Super Bowl LIV Preview

Patrick Mahomes
Patrick Mahomes
Photo: USA Today Sports Images

The story of Super Bowl LIV is offense vs. defense. Yes, the San Francisco offense is pretty good, and the Kansas City defense is pretty good (against the pass, at least) but the hype around this game is going to be about Patrick Mahomes against the San Francisco defense.

On one hand, we know that offense is more predictable than defense, and that would seem to favor the Chiefs. The 49ers defense has certainly regressed to the mean over the second half of the season. Yes, you might be able to explain that regression with injuries to players such as Kwon Alexander and Dee Ford, and they've rebounded to previous levels in the playoffs, but that's just two games. (In fact, it's more like one and a half games, because Green Bay was moving the ball well in the second half of the NFC Championship.) And if you want to put extra weight on San Francisco's defensive performance in the playoffs, you also have to put extra weight on Kansas City's offensive performance in the playoffs, which happens to represent their top two offensive games of the season by DVOA.

On the other hand, the history of the Super Bowl favors defense. In just this one game, the last game of the season, top defenses have a better record than top offenses. Top 3 DVOA offenses (of which Kansas City is one) have a 13-13 record in the Super Bowl. Top 3 DVOA defenses (of which San Francisco is one) have a 13-7 record in the Super Bowl.

This is the eighth Super Bowl where a top 3 DVOA offense has faced a top 3 DVOA defense. One of those Super Bowls involved the 1991 Redskins, who were a top-3 team on both offense and defense. But in the other six games, the better defense has a 4-2 record against the better offense.

But that's only six games. Not exactly the biggest sample size.

Let's dive deeper into both matchups to look at Super Bowl LIV. For those who may be unfamiliar with the Football Outsiders stats, they are explained at the bottom of the page. Scroll down or click this link. Game charting data appears courtesy Sports Info Solutions, unless noted. All stats represent regular season only, except for weighted DVOA and anything else specifically noted.

San Francisco 49ers vs. Kansas City Chiefs

DVOA 27.9% (5) 30.2% (2)
WEI DVOA 32.2% (4) 44.1% (2)
49ers on Offense
DVOA 7.2% (7) -3.4% (14)
WEI DVOA 13.7% (6) -5.2% (12)
PASS 24.4% (8) -9.3% (6)
RUSH -0.5% (13) 4.1% (29)
Chiefs on Offense
DVOA -19.8% (2) 22.7% (3)
WEI DVOA -13.6% (4) 33.2% (1)
PASS -26.3% (2) 43.7% (2)
RUSH -12.1% (11) -1.4% (14)
Special Teams
DVOA 1.0% (12) 4.1% (2)

If you have FO Premium, you can click here to see all the matchup of DVOA splits for this game.


Let's start with the meeting of strength against strength, the matchup that everyone is waiting to see. The Kansas City offense wasn't as powerful this season as it was in 2018, but it still finished the year third in offensive DVOA. Some of that was because of the games where Matt Moore played instead of an injured Patrick Mahomes, and some of that was because Mahomes himself was limited by injuries early in the year. In our weighted ratings that drop early-season games and weight midseason games less, the Chiefs are the No. 1 offense in the league. They've had their two best single-game ratings of the year in the two playoff games.

The Chiefs offense in also remarkably consistent, in particular Mahomes. In two years as a starter, Mahomes has finished only one game with a negative passing DYAR: Week 17 of this season gainst the Chargers.

While the Kansas City offense has improved over the course of the season, the San Francisco defense has regressed. All five of their below-average games this season have come since Week 9, although the NFC Championship gets a bit of an asterisk because Green Bay got all of its offense in the second half when the 49ers had a large lead. The decline in San Francisco's defense does track with a series of defensive injuries, particularly to linebacker Kwon Alexander and edge rusher Dee Ford, both of whom have returned healthy for the playoffs. And San Francisco had one of its best defensive games of the year against Minnesota in the divisional round three weeks ago.

The San Francisco 49ers play primarily zone defense in a scheme influenced by the Legion of Boom-era Seattle Seahawks. San Francisco used zone on 61% of passes according to Sports Info Solutions, which ranked fourth in the league. (They also led the league with 18% of coverages marked as "other," which is mostly screens and a lot of combo coverages with man on one side and zone on the other.) Mahomes truly excelled against zone coverage in 2019, with 9.7 yards per pass compared to "only" 7.3 yards per pass against man coverage.

You already know about Richard Sherman and how opposing quarterbacks tend to avoid throwing at him on the offensive right side. On the left side, the 49ers have replaced Ahkello Witherspoon with Emmanuel Moseley, and Moseley had excellent charting metrics during the regular season: 63% success rate (10th) and 6.3 yards allowed per pass (14th).

Mahomes specializes in throwing passes to two areas: the short middle, and anywhere deep. Mahomes had the league's best DVOA on passes to the short middle, but this is also a strength of the San Francisco defense. The same isn't true of deep passes, 16 or more yards past the line of scrimmage. Mahomes ranked sixth in the league in DVOA on these passes, but a tight grouping at the top of the league puts him pretty close to No. 1. San Francisco's defense is 12th against deep passes, compared to second against shorter passes. And a particular problem for the San Francisco defense was yards after the catch on these deep passes. San Francisco allowed an average of 10.4 yards after the catch on deep passes, which was last in the league. No other defense was above 7.1. This is not a good weakness to have against the likes of Tyreek Hill and Mecole Hardman.

One interesting aspect of Kansas City's explosiveness is that the Chiefs' offense declined relative to the league as the field got shorter. The Chiefs had the No. 1 offensive DVOA on their own side of the field, but ranked 10th in the "front" zone (from the opposing 39 to the 21) and 19th in the red zone. However, that Chiefs decline in the red zone hasn't been there since their Week 12 bye. In Weeks 1-11, the Chiefs had -14.0% DVOA in the red zone, which ranked 21st. In Weeks 13-20, including the postseason, the Chiefs have had 53.6% DVOA in the red zone, second behind Baltimore.

Incidentally, the San Francisco 49ers' defensive DVOA was also not as good in the red zone as it was overall. For the season, the 49ers ranked ninth in the red zone. Since Week 12, including the postseason, they've ranked 18th in the red zone. However, there's really no consistency for red zone defense separate from overall defense, so this red zone decline isn't the best guide to how we should expect San Francisco to play in the red zone in this game.

Contrary to the idea that the Chiefs should spread things out, the 49ers defense was better this year against 11 personnel than against 12 personnel (the main two personnel groups they faced, and the main two groups Kansas City uses). The yardage difference was small, 5.0 to 4.7, but because teams use 12 personnel more on earlier downs, the DVOA difference was -27.6% DVOA (against 11 personnel) compared to -4.0% DVOA (against 12 personnel). Then again, 12 personnel for Kansas City is often spreading things out since Travis Kelce often moves away from a conventional tight end position.

Kansas City's receivers performed well no matter where they lined up but the slot might be the right place to attack the San Francisco defense. Against receivers lined out wide, San Francisco was third in yards allowed per play and second in defensive DVOA. Against receivers lined up in the slot, San Francisco was ninth in yards allowed per play and 18th in defensive DVOA.

(Note: "Receivers" here means any player, including tight ends and running backs. And "receivers in the slot" includes tight split except a tight end position, even if the receiver is actually the widest receiver on his side of the formation.)

The one type of receiver that San Francisco didn't have a problem with in the slot? Tight ends. Against tight ends in the slot, San Francisco ranked sixth in DVOA. This was part of San Francisco's overall great defense against tight ends. One of the most interesting stories of this game is that Kelce and George Kittle are probably the two best tight ends in the NFL and San Francisco and Kansas City were two of the best defenses against tight ends by DVOA. Against all tight end passes, San Francisco ranked second in DVOA. The 49ers allowed tight ends a league-low 33.5 yards per game (after adjusting for opponent) and only four tight ends had at least 50 yards in a game against them this year. Because the 49ers play so much zone, there's no defender to particularly spotlight for this excellent play; tight ends were covered by linebackers, safeties, and even cornerbacks.

Don't expect Damien Williams to play a big role as a receiver in this contest. San Francisco also had the best defense in the league against running backs in the passing game. And while Andy Reid has always been considered an excellent designer of screens, but the Chiefs did not do well on screen passes in 2019: just 5.0 yards per pass with -6.2% DVOA. Still, we're likely to see a few of them to slow down the San Francisco pass rush; the 49ers faced more screen passes than any other defense this year (5.2 yards per play, -20.5% DVOA).

We haven't talked about the pass rush yet. When it comes to pressure rate, both the San Francisco defense and the Kansas City offense likely rank lower than you expect. The San Francisco defense ranked No. 1 in adjusted sack rate but just 13th in pressure rate. And the Kansas City offense ranked fourth in adjusted sack rate but just 23rd in pressure rate allowed. They get away with this because Mahomes was very good under pressure this season. Kansas City's offensive DVOA with Mahomes under pressure was -3.7%. Being close to zero is phenomenal when the league average under pressure was -64.4%.

The 49ers succeed despite a lower pressure rate because they're bringing that pressure with only four guys. The 49ers blitzed on only 19.5% of pass plays this year, 26th in the league. Mahomes is awesome against a four-man rush, 8.4 yards per pass. But he's even better against a blitz: 9.1 yards per pass.

Part of his success against pressure is that Mahomes is a very good scrambler. Including the postseason, Kansas City has 123.8% DVOA on Mahomes scrambles -- only Ryan Tannehill is higher -- with 9.9 yards per carry. Mahomes' scrambling ability was limited earlier in the season by a nagging ankle injury, but he scrambled more in the second half of the year and has ten scrambles in the two previous playoff games, eight of which converted for first downs.

San Francisco was actually pretty good against scrambles this year, but quarterbacks ran against them a lot. San Francisco faced 70 total quarterback carries during the regular season (not counting kneels), which led the league. They allowed 5.3 yards per carry, a bit below the NFL average of 5.9 yards per carry. On just scrambles, they allowed 5.2 yards per carry and ranked fourth in DVOA. But ranking fourth in defensive DVOA against scrambles still means you're allowing 17.0% DVOA. It's just that scrambles are so efficient that the NFL average is 46.1%. So Mahomes is probably going to scramble a few times and those are likely to be strong gains even though the 49ers are relatively good on these plays.

Kansas City doesn't use the conventional running game much and that's fine because the running game is clearly a weakness compared to the passing game. In fact, it's a bigger weakness than the basic DVOA stats suggest. The Chiefs ranked 14th in run offense during the regular season but that rating is propped up by Mahomes' scrambles. Remove those plays, and Kansas City's run offense DVOA drops further to -7.9% (18th). 

Kansas City's favorite rushing plays are outside zone and inside zone, but the Chiefs weren't particularly good at them in 2019. They had 4.7 yards per carry on outside zone because of a couple of big gains, but just a 34% success rate which led to -21.7% DVOA. On inside zone, the Chiefs averaged just 3.0 yards per carry and had -14.4% DVOA. San Francisco's defense was also very good against these plays: -30.0% DVOA against inside zone (3.2 yd/carry) and -13.8% DVOA against outside zone (4.1 yd/carry).

Kansas City's struggles on the ground extend to short-yardage plays, where they ranked 23rd in short-yardage run conversions while the 49ers defense was No. 1 in preventing such conversions. Surprisingly, even Kansas City's pass attempts in short-yardage situations (3rd/4th down, 1-2 to go) only converted 57% of the time, basically league average.


Let's move to the other side of the ball, to the more underrated units on each team. Normally, we start these playoff previews with a look at the passing game. After all, passing is generally more important than running in the modern NFL. But for the 49ers, everything starts with the running game, and that running game has been phenomenal over the last two months.

The 49ers only ranked 13th in run offense DVOA for the regular season, but that overall number hides an extraordinary split. From Week 6 to Week 11, the 49ers were missing fullback Kyle Juszczyk and/or tight end George Kittle, two of their top blockers. In those weeks, San Francisco ranked 31st in run offense DVOA and averaged just 3.75 yards per carry. But since Week 12, with both Juszczyk and Kittle in the lineup, San Francisco has ranked No. 1 in the league in run offense DVOA and averaged 5.69 yards per carry. There's a similar, though smaller, split in San Francisco's passing numbers.

San Francisco Offense by Week, 2019
  Rushing Passing
Weeks DVOA Rank Yd/Att DVOA Rank NY/P
Weeks 1-5 11.0% 5 5.57 38.7% 5 7.65
Weeks 6-11 -26.4% 31 3.75 15.6% 15 6.70
Weeks 12-20 28.9% 1 5.69 27.1% 8 7.73

Yes, the San Francisco running game really stood out in their dominant win against Green Bay in the NFC Championship Game. But that running game has been playing well for weeks now. In three of the last six games, San Francisco's single-game rushing DVOA has been over 50% with at least 6.0 yards per carry. Since Week 12, San Francisco's DVOA has been better running the ball than passing the ball. That's really rare for a good offensive team. Usually, if DVOA is higher for the run than the pass, it's only because the team in question has a terrible quarterback.

This matters in particular because run defense is such an obvious weakness for the Kansas City Chiefs. Kansas City's run defense was 29th in the league in DVOA and 28th in adjusted line yards. It's a little better in weighted DVOA including the playoffs but still bad (22nd).

San Francisco's best direction by adjusted line yards was left end (third), which was also the Kansas City defense's best direction by adjusted line yards (12th). But San Francisco's ALY numbers were also strong to the right, where the Kansas City defense was very weak.

San Francisco of course loves its outside zone. Based on SIS charting, that was the 49ers' best run play (20.6% DVOA, 6.0 yd/carry) followed by power (13.2% DVOA, 4.8 yd/carry). DVOA lists Kansas City's defense as below average with 6.1% DVOA against outside zone and 6.6% DVOA against power.

San Francisco also likes to use more than just running backs in the running game. If we look at runs by wide receivers and tight ends (wildcat plays and fake punts removed), the 49ers ranked first in the league with 195 yards and 109 DYAR. They had 23 such carries, third in the league. Deebo Samuel has added another three for 49 yards in the postseason. We don't know much about how Kansas City deals with runs like this because they've only faced six of them all season.

There is one statistical split where the Kansas City defense does well against the San Francisco offense: the Chiefs excelled this year when opponents had a fullback in the game. The Chiefs had -20.4% DVOA against 21 personnel, allowing just 4.2 yards per play. The first number ranked eighth in the league, the second number fifth. And it's a much smaller sample of just 29 plays, but the Chiefs also allowed just -16.0% DVOA against 22 personnel. Of course, these personnel groupings with Juszczyk on the field are even bigger strengths for the 49ers offense, whether they are passing the ball or running the ball. San Francisco ran more plays from 21 personnel than any other team and had the best DVOA (26.4%) of any team that used this personnel at least 50 times. That includes 11.2% DVOA running and an even more impressive 48.1% DVOA passing. San Francisco also had the best DVOA out of 22 personnel (42.3%) of any team that used this personnel at least 30 times.

The 49ers primarily have a short passing game based on gaining yards after the catch. Garoppolo's average depth of target was 6.67 yards downfield; only the two New Orleans quarterbacks were lower. But San Francisco led the league with an average of 6.6 yards after the catch, while Kansas City's defense was 30th with an average of 5.9 yards after the catch allowed. The gap between the two units is particularly notable on short passes, 1-15 yards past the line of scrimmage. On these passes, the 49ers were first in YAC (5.2) while the Chiefs were 31st in YAC allowed (4.7).

Despite their general dependence on short passing, the 49ers can make big gains downfield. Remember how Patrick Mahomes was one of the NFL's best quarterbacks on deep passes? Surprise: So was Jimmy Garoppolo. Garoppolo ranked No. 2 in passing DVOA on passes of 16 or more air yards, trailing only Drew Brees. But he was far behind Mahomes in DYAR (total value) on these plays because he just didn't throw many of them: only 64 for the entire regular season, compared to Mahomes throwing 115 despite losing two and a half games to injury. This tweet from the NFL's Next Gen Stats group points out how: San Francisco receivers had the best average separation of any offense on deep passes. Play-action is a big part of these shot plays, as the 49ers used play-action on 31% of passes (second in the league) and averaged 9.7 yards on these plays (third in the league).

San Francisco struggled to throw to receivers who were lined out wide, although only two offenses (Oakland and Baltimore) threw less often to receivers lined up wide. The 49ers had 6.2 yards per pass on these plays (28th) and -27.4% DVOA (32nd). Meanwhile, Kansas City excelled against receivers lined up wide, with 6.8 yards allowed per pass (sixth) and -14.3% DVOA allowed (third).

Receivers in the slot were a different story. San Francisco led the league with 9.9 yards per pass to receivers in the slot, and finished fourth in DVOA. Kansas City's defense was fourth with 7.2 yards per pass allowed to receivers in the slot but tenth in DVOA allowed.

Despite the presence of Frank Clark and veteran late-season addition Terrell Suggs, the 49ers should have the advantage over the Chiefs along the line of scrimmage. Kansas City was only 20th in pressure rate on defense and San Francisco was fourth in pressure rate allowed on offense. Of course, this is in part schematic, with all those designed short throws. San Francisco was all the way down at 26th in ESPN's Pass Block Win Rate. (Kansas City was 19th in Pass Rush Win Rate.) However, Sports Info Solutions' blown block charting smiles upon the 49ers offensive line. Sixty-six linemen in the league were listed by SIS with at least 20 blown blocks this season. None of them were on the 49ers.

Kansas City will blitz more often than the 49ers do; they were above average with blitzes on 26.8% of pass plays. Garoppolo dropped a little bit against blitzes, but not much, going from 8.8 yards per pass against four pass-rushers to 8.0 against five or more. And the Kansas City defense this year allowed slightly more yardage when blitzing compared to a standard pass rush, 5.9 to 5.7.

First down was a significant advantage for the 49ers against the Packers defense. It's less of an advantage against the Chiefs, but still an advantage. San Francisco's offense was best on first down, ranking fifth in DVOA: fifth passing and sixth rushing. Kansas City's defense was 14th on first down: 10th against the pass and only 24th against the run.

There's a general impression that the 49ers might have a harder time coming back from a late deficit because they're not as explosive as the Chiefs. Numbers from this season suggest this is not true. San Francisco was the No. 1 offense by DVOA when losing by more than a touchdown, and ranked third on defense. When tied or losing by a touchdown or less, San Francisco ranked seventh on offense and third on defense. And Jimmy Garoppolo led four fourth-quarter comebacks during the regular season.


The special teams matchup here is closer than the regular-season numbers show, since San Francisco's special teams have been better than Kansas City's during the postseason. As with the NFC Championship, San Francisco's biggest disadvantage on special teams is probably not really a disadvantage. Including the postseason, Kansas City's Harrison Butker has been worth 7.9 points above average after adjusting for weather while San Francisco's Robbie Gould has been worth 4.1 points below average. However, we know that 1) field goal kicking is very inconsistent from year to year; 2) Gould has good career numbers, which are probably more trustworthy than one-season numbers; and 3) Gould has positive value since he returned from a quad injury in Week 13, including a 54-yarder he hit against Green Bay in the NFC Championship. So it's hard to believe that the 49ers should really be trusting Gould any less than the Packers trust Butker just because Gould missed a handful of kicks early in the season.

Kansas City's other advantage comes on kickoffs, where the Chiefs were better than the 49ers on both kickoffs and kick returns. Mecole Hardman had a touchdown against the Chargers but also fumbled away two kick returns this season. Ten of the 26 standard kickoffs he chose to return did not make it as far as the 25. Richie James had neither lost fumble nor touchdown for San Francisco. Six of the 18 standard kickoffs he chose to return did not make it as far as the 25.

Both the 49ers punting and the Chiefs punt returns finished seventh during the regular season, but the 49ers punting had more positive value. We have punter Mitch Wishnowsky as below-average in gross punt value but the 49ers' punt coverage team was excellent. The same goes for Dustin Colquitt and the Chiefs' punt coverage team. Hardman and James are also the main punt returners.

Overall, the Kansas City special teams are more high variance than the 49ers. They're more likely to have a big play that changes the game, whether that play is good or bad for the Chiefs. The playoff win over Houston, for example, saw both sides of that variance.


The more I've analyzed this matchup, the more I've picked out places where the 49ers seem to have a good advantage on the Chiefs. The performance of the San Francisco running game since Week 12 is obviously a huge issue. Kansas City has to stop that running game, but it's a very different style of running than the Tennessee Titans running game that the Chiefs stopped two weeks ago. Passing may be more efficient than running, but running is certainly plenty efficient enough when it's gaining 5.7 yards per carry. The Chiefs may want to dedicate more assets to stopping the run, or perhaps use Tyrann Mathieu as a rover who will be there to both key on running plays and help take away short crossing routes.

The 49ers can also hit deep passes. But they're only going to try a handful of those each game. Those are high variance plays: concentrate on San Francisco's running game and short passing attack and hope the 49ers miss when they do take a shot downfield.

When Kansas City is on offense, San Francisco should be able to pressure Patrick Mahomes more than most of the defenses he's faced this season. They may be able to contain Travis Kelce using Fred Warner, who is an excellent coverage linebacker. And yet, I keep coming back to the idea that the passing game is the biggest determinant of who wins games in the NFL. Offense is more consistent and predictable than defense. Offense is on a greater scale than defense: the best offenses are better than the best defenses. We see that here, where Kansas City's pass offense DVOA is nearly 20 percentage points stronger than San Francisco's pass defense DVOA even though both units ranked second in the regular season.

We've been lucky to have a string of very close Super Bowls with matchups that looked very close going into the games, and this one is no different. But I give the slight edge to Kansas City. I think San Francisco will be able to have offensive success running the ball, but their defense is not going to go out and make Patrick Mahomes look like Kirk Cousins looked three weeks ago. Calling for a high-scoring game didn't end up working out for me last year but I'm calling for a high-scoring game again this year. I also think it will be close, but the Chiefs are the favorite with the better chance to come out ahead.


DVOA (Defense-adjusted Value Over Average) breaks down each play of the season and compares it to the NFL average based on situation and opponent. You'll find it explained further here. Since DVOA measures ability to score, a negative DVOA indicates a better defense and worse offense, and a positive DVOA indicates a better offense and worse defense.

Team DVOA numbers incorporate all plays; since passing is generally more efficient than rushing, the average for passing is actually above 0% while the average for rushing is below 0%.

SPECIAL TEAMS numbers are different; they represent value in points of extra field position gained compared to NFL average. Field goal rating represents points scored compared to average kicker at same distances. All special teams numbers are adjusted by weather and altitude; the total is then translated into DVOA so it can be compared to offense and defense. Those numbers are explained here.

Each team is listed with DVOA for offense and defense, total along with rush and pass, and rank among the 32 teams in parentheses. (If the DVOA values are difficult to understand, it is easy to just look at the ranks.) We also list WEIGHTED DVOA (WEI DVOA), which is based on a formula which drops the value of games early in the season to get a better idea of how teams are playing now (explained here). Weighted DVOA ratings include the playoffs.

Each team also gets two charts showing their performance this year, game-by-game, according to offensive and defensive DVOA. In addition to a line showing each game, another line shows the team's trend for the season, using a rolling average of the last five games. Note that the defensive chart is reversed so upwards is a more negative defensive DVOA (which is better).


56 comments, Last at 02 Feb 2020, 6:40pm

1 opick is in

Super Bowl predcition

49ers 33, Chiefs 29

50 I'm going with the Niners…

In reply to by Raiderjoe

I'm going with the Niners over the Chiefs, because I think the Niners will be able to slow the Chiefs offense down and control the game when they are on offense themselves.

But it will be close and they won't be able to stop the Chiefs completely.

The difference might come on a Niners return somewhere.


49ers 27, Chiefs 24

2 One thing you didn't mention…

One thing you didn't mention was turnovers. The Chiefs had an outstanding 16-5 ratio of interceptions made to interceptions thrown, while the 49ers were almost even (13-12). I'm seeing a Jimmy G pick or two that make the difference in a shootout: Chiefs 38, 49ers 34.

9 He can only throw picks if…

He can only throw picks if the throws in the first place. Put me down for a higher-scoring version of the Packers game, with Mahomes & co.'s superior firepower offset by Andy Reid's inept clock management: 49ers 38 - 34 Chiefs, with Jimmy G barely over 10 pass attempts.

10 Having watched them trample…

Having watched them trample all over the NFC North I am leaning strongly toward a convincing 49ers win. The parallels with SB32 (Denver vs Green Bay) are striking. Elway had a pretty poor game with a couple turnovers but it didn't matter because the offensive line was dominating so effectively, as it had throughout the playoffs. This 49ers line has gotten in synch so well that it's hard to see the Chiefs' defensive front disrupting it.

And the Niners' defense is way better than Denver's was in 1997, especially upfront. I doubt the Chiefs' offensive line will hold up.

If KC is going to win it'll be with a game like the 49ers' last superbowl appearance: a bunch of big scoring plays on offense and not much else. But the Chiefs are not built to run out the clock with a lead, and I can't see them staying turnover-free.

SF 34 KC 24.

13 I meant more in the sense of…

In reply to by Aaron Schatz

I meant more in the sense of how do they achieve it, rather than how efficient are they at it?

The write-up points out that they have slow LBs, so how are they smothering TEs? Is it all Honey Badger?

17 Safeties

Kansas City uses more safeties to cover tight ends than San Francisco does. A lot of Juan Thornhill, who is now injured, plus Daniel Sorensen, and Honey Badger. A little bit of linebackers, and some corners (Charvarus Ward) when tight ends are wide or in the slot.

4 The vegas line to me all…

Its instructive to ask this question. Which offense scares you more: the 2013 Broncos or the 2019 Chiefs?


With the benefit of hindsight, we might say the Chiefs but its instructive to ask nonetheless. That Broncos offense broke all of the in season records. Easy to forget now, but Manning threw 55!! TDS. 4 players had 10 tds. That game to me is instructive. While the 2013 Broncos might be comparable to the Chiefs, are the 49ers comparable to the 2013 Seahawks defensively?


Or will it not matter because the other side is suuuch a mismatch?

6 That Seahawks defense was…

That Seahawks defense was great up and down, but especially great in the secondary. They flat out bullied the Broncos receivers in that game (and many other receiver groups during that period). This 49ers defense is clearly predicated on pass rush and, as indicated in the article, they are relatively weak against deep passes. Which is clearly a problem in this game, if Mahomes can find the time to throw. 

So QB mobility is going to be key. The (relative) success enjoyed by Kyler Murray and Russell Wilson against the 49ers this season seems instructive in this regard.

5 Last time Andy Reid was in…

Last time Andy Reid was in the Super Bowl, he devised a great game plan and almost won, despite his best player (TO) playing on one leg, his QB "getting tired" in the fourth quarter, and of course, his own inept clock management. And that was against the 2004 Patriots, who were better, by both record and DVOA, than this 49ers team. I do think it'll be close, but barring an injury to Mahomes, I just can't see anybody slowing down the Chiefs for four quarters.

Chiefs 31, 49ers 24

11 Why would they have to slow…

Why would they have to slow him down for 4 quarters?  Slowing him down for 1 quarter should do it, because it's hard to see this KC defense slowing down the 49ers offense for that long.  What's the over/under on the number of times the 49ers will have to punt this game?  1.5?  They seem to have just the kind of offense that KC is worst at defending. 

Most of the 1-paragraph-long "hot takes" I've read come down to one of two types:  1) KC will win because Mahomes is Great, or 2) SF will win because History teaches us that great defenses beat great offenses in the Super Bowl.  Those are both pretty lame takes, and it's a bit disappointing that after all his analysis, Aaron basically checks box #1. 

The premise of these articles is that football is about match ups.  SF seems to win most of those in this case, matching up well with the Chiefs.  Or is football about the generic Greatness of certain players and coaches?  This article seems to reject its own premise and concludes that the KC offense is just so good that match ups don't matter.  Maybe that's the right take--if KC does get a big lead and can force the 49ers to have to pass, that could turn into a slaughter--but it sure ignores a lot of the evidence right here. 

14 I see the game going like…

I see the game going like the Seattle-SF games did, except KC has a better offense.

KC started against Houston with 3 punts, followed by 7 TDs and a FG.
Against Tennessee, punt, followed by 5 TDs in 7 drives.

In SEA 1, SF had a stretch of 9 failed drives which let SEA back into it.
in SEA 2, SF did much better -- they only had 2 failed drives. But SEA closed with 3 TDs and a drive that ended at the 1. 4 TDs would have won it.
Against Minnesota, they started hot, but then noodled around, with 13 pts in 8 drives.

Only against GB did they really crush an opponent on offense. 

But you can only keep KC down until they find something that works; they only need one thing. Last year, NE blanked them for a half. They went TD-TD-FG-TD-TD-TD(OT) on their scores. Against GB, SF went TD-FG-TD-FG-TD-TD-FG. Against KC, that loses. NE couldn't have afforded to trade 2 FGs for 1 TD in regulation.

Slowing Mahomes is like tackling Barry Sanders -- it's easier to catch him from behind. The only low-scoring game he was in was a game when he was playing hurt.

So this is less a question of can SF push around KC's defense for most of the game. It's a question of: can they average at least 4 points per drive? One Garoppolo Special might be enough to lose.

20 Slowing Mahomes is like…

Slowing Mahomes is like tackling Barry Sanders -- it's easier to catch him from behind.

That's interesting. I think a lot of us - myself certainly - are experiencing recency bias: the 49ers started fast and ran all over both of their playoff opponents, while the Chiefs started slow then poured it on through the air in both of their games, and hey, the Chiefs' run defense is bad, the 49ers secondary is questionable, it makes sense that the same basic pattern would play out this time. But reality is rarely so straightforward. The scenario where the 49ers jump out to a lead and then the Chiefs mount a comeback is easy to envision - we've seen versions of that already - but the one in which the Chiefs jump out to a big lead (say they win the toss and score a touchdown, 49ers fumble the next possession, Chiefs punch it in, suddenly it's 14-0 in the 1st quarter) is less considered, but eminently plausible.

On paper it looks like a kind of fascinating matchup of weaknesses - the Chiefs offense isn't really built to hold a lead, with its mediocre rushing attack (and the 49ers strength against the sort of short passes they might like to try), while the 49ers offense isn't really built to come back from a big deficit: either they lean on the run game, likely burning a lot of clock, or put the ball in Jimmy G's hands, where he's certainly not bad but he has few weapons (albeit very good ones) and is susceptible to costly mistakes.

I'm inclined to think that the big play ability of both the running game in general (especially when it pits fast backs against slow linebackers) and Jimmy G specifically are pretty underrated, and so maybe the 49ers aren't as hopeless when trailing than popularly (read: by me) believed. At the end of the day, it comes down to the fact that the Chiefs are gonna get their points - probably in the high 20s at least - and so, can the 49ers offense, however it decides to operate, exceed that in 60 minutes? It's certainly an easier lift if the Chiefs take their foot of the gas pedal and end up on the lower end of expectation - like your comment implies they might.

37 By the second half of SEA 1,…

By the second half of SEA 1, the SF offense was pretty decimated. They should have played for the tie in OT. Fortunately it didn’t come back to bite them. In the MIN game, they did “noodle around,” mainly because they didn’t need to do anything else and Jimmy G threw one near-pick too many. They won’t have this luxury with a 10-14 lead against KC unless the run match-up is really that bad. It might be.

The Handsome One does seem high variance when I watch. I don’t know if the stats bear this out. So certainly a bad game from him would tilt the odds.

15 I think it summarizes a…

I think it summarizes a general statement. If your pass offensive is legendary and the defense you are facing is not equally legendary at stopping the pass, then other facets be damned, you are losing. Its like the ace of spades in war. I went back and re-read Aaron's preview of the 2013 sb. He basically said, that battle will be a draw and it will come down to the other sides of the ball. That's not the take he chose here because SF's pass defense is not legendary enough. 

To go further, there's also a sense that if you throw enough bodies at the problem, you can slow down a run game, something that doesn't work versus the pass. If you cannot stop the pass, you cannot stop the pass. But I'll add another point. To really win a game on offense exclusively with running, you almost need a version of what happened in the nfc title game. By comparison. the titans ran all over NE and Baltimore and scored under 30 in both games. Therefore, as pitiful as the chiefs defense is at stopping the run, if they just load the box, they will "only" be gashed for something like 150 yards, not 250+ which will mean their defense will have surrendered "only" 30 pts, not 40+.

So combine those two, and you get the chiefs being favored slightly. That is actually what I find so fascinating about the pregame expectations. Post game everyone will have ad hoc analysis, but pregame tells me what the experts' subjective value of pass offense and run defense are. 


In any event, I am leaning to the 49ers because I do believe more well rounded teams win against one's that are so dependent on one unit. If the Chiefs have a bad day at passing, they are screwed - which is basically what happened in 2013 sb.

22 I don't think it's ignoring…

I don't think it's ignoring matchups to think the Chiefs offense will have a good day. The scariest elements of the Niners defense IMO are their pass rush and the incredible speed and aggressiveness with which they fly to the football to make plays. KC, however, has a good offensive line that should give Mahomes time to look deep, Reid is very good at using motion and route combinations to move defenders and open up space, and, as Aaron discussed, Mahomes is also pretty good under pressure and on scrambles too. I'm not anticipating 40-50 points, I think it'll be a good game, but I think the Chiefs offense will bring it for sure.

28 Enh, Schwartz seems like the…

Enh, Schwartz seems like the only good O-lineman the Chiefs have.  Fisher is average, their interior looks kind of weak. 

It seems to me that this is a game where whoever gets an early lead will have a bigger advantage than normal because that'll determine how frequently the 49ers will be able to use the biggest match up advantage in the contest, their run game.  If they're forced to pass, they'll be playing to the KC strengths on defense; if they have a lead they can grind clock like no one. 

12 Did you compare anomalies?

Hard game to predict, I'd imagine they will be throwing Chris Jones at Defensive End during running downs like they did against the Vikings. So I wonder how that will play into SF run game domination.

Should be a great game barring any jerk helmet to helmet hits or low hits on knees on purpose.

19 Sorry to be pedantic, but it…

Sorry to be pedantic, but it should be "regression toward the mean", not "regression to the mean". The latter implies that the SF defense is just average now.

Beyond that, I agree with zenbitz on the outcome. The game is usually decided by which coach is better prepared. I think Reid might have the edge because he's been here before.

25 The one where the Patriots…

The one where the Patriots came back from a 28-3 deficit to win their 5th Super Bowl? OK...

Oh wait, you must mean the Nick Foles miracle year, the following one. Yes, Pederson did win it, against a NE defense that was way worse than this year's KC defense. Note that neither Pederson nor Foles have come close to repeating that success.

35 49ers

Only Jimmy G can cost the Niners the game, their run game might not give him that chance, and even if the Chiefs' run D is up to the test, Jimmy G will still probably be good enough. Niners by 9.

36 timeouts

And you know Andy's going to misrun at least one end-of-the-half. He's the worst I've ever seen with timeouts.

47 It's not just timeouts

In reply to by BigRichie

The entire last half of the AFC title game was a case study in mismanagement. The fake punt. Williams going out of bounds on a run play. Mahomes throw with 2:20 left. If that OPI isn't called with about 4 minutes left, Tennessee would have had decent field position down 11 and at least a decent chance to make things interesting.

For all the talk of Reid's offensive genius (and it is well deserved) it gets mitigated, maybe more so, by his terrible understanding of end of game dynamics.


48 It's not just timeouts

In reply to by BigRichie

The entire last half of the AFC title game was a case study in mismanagement. The fake punt. Williams going out of bounds on a run play. Mahomes throw with 2:20 left. If that OPI isn't called with about 4 minutes left, Tennessee would have had decent field position down 11 and at least a decent chance to make things interesting.

For all the talk of Reid's offensive genius (and it is well deserved) it gets mitigated, maybe more so, by his terrible understanding of end of game dynamics.


38 Can the Chiefs tackle? They…

Can the Chiefs tackle? They more or less tackled Henry, and they won’t see anybody that big, but they are going to have to tackle a lot of Niners (Mostert, Kittle, Deebo) in a lot of ways from a lot of looks. I could see this getting overwhelming for them (well maybe not the Honey Badger).

39 I think the SF defense matches the KC offense

But the SF offense bests the KC defense. I can see it coming down to Mahomes running his way to a comeback, mostly because that's how Seattle was able to beat SF. And frankly, if not for a horrible non DPI call at the end, would have swept them. Mahomes is like Wilson. But if he doesn't have a Wilsonesque performance, then SF is going to win this one.

45 Not really relevant to…

Not really relevant to previewing the game, but it really is incredible the extreme good fortune Chiefs have had with their playoff run. The combination of the Patriots losing to Miami in week 17, then the Titans knocking off the Patriots and Ravens was incredibly unlikely and virtually quadrupled their Super Bowl odds without them having to do a thing. Stuff like that almost always get overlooked when judging teams, coaches and players historically.

46 The 49ers also missed out on…

The 49ers also missed out on the Wilson Nightmare 3 and the Saints, who put up 46 points on that defense earlier in the year.  The Packers had the second worst adjusted defensive line yards, ahead of only the Dolphins, and were a great matchup for the 49ers run game.  The Titans were also better than the Packers in weighted DVOA.  Of course, the 49ers were the 1 seed anyway, but they caught some breaks, not as much as the Chiefs this year.

Personally, I thought it was about time Andy Reid got this kind of luck in the playoffs.

49 In 2003, the Rams lost a…

In 2003, the Rams lost a terrible game to a bad detroit lions team in week 17 that cost them the 1seed and vaulted KC to the 2seed. It didnt end up mattering because the eagles lost to the panthers anyways at home. 

Reid also got the easiest opponent he could have imagined in 2008 against a regular season mediocre Arizona Cardinals. 

He lost. I'd say Reid has had his share of misfortunes, but hes also squandered a lot of good fortune too.

51 I'm going to be rooting for…

I'm going to be rooting for the Chiefs and Andy Reid tonight, but I think SF has the better matchup and will win a close game. I don't know how much of that is my natural pessimism, recency bias from the Green Bay game, or something else entirely, but all of my instincts are saying the SF defense only has to win on a few possessions, and their offense is just good enough to give them the game.

52 Looks simple

The strength of the SF pass defense is their pass rush. Mahomes neutralizes that with his incredible ability to throw accurately under pressure. How many times have we seen him heave the ball downfield, throwing off his back foot, and hit a receiver in stride? KC wins that key matchup,and accordingly the game

53 I think you are selling…

In reply to by lowsmoke

I think you are selling short the SF defense. Their linebackers cover well and Sherman had a renaissance year. They are also deep in the secondary, which you will need when the chiefs deploy three legitimate threats at receiver. 


Mahomes is always scary even in super long down and distance so I grant you that. 

54 I'd like to see Andy Reid…

I'd like to see Andy Reid win the SB, but I'll be happy with any outcome and looking forward to enjoying what I hope will be a great game.

SF seems to match up well against KC, but I feel like KC's still the better team and will prevail. For all the talk early in the year about the strength of the NFC, the only two teams I felt could truly neutralize a healthy KC were NE and BAL, and TEN kindly removed both of them from KC's path. Maybe SF will prove me wrong, but I don't see them slowing down the KC offense very often, and I don't see them sustaining drives as often as they did in the NFC Championship game. To win, I think SF needs to win the turnover battle and get some big plays out of special teams or the passing game. If the reverse is true and KC gets a turnover advantage and more big plays, we could be looking at a blow out, because toe-to-toe I expect KC to convert more "regular" drives into TDs than SF will.

Cue the 49ers now making me look like an idiot LOL.

55 A bit surprised by this take…

A bit surprised by this take. The chiefs have one ultra unit and one terrible unit.


By contrast, SF as a team has no weaknesses and their strength on defense matches the strength of KC( though KCs offense still better). On the other side, SF heavily overmatches KC.

Feel like too many people overrate pass offense as some kind of all powerful trump card. 

56 I don't view this year's KC…

I don't view this year's KC defense as terrible.  SF's run-focussed offense may match up better against KC than a lot of teams, but I'm dubious about the spread between KC's pass- and run-effectiveness on D, and wonder how much of that is because they could afford to let teams run?  I see the current KC defense overall as being closer to their pass efficiency than their run efficiency, and as having improved over the second half of the year.

But we'll know better in a few minutes!