert Foster: two catches, 62 yards.
  • Offensive tackle Dion Dawkins: one catch for a touchdown.
  • Alleged No. 1 wide receiver Kelvin Benjamin: no catches in two targets.

Dave Bernreuther: My mistake; the Bills got 27 in the first half in Minnesota, not 31.

This game they're doing it by vastly different means. Pretty sure the graphic I just saw put the yardage at 313-68.

But congrats to Todd Bowles on the field goal down 31-0 so you don't get shut out. I'm sure that'll help your resume next month...

(It was a long one at the end of the half so I actually can't be THAT critical of the decision. It still looks bad though. As did the fact that McDermott tried to ice the kick.)

The Bills offensive touchdown lead is now back in the hands of a skill player, as Zay Jones catches a score on a play that shouldn't have happened, if only because Terrelle Pryor fell down on a play where Barkley looked like an actual NFL quarterback and should've had him in the back of the end zone.

I can't really blame Todd Bowles too much for the roster he has been given and the unrealistic expectations they've placed on him ... but if you're down 38-3 at home to a contender for the worst offense in DVOA history, being led by a street free agent ... well, you deserve a midseason firing.

And on that note, I'm now annoyed that this totally ruins the 2018 Bills' shot at being the worst offense in DVOA history.

Vince Verhei: Have faith! The 2005 49ers had four games where they scored 24 points or more. The Bills have 38 (and counting) today, but that includes seven points on a play where they fumbled -- that will help them on the scoreboard, but hurt them in DVOA.

Arizona Cardinals 14 at Kansas City Chiefs 26

Derrik Klassen: Of all the teams to score the first opening-drive touchdown versus Kansas City this year, it is Arizona. The Cardinals trudged down the field with a handful of middling runs, K.C. penalties, and play-action passing. Josh Rosen connected with David Johnson on the perimeter for a short catch-and-run touchdown for Arizona's battering ram.

Arizona has no chance to keep pace with Kansas City here, but it would be nice to see them string together a few more drives like that for Rosen. He got hit too often on that last drive, but capitalized on the few legit opportunities he got. All Arizona really has left to play for this year is developing Rosen, so a few more scoring drives would be really encouraging to see from him.

I must say, Arizona's defense is doing a fine job of getting pressure on Patrick Mahomes and forcing some ugly passing within the 20-yard range. However, K.C.'s offense can make up for all those lost plays and yards in a heartbeat.

Tyreek Hill has been the engine for the offense today, constantly giving Mahomes a good target, be it burning someone down the sideline or finding a hole in tight coverage in the end zone. Arizona just has no answers for his speed right now.

With the game 20-7 in favor of Kansas City at the half, Arizona is going to need to protect Rosen and give him chances to create chunk plays to try to match Mahomes.

Jacksonville Jaguars 26 at Indianapolis Colts 29

Dave Bernreuther: With Leonard Four eggs back (no, I'm not correcting that auto correct) in the lineup, Doug Marrone is playing Hide the Bortles again. Four straight rushes to open the game, already in a seven-point hole, with the final one being a give-up draw to T.J. Yeldon on third-and-9 -- against the Colts pass rush, mind you -- does not exactly reek of confidence in your quarterback.

On the ensuing drive, the Colts stall out after a nice gainer to snack Doyle out of the backfield (not going to correct that one either) and Rigoberto Sanchez's punt bounces into the end zone ... but is legally swatted back into the field of play, directly at a Jaguar, who fields it at the 2 ... and is given forward progress to the 3. Fournette is going to have his work cut out for him on this next drive.

Donte Moncrief getting wide open enough to catch a lollipop from Blake Bortles and then waltz untouched to the end zone supports my earlier point that it is dumb to go run-heavy against the Colts defense.

Scott Kacsmar: It's funny how run-heavy the Jaguars get with Leonard Fournette in the game. He's back, so he has nine carries on the team's first 14 plays. He only has 28 yards and the team's only good play is the 80-yard Moncrief touchdown. Meanwhile, Andrew Luck passed for 163 yards in the first quarter alone. The last time he played Jacksonville (Week 17, 2016), he led a 17-point comeback win. Looks like he can play from ahead today, and just benefited from a 53-yard run as the Colts look to get big rushing numbers for the third game in a row.

Dave Bernreuther: The Dave DeGuglielmo Colts offensive line is playing so well right now that nobody is ever going to give Chris Ballard anything but praise for spending a top-ten pick on a guard, and that makes me sad.

But it was someone named Mark Glowinski who pulled and plastered a Jaguar (a defensive back, but still) to spring Jordan Wilkins for a huge gain on a beautifully designed play with just a hint of misdirection that Luck sold with a slight head fake to the man in motion ... and in the blink of an eye after that Eric Ebron has his THIRD touchdown of the first half. After he came free completely uncovered on another beautiful play design.

On another note: I won't lie. I've never been a fan of West Coast offenses. I have always thought they're better for hiding a quarterback you couldn't trust to carry a team. I don't like asking a generational talent to run that offense as opposed to a Coryell-based one, even given how much sense it makes to force Luck to get rid of the ball sooner. I despised replacing Arians' system with Pep Hamilton's. Furthermore, when I was around the Colts, I found Frank Reich likable but not in any way confidence-inspiring as a coach, and completely wrote him off when Peyton had him swapped with Ron Turner. I also don't like fullbacks. Or 22 personnel. Or any kind of run-heavy personnel in today's game.

But damn. What Reich is doing win this offense brings a tear to my eye. He's using tight ends brilliantly. He's using the backs brilliantly, playing to their strengths and against their weaknesses. He has made defenses actually care if the Colts choose to run. And on top of that he's aggressive on fourth down and hates ties (even if that's starting to look like potentially a very important half-win six weeks later).

Frank Reich has me completely smitten. He is my favorite Colts coach of my lifetime. By far.

Get that man a pass rush and this team will win a Super Bowl.

Frank Reich just went for two up 27-13 after a penalty on the extra point (after their fourth tight end touchdown of the half, another nice catch by Mo Alie-Cox) and I am out of words to describe my affection for this man. It's 29-16 Colts at half after Bortles chucks one out of the end zone despite having open receivers (plural!) and the best part is that Andrew Luck looks annoyed, rather than satisfied.

Bryan Knowles: This is essentially an elimination game -- the winner will be just one game out of playoff position, the loser will essentially be out. Frank Reich is coaching like it's a playoff game. Doug Marrone is not.

Dave Bernreuther: The Colts pass drop epidemic rears its head at the worst time after a few weeks off. Luck hits Mo Alie-Cox RIGHT IN THE HANDS but it bounces off of him and into an interception. And now the Jags have a shot to drive for the lead shortly after a missed field goal kept it a 29-23 game. It was an easy kick too, indoors, and having been there to witness the loss to a 60-yard field goal from another Jaguars kicker named Josh -- Scobee -- it was somewhat comforting to see that one sail wide.

Leonard Fournette is having a Marion Butts type of day. He has been largely bottled up and useless and put them in bad spots, but somehow has two touchdowns. After another failed run puts them in a bad spot (although at 8-for-13 on third down, third-and-long isn't that bad a spot for the Jaguars offense, I suppose), Bortles has one tipped and incomplete, and the Colts get a chance to kill some clock and possibly add to a six-point lead here in the fourth. I'm definitely having some flashbacks to the 2017 Colts and their blown leads. Boy do I not miss Chuck Pagano and Rob Chudzinski right now.

Bryan Knowles: Adam Vinatieri pushes a field goal wide right, giving Jacksonville the ball back, down three, with three minutes left in the game. This is essentially an elimination game, so we've got high drama in the dome in Indy -- those Pagano flashbacks have to be getting more vivid now.

Dave Bernreuther: Reich is testing my allegiance. Up three with under three minutes to go, he sends Vinatieri out from 52. We all know a three-point lead is better than a six-point lead. And a 52-yarder is no sure thing, even indoors. So of course Vinatieri misses (badly), which could actually be a blessing, and now the Jags are already near midfield.

On the plus side, there is enough time left that even if the Jags score here, there should be some time left. On the down side, the Colts have been shut out in the second half after a very nice first.

New England Patriots 10 at Tennessee Titans 34

Aaron Schatz: Patriots defense looks discombobulated so far. Big runs allowed, and two DPIs for Stephon Gilmore early. 14-3 Titans after just nine minutes.

Brady just ran a sneak on third-and-2 (not third-and-1) on the Titans 12 and got nothing. Titans stonewalled center David Andrews. Seems like a strange time to go for the sneak with a full 2 to go. So the Pats went for it on fourth-and-2 and got it on James White leaking out of the backfield. They got that play all the way up to the 1. Two plays later, James Develin into the end zone. Fullback touchdown! 17-10 Titans. Offenses definitely over defenses today.

24-10 at halftime. Between last year's playoff game and this game here, Corey Davis clearly keeps his best performances for New England. Great catches today -- jumping, sliding -- despite good coverage from Stephon Gilmore (as I said before, coverage so close he was flagged for DPI twice). Meanwhile, the Titans front is getting a lot of pressure on Brady and he has had some big missed throws. The best thing the Pats have going is that Logan Ryan is having trouble with Julian Edelman, he has been wide open a couple times. I do wonder, where is Chris Hogan? I mean, every other team has been picking on Malcolm Butler. Why aren't the Patriots?

Adoree' Jackson is on Josh Gordon today and has done a pretty good job in coverage; there have also been a couple of passes that went right through Gordon's hands.

With 11:41 to go in the fourth quarter, the Patriots ran some trickery on third-and-7 with a handoff to James White, flip back to Julian Edelman, and then pass to Brady coming out of the backfield. Except, you know, Brady has the legs of a 41-year-old quarterback, and he stumbles and can't even make it to the first-down marker. Marcos Cannon jumps offside to turn fourth-and-1 into fourth-and-6, and then Brady can't hit Edelman (pass defensed by Logan Ryan) for the turnover on downs. Just an all-around failure by the Patriots today.

And the Titans added insult to injury by completing a pass to their quarterback on the next drive. A better one, Darius Jennings to Marcus Mariota for 21 yards.

Dave Bernreuther: It's not the Patriots' day. And that almost never happens after September.

First we see a clever reverse pass -- White to Edelman to Brady -- literally fall *just* short of the first as Edelman didn't quite throw Brady open and the latter tripped and fell a few inches shy of the first. Then on the fourth-down try ... it's the Patriots who get flagged for a false start. That NEVER happens. That's the kind of thing that other teams seem to always do against New England. The fourth-and-6 pass is broken up and suddenly we're looking at the very real possibility that the Titans will win this game. Which is not something I thought possible, even with their lead at halftime.

And oh my goodness. The Titans immediately run the left-handed version of the same reverse-pass, with Mariota picking up a chunk of yards. Up 17 points in the fourth quarter, you could make the argument that that's a dick move. Surely half of America is laughing its head off right now though.

And as if it wasn't bad enough for New England, now Julian Edelman is walking to the locker room.

Vince Verhei: Isn't that how it went in the Super Bowl too? Incomplete pass to Brady, then the Eagles respond with the Philly Philly touchdown to Nick Foles? It's like teams take passes to Brady as an insult and feel the need to respond in kind.

Tom Gower: Well that was not quite how I thought that game would go. The Tom Brady we saw against the Titans in January was perfectly comfortable, at times running time and letting them just get set and finding yet another open receiver as the Patriots dominated the final three quarters after some early struggles. The Titans took the lead after scoring first again this time and got a couple scores on the board, but the Patriots made it 17-10, got a stop, and got into scoring position again. But Stephen Gostkowski missed a 52-yard field goal on fourth-and-4 and the Patriots wouldn't make it inside the 40 again. Credit to the Tennessee pass rush and coverage teams working together. Brady was sacked thrice and the Titans were credited with six quarterback hits, but a number of his 20 incompletions on 41 attempts were essentially throwaways with no realistic chance of completion after having to reset when his pocket broke down before he had a good receiver. Yes, having to play a third-string guard and an injured Trent Brown or backup at left tackle mattered, and Rob Gronkowski missing mattered as well. But this was the sort of performance we haven't seen from the Titans despite their investments on offense, except in their role as Blake Bortles' bête noire.

Offensively, the Titans, who have been backed up much of the season, started three first-half possessions in Patriots territory and got 17 points out of those, crucial to the 24-10 halftime lead. It was a good way to build on their improved work on offense against the Chargers before the bye and Dallas on Monday. The key to them competing for an AFC South title or wild-card spot was basically to be better than they'd been on defense, but especially on offense as they worked through the transition period. Tajae Sharpe had been their most reliable receiver and a frequent Marcus target, especially on third downs, but expectedly didn't play much of a role against New England's more man-focused coverage approach. That meant they needed a lot out of Corey Davis, singled up against Stephon Gilmore for most of the day, and they got it, even against what looked like a zone on first-and-20 after a penalty. Marcus is Marcus: able to throw well now that he's over the nerve injury, and the difference in performance between Marcus comfortable and Marcus uncomfortable can be huge, and the progression in the offense means we're seeing more of Marcus comfortable.

Washington Redskins 16 at Tampa Bay Buccaneers 3

Andrew Potter: Buccaneers gonna Buccaneer. A Ryan Fitzpatrick red zone interception (drink), a Fitzpatrick illegal forward pass when he was attempting to lateral on third down (drink), and a Chandler Catanzaro missed field goal from 30 yards (alcohol poisoning) have the Bucs scoreless in a game they've otherwise dominated. Washington's offense has consisted of precisely one drive in which they put together back-to-back-to-back plays of at least 15 yards. Their other ten plays, including two three-and-out drives, have totaled 21 yards. The makeshift offensive line has been dominated every bit as much as you'd expect, but critical mistakes by the Bucs mean it's 3-0 Washington despite being outgained almost 3-to-1.

Hah. Fitzpatrick just completed a short dumpoff pass to Jacquizz Rodgers, then sprinted past Rodgers and threw a lead block for him. And not just one of those "quarterback kinda gets in the way of a defender" lead blocks, but a proper diving block that, although it mostly whiffed, still kept both Montae Nicholson and Josh Norman out of the play.

That led to a field goal, and we're now tied at 3.

Dave Bernreuther: And here I was about to praise Fitz for that lateral attempt ... in real time to me that looked like he threw it backwards and it seemed like a really smart idea. Guess not.

Andrew Potter: It was better than Matthew Stafford's attempt last week, at least.

Dave Bernreuther: Washington just picked up a huge chunk of yards at the 2-minute warning in a screen to Kapri Bibbs where the (presumably street free agent replacement) offensive lineman was as much as 10 yards downfield at the time of the pass. I was relieved to see a flag on the field ... but it was in fact thrown for holding instead. Which was probably also committed by a street free agent replacement offensive lineman, and somewhat understandable/forgiveable ... but come on. If we're going to let linemen race downfield like receivers we may as well eliminate that rule altogether.

Which could be fun. Just think of how many more Fat Guy Touchdowns there would be.

Bryan Knowles: I've been banging on the table for offensive tackles to be eligible receivers for about 10 years now, and all I've achieved is a slight dent in my table.

Scott Kacsmar: Every game going right now has at least 27 combined points and a team leading by 11-plus points. But not this one. It's 6-3 Washington even though Tampa Bay had at least 36 yards on all five possessions in the first half. A missed field goal and interception hurt. Meanwhile, Washington is 0-for-4 on third down, and I hear this won't be a good game for Alex Smith's ALEX.

Vince Verhei: I turn to this just in time to see Tampa Bay with a third down in the red zone, but the shotgun snap is low and outside, and Fitzpatrick has to chase it down for a big loss. Then Chandler Catanzaro's 48-yard field goal try is wide right, Washington still leads 6-3, and I am sad I don't get to at least watch Drew Brees anymore.

Dave Bernreuther: Well at least you got to see Alex Smith take a deep shot and attempt to right his ALEX wrongs...

It was nowhere near anyone, of course. But it looked pretty while it was in the air. And somehow it resulted in a first down due to an absolutely ludicrous roughing the passer call against Beau Allen. So Washington plods along, nearing the red zone with a chance to take a commanding lead of two field goals. Which, sadly, actually is commanding against Tampa's kickers.

Vince Verhei: A touchdown! Smith finds Josh Doctson in the back of the end zone for six. At first it looked like Doctson may have stepped out of bounds before catching the pass, but the score is upheld. Washington up 13-3 early in the fourth.

After a Fitzpatrick interception leads to a Washington field goal, the Buccaneers start driving again, and Jacquizz Rodgers catches a ball and turns upfield inside the 20. But Zach Brown punches the ball out from behind, it goes all the way into the end zone, and Ha Ha Clinton-Dix falls on it for the touchback. Tampa Bay now up to 22 first downs and more than 400 yards of offense ... and three points.

Bryan Knowles: The record for most yards without a touchdown belongs to the 1986 49ers, who picked up 501 yards in a 6-14 loss against Joe Gibbs' Washington way back when. Tampa Bay's within 100 yards of that record, so they have an outside shot...

Oh my. Tampa Bay gets back into the red zone AGAIN, but Fitzgerald is sacked and fumbles. Washington ball. Tampa Bay now has 481 yards with no touchdowns; that's the fourth-most in NFL history and the most since ... uh, last year, when the Lions rode 482 yards to five field goals in a 20-15 loss to Pittsburgh.

Vince Verhei: Bucs drive 80 yards in 12 plays in only 2:41 -- but Mike Evans drops a low but catchable pass in the end zone on first-and-goal from the 2, then Preston Smith gets the sack-fumble on second down and Ryan Kerrigan recovers to end the threat.

Bucs now up to 481 yards with three minutes and change to go. Record for yards in a game while scoring three points or less appears to be 424 by the 2011 Rams.

Andrew Potter: Donovan Smith was whipped on the sack, and also whipped on the previous play when another sack was wiped out by a holding penalty on Josh Norman. Lost in some of the offensive explosions earlier this year: the Buccaneers offensive line is still a liability.

Also, the Buccaneers just gifted Washington a first down on their game-icing drive by throwing the challenge flag when out of timeouts. That's a 15-yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct. I've never seen that before.

Bryan Knowles: This tidbit in from Nick Mensio over at Rotoworld. Washington has not experienced a lead change all year long. They've never trailed in any of their wins; they've never led in any of their losses. First score has always won.

Tampa Bay finishes 2 yards short of the all-time yardage record without a touchdown, with 499. Fitzmagic!

Vince Verhei: That lead-change stat about Washington is even more amazing than Tampa Bay's red zone performance today, but for the record, the Bucs finish with 498 yards and 29 first downs ... and three points.

(EDITOR'S NOTE: The final game book lists Tampa Bay with 501 yards.)

Scott Kacsmar: Every team with 29 or more first downs has scored at least 13 points until the Buccaneers today. What an epic game of tease and denial.

New Orleans Saints 51 at Cincinnati Bengals 14

Vince Verhei: What looked like the best game of the day has turned into a blowout thanks to the brutal, merciless efficiency of the New Orleans offense. Saints' first four drives of the game:

  • 8 plays, 75 yards, touchdown.
  • 6 plays, 75 yards, touchdown.
  • 9 plays, 90 yards, touchdown.
  • 9 plays, 60 yards, touchdown.

They're already starting to just mess with Cincinnati. On their last drive, on first-and-goal from the 1, they actually took Drew Brees off the field, and Taysom Hill ran a Tim Tebow-esque play-action pass, faking a dive out of shotgun and throwing a pop pass to Benjamin Watson. It should have worked, but Watson bobbled the ball. No matter -- Alvin Kamara scored on a pitch to the left on the next snap.

It looks like Cincinnati is going to end the half with an answering score of some kind, but then Marcus Williams intercepts the ball at the 5-yard line and returns it 78 yards to the Cincinnati 17 with 8 seconds to go. The Saints smell blood, and one snap later Drew Brees hits Michael Thomas for a touchdown. Thomas ran a skinny post and was wide open in the Bengals' zone coverage.

So it's 35-7 at halftime. The Saints have 21 first downs, and they're only 6-of-6 on third down. They've had just one penalty for 5 yards. Mark Ingram is at 99 yards from scrimmage with a touchdown; Kamara, 79 and two; Thomas, 62 and two. Brees has thrown for two touchdowns and almost 200 yards, with no sacks, no interceptions, and only two incompletions. The Bengals just look helpless today.

Bryan Knowles: I thought Saints-Bengals looked like the best game on paper in the early sessions, even with A.J. Green out. Sure, the Saints were likely to win, but the Bengals were in playoff position before the game started, and they were at home, and it would at least be a good test for a team some people are calling the best in the NFL.

It has not been a test. At all. Michael Thomas just scored his second touchdown of the day to take a 35-7 lead. This last one was set up by a 78-yard interception return by Marcus Williams who was covering ... I'm going to say open space? Because the throw was so, so far away from any Bengals that Williams was basically fielding an arm punt. That might have been alright, as there were only eight seconds left on the clock, if he hadn't managed to take the ball all the way into the red zone on the return. I am really, really surprised that the Bengals have come out as flat as they have after the bye; they have had no fight all day long. They can't even slow down Brees and company, and outside of their first touchdown drive, they have just 67 yards of offense. About the only negative thing you can say for the Saints is Terron Armstead leaving the game with an injury. This is just utter domination.

Vince Verhei: Saints open the second half with their worst drive of the game ... which still picks up 61 yards in eight plays. But on third-and-1, Zach Line drops a pass (it wasn't clear he would have picked up the first down anyway), and Wil Lutz adds a patronizing 29-yard field goal to put New Orleans up 38-7. With no Dez Bryant, they called up rookie Keith Kirkwood from the practice squad. He has caught two passes today, including a 42-yarder on that drive.

Among the many, many problems for Cincinnati today: Andy Dalton and John Ross have shown a complete lack of chemistry. The interception at the end of the first half was, officially at least, targeted to Ross. Now Ross gets behind the defense for what might have been a touchdown, but Dalton underthrows the ball and Eli Apple likely would have intercepted that too, but it looked like he dropped it anticipating a collision with Williams. On fourth down, Dalton has a clean pocket and a wide-open Ross on a crosser, but the pass is nowhere near him. Ross has a 2-yard touchdown today, but that's his only catch in four targets. This will be my last update for this game -- the local CBS affiliate just switched to Washington-Tampa Bay. Because a 6-3 game in the third quarter is more compelling than what's happening in Cincinnati today.

The Saints offense did their old defense a favor today by putting their record they don't want in jeopardy.

Detroit Lions 22 at Chicago Bears 34

Bryan Knowles: Cody Parkey has managed to hit the uprights four times today. That's impressive, and a great start to his Loser League II campaign -- two missed field goals, two missed extra points.

Not that that has helped the Lions at all. In a must-win game if they want to stay relevant in 2018, the Lions are just not getting anything put together. Trubisky is 18-for-21, and it hasn't been a bunch of dink-and-dunk, either. Admittedly, yes, the Lions have a terrible pass defense and are missing their best cornerback, but even given all that, Mitchell Trubisky is looking good today, spreading the ball around and basically doing what he wants against the Lions defense. The Bears had five first-half drives: four touchdowns, and the end of the half. They're scoreless so far in the second half because of Parkey, but I doubt the Lions will be able to take advantage.

Los Angeles Chargers 20 at Oakland Raiders 6

Vince Verhei: Chargers kicking game rears its ugly head again, though this won't show up in the special teams stats. Raiders go with a fake punt on their first drive, just a deep snap and then a sweep to the left and Johnny Townsend takes it for a 42-yard gain to convert on fourth-and-4. That's Oakland's second-longest run of the year, and their longest since September. They go for it again on fourth-and-goal from the 1, but the Chargers sniff out the SHOVeLL pass to Dwayne Harris and it's a turnover on downs.

Bryan Knowles: With four minutes left and down 14 points, the Raiders are forced to go for it on fourth-and-5. The Chargers get immediate pressure and Derek Carr … spikes the ball into the ground. It was fourth down-and-game, Derek!

Aaron Schatz: Here's the Derek Carr play. It looks like the Raiders called a negative-ALEX special, a screen pass to the running back on fourth-and-freaking-5.

Bryan Knowles: This game is over. It's a 20-6 win for the Chargers -- and it's an important result. The Raiders become the first team to be eliminated from a playoff seed -- they can no longer win the AFC West. The Browns and Bills dodged that bullet earlier today by coming through with upset victories; the Raiders couldn't do the same.

...OK, "significant" may be a better word than "important," as the Raiders were all but mathematically eliminated a month ago, but still.

Seattle Seahawks 31 at Los Angeles Rams 36

Bryan Knowles: Great play by Tyler Lockett. Seattle was running an end around that the Rams absolutely sniffed out, hitting him 7 yards behind the line of scrimmage (with a face mask penalty, but still). Lockett somehow gets around that and puts up a couple of great spin moves to turn it into an 18-yard gain -- plus an additional 14 from that penalty, putting them into the red zone. That sets up the Seattle touchdown three plays later, as they take an early 7-0 lead. A little bit of luck would really help the Seahawks in their upset bid.

Carl Yedor: Rams march right back down the field and score without needing to convert a third down. Goff was never really under duress. There was one play where he was outside the pocket but not under pressure, and that was about it. 7-7.

Vince Verhei: Last time these two teams played, they both scored 30, and it might happen again after the Rams answer with a touchdown on their first drive. Actually looked very similar to Seattle's score, a simple in route by the tight end (Gerald Everett in this case).

Most exciting play on Seattle's opening drive was an incomplete pass on a Russell Wilson bootleg. They've been using George Fant as a sixth lineman frequently all season, and they finally put him into the pattern as a receiver -- and not just as a dumpoff option, he was somewhere 10 or more yards downfield. Unfortunately the Rams were prepared and he was covered.

Other early news is the weather. There were worries the wildfire smoke would affect the game, but instead the skies are blue.

You may have forgotten, but the Seahawks used a first-round pick on a running back this year.With Chris Carson out, Rashaad Penny is getting more time today, and he just had the two biggest runs of his career, both out of the shotgun. The first he started up the middle, then cut to the left for 38 yards. Then Seattle runs a read-option, and with the defense focused on Wilson, Penny finds plenty of room off the edge to the right for an 18-yard score.

(My wife actually did forget Penny -- she just texted me asking where we got this guy.)

Aaron Schatz: I'm not sure why Tony Romo seems to be so concerned with the fact that the Rams have so many new starters on defense this year. He's using that as an explanation for why the Rams have been so bad against the run. But the Rams were really bad against the run last year as well. I'm not sure what having new starters "needing to learn their gaps" has to do with anything.

Tom Gower: The 2011 Texans under new defensive coordinator Wade Phillips, without the benefit of an offseason, incorporated a bunch of free agents and returning players and improved from awful to sixth in the league. I'd say something more like "stars-and-scrubs is a tough model to get to work, which is why we generally discourage it."

Vince Verhei: The offenses slowed down (especially Seattle's) in the second quarter, and the Rams lead 17-14 at halftime. Officially Seattle only threw eight passes that half (they had another wiped out on a roughing the passer call on their first drive) but Aaron Donald still got two sacks, because he is Aaron Donald. D.J. Fluker being out doesn't help. Wilson is 6-of-8, but hasn't completed a pass that has gained more than 8 yards. That will have to change if they're going to win, obviously.

Seattle's defense is using a lot of bear fronts to take away inside runs, but the Rams are just using a lot of jet sweeps and outside pitches and are still getting big plays in the running game. My favorite play was out of an offset I, with the fullback lined up to the right. Jared Goff started to spin back and to his left like he was going to pitch to the tailback going right, then just did a full pirouette and slipped the ball to the fullback going left instead. Looked like something out of the single wing days. Dr. Z would have loved it.

Andrew Whitworth is having a big day clearing space on the edge, but not so much in pass protection -- he gave up Seattle's only sack so far and a few other pressures.

Tom Gower: The Rams offense is so much fun, like the Falcons of 2016. It all fits together and works. Not much of a surprise, because they're similar offenses, even if they don't operate out of the same personnel packages. Counters to counters to counters, and they're going to find a mismatch somewhere. And the pass game is distributed again this week, with five different players with multiple catches and nobody more than a quarter of Goff's yardage.

Scott Kacsmar: Any flaws Marcus Peters may have had in coverage were overlooked by how great he was at creating takeaways in Kansas City. This season, he had a pick in Week 1, but nothing since. He had an interception of Russell Wilson, but it was negated by a holding penalty on Peters.

Vince Verhei: Another big run by Penny -- this time a zone read that the Rams played so poorly that Penny and Wilson were both running untouched down the sideline, and Wilson even slid at the end to make sure he didn't get hit. Seahawks now over 150 rushing yards today, their sixth straight game over 150. They had never done that before, not even in the Super Bowl years.

Rams only have seven penalties today, but it seems like every one has been massive. Seattle's first drive would have ended in a punt, but Dante Fowler got called for roughing the passer on a third-down incompletion. That just happened again -- Seattle's punt team was coming onto the field, but Fowler mouthed off to a ref for 15 yards and a first down. And Wilson makes them pay with an absolute dagger, a 23-yard go-route touchdown to Tyler Lockett, dropping the ball neatly over Troy Hill's shoulders. Seahawks take a 21-20 lead.

Other Rams penalties wiped out an interception, as Scott noted (it also caused the interception, of course); moved them from second-and-14 to second-and-19 and nearly guaranteed a field goal instead of a touchdown; and handed Seattle 15 free yards after a Rams punt. Germain Ifedi also picked up an unnecessary roughness foul for what looked like some pretty typical pushing and shoving, the kind of thing that happens a dozen times a week. Refs calling them very tight today.

Bryan Knowles: The Rams take the lead back on the first play of the fourth quarter, after a 75-yard drive. Excluding the drive to end the first half, the Seahawks haven't held the Rams under 50 yards since early in the second quarter. The Rams are driving, repeatedly, and the Seahawks have to try to keep up. On the plus side for Seattle, they did manage to stop Todd Gurley on the two-point conversion attempt, so it's just a 26-21 Rams lead.

Vince Verhei: Rams go back in front on a short touchdown pass to Tyler Higbee. Rams go for two, but the Gurley run is stuffed, and the lead is still 26-21. Big play came when Seattle had the Rams in third-and-15, but Robert Woods got wide open in the middle of the zone for a 35-yard gain. Perfectly designed pattern with another receiver running a shorter route to suck up the linebacker and clear the hole for Woods. Sean McVay is so good at manufacturing yards and making things easy for his quarterback, man.

Wilson runs the ball into the red zone with runs of 11 and 21 yards, but then Suh and Donald team up for a sack to force a field goal. Kick is good, but Rams still up 26-24. That's a season-high 60 rushing yards for Wilson and 222 rushing yards for Seattle. They're like that college team this weekend that ran for 700-some yards in a loss.

Seahawks try the surprise onside kick afterwards, but the Rams recover.

Bryan Knowles: I don't get the surprise onside kick, honestly. It's a one-score game; if you hold the Rams to a field goal it's still a one-score game. Janikowski isn't any good at onside kicks, and onside kicks are much harder under the new rules. It feels ... reckless, as opposed to opportunistic.

Tom Gower: The Rams have gotten to field goal range every possession save one, so it's about getting a stop on third downs. Letting them score faster gives you a better chance at multiple possessions in case you need them. I'm not saying I would have done it, especially given how hard onside kicks are to recover now and that it wouldn't be completely unsurprising, but I do get it.

Vince Verhei: On the onside kick, they rolled the dice and it didn't work. It happens.

Rams get a first-and-goal, but after a pair of incompletions, they throw a wide receiver screen on third down and end up with a fourth-and-goal from the 2. I'm absolutely stunned they kicked the field goal for a five-point lead there. No faith in Gurley to pick up 2 yards and a touchdown that would have pretty much iced the game?

Aaron Schatz: I'm sure EdjSports will have an interesting Game-Winning Chance report regarding the Rams' choice to kick a field goal with 7:39 left in the fourth quarter to go up five instead of going for it on fourth-and-goal from the 2. I'm guessing the numbers say this was the wrong choice, but not by as much as it would have been if the Rams had been kicking a field goal to go up six. If you fail on that fourth-and-goal, there's a big difference between being up two (field goal beats you) and being up three (field goal ties you).

Carl Yedor: Seattle goes down the field, aided in part by more Rams penalties, but the L.A. defense holds in the red zone and forces them to kick a field goal. 26-24 now, but Seattle will need to find a way to actually get off the field if they want to make the comeback. Rams are 5-of-8 on third downs, which is making a huge difference in this game.

And maybe Carroll realized that, because Seattle goes for a surprise onside kick, but the Rams recover, giving them tremendous field position. They don't convert it into a touchdown, so it is now a 5-point L.A. lead.

Sebastian Janikowski has not historically been a good onside kicker, but I don't blame Carroll for being aggressive there. Now, that does raise the question as to why they ran the ball and threw short in the two-minute drill before halftime if they did want to be aggressive...

Vince Verhei: And there's Fowler redeeming himself, beating Duane Brown cleanly for the strip-sack and a Rams recovery. And then Woods takes the ball on a jet sweep into the end zone. Rams kick the extra point to go up 36-24 with less than six minutes to go, and that should be that.

Wilson has now been sacked four times in only 17 dropbacks.

This is just like last week. A turnover puts Seattle down two scores in the fourth quarter. They score a long, slow touchdown drive, then use their timeouts to force a three-and-out and get the ball back. Now they have 1:24 to go, no timeouts, at their own 25, needing a touchdown to win the game.

And Seattle gets to the 35, but the game ends there on a spike, three straight incompletes (none of them terribly close), and a Rams kneeldown. On the fourth down, Wilson teased running, which pulled a Rams defender up towards the line of scrimmage and opened things up for Tyler Lockett along the sideline, but on the run and under pressure Wilson sailed a ball over Lockett's head.

Seahawks fall to 4-5, with a 1-5 record in one-score games. Overall, I think it's safe to say they're a much better team than most expected, but unless they start winning these close games in a hurry, it's not going to matter.

And the Rams, well, remain at worst the No. 2 team in the NFC.

Aaron Schatz: They didn't get it. The most confusing part was the play that was clearly an incomplete pass, but everyone acted like it was a fumble because the officials never blew the whistle. Why can't officials just blow the whistle when a play is obviously an incomplete pass?

I also think that should have been intentional grounding. The idea that Rashaad Penny was in the area is silly, he wasn't near the pass and was in fact running away from it.

Carl Yedor: Seattle's GWD attempt stalls out at the 35. After spiking it on first down, Wilson tries to go deep to David Moore but his throw is rushed and out the back of the end zone on second down. On third down, Wilson gets flushed from the pocket and throws it away, and then on the next play Wilson looks like he's considering running for it but at the last second tries to float it over a Rams defensive back just before Wilson crosses the line of scrimmage. Too high. Incomplete. Game over. L.A. keeps pace with the Saints in the race for the No. 1 seed while Seattle drops to 4-5, putting them in a tough position to try to make the playoffs with Green Bay coming to town for Thursday Night Football.

Tom Gower: Final note on the game: I love that Tony Romo loves watching the Rams offense as much as I do. Quite the contrast to Dan Fouts getting confused about what team Malcolm Butler was playing for in the Titans-Patriots game.

Miami Dolphins 12 at Green Bay Packers 31

Zach Binney: The Dolphins and Packers exchange fake punts in the second half. The Dolphins' made sense -- down 16, desperate, offense not moving, less than a yard. Easy pickup. The Packers ... that was reckless. Fourth-and-3 from near midfield, up 16 with about 10 minutes left against an offense that hasn't scored a touchdown in seven quarters and 20-something drives. It was pretty clearly an F-U play, but that is coaching malpractice. There was zero need for it and a lot more downside than upside. Fire Mike McCarthy yesterday.

Dallas Cowboys 27 at Philadelphia Eagles 20

Carl Yedor: This may be a "water is wet" comment but the Cowboys' timeout management has been quite poor today. They've used two timeouts on offense, and they just burned their final timeout when Philly lined up to go for it on fourth-and-10. You're playing a team known for going for it on fourth down, and the mere act of them lining up to go for it cost Dallas its last timeout.

But those missing timeouts don't end up hurting Dallas, as the Cowboys go down and score a touchdown right before half. After a first-down sack, Philly started using their timeouts to try to get the ball back, but a poorly defended screen pass on third-and-long extended Dallas' drive, allowing them to punch it in and go up 13-3. Dallas also gets the ball first to start the second half, so that long screen pass could end up being a critical play in the game.

Tom Gower: 13-3 at the half. Cris Collinsworth claimed early in the broadcast that Carson Wentz' numbers are just as good as they were last year. DVOA doesn't agree, putting him at 7.8% coming into this week's games after 23.8% passing DVOA last year. One of the big differences between this year and last was his exceptional play on third down versus this year. Tonight was another example of the trend, as the Eagles were 0-5 on third and fourth downs in the first two quarters (four passes). Dallas wasn't much easier to watch, getting a field goal after starting inside the 40 after an awful Wentz pick, but Zeke Elliott's hurdle seemed to be a bit of a turning point (or maybe it just was for my energy level). The drive at the end of the half certainly started rough, with the sack, and the Eagles were right to take a timeout then. But you're not supposed to convert third-and-15 with a wide receiver screen, and we got to see why I keep wondering about how Philly can be ninth in pass defense DVOA with all the mistakes I've seen their secondary players make in critical situations.

Aaron Schatz: The Eagles' pass defense DVOA was a lot better in Weeks 1 to 4 before safety Rodney McLeod got injured. It's declined a lot in the last four games.

Tom Gower: I didn't check that split, so that makes a lot of sense.

Aaron Schatz: This was a terrible loss for the Eagles. I don't quite know why the trade for Golden Tate was such a big deal if they were barely going to use him. But it's hard to blame the Eagles' offense for this game when they had more yards per play than the Cowboys did. I feel like the problem was that they let Ezekiel Elliott run all over them and they didn't pressure Dak Prescott that much. He looked very different from the Prescott we've seen most of the year. Spread the ball around to eight different receivers.

Also, the Eagles had no accepted penalties tonight. Just a terrible loss for them to take at home. Two games behind Washington, with trips to New Orleans and Los Angeles coming up that Washington doesn't have to take. Their playoff odds are pretty low now.


125 comments, Last at 15 Nov 2018, 1:12pm

#2 by PatsFan // Nov 12, 2018 - 10:30am

I still think Brady is on the downslope. Yes, the WRs had trouble getting loose and the OL sucked. But that's no excuse for the way Brady was forcing everything to Gordon (into quadruple coverage, for god's sake) and Edelman. We also had at least a couple of the now weekly "miss an open player by several feet even when not under pressure" throws. And he seemed to be flinching away from pressure and not getting his feet set up well even when he had time to throw.

Also, using QB rating as the metric Brady is currently the worst QB in the NFL against the blitz (59.6).

Points: 0

#4 by Yu Narukami // Nov 12, 2018 - 10:39am

Yeah, it seems as every blitz is a home-run sack or creating an INC.

Now we are to 3 games were the loss became inevitable at the end of 3rd Q and there is not even a chance for a comeback in the 4th. That never happened more than once in the recent years.

Bright sides? Dean Pees is always a challenge to TB12's offense, so you can discount that. Plus, they are still easily in control of the division, but even 1st round bye now looks a challenge.

Dark sides? STs are terrible as ever in the BBB-era and OLine is cumulating injuries and personnel-inconsistencies like it is 2015.

Points: 0

#9 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:25am

He may not be on a severe downslope, but if the Patriots defense doesn't improve, it may not take much of a downslope to wreck the Patriots' chances of playing in February, or even deep into January.

Points: 0

#13 by Ryan // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:37am

Given the way Brady has looked in recent weeks.....are we even sure home field in Jan would be that massive of a boon for him? Do we think he can improve his accuracy in cold or rough weather? A stunning number of inaccurate throws and even one-hoppers recently from Tommy.

Points: 0

#15 by aces4me // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:45am

While his absolute accuracy may not increase his accuracy relative to his opponent may. Brady has always been a excellent bad weather quarterback. That cant be said of other starting QBs in the league.

Points: 0

#67 by johonny // Nov 12, 2018 - 4:20pm

Will it ever matter, if none of the other three teams in that division can organize a professional football team? I think Brady would retire if the division wasn't so, so terrible. But given winning the AFC east is basically given year in and out, you can see why he continues to play through the declining years. He's two wins from the Super Bowl year in and out. Without Brady, eeck imagine what the division would look like. The big fear with Brady, is at 40+ years he's going to take that one hit too many and ruin his retirement years.

Points: 0

#69 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 4:28pm

I would pick the Brian Hoyer led Patriots to win this division. And and I feel confident saying that.

Points: 0

#120 by mehllageman56 // Nov 13, 2018 - 4:15pm

If Hoyer started now, then that pick makes sense. From the start of the season? The Patriots are at 16th in Defensive DVOA, ahead of only the Dolphins in the division. Their special teams are tied for last in the division with Buffalo, at 17th with a perfect 0.0 DVOA. The Patriots are an unusually low 9th in Offensive DVOA, ahead of Miami and way ahead of the disasters that are the Jets and Bills offenses. So maybe, but I think you are underestimating the drop off from Brady to Hoyer. This year, because of the Jets starting off with Darnold and the Bills being a train wreck for a variety of reasons, perhaps the Pats win the division a little over 50 percent of the time. Next year? Well, as a Jets fan I would love it if the Pats start Hoyer next year.

Points: 0

#121 by theslothook // Nov 13, 2018 - 5:29pm

There is a massive drop off between Brady and Hoyer. And yet, the AFC east is so putrid, it really comes down to NE w Hoyer and Belichick or Miami w Osweiler and Gase(I am simplifying enormously). I like my chances with the former.

Points: 0

#123 by mehllageman56 // Nov 14, 2018 - 1:29pm

It's not just Belichick and Hoyer vs Game and Osweiler/etc, it's also vs Jet's next coach/Darnold and Bill's terrible coach/Josh Allen. That is for next year, and that's still simplifying it, since you also include the other players on offense on those teams, and also the extra players the Jets and Bills get next year due to the amount of cap room they have (Jets have almost 100 million, the Bills have 50 million). The Pats can get a bunch of cap room, but only if they cut Brady, Gronk, both safeties, etc. The Jet's cap room doesn't include their receivers, but I would assume they keep Enunwa and Robbie Anderson, given the cap they have.

Points: 0

#104 by RickD // Nov 12, 2018 - 9:42pm

Well, he was the MVP last season. Even regression toward the mean (of his career performance level) would look like a "downslope".

He's not playing as well this season as he did last year.

He's also missing Amendola, Cooks, and Lewis, and Gronk was out yesterday. Hogan has had a disappointing season. Were it not for James White, the team would be dead in the water.

Points: 0

#105 by PatsFan // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:03pm

It’s not the lower stats on their own (that’d be expected for many of the reasons you say). It’s the particulars of many of the bad plays.

Points: 0

#124 by Noahrk // Nov 14, 2018 - 8:33pm

Also, 6% DVOA sounds really low for him, even accounting for the bad receiving corps. Didn't he have a putrid receiving core a few years ago? I bet his DVOA was higher than this back then.

Points: 0

#1 by Biebs // Nov 12, 2018 - 10:24am

I'm sure this will come out during DVOA. But, I have to think the Jets defensive effort will go down as one of the worst single game defensive DVOAs after opponent adjustment.

Points: 0

#3 by Ryan // Nov 12, 2018 - 10:37am

Count me among the Colts fans heaping praise on Ballard for the Nelson pick (hell, throw Braden Smith in there too). I'm sure there are plenty of formulas which demonstrate how it wasn't the appropriate value pick or whatever at 6. But the transition from watching Luck risk loss of limb on a weekly basis to four games in a row without a sack, effective running, an offense that is actually fun to watch--it's been beautiful. Nelson and Smith have been immediate impact players and look like long-term solutions. Wouldn't have it any other way.

Points: 0

#6 by Dave Bernreuther // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:04am

Luck isn't being hit less because Nelson is excelling in pass protection; he's being hit less because the offensive design has him throwing the ball sooner, and as he gets more comfortable in it he's not hanging onto it as long by choice anymore. Sacks are more on the quarterback than the line. Always have been.

I enjoy watching the line and the run game too. It's really a nice refreshing change. But that offense would be clicking really well right now without Nelson. They've made enormous strides at that position group with just coaching and health.

It's tough. With Chubb having come off the board, there wasn't any player I'd have wanted more. Nelson was a sure thing. You'd never say no to a sure thing. But it's just... I don't know. Conflicting. I'm not calling it dumb. I don't hate it. I just don't like it either. I don't know what to feel. Because it's pass defense that will be what turns this team into a real contender, not run offense. If and when they find that, they'll be a threat. And it won't really have anything at all to do with a guard.

Points: 0

#12 by Ryan // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:35am

I totally agree that Reich's quick-pass offense is protecting Luck too, no question about that. A shift toward that type of passing game was long overdue. But I highly doubt we're anywhere near as effective running the ball--and thus creating genuine offensive balance that defenses must respect--without Nelson/Smith; their pass protection also makes the selective intermediate to long-intermediate shots viable. They're creating pockets that allow Luck to demonstrate his natural feel for pocket movement (as opposed to mad scrambling, which he can also do of course, but that's not what you want to see). There were a few plays yesterday where Luck made a subtle step or two (usually forward, into the pocket) and released the ball on time that definitely would have been sacks before, either because a tackle couldn't handle the edge or because a guard got mauled inside. I don't think it's a coincidence that the Colts are among the best in the league at converting third-and-long this year.

The bigger picture to me is that this roster was (kinda still is?) riddled with holes. There was no solving all the problems in one draft. Seems Ballard felt protecting Luck needed to be step 1, and he went big in that direction, both schematically and via draft, especially considering the mystery surrounding the shoulder. This team was never going to be super-competitive this year no matter how the draft went. Might as well set the foundation on the line over the next few years while you try to improve the defense.

Points: 0

#23 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:00pm

I'm with David in thinking that while Nelson has been good, it's been more of scheme and improvement as a whole that deserves the credit.

Also I agree, the colts have talent but there are still gaping holes all over the roster. Secondary, pass rush and wide receiver are real sore spots that nearly cost them the game.

That said, I think this has been Luck's best season so far and it's kind of flying under the radar.

Points: 0

#106 by Bobman // Nov 13, 2018 - 12:01am

In defense of the Nelson pick (and in agreement with what was said above about scheme--they're related IMO), having an actual run game, or even the threat of one, is helping the pass game a lot as well. If the DL has to consider the run before teeing off, that's maybe an extra half-second for Luck on a dropback. Given how active the TEs are in the receiving game (I assume they are on a trajectory to have the most TE TDs in a season as a team), they're not really too active blocking--not "third tackle" like. That means that Nelson, who admittedly seems to be more of a run blocker at this point, is benefiting the run game first, which, when blended with the scheme, is producing improvements in the pass game as well--beyond what we see as his blocking on pass plays. (and it can't be crap--Luck has been unsacked in the last 3.99 games--sacked on his first dropback vs the Pats, and nothing since).

Plus his video clips are golden--just crushing guys, then pushing them down for good measure, and singing on the sideline. Saying to Castonzo "I punched you in the back... you cool with that?" And calling for Ryan Kelly after a TD like Rocky calling for Adrian at the end of Rocky I. He is, after all, like 22, just a big and very talented kid.

You know how people sometimes discuss the relative greatness of Brady and Belichick and where they would stand without the other? Well, if in ten years Nelson looks like a HOFer and Reich is still coaching (and winning), maybe the same discussion can ensue--Reich's scheme maximizes Nelson's contributions. Please note,I did not just compare Reich to Belichick or Nelson to Brady, just *potentially* their respective relationships.

Points: 0

#112 by Purds // Nov 13, 2018 - 10:19am

The other things to notice about Nelson is his motor. He is always the first one to come into the TV screen at the end of a play, a short or long one. He follows the play to it's end, helps up his RB or WR (or sometimes his QB). That attitude helps on a OL that has been so needing of leadership for so many years. I am very happy with the pick, especially when you factor in that it was a trade down with other picks added.

Points: 0

#16 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:58am

I really like a Coryell/Gibbs approach to offense as well, but the First Commandment of that offense is "Thine quarterback shall be made comfortable in thine pocket, forever and ever, Amen", and if you don't have that kind of personnel, you shouldn't be running that kind of offense. In the salary cap era, combining a generational qb talent, with that kind of oline talent is extremely difficult.

Points: 0

#108 by Bobman // Nov 13, 2018 - 12:03am

Will, I must've sat behind you in Sunday school,but I was napping during that lesson.

Points: 0

#5 by ChrisLong // Nov 12, 2018 - 10:48am

I just don’t understand the constant calls to fire McCarthy. The Packers were in the NFC championship game two years ago, and were 4-1 and on pace to make the playoffs again last year before Rodgers got hurt. Yes the Packers are underperforming this year, although not by nearly as much as many seem to think, and certainly not to the level that he should be fired.

The Packers hung to the bitter end with the Rams, and were in a great position against the Pats in the 4th quarter. Two of the best teams in the league, and they were going to toe-to-toe with them in their own stadiums. They lost to the Lions when Crosby missed 5 kicks, and lost to a decent Redskins team on the road. And they tied the Vikings in another fluky game. What about this says McCarthy is doing a bad job? I just don’t get it.

Points: 0

#7 by Arkaein // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:09am

Yeah, McCarthy finally gives Aaron Jones an appropriate amount of reps, the Packers cruise to an easy victory, and still calls to fire McCarthy when he pulls out an aggressive call to basically ice the game. If anything the fact that Miami couldn't do anything in the red zone is a point in favor of the fake punt, even if it failed the D was likely to hold them to 3.

Not that McCarthy was perfect by any means. The 3rd drive where they put Williams in instead of Aaron Jones was ridiculous, due to Miami getting the ball first and later getting back-to-back possessions due to the Packers fumbling a punt meant that there was no danger of overusing Jones in the first half, and they ended up failing on both 3rd and 4th and short near midfield when they probably convert with Jones.

This Thursday's game is practically a playoff game against the Seahawks. Winner still has their work cut out for them to make the playoffs, but the loser is pretty close to eliminated. I'm definitely not going to call for firing a coach who still has the team in playoff contention (currently 7th seed in NFC) and has shown the ability to make late season runs before.

Points: 0

#8 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:11am

I've not been a big McCarthy critic, but if I were to make that argument it would be that having Aaron Rodgers and generally good blocking should result in greater passing efficiency.

Points: 0

#11 by ChrisLong // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:27am

Replying to both of these at once:
-Yeah, I’m not gonna call McCarthy a great coach, but good coaches don’t grow on trees and that’s what I think he is. And rotating backs is something nearly every team does, and while everyone is saying “oh man they put in Williams for a whole series!” I’m saying Jones wasn’t out for like 4 plays. Yes Jones is better, but he’s never shown the ability to be a true workhorse back without getting injured, either.

-Yeah, watching Packers games I think it’s part McCarthy not being Sean McVay, part subpar receiving talent, and part Rodgers pressing. Not being Sean McVay isn’t a sin; the best offensive mind the league has seen in a while isn’t the best comparison. Perhaps Tom Brady and the Patriots are: HOF QB with good pass blocking and subpar receivers. Check out those DVOA comparisons and you’ll see they are quite similar.

The Packers receivers are not good outside of Adams. Jimmy Graham has looked stuck in the mud all season. Cobb and Allison are both replacement level and have been hurt to boot. And the rookies are very raw and make multiple mistakes per game bc they are rookies, but have potential to break out in the future.

And Rodgers is definitely pressing. It is obvious to anyone watching that he is still the most talented QB on the planet and just is not living up to that talent. Maybe that’s coaching, but maybe it’s also him not trusting the scheme. He misses open guys more than he should, not in throwing bad passes but in just missing that they are open and moving on to the scramble drill.

Points: 0

#14 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:45am

Brady may be finally playing like an old man, so that may no longer be a favorable comparison for McCarthy. We'll know more in 7 weeks. Rodgers seems fully recovered, and we're going to find out if Brady plays like a 41 year old who has been hit like an NFL player for 9 games and thus falls apart over the last 7.

Like I said, I've never been one to hammer McCarthy, but if they miss the playoffs, and finish 3rd in the division, the anti-McCarthyites are really going to go nuts. I have zero idea of how Gutekunst sees him, but it wouldn't be the first time a new GM was eager to get his own hire installed as head coach, even if it makes matters worse.

Points: 0

#17 by Arkaein // Nov 12, 2018 - 12:12pm

For what it's worth, Packers president Mark Murphy is the one who would make the decision to fire McCarthy. Understandable I think that they didn't want to give a first year GM total control over a well established coach.

Not sure who would hire a new coach in the event of a firing.

Points: 0

#18 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 12:20pm

If he goes, however, it'll likely be due to Gutekunst lobbying for it. Kind of like how A.J. Smith lobbied for Schottenheimer to be fired, and yes, I acknowledge that this may be a ridiculously unfair comparison to Gutekunst.

Points: 0

#38 by dank067 // Nov 12, 2018 - 2:03pm

I don't know who will start the discussion but McCarthy is slated to enter 2019 as a lame duck in the last year of his contract, so I think a decision on his job is almost certainly going to be made. And it's extremely difficult to imagine an extension for McCarthy if they miss the playoffs again.

Points: 0

#34 by Cythammer // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:57pm

"Yeah, I’m not gonna call McCarthy a great coach, but good coaches don’t grow on trees and that’s what I think he is."

See, I disagree because I think the Packers would basically have their pick of the head coaching candidates if/when they fire McCarthy. Getting to coach Aaron Rodgers should make Green Bay by far the most attractive position available. John Harbaugh will apparently be free at the end of the season, among whatever other options there might be. As it is, the Packers seem to be settling for mediocrity from from their head coach.

Subpar coaches keeping their jobs for too long because of their star QBs seems to be a pattern in the NFL. Look at Pagano with Andrew Luck or Jason Garrett being propped up for so many years by Tony Romo. I don't think McCarthy belongs in the same category as those guys, but I think GB could certainly do better.

Points: 0

#65 by ChrisLong // Nov 12, 2018 - 4:08pm

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. For every Sean McVay, there are 10 Hue Jackson’s. Hue Jackson was lauded on this site as a creative offensive mind who got the most out of Andy Dalton; look what happened in Cleveland. Coaches with potential do grow on trees, but coaches that realize that potential do not.

The “struggles” of the Packers have much more to do with Ted Thompson’s poor drafting and refusal to sign free agents than they have with McCarthy. And let’s not forget they are .500 with a positive point differential and above average DVOA, including a top 10 offense. If that’s a coach’s floor, I’ll take that in a heartbeat.

Points: 0

#66 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 4:18pm

I think what's hurting McCarthy is that the offense is underachievibg given the QB they have. There are largely three possible explanations for this: the talent around the QB is so awful despite the coach and QB, the talent is supbar but the coach is not doing enough to compensate, or Aaron Rodgers himself has declined.

You hear the same stuff out of Dallas btw. I think most everyone is skeptical on Rodgers being the culprit, so it comes down to one and two and ultimately a matter of taste. Since this has been trending down for some time, I'm in the camp that they should probably move on.

Points: 0

#71 by mrh // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:02pm

If the Packers fire McCarthy, do the Browns (GM Dorsey has GB connection) hire him? Remember, Dorsey snapped up Reid right away and that seemed to rejuvenate both Reid and the franchise. My guess is yes, but if not, that would be a very telling "no hire."

Points: 0

#72 by Cythammer // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:02pm

A top ten offense is basically automatic with Rodgers. That's not a point in McCarthy's favor in the slightest I don't think. In fact, if they are merely top ten, and not top five, I'd say it's a mark against him. The rest of what you've said applies to a typical team with a head coach job opening, but it shouldn't apply to the Packers. Every coach will want to coach Rodgers, so Green Bay should be able to land a much higher quality candidate than Hue Jackson.

Points: 0

#86 by ChrisLong // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:08pm

If a team fires it’s offensive-minded coach because they require a top-5 offense every year, no matter the roster context, that is foolish.

Points: 0

#99 by jh_eldred // Nov 12, 2018 - 7:27pm

If your offensive minded coach can't squeeze a perennial top-5 offense out of the most talented QB in a generation and a general mix of solid position players and linemen, then that coach may be a fool.

Points: 0

#93 by ChrisLong // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:23pm

Also, before 2017 (when they finished second) the last time NO finished as a top-5 offense? 2013. They should’ve fired Sean Payton for sure though.

Points: 0

#96 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:49pm

Interestingly, the Saints came close to firing Sean Payton, but that was the result of perennially awful defenses. A great draft saved him in that regard. Another interesting comparison would be Andy Reid with the eagles - which stemmed from failed expectations for the 2011 season.

I don't know to feel about McCarthy in comparison with Reid and Payton and I'm doing my absolute best to do so without the benefit of hindsight. I thought Andy Reid's tenure had gone on too long in Philadelphia and it was time. Like McCarthy, the team was trending downward and it just felt like the inevitable end was in sight. With Payton, I think I gave him more of a pass since the defense was awful because of poor drafts and the offense was still good despite an aging roster.

That makes McCarthy seem more like Reid than Payton. I just can't shake the feeling that this offense is underachieving and someone deserves blame for that. If you watch the offense - it just executes poorly for an alarming number of stretches. Rodgers himself is capable of absolute brilliance and then too many moments of mundane, uninspiring play.

Its considered sacrilege to suggest its Rodgers himself thats the problem and I'm still not ready to go there, which unfortunately leaves McCarthy. Its possible the replacement is Hue Jackson and the problem gets worse. Its also possible they find a different head coach that by virtue of doing something different, re-energizes the offense.

Points: 0

#102 by dank067 // Nov 12, 2018 - 8:14pm

Reid has done an absolutely fantastic job in Kansas City and I've become enough of a fan of his that I hope he's able to win a title before he's done. That being said, had he remained in Philly I'm not sure he would have been able to turn things back around and have the success he's having now. I think the team and the coach both needed to move on from each other to get out of the rut they found themselves in. That's more or less how I feel about McCarthy - maybe he can reinvent himself elsewhere, but it's going on four seasons now that he has struggled to find answers for what is plaguing his team in Green Bay.

Points: 0

#101 by dank067 // Nov 12, 2018 - 8:04pm

Even as the Saints missed the playoffs in '14, '15 and '16, Brees never finished worse than 5th in DYAR or 7th in DVOA. The past four seasons for Rodgers in terms of DVOA after finishing #1 in in 2014 have been 17th-8th-14th-11th (through last week). I don't know if you're appreciating just how much GB's passing offense has fallen off from where it was at and how sustained of a fall it has been.

Points: 0

#85 by Mountain Time … // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:07pm

It doesn't matter what the ratio of Sean McVays to Hue Jacksons is. All that matters is identifying and sorting them correctly.

Also, perhaps McCarthy is a good coach in a vacuum, but the NFL isn't a Hoover. It's even possible that a worse coach could achieve better results in this specific circumstance, due to a wide variety of things.

Points: 0

#87 by ChrisLong // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:10pm

All the available evidence indicates that NFL GMs and really most if not all observers can not reliably identify which coaches are going to be good before they are hired.

Points: 0

#89 by Mountain Time … // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:14pm

The numbers are likely skewed because the people who are bad at it have the most opportunities to try. How many head coaches has Ozzie Newsome hired?

Points: 0

#92 by ChrisLong // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:20pm

1) we don’t know anything about how good Gutekunst is at picking coaches, so we go with the average.

2) John Harbaugh is one of the people being suggested in this thread as a potential replacement bc he could also be fired for stupid reasons.

Points: 0

#95 by Mountain Time … // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:47pm

And Baltimore could then hire McCarthy! Brilliant! I actually think that would help both teams.

Points: 0

#97 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:52pm

I think the Ravens would be making a mistake firing Harbaugh. The primary culprit is a tough division and an inept, overpaid quarterback. Those are not the fault of Harbaugh. McCarthy does not have those excuses.

Points: 0

#113 by Bryan Knowles // Nov 13, 2018 - 10:48am

Jackson may well be that creative offensive mind who was Peter Principle'd out of his element -- see Norv Turner for another great example there. It's possible returning to an offensive assistant or coordinator role will see Jackson return to being a somewhat respected offensive mind, rather than a laughingstock coach. I would argue that his greatest failings over the past few seasons have been in personnel management and situational awareness, and that perhaps the stresses of running an entire team had a negative impact on his ability to design an offense.

All that being said, it's also a reminder that sample sizes are a thing, and sometimes, what appears to be a good coach or a successful scheme is, in fact, a lucky one.

Points: 0

#114 by Will Allen // Nov 13, 2018 - 11:06am

Coaching evaluation is considerably more difficult than player evaluation, and player evaluation is really, really, really, hard. Most of the stuff we say about coaches is little better than a wild-assed guess.

Points: 0

#98 by jh_eldred // Nov 12, 2018 - 7:20pm

Some issues with your suppositions;

- Jones isn't just better, by DVOA he's the most efficient runner in the NFL. Williams is useful but to be frank he's just a guy. You shouldn't give those guys equal snaps.

- It's not just the McCarthy isn't McVay, his offense has gotten worse the last few years with no light at the end of the tunnel. McCarthy isn't a scheme wizard like McVay and Reid, his reputation was as a QB whisperer and while Rodgers would not be who he is without McCarthy, the two aren't getting along behind the scenes and McCarthy can't seem to correct Rodgers' bad habits. He hasn't been able to develop the backups he's had either, to hilarious results. He runs an archaic scheme and can no longer work harmoniously with the starting QB, what else does he bring at that point?

- "The Packers receivers are not good outside of Adams.....Cobb and Allison are both replacement level" This is an abject lie. Cobb isn't popular among fans because he's injury prone and once a year has a game where he can't do anything right, but he's not a bad player. His rate stats are on par with Stefon Diggs this season. Allison is roughly average. MVS has been really good since those two got hurt. Graham is bad, but that's no different than the tight ends Rodgers has played with his entire career. Even if your claim was correct, Andrew Luck is having an excellent season with one good receiver, one solid receiver, and a bunch of chaff.

- McCarthy has routinely had mediocre to bad defenses and special teams the last few seasons. Setting aside how overly loyal he is to his coordinators and mediocre veteran players, once again if the offense is slipping, he's not bringing anything else to the table.

The team stays competitive because Rodgers, despite his growing flaws, is still good enough to keep them in games, and they're sporadically talented elsewhere. McCarthy isn't a bad coach (he'd be one of the first coaches hired once he does leave), but he's getting farther from good each year because his scheme doesn't progress and his rift with Rodgers continues to grow. I get the "you might hire someone worse!" mentality, but you can't live in fear of the worst case scenario. Rodgers is in the twilight of his career and I don't see how McCarthy gets him another ring. Don't get stuck with the next Jeff Fisher.

Whether it's that his message has grown stale or he's checking out mentally, he probably needs a change of scenery. And this is coming from someone who was a fierce McCarthy defender once upon a time.

Points: 0

#29 by morganja // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:19pm

It's time for Green Bay to fire McCarthy and buy Jon Gruden's contract out from Oakland.

Points: 0

#88 by Mountain Time … // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:11pm

In a stunning move, Gruden trades himself for more 1st round draft picks!

Points: 0

#10 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 11:26am

I guess my guess that the Eagles might have a big improvement in the 2nd half was off the mark. I knew their secondary had injury issues, but, good grief that was bad. With the D.C. oline destroyed the Cowboys have a chance still.

Points: 0

#51 by Pat // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:15pm

Well, they *did* have a big improvement - on offense. On defense there wasn't anything they could do, they just didn't have the personnel. I mean, they called it out on TV - on those 3rd and long plays, they literally just put everyone at the first-down marker. They knew the DBs couldn't manage any coverage, they literally just wanted Dallas to run a screen and hoped the guys could tackle.

Saying they had "injury issues" is underselling it a *ton*. They weren't super-deep at defensive back to begin with, after losing Robinson in the offseason. Let's put it this way: after the Super Bowl last year, the Eagles expected their starting CBs to be Darby and Robinson, with Mills/Jones/Douglas fighting for the nickel/dime spots. That was *absolutely* the plan, and that's totally solid. There was even talk about them *trading away* a defensive back, because they were too loaded there. Instead, they got outbid for Robinson by the Saints. Then they tried to recover by trading for Daryl Worley, who was a disaster (got arrested and released a month later). Going in with Darby/Mills/Jones/Douglas isn't the *best* situation, but it wasn't *awful*.

But after losing Darby, they're literally down to a guy who could've been *inactive* on game days if the plan had gone right and a practice squad UDFA.

Points: 0

#52 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:18pm

I believe(outside of qb) defensive back injuries and o line injuries are the worst places to lose bodies. You can scheme around an anemic pass rush or wide receivers, but when you have no faith in blocking or covering - your scheme becomes almost non-existent. You are at the mercy of your players' skills.

Points: 0

#58 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:44pm

I really need to pay closer attention to these depth issues before speculating. Which is why I usually avoid speculating.

Points: 0

#62 by Pat // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:57pm

They did a bad job covering it during the game. They did mention that they were literally putting street free agents on the field by the end of the game, and they mentioned the fact that Schwartz would have to think "wait, has this guy ever practiced this position?" before doing anything.

But then they also criticized some of the defensive playcalls at the end bizarrely, like the fact they were in obvious man coverage, or the obvious prevent defense. There's a *reason* they couldn't disguise anything.

Points: 0

#53 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:20pm

I think people laugh at Miami for being(to quote a brilliant Tanier comment) wildcard oatmeal, but don't the Redskins look like that too? They are the definition of blah. Their offense is ok, their defense is a little better than ok, but Ok gets you beat at home in the playoffs.

Points: 0

#55 by jtr // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:31pm

Washington looks to me like they're mostly just beneficiaries of the fact that SOMEBODY has to win the NFC East and nobody else is at all up for the task. This week was an absolutely freaky game that had waaaaaaaaaay more to do with the Bucs screwing up than with the Skins taking control of the game. Given Washington's offensive line has been annihilated and will be a weakness for the rest of the season after being a strength before, they certainly look like they'll be the default winner of a shitty division who gets beat up by a hungry wild card team.

Points: 0

#57 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:41pm

As of 10 days ago, they could really block, and you have a fighting chance with nearly any opponent with that, as long as you aren't horrid elsewhere. Oh well.

Points: 0

#19 by BJR // Nov 12, 2018 - 12:27pm

Rams/Seahawks notes: the game would likely not have been close had it not been for several ridiculous personal foul penalties on Rams defenders, at least two of which were drive-extenders. I was shocked to see such a lack of discipline from what I assumed to be a well-coached team, although I guess they were extremely fired up after being embarrassed by the Saints last week.

Speaking of coaching, the decision by McVay to kick the field goal to go up 5 came across to me as weak. Numbers based on league averages might make this close to a neutral decision, but the Rams are clearly not an average offense.

The failure to call grounding on Wilson during the final drive was ridiculous, and there was a similar earlier play where Goff flung the ball away aimlessly whilst in the clutches of a sack and went unpenalised (he may have been out of the pocket, I haven't watched replay). I realise asking the refs to make subjective calls on what is and isn't grounding is not what the NFL wants to do, but this feels like one of the areas where the rules are unfairly skewed towards offense. I'd like to see more grounding calls on what are obvious throwaways during the course of a sack.

The Seahawks late game offense was atrocious. They were still running the ball up the middle with less than 5 minutes left, and generally taking far too long to get plays off. On the final drive they spiked the ball past midfield with around 45 seconds left on the clock - why do teams do this? There must be a basic play they can practice, and an experienced QB can audible in a game situation that at least has some chance of success, with the worst case being a quick throwaway? Burning a down should be a last resort, reserved only for when the clock is approaching zero.

Points: 0

#20 by mrt1212 // Nov 12, 2018 - 12:46pm

The plodding Seahawks offense on their penultimate drive seems like an admission they don't have a cohesive and cogent passing game in the cupboard. In fact, having watched all the Hawks game this season, it really feels like Pete and Schotty kind of resent having to go out and win a game down two scores and that resentment makes the go ahead drive like pulling teeth from an ornery alligator. It feels that way...not saying it is.

Points: 0

#32 by ChrisS // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:41pm

The 2nd one on Fowler was great. He is complaining to the ref about being held, the ref is being pleasant, smiling and trying to placate Fowler. Then Fowler says the magic words the ref's face immediately changes to a scowl and he flings his flag. I find the turn around by the Seattle running game to be amazing, one of the worst last year to one of the best this year. Just the result of getting rid of Tom Cable?

Points: 0

#84 by BJR // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:54pm

I don't know enough to comment on how the Seattle run game turnaround has happened. I do know enough that it is not going to make them a contender. The run game was great yesterday, but the only reason the game stayed competitive was because of penalties, and 90 yards of scrambling from Wilson. You simply can't win games against good teams putting up such paltry passing stats, barring significant good fortune (see also Cowboys, Dallas).

Points: 0

#103 by GoDog // Nov 12, 2018 - 9:00pm

Carroll is clearly trying to get to 2013 form using a run offense and dominating defense, all anchored on a quarterback that can take care of the ball. This feels more like 2010 when they won the division with a 7-9 record and Matt Hasselbeck at QB. That, of course, led to playing the 11-5 New Orleans at home in the playoffs with the famous Beast Quake run. It's the defense that is lacking this year, though not as bad as many imagined. The offense scored 31 points twice on the Rams and lost both times by scores under a touchdown, not bad against a top-notch team. The Seahawks with Wilson have done quite well with modest passing stats in 2012-2014.

Points: 0

#111 by BJR // Nov 13, 2018 - 7:38am

It goes without saying that from 2012-2014 the Seahawks had an all-time great defense, and would have been leading for the vast majority of their games, making prolific passing unnecessary. Carroll is a good coach in many ways I'm sure, but given the makeup of the current Seahawks roster (i.e. a good QB and at-best average overall talent elsewhere), focusing on a run heavy offense as a path to winning is delusional.

Points: 0

#22 by Blackmallow // Nov 12, 2018 - 12:52pm

No mention about the number of fake kicks yesterday? Must be a record, no?

Points: 0

#25 by mehllageman56 // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:02pm

Couple of comments.
1) Brady's been losing accuracy since last year. Gronk's catch radius helps with this, but Brady had poor accuracy games against Miami and the Jets late last year. I caught part of the Tennessee playoff game, and it didn't seem Brady was great there either. Missed the AFC championship, so I can't comment on that, and obviously he was great in the Super Bowl.
2) I didn't see any games yesterday, so I don't know what happened to the Jets defense. I do know Bowles blitzes a lot, so Brady being the worst against the blitz isn't ideal for the next game, even though I'll assume the Pats come back and take care of business.
3) Apparently the Patriots used Brady as a receiver yesterday, and have done so several times over the last year. Every time he ends up being open, but it hasn't worked out for New England (drops, tackled well short of first down, etc.). I wouldn't throw to Brady against Jamal Adams. Not a good idea. Hope the Pats shelve that stuff.
4) Yesterday probably doomed Bowles to being canned. There might be more dissension in the locker room than we know. Jamal Adams was mad the week before about losing, and now the defense does that against the Bills. Maybe Bowles gets them together and they're respectable the rest of the year, or they could really tank. Hopefully yesterday is the worst they play for a while, but just looking at the score and who they were playing, that was Kotite material.

Points: 0

#28 by mrt1212 // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:17pm

I think it raises an interesting question - how far can a top QB fall relative to their own prior performance before you start trying to find a nice farm upstate to take care of them? Also ask this question relative to the QB's peers.

Points: 0

#30 by mehllageman56 // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:34pm

Barnwell had an article about top quarterbacks in their later years. Usually they fall apart really fast, the way Peyton did.

Points: 0

#45 by Aaron Brooks G… // Nov 12, 2018 - 2:52pm

Depends on who the backup is.

The 49ers punted early, but they had Young waiting in the wings.
Arguably so did Green Bay, but they had Rodgers.

The Broncos had Osweiler, so even Manning's corpse eventually got his job back. If the Pats still had Garoppolo, Brady might be at risk this season. But they don't. Brady has a ways to go before he's sub-Hoyerian.

Points: 0

#31 by mehllageman56 // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:40pm

So I watched the highlights for the Jets and Pats games. Jesus, the Jets defense played terrible. I noticed one guy at the center of most of it: Trumaine Johnson is back, and that isn't good. Missing tackles, getting beat over the top at the start of the game. Glad they gave him so much money. Everyone else wasn't good either, but a lot of it was the front seven not having discipline and getting gashed in the running game. Also, they're better off with Darnold since he can avoid the rush. It wouldn't have mattered in that game.

So if the Jets had started Bridgewater this season instead of trading him, is Bowles and MacCagnan on the hot seat? I count at least two games the Jets would have won with Teddy: the Browns game, and the second Dolphins game. He would not have helped yesterday (they could have had prime Peyton Manning and it wouldn't have mattered), but perhaps another game or two. So they would be sitting with 5 to 6 wins right now, and while this loss would be embarrassing, it wouldn't be the coach killer it is now.

Points: 0

#33 by mehllageman56 // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:42pm

As far as the Patriots game, I'm thinking Mariota is back to where he was supposed to be. They'll be hard to beat if the defense plays like it did in that game. Not sure how much blame I throw to the Patriots-they did lose contain on a couple of run plays. The special teams are definitely down this year though.

Points: 0

#35 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:57pm

Are the Patriots materially less talented than last year or just more injured?

Points: 0

#37 by dmstorm22 // Nov 12, 2018 - 2:02pm

I'm on the materially less talented side.

Overall, the striking thing about the Pats this year is that in their three losses, they've been completely outplayed. You have to go back to 2014 to see games like their losses from this season (aside from the Brissett game in 2016).

The 4th quarters in each loss were never in doubt. Sure, some of this is Brady getting worse, but overall the team just seems less talented - though not many of the players they lost are performing that great.

Points: 0

#40 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 2:31pm

I'm not convinced last year's team was any better outside of having Brandon Cooks. This decline feels more about Tom Brady lacking quality weapons than anything else. I've seen chips and dents in his game for the last couple seasons, but smart coaching and good talent made those irrelevant. I haven't watched Brady enough to see if he's truly suffering a prohibitive decline.

Points: 0

#42 by mehllageman56 // Nov 12, 2018 - 2:41pm

Don't think it's prohibitive. I've just noticed a slight decrease in accuracy. His arm strength isn't lacking, and he still generally has the pocket presence, which was his greatest gift, in my opinion. Perhaps his release is a little slower, and he's taking more sacks because of blitzes. Yesterday there was one sack where I thought he would have gotten the pass off. Brady might be the one exception to drastic declines in older quarterbacks that proves the rule.

Honestly, the defense is better than last year. Gronk has been gone more often this year than last year, and they did have Cooks last year as well. The special teams is nowhere up to the Pats' standards though, and usually that has more to do with coaching/randomness than anything else.

Points: 0

#44 by dmstorm22 // Nov 12, 2018 - 2:51pm

I think you're underrating the dropoff in his arm. I've noticed his balls floating a bit.

It's nowhere near as noticeable as 2014-15 Manning, but there were a few short slants and ins that just got there a bit slow, a couple slow enough for the Titans defenders to get a hand on them or at least pressure the receivers a bit.

This has been happening in spurts all year now.

Brady right now is playing like an average QB. We have to remember, this is 2018, where 14 different QBs have a passer rating above 100. Brady is at 95.

Points: 0

#61 by PatsFan // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:55pm

And there are the increasing numbers of inexplicably off-target throws - receiver is open, Brady has time to throw, but the ball ends up 3 feet to the right of the receiver or in the dirt 5 feet short of him.

Now, I think Brady’s overall stats falloff is primarily due to non-Brady things (like OL and reciever and RB injuries), but IMHO there’s something going on with him,

Points: 0

#64 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 4:03pm

The problem is that a 41 year old qb with o-line issues by mid November has a decent chance to look like a 61 year old qb by January, even if he has magic pajamas to sleep in.

Points: 0

#41 by sbond101 // Nov 12, 2018 - 2:40pm

Edelman & Gronk have been way less effective when they've been on the field (which hasn't been much) and Hogan is also having a down year. When the O-line is playing well and Sony Michel the offense is still very effective - yesterday they were down an LT & LG, Andrews had a crappy game at center, and Sony Michel only got a few snap. Gordon has played really excellent football, but it's not much to build an offense on. As far as the future goes either they have to fix the running game or Edelman/Gronk have to miraculously play at the level they played circa 2014 - the former seems reasonably likely the later seems somewhat distant, however 1/2 should be enough to carry them deep in the playoffs if they can clean up the rough edges (special teams issues, inconsistent DL play etc...). I don't think they'll win a superbowl, but I think it's wrong to say that another AFC contender is significantly more likely to put it together in time.

Points: 0

#43 by mehllageman56 // Nov 12, 2018 - 2:46pm

Right now I'd argue that KC has already put it together. Granted the defense is nothing to write home about, but they seem to be playing better. In KC the Chiefs should be favored. Might add the Steelers pretty much destroyed a decent NFC contender on Thursday, so I wouldn't say they don't have it together yet either. The Patriots are obviously a contender, but they are currently the 3 seed, a half game back of Pittsburgh and 2 back of KC. That game in Pittsburgh later this year will be really important.

Points: 0

#47 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:03pm

Pittsburgh still has to go to New Orleans and their division is still miles harder than the Patriots. Pats still have Minnesota on the docket, but that game is at home and the rest of the division is thoroughly flawed.

Kansas City is the better team now but I just can't shake the feeling that relying on a second year player to carry an offense first team deep in the playoffs is not going to end well. Its one thing to ask Brady, Manning etc to do that but this is Mahomes. And even those QBs never actually won the Superbowl when their defenses were poor. With hindsight, it might seem like a foolish statement, but I obviously don't know what Mahomes' career is going to look like so I'm erring on the side of pessimism given how long he's been in the league.

Points: 0

#110 by Yu Narukami // Nov 13, 2018 - 2:44am

Brady +1yr
Edelman +1yr +back from ACL
Gronk always lingering injuries
OL is fine with the starters, when Waddle sub in and Gronk is not there helping, things get bad

Bad as last year. The LBs corp is lacking athleticism.

Seriously undeperforming, with basically the same personnel as the last years.

The main issue is the lack of true talent picked in the draft in the last 5 years. Copying my comment from week 3, this is the list of the players picked in the first three rounds:


1.23 IR
1.31 Sony Michel (very good, but already missed several games)
2.56 IR
Nothing on 3rd


Nothing on 1st (traded for Cooks, now with the Rams)
Nothing on 2nd
3.83 Rivers (2017 IR, almost always inactive)


1st round docked
2.60 the Cyrus Jones abomination
3.91 Brissett which became Dorsett (5th-6th option at WR)
3.96 A character from FF7 which now is in PS


1.32 Malcom Brown (sometimes good but bad this year)
2.64 Jordan Richards (bust, shipped to Falcons)
3.97 Grissom (PS/ST guy)


1.29 Easley (IR forever then cut)
2.62 Jimmy G (traded)
No 3rd rounder

Points: 0

#36 by ChrisS // Nov 12, 2018 - 1:57pm

Dave B. said "Washington just picked up a huge chunk of yards at the 2-minute warning in a screen to Kapri Bibbs where the (presumably street free agent replacement) offensive lineman was as much as 10 yards downfield at the time of the pass...... If we're going to let linemen race downfield like receivers we may as well eliminate that rule altogether." I thought linemen were allowed downfield on passes thrown behind the line of scrimmage. Am I wrong?

Points: 0

#39 by jtr // Nov 12, 2018 - 2:22pm

Yes, you're wrong. The rule applies to all forward passes, regardless of whether the receiver is downfield or not. The only exception in the NFL rules is that a lineman can be downfield if he is continuously in contact with the defender he's blocking--so basically you can drive-block the DT as far downfield as you like as long as you maintain contact with him.

Points: 0

#54 by panthersnbraves // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:25pm

I might be wrong, but I think the confusion is coming from the difference between HS/College rules and NFL. I think in the lower ranks, the Linemen can be quite a bit downfield, so long as the ball is thrown behind the LOS. In the Pros, they have to be within a yard (or two?) I don't know the exact, but in one of my son's HS games, the ref used the Pro rule, and the coach had a cow for him not knowing the rules. I looked it up, but that was a fair bit of time ago now.

Points: 0

#70 by ChrisS // Nov 12, 2018 - 4:30pm

Thanks, that's it. I should google before I comment "In the NFL there is no "screen pass exception", this is a NCAA rule where a player can be down field if the pass is completed behind the line of scrimmage"

Points: 0

#48 by TomC // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:07pm

Random thoughts on games I watched:

1) I was shocked to see how bad Detroit looked. The Bears are a decent but very flawed team, and the Lions made them look like SB favorites. (Yes, the score was 34-22, but take away special teams flukes and that's more like 41-14.) Dave Birkett in the Free Press gave the coaching staff a "G" because he didn't feel an "F" was sufficient to describe the job they did. Curious if people who follow the Lions feel like Patricia is on the hot seat, or if they are committed to him while they half-rebuild.

2) The Packers picked up 10+ every damn time they gave it to Jones. And yes, Miami's LBs are bad, but you have to wonder what Green Bay's record would be if they'd figured this out earlier (and whether they will actually stick with it or go back to Rodgers dropping back every down).

3) I was impressed with how active Dallas's defense was last night. That's typical of Marinelli squads, but I don't always see it with the Cowboys. And I can't figure out what happened to Prescott in the 2nd quarter; he was actively bad for a good chunk of the game, then all of a sudden some switch got thrown.

Points: 0

#50 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:14pm

Mike Tanier said the Eagles ran out of corners and all of a sudden, everything got wide open. I was a huge Dak fan during his rookie year, but two years of his play has me on the side of real pessimism. Pessimism in the sense that I think he's likely to end up as an Andy Dalton level qb, but there's a non zero chance he ends up worse than that.

Maybe Linehan is to blame or maybe its Garrett, but Dak is still the one pulling the trigger and this would have me concerned.

Points: 0

#56 by TecmoBoso // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:35pm

Yeah, I think the ceiling on Dak has to be lowered compared to where many/most (myself included) had it after 2016. But the decline of the Dallas O-line and his non-RB skill guys last year and this year are pretty bad (Dez was losing his fastball in 2016, but it was pretty much gone last year; Whitten got old, etc). Cooper should help as at least Dak should have someone that should help their passing game a bit. And of course, as you said, better coaching should help him too.

Points: 0

#63 by Cythammer // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:59pm

Andy Dalton was an MVP candidate in 2015 before he had a late season injury. Now, that isn't representative of his average level of play, but still, it would be a dream for Dak if he ends up as good as Andy Dalton. As it is he's a not particularly accurate QB who has absolutely zero ability to raise his team's level of play and can only succeed when he's in a virtually perfect situation (the 2016 season). I mean, he regularly struggles to reach 200 yards passing. In the NFL of 2018 that's pitiful. He has bad receivers, yes, but he also has one of the best RBs in the league. Dak should not be considered a long-term starter unless he vastly improves.

Points: 0

#49 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:09pm

About month back, I thought the Rams were an insane juggernaught. Since then, I've become more and more pessimistic with each game. I am suspicious that getting Talib back is going to suddenly fix what's ailing this group.

I like a lot of their defensive players, happen to think they have the very best player in the nfl, and i love their coordinator too. All of that should not add up to a bad defense and yet it is. I think this is a team highly susceptible to a first round upset more so than is being talked about.

Points: 0

#59 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 3:50pm

Yeah, even with Talib out, they are much, much, softer on defense than I would have expected.

Points: 0

#90 by BJR // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:17pm

There was an alarming lack of discipline yesterday, with 5 separate personal foul penalties on the Rams defense. I expect a fire was lit under them after they were eviscerated by the Saints last week, but most of the penalties were not on borderline hits and the like; they were of the plain boneheaded variety. Fowler was flagged for mouthing off at the ref. Suh flattened Wilson long after a pass was delivered, obviously out of frustration. Aaron Donald got in a fight with a Seahawks lineman which he continued post-game (fines and possibly suspensions incoming there).

It would be fun to be a fly on the wall in the Rams building this week; does McVay possess the authority to confront Wade Phillips and order him to get some ****ing control of his guys?

Points: 0

#68 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 4:26pm

I'm usually the last one to believe in conspiracy theories, but watching the Raiders call that screen pass on 4th and 5 and then watching Carr throw it into the dirt has me almost convinced that they intentionally trying to lose.

I still default to my preferred explanation... Jon Gruden is toxic.

Points: 0

#73 by Will Allen // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:05pm

I'm just about convinced that the goal is not only to lose every remaining game this year, but every game next year, and all capital from the 2019 draft, and all remaining veteran talent, will be leveraged to obtain 30 draft picks in 2020, including Alabama's quarterback.

Points: 0

#77 by billprudden // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:11pm

If the 10 year contract was real, and they wanted to splash in Vegas, then this almost makes sense.

But I can't see John coming back for 1-31.

If the only two options are incompetence or conspiracy, and we're discussing Davis and Gruden, well...

Points: 0

#80 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:19pm

The thing is - that contract is guaranteed. So if you fire him, he gets his money and now you have to pay a second head coach. Mark Davis is, relatively speaking, a welfare recipient when compared to the other NFL owners. The next closest I guess would be the Spanos family - so I'm not sure how palatable it will be to do that. I also question his general competency at anything. I first wondered how Jon Gruden duped him into that 10 year contract, but I suspect it was Davis himself who came up with the contract.

Points: 0

#117 by LionInAZ // Nov 13, 2018 - 3:37pm

Are you sure the contract is guaranteed? I looked for a reliable report that confirmed that, but the gist I got was that no details have been released other than the length and the $$$$$$$$$$. What's your source?
It would take a mental instability to guarantee a contract like that without conditions.

Points: 0

#118 by Mountain Time … // Nov 13, 2018 - 3:55pm

It doesn't seem to be a rule, but it's certainly a common practice that's so common it might as well be a rule. From a 2017 CBS Sports article:

Unlike players, coaches are generally given a fully guaranteed contract, which means they're paid for the duration of the contract, even if they get canned.

From CBS Sports in 2014:

NFL head coaches aren't naive and that's why they have contracts with guaranteed money.

When a head coach gets fired they receive the rest of the money in the contract with few exceptions. Occasionally an owner will try and fire a coach with cause. Translation: the owner doesn't want to pay the remaining portion of the contract and thinks he can prove the coach did something to breech the contract.

Al Davis refused to pay Mike Shanahan or Lane Kiffin the remaining money on their deals and, to my knowledge, went to his grave without ever paying off the deals.

That last part is interesting, I did not know that. Mark is no Al, though. Probably not even late-career Al.

Points: 0

#119 by Will Allen // Nov 13, 2018 - 4:05pm

I don't remember the Kiffin outcome, but the Shanahan thing was more complicated thannis commonly portrayed, with Shanahan being a recipient of a loan from Davis upon his initial signing.

Just looked it up; Kiffin lost his arbitration against Davis, due to salary offset language with regard to his college coaching jobs.

Points: 0

#75 by Boots Day // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:05pm

It greatly amuses me that in the name of rebuilding the Raiders, Jon Gruden has shed his 27-year-old star pass rusher and 24-year-old star wide receiver, yet he still employs a bunch of old guys who made their bones elsewhere like Doug Martin and Jordy Nelson and Dwayne Harris and Jared Cook and Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie and Frostee Rucker. Reggie Nelson, y'all!

Points: 0

#78 by billprudden // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:12pm

Yeah, and that raises a good point. Unused salary cap rolls over. If this was a real tank, we'd never have hired those dudes and we'd be taking 50m into next year, and 125m into Vegas in '20.

Points: 0

#79 by theslothook // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:14pm

Some fans will defend the cooper trade since it netted them a first round pick and Cooper's quality as a player is still murky(he's good, but how good exactly? He might even be just slightly above average - a younger alshon jeffery, but that's another discussion).

These trades have to be viewed in overall team context. The expectations set by the coach, owner, and gm was that this team was ready to win now and ride its young talent. In half a season, the team is a crater filled sinkhole embracing a 76ers style rebuild. Like you said, that might seem like a sensible strategy when your team is old and fading. The raiders are in that boat now, but they weren't when the season started.

I think people around here remember Josh McDaniels famously avada kedavra-ing the Denver Broncos into the stone age, but at least he won some games along the way. Gruden hasn't managed to do that, with one win coming in overtime over the Hue Jackson coached Browns.

Given his ridiculous contract, he's not going anywhere, but I truly believe - you could give him any roster you want and Gruden will manage to destroy that too. Sorry Raider fans, its going to be an ugly upcoming decade!

Points: 0

#81 by Boots Day // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:27pm

I don't hate the Cooper trade - he's clearly worth a No.1, and I suspect that this time next year, Michael Gallup will be the Cowboys' No. 1 receiver anyway. But if you're trading Amari Cooper to give playing time to Brandon LaFell? What's the point of that?

Points: 0

#94 by Mountain Time … // Nov 12, 2018 - 6:42pm

Grüden's razor: never attribute to tanking that which can be adequately explained by Grinding.

Points: 0

#82 by mrh // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:32pm

Chiefs vs. ARI. A workmanlike victory that had me worried it would be a clunker like last year's Giants' game. Reid's Chiefs always seem to have one against an inferior team and I thought this might be it.

Started with 3 passes to Hill: 38 yds, inc, 37 yds/TD. Thought the offense would roll but it did not. Chandler Jones beat up on Eric Fisher and Cards got good pressure on Mahomes all day. Missing Morse and Laurent Duvarney-Tardif hurt them; I don't know if they'll get Morse back soon but it would help not playing a 3rd-string center vs. the Rams. I think the offense missed Watkins as well.

The D did get good pressure all day. ARI's line isn't very good and the return of Houston helped. Stupid penalties helped both Cards' TD drives (as did a long KO return to start 2nd half). The run defense still is bad and Gurley could go for 200 on the ground. The Chiefs main chance of stopping the Rams is getting them in obvious passing situations thru an offensive mistake (penalty, botched handoff, missed assignment) and then pass pressure sacking Goff or causing a bad throw. Hard to see the Rams scoring less than 35.

Points: 0

#83 by Anon Ymous // Nov 12, 2018 - 5:49pm

I think it's safe to cross NE off as a legitimate SB contender. Oh, they'll win the East and Pittsburgh's schedule gives the Patriots a decent chance at a bye. Once in, anything can happen.

But this team just isn't that good. Sunday's game looked like a carbon copy of the Detroit and Jax games, which raises questions as to how much they've actually improved since then. Brady looks old and incapable of carrying a weak roster. Give him weapons and they can put points up on anyone, but the drop off is precipitous when the necessary talent level is breached, even if by the slightest amount.

The defense appeared to be making strides, but allowing TN to roll up 34 and move seemingly at will is a feat Tampa could only strive to achieve. And the special teams can still barely get out of its own way. This was quite literally one of those games where you struggle to find a single player who had a good performance.

My formal prediction is NE's playoffs will last as long as they remain in the friendly confines of Gillette. After that it ends, likely in unsightly fashion.

Points: 0

#100 by Jose21crisis // Nov 12, 2018 - 8:02pm

OK, my (late) thoughts:
a) No Panthers v. Steelers audibles? Awww, Anyway, I still wonder what was that PIT offensive explosion and that CAR defensive implosion. The only worrying thing from the Steelers is Jordan Berry's punting and Vince Williams getting beat by Christian McCaffrey twice (He got hit by a pick play, but still. They still have to play the Pats and the Saints, and both James White and Alvin Kamara are no joke)
b) Atlanta v. Cleveland. One of the Falcons' LBs, DeVondre Campbell, actually said what everyone knew, but no one said. They didn't really prepare for the Browns. I just can't trust the Falcons this season anymore apparently.
c) Seahawks v. Rams. The Rams' defense really worries me.Their pass defense shining stars: Aaron Donald, Ndamukong Suh and Dante Fowler occasionally. No featured defensive back. Marcus Peters has been ... just ... getting beat or getting penalized after getting a pick. As soon as Talib got injured that defense started to come down a bit. The run defense is ... uhhh .. kind of there. (Ok, looking at DVOA, their pass D is 12th in the league, their run D is 24th). Their offense is awesome, but if they slow down by just a bit, the opponent is probably catching up. And when that opponent is the Chiefs (A team whose defense is ... not that awesome either, but their O is overpowered) ... Shootout will ensue. But I wonder what will happen come January. The Rams will run into what I think is the best team NFC, the Saints. I have not seen nothing that would prevent a game from repeating itself. Similar with the Chiefs, they might run into Pittsburgh again (Divisional? Championship?), but looking a PIT's general improvements and KC's slight defensive improvements (Not a lot), I'm not seeing anything that legit tells me the game would go the same.
d) Saints v. Bengals. I knew the Saints offense was awesome, and their defense helped too. But what the *bleep* was that defensive effort by the Bengals? They are also down a coordinator, and Marvin Lewis will take over defensive play calls.
e) Bucs v. Washington. Could someone explain how the Bucs were able to move the ball at will, to the tone of 501 yards, but were unable to get more than a FG?
f) Patriots v. Titans. I just saw the 1st quarter, but what I saw was interesting. Brady wasn't always on target, and the times he wasn't he was quite off, but other times he dropped good passes. Josh Gordon had a fairly terrible drop over the middle that was very catchable (He had a not good game from what I read). Is the Patriots tactic of running the ball more because "We have a real run game" or more because "We can't rely on Brady's arm forever"? Also, for the love of everything that's nice, could you stop throwing the ball to Brady? Not only that tends to get you a loss, but why not scheming a real receiver instead of the never athletic to start with, 41 year old QB?
g) Last one. So ... Estadio Azteca looks ... uhhh ... terrible (I'm underselling it). It has artificial turf apparently, and it looks really terrible (Understatement). Plus there is a soccer game the Saturday before the Rams v. Chiefs game (Or Super Bowl 52.5, like some people call it.) 2 things: a) Isn't that type of turf that type that causes a fair amount of injuries? b) How does it look so bad is beyond me?

Points: 0

#116 by big10freak // Nov 13, 2018 - 3:00pm

FWIW there is a LOT of talk that MM is just being spiteful with respect to Jones' playing time. All the Packer beat writers have been asking about his touches for weeks, McCarthy know it's being discussed now nationally, Rodgers is complaining both public and private which given that Rodgers has the rep of always wanting to throw is pretty interesting and supposedly MM is getting pushed by his GM who he does not report to so he doesn't think he has to listen to that input. So MM is digging in to the whole 'gotta watch his workload and he doesn't do the best pass blocking and some other BS' set of reasons only McCarthy can discuss with a straight face.

If any of the above is remotely accurate and again the story has been pretty consistent around the team the last 3-4 weeks this alone should get the guy fired. JFC

Points: 0

#122 by jh_eldred // Nov 13, 2018 - 6:44pm

What's irritating is when Jones has been given the opportunity to pass block, he's done a solid job (he made some really nice blocks on Sunday). And while Williams may be better at it, he's not a big receiving threat nor a running threat so you're still giving up something when Williams is on the field.

Points: 0

#125 by Cheesehead_Canuck // Nov 15, 2018 - 1:12pm

Patriots will end up with a first round bye even if they aren't as good as Chiefs and Steelers because of the division they play in. They have Vikings, Steelers, and then 4 games against their 3 stooges, as Scott likes to say. Maybe Pitt finally figures them out this year, but being at home vs Minnesota gives them an edge... let's say 1-1 in those games. And then there's an easy 3 wins against NY (x2), Buf at home, and in Miami. Or even 4 if they go down to Miami where they often struggle and Osweiller is still playing.
11-5 is probably a worst case scenario. Their usual 12-4 is more likely.

If GB can win in Seattle tonight (I kinda have my doubts but it's possible), then Sunday night's game will be interesting. A Vikings win and there will only be 1 game separating the 3 teams. A WC could certainly come out of the NFC North, as it often has in recent years.

Points: 0

Save 10%
& Support Andrew
Support Football Outsiders' independent media and Andrew Potter. Use promo code POTTER to save 10% on any FO+ membership and give half the cost of your membership to tip Andrew.