by Bill Connelly

If you have been reading Varsity Numbers for a while, you are probably (well, hopefully) familiar with the Adj. POE (Points Over Expected) measure, my attempt to quantify the point value a given ball-carrier brings to the table as compared to an average college back. It is not a perfect measure, but in adjusting for opponent and converting to a point value, I hope it is at least somewhat informative and relatable. We will revisit that measure (and, one day, figure out an easy way to share it from week to week) soon enough.

From the moment I came up with Adj. POE (it's been a while now), I wanted to come up with a way to create an equivalent measure for receivers. It is trickier, of course, since a) you need full targets data (i.e. both catches and the incomplete passes targeting you) and b) pass-catchers need somebody throwing them the ball. It is rather complicated, but it's time to take a step forward in that regard.

What I'm sharing below is very much a rough draft of whatever a receiver measure might end up becoming. Honestly, the end goal is probably an "Adj. POE" figure that equates to points the same as the running backs measure does, but I think I want some feedback first.

Below, you will find a measure that attempts to answer the following questions about a given pass-catcher:

1) How much do you produce?
2) How important are you to your team's passing game?
3) How good is the passing game to which you are important?
4) And how much is the forward pass featured in your team's offense?

All four of these questions are important. To begin attempting to answer them, I simply multiplied the following four measures together:

• Yards Per Target. This is exactly what you think it is: total receiving yards divided by total targets. This attempts to answer question No. 1 above, telling you how much a receiver has produced with his given opportunities.
• Target Rate. This is the percentage of a team's targets targeting a given player. This addresses Question No. 2. It is, in theory, easier to produce a large per-target average if you are a small piece of your team's passing game and an opponent isn't putting its No. 1 cornerback on you (or, really, paying you much mind).
• Passing S&P+. This is the Passing S&P+ rating for a given player's team. Question No. 3 is tricky. The quality of the quarterback throwing you the ball matters, as does the quality of the line protecting the quarterback throwing you the ball. With infinite time and resources, we could come up with a "happy place" measure that splits credit between the line, quarterback, and receiving corps. We do not have that yet. This is a decent place-holder for such a measure.
• Team Pass Rate. The ratio of a team's passes to its overall plays. Let's put it this way: Air Force's No. 1 receiver almost always has an incredible per-target average. This year, Falcons receiver Ty MacArthur has caught 20-of-28 passes for 372 yards; that's a 71 percent catch rate, and 13.3 yards per target. Air Force's No. 2 threat, Drew Coleman, has caught 12-of-17 balls for 305 yards, a 71 percent catch rate, and 17.9 yards per target. Those are fantastic averages, but ... of course they are. Air Force runs so much that opponents are probably playing the run even on third-and-long. Five Arizona receivers have been targeted more than MacArthur. Hell, six Michigan State receivers have been targeted at least 41 times, and the Spartans aren't even an incredibly pass-heavy team. The point, of course, is that if MacArthur and Coleman were facing the normal load of targets for a No. 1 or No. 2 receiver, on a team that actually passes a normal amount (or more), they probably wouldn't be averaging 13.3 and 17.9 yards per target, respectively. The inclusion of Team Pass Rate, then, is simply a safeguard against overrating big numbers from run-heavy schools. (Of course, this probably would have punished Georgia Tech's Demaryius Thomas in 2009 to a certain degree, but his numbers were probably absurd enough to overcome it.)

Below you will see the nation's top-50 receivers according to the product of these four measures, something I am tentatively calling "RYPR," which is simply (Target Rate x Yards Per Target x Passing S&P+ x Pass Rate). We'll worry about a fancy name later.

This is not intended to be the final version of a receiver rating tool, but I must say, the list it produces below is pretty damn good for a rough draft. My first requirement for any ranking of receiver probably would have been "By God, Marqise Lee better be first," and he is. But the entire list is strong. In need of improvement? Always. But it's a good first step.

Anyway, for a rough draft, I like this. But I'm very, very much open to suggestions and feedback. Thoughts?

National Averages

While we're playing with this data, I thought it would be interesting to take a look at some averages. All but three teams have completed passes to at least 10 targets, so below are some general averages for a given team's top-10 targets.

As you pore through the full data in the Google Doc provided above, keep some of this in mind. A typical No. 1 target sees about one-fourth of a team's passes, but the range is quite large, from Vanderbilt's Jordan Matthews (40.0 percent) and USC's Marqise Lee (39.9 percent) to Oregon's De'Anthony Thomas (14.1 percent) and UTSA's Earon Holmes (12.1).

Meanwhile, the average RYPR (can't wait to come up with a better name than that) for a No. 1 is around 107.0, but the range spans from Lee (348.0) and Terrance Williams (291.0) to New Mexico's Lamaar Thomas (13.0) and South Alabama's Bryant Lavender (27.1). Worst No. 1 target for a BCS conference team: Kansas' Kale Pick (45.1).

(In this case, "No. 1 target" literally just means "most-frequently targeted player," and at this point it in no way takes injuries and missed games into account. That is too difficult at this stage in the game. In the lengthy offseason To Do List, though, is a way to track injuries at least relatively well.)

This Week at SB Nation

It's been a fun week at the ol' SBN. It's featured one of my favorite Numericals and one of my favorite previews (Alabama-A&M).

• Monday
  Joker's out, who's next?
  Vote Johnny Football (with Jason Kirk)
• Tuesday
  The Numerical: Can Geno find his mojo?
  Mizzou to the SEC: One year later
• Wednesday
  Can Alabama Fend Off A&M's Kitchen Sink?
  2012 Heisman Horse Race: Hello, Mr. Barner
• Thursday
  Kansas State and Oregon on upset watch?
  F/+ Picks

Posted by: Bill Connelly on 08 Nov 2012

9 comments, Last at 29 Dec 2012, 3:35am by sox12