Writers of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

Most Recent FO Features


» Weight and Injuries

NFL football is a violent game, and traumatic injuries are unfortunate but unavoidable. But are bigger players more likely to be hurt than their smaller peers?

20 Aug 2010

Cover-3: Plus Ca Change ...

by Doug Farrar

The Redskins' New 3-4
Buffalo Bills 17 at Washington Redskins 42
Friday, August 13

Whatever percentage of pre-preseason coverage that wasn't taken up by the endlessly predicable Brett Favre saga and Darrelle Revis' holdout seemed to be centered around the idea that Albert Haynesworth, just one year after signing a seven-year, $100 million contract with the Washington Redskins, accepted a $21 million roster bonus while planning to blow off minicamps as a measure of his dissatisfaction with the 3-4 defense implemented by new defensive coordinator Jim Haslett. Fearing that he'd be stuck at nose tackle, plugging blockers so that everyone else could benefit, Haynesworth waited until training camp to report and then spent several days failing the conditioning test that would allow him to practice. He finally practiced as the second-string nose tackle on August 9, which gave him less than a week of work with the new scheme before the team's opener against the Bills.

Even before Haynesworth took the field in the second quarter, it was clear that the defense Haslett was installing was not the kind of vanilla 3-4 that would force players into singular roles. As if to prove a point, Haslett brought many different looks onto the field. There were 5-2 fronts with Andre Carter and Brian Orakpo as the endbackers and Ma'ake Kemoeatu in the middle, 4-man lines with Kedric Golston and Adam Carriker inside and the Carter/Orakpo combo on the edges (this was a primary front against the pass), and my pre-Haynesworth favorite, the zone blitz that led to an interception of a Trent Edwards pass near the end of the first quarter.

Figure 1: Redskins' zone blitz

With just 43 seconds left in that quarter, the Bills had second and 10 at their own 38. They lined up in a shotgun set (Fig. 1), and the Redskins countered with the kind of 3-4 inside linebacker blitz that wouldn't look out of place in one of Dick LeBeau's playbooks. At the snap, Carter (99) backed off to cover the mid-zone, while linebacker Rocky McIntosh (52) led the charge between the tackles. At this point, a number of things happened in quick sequential order, and none of them were good for the Bills. Receiver Roscoe Parrish tried to cross over from the left slot, but he was obstructed from Edwards' view by Carter. Right tackle Kirk Chambers blocked inside, leaving rookie running back C.J. Spiller to block Carriker. There are many things that Spiller does well, but blocking isn't high on the list just yet. Carriker easily flushed Edwards out of the pocket, at which point Carter hemmed back in. Edwards rolled right, but missed the fact that cornerback DeAngelo Hall had inside position on receiver Lee Evans. When Edwards threw the ball, Evans didn't work his way back, Hall jumped the route, and returned the pick to the Buffalo 12-yard line.

It was a great call and a well-executed play, even coming as it did against the second-worst quarterback when hurried in 2009 (only St. Louis rookie Keith Null had a lower DVOA under pressure than Edwards' -97.2%) and the third-worst shotgun quarterback in the game (-47.2% DVOA; only Kyle Boller and Matthew Stafford were worse among quarterbacks with at least 100 attempts). You got to see why those two stats are indicative of Edwards' abilities, but you also got a sneak peek at a versatile defense that could do some damage.

Haynesworth finally got in the game with 8:10 left in the first half, lining up first at one-gap nose in a 5-2 with his head lined up against the center's left shoulder. After a Bills' false start, he went with the same role, moved over the center's left shoulder at the snap, and took the right guard out of the play, allowing rookie linebacker Perry Riley to shoot through the middle and force another hurried attempt. That was an example of Haynesworth working in tandem with other linemen, using his quickness off the snap, and dismantling the Bills' already sketchy blocking concepts with movement off the ball and the ability to occupy a double team. On second and 15, he lined up over the center's right shoulder and easily split the center-right guard double team. On third and 15, Haynesworth lined up as a three-technique tackle in a four-man front, with Vonnie Holliday also in the middle. This time, Haynesworth took left guard Andy Levitre one-on-one, and pushed Levitre back into Edwards, almost deflecting a pass that was completed for 14 yards to receiver Steve Johnson. That play was less about scheme and more about Haynesworth's ability to use his power to demolish an offensive lineman on the track.

I was less impressed with Haynesworth as a 4-3 end in a play that came with 3:35 left in the first half. The Bills had second and 15 from their own 7-yard line with Ryan Fitzpatrick at quarterback (seriously ... I like Chan Gailey as a coach and I just feel bad for him). The Bills went three-wide with a single back (what we should probably call the "Colts Formation" from now on), and Haynesworth was playing right end. He shot inside on a counter to rookie back Joique Bell, but Bell headed outside for a 17-yard gain. I have to think that this is just down to coaching points and what Haynesworth is used to. When he was in Tennessee, the Titans would line him up as a right end in their 4-3 at times, but it was generally to loop back inside around Kyle Vanden Bosch, who would then take the edge. This was just a weird look that did the Redskins no good.

However, considering all the attendant drama and Haynesworth's late start in this defense, I was impressed with his performance, and far more intrigued by what Haslett is putting together in D.C. Haynesworth's objection to the new scheme may have made the Redskins look like one of those teams that implement the 3-4 as a cure-all before they have the personnel to run it (not unlike the team they played last Friday), but there seems to be a plan here, and Haynesworth could be a key man in the recovery of a team that has managed to live below expectations for most of the last decade.

The New Left: Doug Free and the Post-Flozell Landscape
Oakland Raiders 17 at Dallas Cowboys 9
Thursday, August 12

In the ninth grade, Dallas Cowboys starting left tackle Doug Free almost quit football to work at a dairy farm. "I was 15 years old, the job paid well and I loved what I was doing," he said in an interview shortly before he was drafted in 2007. "I kind of had to be talked back to football. And it all worked out."

Well, eventually. Selected in the fourth round by the Cowboys that year, Free was Dallas' swing tackle in 2009, subbing out for Marc Colombo and Flozell Adams when injuries made that a necessity. Those outside the Cowboys fan base didn't really get a Doug Free name check until the Cowboys were destroyed by the Minnesota Vikings in last year's divisional round. In that 34-3 whipping, Free replaced Flozell Adams at left tackle in the second quarter, tried to deal with Jared Allen, gave up a sack and a fumble early, and became Exhibit 1A (along with Colombo, who was beaten even worse by Ray Edwards) of the team's offensive line woes. Cowboys coaches were relatively unconcerned about Free's future -- when Adams was released and Free was named the starting left tackle in the offseason, they were remembering the guy who repeatedly graded out higher than any other Cowboys linemen late in the season.

Free looked strong in the Hall of Fame game against the Bengals (especially in comparison to Alex Barron), and showed his willingness and ability to stand up at the point in run blocking on the Cowboys' first play from scrimmage. From their own 31 and with tackle/tight end Pat McQuistan outside Free in a six-man front, Free engaged end Marcus Dixon as Marion Barber tried to bounce outside to the left. Dixon was able to wriggle free and help bring Barber down. Free has a tendency to play high in run-blocking at times, and you'd generally like a guy to get under a defender's pads for more push. This is where Free has more strength that he's sometimes given credit for, and it doesn't always show.

Free was more impressive on second down, when Tony Romo hit Jason Witten on an 18-yard cross. He showed great pass-blocking form against end Matt Shaughnessy, fanning out wide, closing off any inside angle, and pushing Shaughnessy back repeatedly. On the next play, first and 10 from the 50-yard line, Oakland's coverage kept Romo waiting for an open man, and Colombo gave up a sack to rookie end Lamarr Houston (another guy to watch this preseason). Free stayed strong against Shaughnessy even with the time elapsed -- Shaughnessy tried to come back upfield after penetrating about four yards in the pocket, but Free kept him at bay with some really nice hand movement. When you watch Free play, keep an eye on how he uses his hands to keep defenders where he wants them. It's one of his most valuable traits.

I like what I've seen from Doug Free so far. The pass blocking is encouraging, and he shouldn't be hit for too long with the debit that comes from getting blown up by Jared Allen -- there are few tackles in the league who can survive Allen for 60 minutes. He's good in space and doesn't fall all over himself when he's asked to get quick and be somewhere in a hurry. What I'd like to see more of (and according to Rob Rang of NFLDraftScout.com, this was a ding on Free going back to college) is a guy who can explode into the defender and push back. He doesn't exhibit the "violence" that I think is common to all the best at his position, but for a player with only seven NFL starts, Free is on the right track and should be able to live up to expectations.

St. Angerer
San Francisco 49ers 37 at Indianapolis Colts 17
Sunday, August 15

The more things change, the more they stay the same ... David Carr still has no pocket presence.

What do you do if you're an undersized but extremely productive linebacker in need of a system that will allow you to flash your undersold abilities? You start by hoping you're drafted by the Indianapolis Colts, who have developed quite the cottage industry around guys with specific skills hidden by unattractive measurables. Four years ago, the Colts picked up the 6-foot, 235 pound Clint Session out of Pitt in the fourth round, and spotted 5-foot-11, 235-pound undrafted Gary Brackett in 2003. Last season, Session and Brackett were two cornerstones in what might have been the NFL's fastest defense. Iowa's Pat Angerer, another smaller (6-foot, 235 pounds) speed demon, was selected in the second round of the 2010 draft and has been backing up Brackett in camp. In 2009 with Iowa, Angerer racked up 135 tackles (47 solo), a sack, five pass deflections, and two forced fumbles. He was similarly productive in his first NFL game, preseason though it may have been: eight tackles (five solo), two sacks, two quarterback hits, and another tackle for loss. I wanted to look at the sacks, which came in a three-play sequence against the 49ers.

Figure 2: Indy's zone blitz

With 2 minutes remaining in the first half, San Francisco lined up three-wide at the Indianapolis 23-yard line, and the Colts countered with what looked like one of their seemingly endless vanilla Cover-2 defenses. But those who were paying attention last season will remember that under defensive coordinator Larry Coyer, Indy put a bit of color on the canvas, blitzing with a bit more regularity and shaking things up with their fronts. On this play (Fig. 2), the line slid left, the left end backed into coverage, and the 49ers' offensive line responded with slide protection, leaving an open lane for Angerer to come through. Linebacker Vuna Tuihalamaka (yet another 6-foot, 230-pound guy) blitzed from the nickel edge, which took the halfback out of the play. Meanwhile, David Carr was a big bunch of "Yikes!" in the pocket. He looked to his right, looked to his left, ran a little play fake, did his taxes and watched the latest episode of Pillars of the Earth back there – seriously. If Carr crossed busy streets with the same awareness he has in the pocket, he'd have gone "splat" years ago.

After an Anthony Dixon 17-yard run (Angerer got lost in the middle on that one -- on the downside, that's another way he fits with this linebacker group), Angerer got his second sack by shooting through a five-man front, beating right guard Chilo Rachal (who did not enjoy film review, I'm sure), and taking Carr down again. Carr was sacked again on the next play (this time by Fili Moala), and you had to start wondering whether the poor guy should have been benched for his own safety.

Preseason and quarterback caveats aside, Angerer's a guy to watch. With cornerbacks Jerraud Powers and Jacob Lacey in 2009, the Colts proved that they have no problem putting young defensive players in starting roles and asking them to make a difference. That their personnel modus operandi is so in tune with their on-field needs -- well, that's why Bill Polian gets the big bucks. I want to see more of Angerer dropping into zones and filling gaps consistently, and that next chance comes against the Bills on Thursday night. Based on what Buffalo showed against Washington's defense, Angerer will get more chances to impress.

Posted by: Doug Farrar on 20 Aug 2010

21 comments, Last at 23 Aug 2010, 10:33am by c_f


by commissionerleaf :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 2:07pm

Too bad Sessions can't find a tackle with a compass and a flashlight. The reason light, fast linebackers aren't in much demand is that they get lost in traffic and miss tackles on, say, 220-230 pound running backs. Sessions got run over by Reggie Bush in the SB, just to name a popular highlight. Reggie Bush! The guy falls down when the wind blows too hard.

I'm not knocking Polian, who is a genius, and the guys absolutely fit the Dungy (and Coyer) scheme to a T. And it isn't like they can chase FA's when they have to resign the Dallas Clarks, Reggie Waynes, and Peyton Mannings of the world. But the Colts linebacking corps are basically a bunch of out-of-position strong safeties (which used to work great in Madden!), which means a lot of missed tackles.

And the Colts aren't going to have a really good (rather than merely average to above average) defense until they put some "real" players on the field behind Mathis and Freeney. I know that's okay with them, but as a Colts fan, watching even bad teams march down the field can be depressing.

by Monkey Business (not verified) :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 2:32pm

This is an endless debate amongst the fandom, which as a Colts fan I'm sure you know. Everyone wants the team to get bigger. We want Vincent Jackson-sized wide receivers. We want Marcus McNeill-sized offensive linemen. We want Ray Lewis-sized linebackers.

Yes, the Colts linebackers get pushed around sometimes. But, for every time a guy gets run over, there's one of them blasting into the backfield for a sack or tackle. For every time a RB drags a guy for three or four yards, there's a sack on a crucial 3rd and 1. And when it gets to the redzone, the Colts are pretty damn good at keeping people out.

by Big Johnson :: Sun, 08/22/2010 - 8:57pm

i agree. it is an endless debate among the fandom but it shouldnt be! When a big guy plays good he gets touted as the redefining player at his position. Ill pick the wr argument. If 6'2 and over, and 220 lbs and up are the really skillful players that everyone thinks they are, then why dont players just exclusively find players at that size to play the position. There are TONS of people around the world that fit this size description. The obvious and right answer is that just because a wr fits that size doesnt mean he is better than someone who doesnt fit that size. Im so sick of the size argument. Wes welker is small, randy moss is tall and skinny. harrison is skinny, chad johnson is skinny, reggie wayne is skinny. Ultimately everyone knows that white people cant jump or run, that black people cant swim, and that size makes no difference in how good you are at football.

by CoachDave :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 4:03pm

And Session's crappy tackling technique (head down, all shoulder, no wrap up) doesn't do him any favors if he does get to the tackle.

How many times did he succeed in hitting the ball carrier by laying his shoulder only to have them spin off of him and take it up field, instead of wrapping up and playing to the pursuit strengths of the Colts' defensive speed? 5? 10?

by Clint (not verified) :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 4:31pm

You mean Session.

by Go Defense (not verified) :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 6:53pm

Are you serious? Clint Session can't find a tackle? Why did he lead the Colts in tackles with 103, ahead of Bracket who had 99?

I also wonder if you even watched a game last year. At the midway point of last season the Colts were the best scoring defense. If I'm not mistaken, they finished the year as the defense that gave up the fewest 20+ yard plays. And this was with a new defensive coordinator and quite a few injuries. I understand their defense will have more injuries because they are undersized, but that is also why our first several picks in this years draft was to add depth to those positions.

I for one am excited about this upcoming season. I think the defense has a lot of potential and can't wait to see what the rookies bring to the table.

I'm sorry not every game is a blowout for you to enjoy.

by Yoshiki (not verified) :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 4:23pm

Yeah... good way to make clear one's ignorance about football... try and claim Clint Session has trouble tackling.

Really the NFL should expand and add another franchise for all these so called Colts fans who try and criticize team management while at the same time pushing for the team to take ridiculous actions like "adding size, just 'cause" and "going for a perfect regular season record."

I am ever grateful that my favorite NFL franchise is run by the Polians and not these idiots.

by CyHawk7 :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 4:40pm

Having watched Angerer in HS (powerhouse Bettendorf) and at U of Iowa - I can attest that he is a warrior and fans will love to see his intensity and motor. Coach Ferentz & DC Parker has proved adapt at turning our high motor, intelligent, and work ethic players to the NFL. Hopefully his colorful quotes start to be noticed as well, very funny guy.

by Crushinator :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 5:10pm

The Colts in general just don't care if you run on them. That's why they don't get bigger, because you can find cheap, small, rangy specialists late who are great against the pass.

I'm not sure what their DVOA splits are, but I imagine when the game is close they're only an average to mediocre D and when they're ahead and they can all play to their strengths, they become a damn good D.

The whole defense really works because of Peyton Manning. If he ever got hurt, they might instantly become a 1-15 team.

by zlionsfan :: Sat, 08/21/2010 - 6:17pm

Actually it's more the other way around, which makes sense when you think about it. They play well only when they "have to" ... when they're up 21, it doesn't matter much if they give up 7 because they know Peyton and company will answer more often than not.

Last year, they were 8th in late and close situations, 14th when losing (either big or small; presumably not too many plays were run in the former situation), only 26th when tied or winning small, and 20th when winning big.

The only one of those that surprises me is the 26th. Then again, I suppose that's still the offense ... in the first half, there's not nearly as much pressure to stop the other team.

I'm fairly certain they would not be a 1-15 team without Peyton. You have to be really, really bad to win fewer than 2 games. Hey, the Lions were one of the worst teams in DVOA history and still won 2 games. But without Peyton for a full season (and a replacement-level QB or worse in place), I'd expect the current Colts to be more like a 4- or 5-win team.

by tomdrees :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 5:30pm

Every time a Colts fan whines, an angel dies.

Try being a Skins fan in the Snyder era. Even if you don't agree with it, you don't know how lucky you are to have somebody in charge who shows any evidence of planning. The Redskins personnel plan is "Oooooh look at that! I want it I want it I want it."

by Bobman :: Fri, 08/20/2010 - 7:41pm

Well, okay, point taken, but remember, please, that some of us lived through a winless 1982 and a 1-15 season nine years later, along with a seemingly endless passel of 2-14s and 3-13s....

Hey, this article subtly brings up a good question: WHAT THE HELL IS POLIAN PAID?

He's worth as much as any GM I'd guess and most HCs as well. I'd assume the market value is at least $5M, but no idea.

by Mr Shush :: Sat, 08/21/2010 - 10:55am

Yeah, the pure GMs (or other non-coach football men) who are even plausibly as valuable as Polian are Parcells, Newsome, AJ Smith, perhaps Ted Thompson and no-one else I can think of. I'd also agree that there are few coaches who are worth as much (Belichick, of course, Reid and Shanahan probably, Payton maybe, and conceivably some of the younger guys on whom the jury is still out - Ryan, Harbaugh, perhaps one or two others). Polian should go to Canton at the first ballot whenever he finally hangs it up. Only Manning has been more important to the Colts' success.

by Karl Cuba :: Sat, 08/21/2010 - 11:45am

Mickey Loomis is pretty good.

by zlionsfan :: Sat, 08/21/2010 - 6:23pm

Five-year rule. No complaining for two more seasons. :)

Besides, I'll see your strike-shortened 0-8-1 season and raise you an 0-16. The Colts did have 6 seasons with 3 or fewer wins including that 1982 thing, but it took 18 seasons for that to happen (1981 to 1998). The Lions just knocked out 5 in 9 years while cleverly avoiding any intervening .500 seasons.

Certainly recent success doesn't exactly remove distant seasons of pain, but you're not likely to get much sympathy by bringing them up to fans of currently-suffering teams. Saints and Patriots fans, now, they may be a little more receptive!

by musicman (not verified) :: Sat, 08/21/2010 - 8:41am

The tendency for Session to try and blow up a guy instead of wrapping up is annoying. However, the same tendency won Bob Sanders DPOY a few years ago. The LB's and perfect for the system. And while, yes they do get beat (all LB's do sometimes) they are also almost impossible to get outside on if they simply play in position. In the Colts system they are responsible for the outside contain. They aren't big fill the middle guys and never will be. It's a swarm D philosophy, not a man to man one. BTW, if you truly think there is no talent behind Freeney and Mathis, you really do not have a good sense of the skills of arguably one of the best secondary's in football. Hayden and Powers would start on almost any other team, Bethea, Bullet, and Sanders are all excellent safetys.

by Bobman :: Sat, 08/21/2010 - 1:31pm

Mark me down as one of those loony old guys at the end of the bar who, in 2040, will still be arguing that Gary Brackett was robbed of at least two pro bowls. At this point I cannot recall the years--2005 and maybe 2007 or 8. No doubt a significant part of his value/productivity is the system, but that's more or less true of 99% of the guys not in Canton, and arguably, 50% of the guys there too.

As for the Colts safeties, there are how many safeties in the league--64 starters and another 10 that serious fans might be able to name with a gun to their heads. I'd only put a handful ahead of the Colts guys. (But as seen in the last SB as well as previous playoff losses--SD games without Freeney vs SD, half of Freeney vs NO, half Mathis vs SD, no Brackett next year vs SD-- the guys up-front really start things up for Indy.)

by tuluse :: Sat, 08/21/2010 - 5:35pm

I'm really hoping Peppers can have a Freeney like effect for the Bears. I think our safeties are pretty close to average. When Tillman is healthy he's good. So if we can bring some pressure with just four, I think the secondary should be OK.

by c_f (not verified) :: Mon, 08/23/2010 - 10:33am

Peppers will help free up Tommie too. And while the starting corners are fine, I wouldn't exactly label the safeties as average: Chris Harris, sure, but then you're starting a third-round rookie (Major Wright), or a backup-caliber DB in Manning or Steltz.

by Karl Cuba :: Sat, 08/21/2010 - 11:52am

I thought that it was Anthony Davis that really had a rough game against the Colts, he seemed very tentative but maybe the communication on the right hand side of the line was part of the problem. Moala was Rachal's guy on the sack but it was Davis that allowed the defender to get underneath him which meant that he couldn't hand his guy off to Rachal and was also in the way when Chilo tried to get across to cut of Moala. Davis looked good when run blocking but he seems to have a way to go in pass protection, he'd better learn fast.

by Doug Farrar :: Sat, 08/21/2010 - 12:29pm

Yeah, you have to assume that Davis is still getting his head around everything. And when Carr's back there, it's tougher on his linemen. I think that Iupati will be the first of the two to stand out.

I thought the Colts used Angerer in some interesting ways, though. Haven't watched the Colts-Bills game yet, but I want to see more of him filling gaps and covering.