Football Outsiders
Innovative Statistics, Intelligent Analysis

Introducing SackSEER

Guest Column by Nate Forster

Just as the names Dwight Freeney and DeMarcus Ware strike fear into the hearts of opposing quarterbacks, the names Vernon Gholston, Erik Flowers, and Jamal Reynolds strike fear into the hearts of general managers. All three of those players were hailed for their raw physical talent and ability to sack college quarterbacks. All three have been NFL flops. When general manages swing and miss on high-end pass rushers, failure looks particularly bad on the stat sheet. Flowers only recorded five sacks over the course of his career, Reynolds only recorded three, and so far, Gholston has exactly zero sacks. Yet, in the same years that Flowers and Reynolds were selected by soon-to-be disappointed teams, savvy clubs snatched up players like Aaron Schobel and Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila later in the draft. Is there a way for teams to know before the draft that players such as Schobel, Gbaja-Biamila, Ware, and Freeney will succeed while players such as Gholston, Flowers, and Reynolds will fall flat?

I have poured through college statistics, biographies, and pre-draft workout data to try and shed light on what is one of the great mysteries of the NFL Draft. The result is SackSEER, a regression model that projects the professional sack totals of college edge rushers selected in the NFL Draft. Edge rusher is defined as a player who has spent a significant part of his career lining up as either a defensive end in a 4-3 alignment or an outside linebacker in a 3-4 alignment. The research to produce the method considered all edge rushers drafted in the first two rounds of the NFL Draft between 1999 and 2008.

There are four main factors that correlate to sack success in the NFL: vertical leap, short shuttle time, sacks per game in college (with some playing time adjustments), and how many eligible games worth of NCAA football the player missed for any reason (except early entry into the NFL Draft). SackSEER projects each prospect's total sacks through five years, which is roughly the average length of the rookie contract received by a first- or second-round pick. Although the individual trends are small, when considered together, they project sack production approximately three times more accurately than a player's draft position within the first two rounds. Overall, SackSEER accounts for approximately 40 percent of the historical variation among these players' accumulated five-year sack totals.

Like Playmaker Score, SackSEER is more accurate at identifying busts than it is at singling out potential stars. The best SackSEER projections include some of the most productive edge rushers in the NFL, but they also include some disappointing players such as Jason Babin and Bryan Thomas. By contrast, if many of the players in the worst SackSEER projections seem unfamiliar, nobody could fault you. With the exception of Tony Bryant, none of the players with the worst SackSEER projections have more than five career NFL sacks.

In the tables below, players with less than five years experience are listed with projected five-year totals based on draft position and sacks so far. These estimates are marked with asterisks.

Best SackSEER Projections, 1999-2009
Name College Year Team Pick SackSEER Sacks
(Yrs 1-5)
Aaron Schobel Texas Christian 2001 BUF 46 40.1 46.5
Mario Williams N.C. State 2007 HOU 1 38.6 39.5 (48.5*)
Andre Carter California 2001 SF 7 38.4 32.0
Shawne Merriman Maryland 2005 SD 12 37.9 43.5
Bryan Thomas Alabama-Birmingham 2002 NYJ 22 36.6 15.0
Connor Barwin Cincinnati 2009 HOU 45 36.5 4.5 (25.5*)
DeMarcus Ware Troy State 2005 DAL 11 35.8 64.5
Terrell Suggs Arizona State 2003 BAL 10 35.3 45.0
Courtney Brown Penn State 2000 CLE 1 34.8 17.0
Jason Babin Western Michigan 2004 HOU 27 34.2 15.0
Manny Lawson N.C. State 2006 SF 22 34.2 12.0 (16.0*)
Julius Peppers North Carolina 2002 CAR 2 33.6 53.5
Worst SackSEER Projections, 1999-2009
Name College Year Team Pick SackSEER Sacks
(Yrs 1-5)
Paul Toviessi Marshall 2001 DEN 51 12.5 0.0
Erik Flowers Arizona State 2000 BUF 26 10.9 5.0
David Veikune Utah 2009 CLE 52 10.9 0.0 (12.0*)
Ikaika Alama-Francis Hawaii 2007 DET 58 10.9 1.0 (7.0*)
Erasmus James Wisconsin 2005 MIN 18 10.7 5.0
Anton Palepoi Nevada 2002 SEA 60 10.5 4.0
Robert Ayers Tennessee 2009 DEN 18 9.4 0.0 (12.0*)
Tony Bryant Florida State 1999 OAK 40 8.2 17.5
Dan Cody Oklahoma 2005 BAL 53 7.9 0.0
Jarvis Moss Florida 2007 DEN 17 7.6 3.5 (10.5*)
Jerome McDougle Miami 2003 PHI 15 6.8 3.0
Michael Boireau Miami 2000 MIN 56 2.3 0.0

The trends that SackSEER identifies for edge rushers drafted in the first two rounds persist with later-round edge rushers. For instance, SackSEER would have identified Robert Mathis and Adalius Thomas as top edge rushers. Unsurprisingly, however, SackSEER is not quite as accurate when projecting the edge rusher taken deep in the draft. For now, we are only using the system for players selected in the first two rounds of the NFL Draft. (This will be further discussed in Football Outsiders Almanac 2010.)

Let's look at the four elements in SackSEER and why they help indicate a player's ability to successfully rush the passer in the NFL:

The vertical leap's importance is based on simple physics. If a 270-pound defensive end has the leg strength to jump 40 inches in the air from a standing position, it is very likely that he will be able to employ that same functional strength to burst quickly and powerfully off the line of scrimmage.

The short shuttle run measures change of direction speed, burst, and hip flexibility. DeMarcus Ware had a jaw-dropping 4.07 second short shuttle, and Jevon Kearse ran the short shuttle twice with an average time of 4.12 seconds. No elite edge rusher has emerged from any round of the NFL Draft since at least 1999 with a short shuttle slower than 4.42 seconds.

The third variable in SackSEER is a metric called SRAM, which stands for "Sack Rate as Modified." This measures sacks per game with a few important adjustments. First, sack rates are adjusted to compensate for the fact that college edge rushers as a whole become more productive as they progress through their college careers. A three-year starter who comes out as a junior will be a better prospect than a three-year starter with the same sack rate who is coming out after his senior year. SRAM also attempts to fill in the gaps for players who spent part of their college careers at positions that are less conducive to pass-rushing success, such as defensive tackle (Tamba Hali), 4-3 linebacker (Clay Matthews), or tight end (Ebenezer Ekuban).

The final metric is both the strongest factor and the least intuitive: missed games worth of NCAA eligibility. SackSEER suggests that a college edge rusher who misses numerous games for any reason other than early declaration for the NFL Draft has little chance of succeeding as a professional. This includes players who miss games due to injury, suspensions, academic standards, or sickness. Medical redshirts are included, although standard freshman redshirts are not. Players with health issues in college tend to have health issues in the NFL (Erasmus James, for example). Missing games for other reasons is also indicative of failure at the NFL level. Scroll down to the comment on Jason Pierre-Paul for the remarkable list of failed prospects who spent time at junior college.

The research behind SackSEER will be discussed in more detail in Football Outsiders Almanac 2010, as will the specifics behind the adjustments to sack rate that create SRAM. For now, we wanted to preview this year's draft with a look at how SackSEER evaluates the top edge rusher prospects of 2010. (Please note that the exact projections listed here may differ from those listed in FOA 2010 because of future refinements to the system.)

2010 Draft Prospects

Jerry Hughes, Texas Christian University

Vertical: 34.5", Short Shuttle: 4.15, SRAM: 0.55, Missed Games: 3
Projection: 27.7 Sacks through Year 5

Jerry Hughes separates himself from the rest of the pack by virtue of his elite 4.15-second short shuttle run at the Combine. Not only is Hughes' short shuttle time the best amongst defensive linemen in 2010, but it is also better than any shuttle time run by any edge rusher at the Combine in 2009 or 2008.

The other interesting factor with Hughes is a huge jump in SRAM between his sophomore and junior seasons. Hughes recorded only a 0.09 SRAM for his first two years but recorded a 1.0 SRAM during his dominant junior and senior years. This type of improvement compares favorably to other top edge rushers of past drafts. Patrick Kerney, Elvis Dumervil, and Dwight Freeney had 1.0, 2.0., and 3.5 sacks in their first two years, respectively, but subsequently exploded once they became full-time starters in their junior and senior years. Hughes' career path is similar. He was stuck for two years behind Chase Ortiz and Tommy Blake at TCU.

However, Hughes also bears a certain similarity to another prospect who was not quite as successful as Freeney and company: Jason Babin. Babin, like Hughes, recorded a lot of sacks once becoming a full-time starter at a small school, registered a lightning quick shuttle at the Combine and a mediocre vertical leap. Babin, along with Bryan Thomas, is the type of prospect that SackSEER occasionally misses on: a quick, productive, small-school edge rusher who lacks elite explosion. On the other hand, there are plenty of success stories who share Hughes' particular profile, such as Terrell Suggs, Robert Mathis, and Jared Allen. It all adds up to Hughes being a good, but not great, edge rusher prospect.

Derrick Morgan, Georgia Tech

Vertical: 34", Short Shuttle: 4.43, SRAM: 0.59, Missed Games: 1
Projection: 23.3 Sacks through Year 5

As a prospect, Derrick Morgan is the polar opposite of former teammate Michael Johnson (now with Cincinnati). Morgan was much more productive in college -- building off of a solid sophomore campaign by recording 12.5 sacks in 13 games as a junior -- but lacks Johnson's athleticism, registering mediocre vertical and short shuttle numbers at the Combine. Conventional wisdom says that Morgan is the "safest" edge rusher in the draft, but SackSEER considers Morgan as a middle-of-the-road talent, basically a 50-50 shot.

Everson Griffen, University of Southern California

Vertical: 34", Short Shuttle: 4.36, SRAM: 0.52, Missed Games: 3
Projection: 22.8 Sacks through Year 5

Very few followers of the NFL Draft are particularly excited about Everson Griffen. Unlike Hughes, Griffen has never had a "breakout" season. He has never recorded fewer than 4.5 sacks and never more than eight. Although Griffen's year-to-year sack numbers have been bizarrely consistent at USC, he suffered from consistency problems from game to game, and he was benched more than once for poor play. Giffen's benching only led to him missing three games, so SackSEER is at least lukewarm on his prospects for transitioning to the next level.

Brandon Graham, University of Michigan

Vertical: 31.5", Short Shuttle: 4.25, SRAM: 0.62, Missed Games: 4
Projection: 22.1 Sacks through Year 5

The comparison between Brandon Graham and fellow Michigan alum LaMarr Woodley has been beaten to death by pundits. SackSEER, however, distinguishes Woodley and Graham both by virtue of their prospects for success and by their athleticism. Woodley was an extremely explosive but somewhat "stiff" prospect, recording an excellent 38.5-inch vertical leap and a below-average short shuttle at 4.42 seconds, which added up to a solid 28.2 sack SackSEER projection. Graham, on the other hand, demonstrates good quickness with his 4.25-second short shuttle time, but his 31.5-inch vertical leap raises a major red flag. A more apt comparison for Graham would be Tamba Hali, who shared both Graham’s hustle and lack of jumping ability coming out of college.

Sergio Kindle, University of Texas

Vertical: 36.5", Short Shuttle: 4.53, SRAM: 0.48, Missed Games: 7
Projection: 18.8 Sacks through Year 5

Kindle had a standout performance with two sacks in the National Championship game against Alabama. Very few people have noticed that Kindle had only four sacks in the Longhorns' other 13 games.

Kindle played linebacker for his first two years at Texas, so he gets the full benefit of SRAM's adjustment for playing "out of position." That experience leads many to believe that Kindle is an ideal fit as a 3-4 outside linebacker, but SackSEER is markedly apprehensive due to Kindle's relatively low productivity and missed games. Kindle has suffered multiple minor knee and ankle injuries and, although it is not as fresh in the minds of the football-loving public as Dunlap's DUI, Kindle also served a three-game suspension because of a drunk driving incident.

Kindle's good 36.5-inch vertical leap improves his projection somewhat, but it is more or less canceled out by his poor shuttle run. The most successful edge rushers drafted between 1999 and 2008 after running a 4.5-second shuttle or slower in were Ray Edwards and Tony Bryant. These players had their best seasons as strong-side defensive ends in a 4-3, often lining up opposite slower-footed right tackles. As a classic 'tweener, whose size limits him to rushing the passer and dropping back in coverage, Kindle will probably not be able to fill a similar role.

Carlos Dunlap, University of Florida

Vertical: 31.5", Short Shuttle: 4.61, SRAM: 0.62, Missed Games: 2
Projection: 16.1 Sacks through Year 5

Carlos Dunlap may be a victim of his own hype. At Florida, Dunlap was billed as the next in the line of big men -- such as Mario Williams and Julius Peppers -- with the rare combination of size to be stout against the run and speed to rush the passer. However, many who have reviewed Dunlap's game tape have accused him of "taking plays off" and "not playing as fast as he times."

These critics may be half right, because Combine numbers suggest that Dunlap's total athleticism doesn't match his raw straight-line speed. Compare Dunlap's 31.5-inch vertical leap to those of Mario Williams and Julius Peppers, who leapt 40.5 inches and 36.5 inches, respectively. Dunlap's vertical leap is far more similar to those of the unsuccessful Florida Gators of recent past -- Derrick Harvey and Jarvis Moss. Dunlap also failed to impress with his short shuttle. Ironically, Dunlap's redeeming characteristic is his productivity on the field, where he has received the most criticism.

Jason Pierre-Paul, University of South Florida

Vertical: 30.5", Short Shuttle: 4.67, SRAM: 0.44, Missed Games: 26
Projection: 3.8 Sacks through Year 5

This projection is not a misprint. Although Pierre-Paul is widely regarded as one of the top edge rushers by draftniks, it is hard to conceive of a prospect that SackSEER would like less.

Is it fair to say that Pierre-Paul 26 missed games because he spent his first two years in junior college? Yes, because the few recent edge rusher prospects with junior college experience were among the worst defensive draft picks in recent memory. The illustrious list includes Anton Palepoi, Jerome McDougle, Tony Bryant, Lamar King, Erik Flowers, Michael Boireau and most recently, David Veikune, Cleveland's 2009 second-round pick, who did not record a sack as a rookie and was inactive for much of the season. Unless you count Julian Peterson, a 4-3 linebacker who doesn't fit this study, you have to go back to Leonard Little in 1998 to find a former junior college player who panned out in the NFL, and Little spent only one year at junior college. When Tony Bryant is your upside, you're in trouble.

So why do junior college edge rushers struggle so mightily when transitioning to the NFL? Most edge rusher prospects who play at the junior college level miss two years worth of their NCAA eligibility, and they are understandably "raw" when they enter the professional ranks. Although many coaches believe that such a player can be "coached up," the coaching staff can only devote so much of its valuable coaching resources to a single player. Moreover, many players who go to a junior college have significant or severe academic issues, and expecting them to digest a complicated NFL playbook while also "catching up" on their fundamentals may be unrealistic.

However, even if we removed the missed games adjustment, Pierre-Paul would still have the worst projection in this class. Although Pierre-Paul's "handflips" video has earned him the distinction as the 2010 NFL Draft's consummate physical "freak," he put up poor numbers in all of the workout metrics that matter to SackSEER. This is certainly not the first time that similar "gimmicky" athleticism has not translated into workout numbers. For instance, just last year, San Diego State defensive lineman Jarron Gilbert made waves (pardon the pun) with a widely circulated video depicting Gilbert jumping out of a swimming pool flat footed. Despite his aquatic jumping ability, Gilbert only registered a 35.5-inch vertical leap at the Combine.

The ability of Pierre-Paul to translate his particular brand of athleticism to pass rushing success is speculative at best. Overall, the general manager who pulls the trigger on Pierre-Paul better be very confident that he has something special -- so special that it will completely buck the historical trends.

SackSEER Sleepers

When it comes to sleepers, SackSEER rates two prospects above the rest: South Carolina linebacker Eric Norwood and Washington defensive end Daniel Te'O'Nesheim. Eric Norwood's Combine numbers are similar to those of Clay Matthews a year ago, and he had better college sack production. Te'O'Nesheim has been billed as a productive, high-energy player who lacks the athleticism to compete at a high level, but his 37-inch vertical leap and a 4.18-second short shuttle at the Combine are enough to convince SackSEER.

Nate Forster is an attorney in Boston whose hobbies include drinking Slurpees, wearing hooded sweatshirts, and delivering bone-crushing hits on opposing quarterbacks. Although never invited to the NFL Combine, he did hold a personal pro day where he amazed all in attendance by reading a transcript of a Todd McShay-Mel Kiper debate in the voices of Shaggy and Scooby Doo. Special thanks to my fiancée for putting up with me while I "was doing stats," and to the posters at the forums, especially AlanSP, for their thoughtful comments on an early version of this model.

Editor's Note: If you are interested in publishing a guest column at Football Outsiders, please e-mail your idea or rough draft to Contact Us. Come up with something really good, like SackSEER or the Lewin Career Forecast, and we may even ask to publish it in our book.


116 comments, Last at 04 Nov 2012, 2:21pm

1 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Nice article, I remember reading the thread you put up with as you were developing the system and it is good to see where it ended up.

It doesn't seem to be all that good a class of pass rushers if the best of the bunch can be expected to acrue 5.5 sacks a year.

25 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Any metric expected to correlate to a group as a whole is going to have compressed ranges. IE, if you expect guys to average 5.5, there's usually going to be some who overperform, and some who underperform.

This gives you an idea who has the best chance of turning into a stud, and who has very little chance.

In reality, any of the 20+ projected guys could probably end up as studs. The rest of them, probably not.

57 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Seriously, compared to last year when there were a few guys a good bit over 30.

edit -- woops, just saw post #48 below. So I should say, yes, seriously, considering that no one is this year's class comes within 5 of making the top ten.

15 Re: Introducing SackSEER

The table was linked in the thread that was linked below.

His projection was 37.2 so even if that is his eventual total he would still be good for six sacks a year after his very good rookie season.

48 Re: Introducing SackSEER


I am the SackSEER dude.

Since there is some linking going on to the earlier model, I just wanted to clarify about what the updates have to say about 2009. If Orakpo was in this draft, his projection would fall just about between Hughes and Morgan. Also, the adjustments that I have made downgrade Maybin considerably, because they better account for regression to the mean following his breakout sophomore season.

Last year's draft had a lot of quirky prospects with high-ish projections. You had two redshirt sophomores (which had never happened in the data set before), a senior defensive end that played tight end for three years, and a senior "elephant" backer who had played a more traditional 4-3 linebacker role in his first three seasons. I feel better projecting this class because we have all straight-up juniors and seniors, and lots of players with projections on the low side.

3 Re: Introducing SackSEER

I went to UW and have seen a whole lot of Daniel Te'O'Nesheim. He unfortunately has played at UW while the team was really really bad. He is even better than his sack stats suggest because he was doubleteamed basically every single play of his career and certainly every play for the past 2 or 3 years. In his time with us, he was the only pass rush threat on the team and certainly the only player on the D-line with any chance of making a play in either run or pass situations. And because the team lost so much, the other team was rarely in "must pass" situations and he couldn't pin his ears back and sell out to the pass rush. He is a pretty complete guy, capable of making plays in both the run and the pass game. I think he might be a little small for a 4-3 end, and I don't think he can cover well enough to be a 3-4 endbacker, but some team will get an excellent tweener in the 3rd or 4th round.

31 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Colts MUST pick Te'O'Nesheim in the 3rd. I was SUPER high on Triplett when he came out a decade ago as well and was thrilled he fell in the 2nd round to Indy. His career was mediocre, not entirely hi fault.

As an end, I think he's taller and heavier than Freeney, for example, but not as fast. A great article I read in some Pac-10 mag last fall quoted his HS coaches describing him as "the smallest Samoan I'd ever seen." That was as a 5-8 135 lb +/- freshman in HS.

36 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Te'O'Nesheim is one of my favorite prospects in this draft. I have no idea why anyone would take Pierre Paul over him, yet Pierre Paul is typically lumpped in as a first rounder by all the draft sites and Te'O'Nesheim generally started as a 5th or 6th rounder on most of their boards but has been moving up. Somehow Pierre Paul with his 59 KEI and 13 backflips is labeled the elite athlete while Te'O'Nesheim who broke the 70 KEI threshold got labeled as the try hard but limited athlete type. No one has been able to explain that to me.

44 Re: Te'O'Nesheim

In reply to by Anonymous Coward (not verified)

You ask why Pierre Paul gets labeled the elite athlete while Te'O-Nesheim is called the high-motor but limited athlete? Simple: Pierre Paul is black, Te'O-Nesheim isn't. I have long noticed how a non-black player can run a 4.4 with a 40" vertical, super shuttle and cone drill, etc., etc., and will always be described as "very intelligent" and "great motor" which makes up for "limited athleticism." Most people, even supposed experts, can't seem to see beyond race and just describe what the tale of the tape actually says.

89 Re: Te'O'Nesheim

In reply to by Eric D (not verified)

That's true. Toby Gerhart got screwed over also, do to racism. He should have won the Heisman, and he is getting dissed in the draft as well, for that one reason.

4 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Nice research. Having seen some different ideas with mock drafts, I hope my Saints at 32 can select Hughes from TCU. One of the Saints' beat writers actually selected him in his mock (published Sunday, iirc).
I'd be interested in the numbers for the other USF guy, George Selvie.

70 Re: Introducing SackSEER

I frankly never got what anybody liked about Ayers in the first place. His college numbers were awful, his athletic "measurables" were lousy, his size/strength was nothing to get excited about either, and he had character concerns to complete the package. He apparently had a nice senior bowl, and he played the run pretty well as a senior, but I have no idea what made teams look at him and think "mid-first round pick"

84 Re: Introducing SackSEER

He *was* expected to be drafted in the teens, though. At least in the first round. Enough people outside of Denver must have liked him enough for that consensus to develop.

80 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Well, in McDaniels' defense, he only had 50 names on his draft board, so it's not like there were a lot of players for him to choose from at that spot.

Seeing all those Broncos busts on this list really brings me back. I never thought Paul Toviessi would get hurt and never play a down, but I was definitely bearish on both Moss and Ayers when they were drafted for much the same reasons why SackSEER was bearish on them.

7 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Interesting. It's hard to evaluate this without more of the rationale behind the scenes. Why did you decide those numbers work, and some others don't?

I'll be looking forward to filling in the gaps when PFA comes out.

41 Re: Introducing SackSEER

No, no. You put the web address in the "URL" spot. The "Text for link body" is where you put a description. For instance:

<a href="">The Worldwide Leader</a>

Will end up looking like this:

The Worldwide Leader

Where clicking on "The Worldwide Leader" takes you to the ESPN website.

51 Re: Introducing SackSEER

The trick is to embed other tags within the tags. So for instance, to make this show up:

<a href="">The worldwide leader</a>

I've put an <em> and </em> between the "<" and the "a" and then again between the "<" and "/a". (Though any of the tags will do.) It looks like this:

<<em></em>a href="">The worldwide leader<<em></em>/a>

To actually get that to show up took even more embedded tags. But trial and error will eventually show you how it works.

52 Re: Introducing SackSEER

There is a different way to make 'tags' visible rather than having them get used. Use the ampersand key followed by the letters lt and a semicolon to make the < sign (full code &lt;), and the same but with gt to make the > sign (&gt;). Use those two four symbol codes in place of the < and > and it will get displayed rather than interpreted:

<A HREF="">This is a fake label for my fake url</a>

The above was made by using:
&lt;A HREF=""&gt;This is a fake label for my fake url&lt;/a&gt;

8 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Very interesting. SackSEER lines up pretty well with my opinions of this class. I like what little I've seen of Hughes, Morgan seems like a safe pick, especially considering his ability in run support, JPP has bust written all over him, etc.

Edge rusher seems to be one of the hardest positions to scout correctly. Because it is one of the top 3 in positional value, it will be interesting to see how this metric hold up.

9 Re: Introducing SackSEER

whoa, this is cool. I wonder how many late nights and algorithm crunching SackSEER took to produce. Great stuff.

10 Re: Introducing SackSEER

So you now have Speed Score, Playmaker, the Lewin Career Forecast and now SackSEER, as well as your kicker thing, whose name I forget. How long until you have every position and are then able to statistically project the draft?

I really like the missed games metric, a lovely little abstraction that allows you to analyse the cumulative impact of several different factors that are often difficult to quantify. I would have thought that it could immediately be applied to other positions to achieve the same effect.

(some height/weight figures might be helpful to put players in context)

Top stuff.

11 Re: Introducing SackSEER

I'd be interested to find out what Ndamukong Suh's expected sack rate would be... he's an outlier for your statistics - but people have claimed he could play anywhere on the line so it'd be an interesting exercise.

His stats:
Vertical: 35.5", Short Shuttle: 4.44, SRAM: ? (24 sacks in 54 games with 38 starts all at DT), Missed Games: 11 (medical red shirt)
Projection: ? Sacks through Year 5

18 Re: Introducing SackSEER

It would be interesting to see if this projection worked as
well for DTs and DEs (was it tried on DTs?).

Captcha : barnyard time (scared)

12 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Now if you guys could create studies for QBs and LTs, all someone would need to do to build a great pro franchise is subscribe to FO.

17 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Looks like someone in Houston may have figured out something along these lines, while someone in Denver most decidedly has not.

22 Re: Introducing SackSEER

I thought the same thing that you did when I was crunching the numbers.

Also, having the benefit of having the full data in front of me, I would also say that perhaps Al Davis has figured out something that SackSEER hasn't, because he has gotten moderate production out of a few players that SackSEER absolutely hated, which is why I have to say "except for Tony Bryant" after every other sentence. Also, how Matt Shaughnessy managed to fall on top of the quarterback four times last year is beyond me.

24 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Note that those three Texans were drafted by three different head coach/general manager combinations: Capers/Casserly for Babin, Kubiak/Casserly for Williams and Kubiak/Smith for Barwin. Casserly had final say in the Capers era, but lost it to Kubiak when Kubiak was hired (and by most accounts other than his own had no real say in the 2006 draft, immediately after which he was axed and replaced with Smith). I have no idea how many of the more junior front office staff survived the regime change, or if such a notion might have originated with one of them. To be fair, the Texans have largely drafted very well in general since Kubiak was hired, so it may simply be a case of good overall talent evaluation (coupled with an initial roster containing precisely no viable 4-3 DEs and hence a propensity to draft them high) leading to similar results to a statistical system, without such a system actually being used.

21 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Just curious how/why you used Conner Barwin as an example in your chart when he had 4.5 sacks on 369 offensive snaps while Cameron Wake had 5.5 sacks on less than half the offensive snaps(167 offensive snaps)

I would think Wake would project much higher with the numbers

23 Re: Introducing SackSEER

The lists above are the players who had the highest projections based on their college careers and combine performances, not their NFL performance. Also, only players drafted in the first two rounds were considered, as the system becomes less accurate for later drafted players. Barwin was a second round pick; Wake was undrafted. Finally, Wake left school in 2005, meaning those 5.5 sacks represent the totality of his NFL value through five years of being eligible to play pro football. He was a CFL stud, meaning his first live NFL action came at a point where he was 27 years old and had two years of prior pro pass rushing experience. Barwin saw his first NFL action at not quite 23, having rushed the passer for only one season in college (he was previously a tight end). Wake was a better player than Barwin in 2009, but I think it's very likely Barwin will have the more productive career when all's said and done.

87 Re: Introducing SackSEER

Not sure how many games he missed or how his sack numbers would translate, I know he moved around at Penn.

But Wake's other two numbers:

Shuttle: 4.13
Vertical: 45.5 (!)

He was the best pass rusher in the NFL last year, snap for snap. He had 7 sacks and 20 QB pressures in 167 snaps.

I wouldn't bet against him this year now that Porter is finally gone.

26 Re: Introducing SackSEER

"Also, only players drafted in the first two rounds were considered, as the system becomes less accurate for later drafted players. "

Is anyone else kind of convinced that all of the metrics having this same caveat is an indication that there's some institutional inertia happening on teams? IE, lower picks not getting playing time despite being better players than the guys above them?

27 Re: Introducing SackSEER

In reply to by Rich Conley (not verified)

thats definately a possibility and is probably fairly common. Reminds me of one of my least favorite sports cliches and mostly used for quarterbacks.

We must start quarterback A over quarterback B because we have invested X amount of dollars in quarterback A.

56 Re: Introducing SackSEER

That may be part of it, but I think it's mostly just about controlling for high production from non-NFL calibre players due to system, quality of competition or some combination of the two. That's probably more true of LCF than SackSEER, since SackSEER involves a substantial combine component which is not dependent on college performance.

68 Re: Introducing SackSEER

No, I think they don't play because they're not very good.

Especially at a position like defensive linemen where you can rotate so many players in.

28 Re: Introducing SackSEER

I was just reading scouting reports on Jerry Hughes over the weekend, and thought he sounded like Trent Cole. So I was already hoping the Eagles would draft him at #24 before I read this report. Now I'm even more convinced.

Incidentally, Cole's numbers:

Vertical: 38
Shuttle: 4.22
Sacks: 19 (played a lot of linebacker)

Can't find games played or missed.