Well, they've made the title of this column even worse. I mean Monday Morning Quarterback: Tuesday Edition was bad, but Tuesday Monday Morning Quarterback seems worse. I'd go with MMQB 2: Electric Boogaloo.
3 comments, Last at 01 Feb 2011, 8:55am by rosewillson
OK, quiz time. Of the top 10 quarterbacks in the league, who would you say is the most inaccurate? If I hadn't already seen the article, I still would have guessed Donovan McNabb. But here's an interesting statistic: McNabb has completed 57.9 percent of his passes since 2000; last season Tom Brady had a completion percentage of 60.2 and Jake Delhomme came in at 59.2. So why is McNabb often characterized as being all over the place even though his numbers are very similar to two Super Bowl quarterbacks?
OK, this one is bound to start some arguments. It's ESPN Page 2's list of the top 10 greatest NFL coaches of all time. (Actually, it goes to eleven, which is one louder.) The top three are Vince Lombardi, Paul Brown, and Don Shula, and the only current coaches on the list are there for past glories: Bill Parcells (10) and Joe Gibbs (5).
1 comment, Last at 09 Jul 2006, 6:24pm by cliff priester
The latest from Peter King has some info from Michael Holley's upcoming book on the Patriots, including suggestions that Bill Parcells was talking to the Jets about taking over there during the week leading up to the Patriots loss in Super Bowl 31.
Our friend William Krasker begins his regular weekly analysis of NFL strategy using his complicated Dynamic Programming Model. Among Bill's contentions: Steve Mariucci screwed up by not going for two when Detroit went ahead 19-14, the Dolphins punted three times on 4th-and-1 when they should have gone for it, and Joe Gibbs should have gone for a touchdown from the Tampa 2-yard line at the start of the second quarter. Go give Bill's site some love, his stuff is excellent.
The Denver Broncos just can't seem to play nice with the NFL's salary-cap rules. For the second time in three years, the NFL has fined the team and stripped it of a draft choice for circumventing the league's salary-cap rules.
In the 2002 draft the Texans took David Carr No. 1 and the Lions took Joey Harrington No. 3 (quick quiz: who was taken second overall?). Sunday they'll face each other for the first time. What's interesting is that they both have similar NFL numbers but Carr is considered the better quarterback. I wonder if this has more to do with expectations being greater in Detroit than Houston, or are the stats misleading and Carr is actually better than Harrington? Let me put it this way, if you're Matt Millen (yikes), who would you rather have?
It's only week two but the Ravens ship that was sailing toward the AFC North title in the preseason is taking on a lot of water. Well don't fret because even though Baltimore is down to four receivers (outside of Kevin Johnson, none have more than eight NFL starts), Deion Sanders may also get some snaps at the wideout position. And in case you're wondering, Kordell Stewart is working there as well. It's bad enough that the number two receiver going into the Steelers game is also the backup long snapper (Randy Hymes), but does anyone think that Sanders and possibly Stewart can help?
I admit that I often make disparaging remarks about former players turned television commentators because a lot of the time they don't know what they're talking about (see Sean Salisbury or Chris Collinsworth). Of course guys like Ron Jaworski and Merrill Hoge go a long way in assuaging my concerns, and now I'm adding Troy Aikman to the list.