Extra Points
News and commentary from around the Web

Injury Aftermath: Divisional Round

Kansas City Chiefs QB Patrick Mahomes
Photo: USA Today Sports Images

Our attention now shifts exclusively to the teams that remain alive in the playoffs, with the exception of major injuries to eliminated teams.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Green Bay Packers (Sunday, 3:05 p.m. EST)

Buccaneers backup linebacker and special teams coverage player Jack Cichy broke his arm on the first punt against New Orleans. Wide receiver Antonio Brown is having scans on a knee injury. Cichy already spent a portion of the season on injured reserve due to a hamstring injury; this latest injury will probably end his season. Halfback Ronald Jones played through his quad injury against the Saints, rushing for 62 yards on 13 attempts, but Leonard Fournette remained the team's primary back. Jones will probably be questionable on the injury report all week, but he is likely to play against Green Bay. Safety Jordan Whitehead and guard Ali Marpet were on Tampa Bay's injury report at the end of last week, but both played against the Saints and should be available against Green Bay. Defensive tackle Vita Vea has been designated to return from injured reserve.

Packers linebacker Krys Barnes injured his left thumb against the Rams, but he returned to the game with his hand bandaged into a club. It is likely that he fractured the thumb, but most linebackers are able to play through such injuries. Halfback AJ Dillon injured his quad. Around 60% of quad injuries do not cause missed games, and most such absences are only a single week. Dillon has a strong chance to be available against the Buccaneers. Guard Simon Stepaniak, who had hoped to return this postseason, instead was placed on injured reserve last week to make room for backup tackle Jared Veldheer.

Buffalo Bills at Kansas City Chiefs (Sunday, 6:40 p.m. EST)

Bills receivers Stefon Diggs and Cole Beasley were both on the initial injury reports ahead of their game against the Ravens, but both were removed from the final report of the week and played the full game. Fellow receiver Gabriel Davis injured his ankle in the first quarter. Though he was targeted another two times in the first half, Davis saw no targets after halftime. Still, the fact that he could return at all suggests a low-ankle sprain rather than the dreaded high-ankle injury. Less than half of low-ankle sprains to wide receivers cause missed games. As always, midweek practice reports will tell us more about Davis' likely status for the AFC Championship Game.

The headline injury ahead of the conference championship weekend is the concussion suffered by Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes during the win over Cleveland. After being visibly woozy on the field following a collision, Mahomes is now in the league concussion protocol. The absolute quickest he can possibly clear the five-step protocol is five days; the median time for quarterbacks to return to full activity (necessary for game participation) is seven days. That makes Mahomes legitimately questionable for the game against Buffalo. The historic numbers for quarterbacks suggest that Mahomes is quite likely to be available; only one in four quarterbacks misses a game after being concussed the previous week. However, concussion outcomes are less consistent than those for typical muscular or skeletal injuries. Chad Henne will start if Mahomes cannot clear the protocol in time, with veteran Matt Moore likely to be elevated from the practice squad as Henne's backup in that eventuality. Cornerback Bashaud Breeland also left the game with concussion symptoms, and he is also now in the league concussion protocol.

In other injury news, halfback Clyde Edwards-Helaire missed the game as he continues to rehab his high-ankle injury. A prospective AFC Championship Game was always the earliest possible realistic date for Edwards-Helaire to return, but even that is quite unlikely. Edwards-Helaire did not practice at all ahead of the divisional round, and most high-ankle injuries to halfbacks cause absences longer than the four weeks that will have passed since Edwards-Helaire's Week 16 injury. Darrell Williams will again be the primary back if Edwards-Helaire cannot play against Buffalo. Guard Mike Remmers played against the Browns despite an illness, and his status for the AFC Championship Game does not appear to be in jeopardy.

Comments

6 comments, Last at 21 Jan 2021, 10:58am

1 CEH Practice

Helaire actually got a limited practice in on Wednesday before being pulled on Thursday/Friday.

2 Jack Cichy

It would have been nice to see former Badger folk hero "Three Sack" Jack get to play in Lambeau.

 

https://saturdaytradition.com/wisconsin-football/cichy-more-nickname-badgers/

 

3 Obviously, the Mahomes…

Obviously, the Mahomes injury is a dominant concern, but the Breeland injury is very significant as well.  The Bills running game is not that good and probably worse with Moss out, so the Bills are not likely to be able to exploit the Chiefs' main weakness (run D).  A weakened Chiefs pass D w/no Breeland helps the Bills' chances.

4 Concussion

Careful in your reporting. It was never stated by the team or the league that Mahomes had a concussion. He was sent to the concussion "protocol" (protocol being the keyword). Meaning he demonstrated concussion like symptoms mainly because of the way he stood up and looked woozy. He was determined out of the game because once you're in concussion protocol you can't come back into the game, per league rules. I'm not trying to say he didn't have concussion but he has not been officially reported that he had concussion by the team or league. Once a player is n protocol they have to follow the steps all the way through per league rules. Please don't assume without an official report by the team or league, that's not good journalism, your job is to report facts not assumptions. If it's op-ed piece then state it. Thank you. 

5 Pedantry

In reply to by NFLFan2021

Definition of pedant

1aone who is unimaginative or who unduly emphasizes minutiae in the presentation or use of knowledge.

A player being in the concussion protocol must be treated as having a concussion when discussing the possibility of them missing time, so for FO's purposes, there is functionally no difference. Additionally, multiple news outlets have referred to Mahomes as having a concussion. Just because KC hasn't made an official announcement of him having one doesn't change the fact that he's in protocol. 

6 I agree with the Definition…

In reply to by nick.hornsby

I agree with the Definition.

This line below is my issue. 

"The headline injury ahead of the conference championship weekend is the concussion suffered by Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes during the win over Cleveland"

Yes, he is in CP because of symptoms  but that does not mean he has suffered a concussion. If you have flu like symptoms does that mean you have the flu? Just because other news outlets have referred doesn't make it true or right. Again, their job is to report news/facts not assumptions. If the line said "likely" or "possibly" I'm okay with that. Not trying to be ticky-tacky but I believe it's important for reporters to keep the integrity of the facts and not assume. It's mis-leading and people just believe because someone wrote or said it which is even more unfortunate.

Now if the Chiefs or NFL come out and say it was indeed a concussion then that's fact. Some experts think he "may" "possibly" "a suspicion" suffered a carotid sinus nerve injury which caused him to stumble when he tried to get up. So if that's the case then he didn't suffer a concussion. Will the writer come back here and correct his article? Possibly the best thing to do is not say it in the first place and mis-lead people, and wait for the facts. This is my issue with writers especially in their profession; words and the way they're phrased matter. 

https://twitter.com/drjessemorse/status/1352080732689211392?s=10