Week 13 Quick Reads

by Vincent Verhei

It got lost in all the crazy offensive numbers of 2018, but Dak Prescott set an NFL record in Dallas' 13-10 win over New Orleans on Thursday night. Playing behind a threadbare offensive line that was missing several projected starters from the preseason, Prescott was thrown to the turf seven times by the Saints' ferocious pass rush. Amidst all that abuse, though, he was able to throw 28 passes, completing 24 of them. That's a completion rate of 85.7 percent, and that's the highest ever for a player who was sacked seven times in a game.

In fact, the seven-sack completion percentage leaderboard is littered with players from this season. Derek Carr also makes the top 20 for his 16-of-22, 72.7-percent, seven-sack game on Thursday night against San Francisco in Week 9. Players from 2018 make up four of the top 60 games, and six of the top 100.

No matter how you want to define a "high-sack game," players this season are re-writing the record books for completing lots of passes while eating lots of turf:

Six sacks or more: Players from 2018 rank first and third and make up six of the top 20, and nine of the top 100.
Five sacks or more: Players from 2018 rank first, third, and 15th, making up seven of the top 75.
Four sacks or more: Players from 2018 make up five of the top 10 and nine of the top 100. Philip Rivers and Marcus Mariota rank first and second for what they did in about a 30-hour stretch last week.

On the surface, none of this should be surprising, because NFL quarterbacks are completing more passes than ever before. Basically, if you're not completing at least two-thirds of your passes this year, you're not a good quarterback. Going into Monday Night Football, 65.2 percent of all pass attempts have been completed this season. That would be a big jump for the all-time record, breaking the 63.0 percent mark set in 2013, but these numbers have been trending up fairly steadily ever since the 1930s.

What's new this year is the frequency of sacks. There have been 968 sacks this season, along with 13,334 pass attempts. That means quarterbacks have been sacked on 6.77 percent of all dropbacks, a step up from the 6.40 percent mark in 2017. In fact, that would be the highest rate since 2004. And that's very unusual, because as completion rates have gone up over time, sack rates have typically gone down. The following chart plots the average completion rates and sack rates for every season in the NFL since 1982, the first year that sacks became an official statistic. We've highlighted the marker for 2018, but we really didn't need to -- it's such an extreme outlier, it stands out on its own.

Here's another way to look at how strange this season has been: there are 13 quarterbacks this season who have completed at least 65 percent of their passes while being sacked on at least 6.7 percent of their dropbacks. Only 11 quarterbacks have done that over the course of a full season prior to 2018.

QBs with 65% Completion Rates and 6.7% Sack Rates
Name	Year	Team	Cmp	Att	Cmp%	Sacks	Sack Rate
Aaron Rodgers	2011	GB	343	502	68.3%	36	6.7%
Aaron Rodgers	2012	GB	371	552	67.2%	51	8.5%
Alex Smith	2014	KC	303	464	65.3%	45	8.8%
Alex Smith	2015	KC	307	470	65.3%	45	8.7%
Ben Roethlisberger	2009	PIT	337	506	66.6%	50	9.0%
Carson Wentz	2018	PHI	230	330	69.7%	29	8.1%
Dak Prescott	2018	DAL	243	364	66.8%	45	11.0%
Daunte Culpepper	2004	MIN	379	548	69.2%	46	7.7%
Derek Carr	2018	OAK	292	423	69.0%	38	8.2%
Deshaun Watson	2018	HOU	242	364	66.5%	41	10.1%
Eli Manning	2018	NYG	296	436	67.9%	41	8.6%
Jameis Winston	2018	TB	157	232	67.7%	18	7.2%
Marc Bulger	2004	STL	321	485	66.2%	41	7.8%
Marcus Mariota	2018	TEN	188	274	68.6%	38	12.2%
Matt Ryan	2018	ATL	326	460	70.9%	36	7.3%
Matthew Stafford	2015	DET	398	592	67.2%	44	6.9%
Matthew Stafford	2018	DET	292	439	66.5%	36	7.6%
Philip Rivers	2010	SD	357	541	66.0%	38	6.6%
Russell Wilson	2015	SEA	329	483	68.1%	45	8.5%
Russell Wilson	2018	SEA	217	326	66.6%	37	10.2%
Ryan Tannehill	2014	MIA	392	590	66.4%	46	7.2%
Ryan Tannehill	2018	MIA	118	178	66.3%	15	7.8%
Minimum 200 dropbacks

Why is this happening? That's a longer and more complicated question than we have time to answer here, but we do have a few theories:

While plays like run/pass options, bubble screens, and SHOVeLLs are boosting completion rates by making throws as easy as possible, the practice time devoted to those plays may be better spent on keeping quarterbacks upright in longer-yardage scenarios. It's also fair to ask whether defenses have caught up with RPOs after they played such a big role in Philadelphia's Super Bowl win last season. Mind you, we have no evidence this is happening -- it's a shot in the dark, a total guess -- but it might explain the pass protection issues a lot of teams seem to be having.
As rules about illegal contact and hits on receivers make it more difficult than ever to play pass coverage, defenses might be willing to leave more receivers open for an increased chance of putting the quarterback on the ground before he can even throw the ball in the first place.
As the value of each possession goes up, it's possible that quarterbacks are more willing to take sacks rather than risk a possible turnover on a pass under pressure. Better to eat the ball and try to convert a third-and-long than to put it in the air anywhere near a defender.

Quarterbacks
Rk	Player	Team	CP/AT	Yds	TD	INT	Sacks	Total DYAR	Pass DYAR	Rush DYAR	Opp
1.	Patrick Mahomes	KC	23/38	295	4	0	0	150	141	9	OAK
Mahomes loses 50 DYAR due to opponent adjustments, most of any quarterback this week, and still finishes on top of the pile. Throwing to his tight ends against Oakland, he went 15-of-19 for 207 yards and 10 first downs, including three touchdowns.
2.	Tom Brady	NE	24/32	311	1	1	0	149	145	3	MIN
Brady was helped a lot by receivers making plays with the ball in their hands. On throws to receivers within 2 yards of the line of scrimmage, he went 12-of-15 for 162 yards and eight first downs.
3.	Philip Rivers	LAC	26/36	299	2	0	2	143	143	0	PIT
The Chargers offense only had three drives in the second half: two touchdowns and a winning field goal. On those three drives, Rivers went 13-of-16 for 152 yards with 10 first downs, including a score.
4.	Derek Carr	OAK	29/38	285	3	0	3	124	121	3	KC
The Chiefs took a 26-10 lead with 5:48 left in the third quarter. From that point to the end of the game, Carr went 13-of-18 for 156 yards with 10 first downs, including three touchdowns, with one DPI for 17 more yards and one sack.
5.	Carson Wentz	PHI	27/39	306	2	1	0	99	99	0	WAS
6.	Jameis Winston	TB	20/30	249	2	0	4	96	81	15	CAR
Winston had a good day on deep balls against Carolina, going 4-of-6 for 72 yards, plus DPIs of 12 and 52 yards on two other throws.
7.	Russell Wilson	SEA	11/17	185	4	0	3	95	94	1	SF
Wilson only threw one pass to his right: a completion at the line of scrimmage to Chris Carson, who then gained 27 yards on first-and-20. In related news, Richard Sherman usually stays to that side of the field for San Francisco.
8.	Baker Mayfield	CLE	29/41	397	1	3	0	89	89	0	HOU
Take away the second quarter and Mayfield was the best quarterback of the week, but in the second quarter, he was the worst quarterback of the week. In those fateful 15 minutes, he went 3-of-10 for 24 yards with just one first down; a 47-yard DPI; and three interceptions, including a pick-six.
9.	Ben Roethlisberger	PIT	29/45	281	2	1	1	83	83	0	LAC
Roethlisberger had a bad night throwing to his right: 5-of-9 for 32 yards with one first down and one interception.
10.	Deshaun Watson	HOU	22/31	224	1	0	4	80	71	9	CLE
Throwing to his tight ends, Watson went 5-of-5 for 57 yards and four first downs, including a touchdown.
11.	Ryan Tannehill	MIA	16/24	137	3	1	3	73	81	-7	BUF
In the red zone, Tannehill went 5-of-6 for 50 yards, with three touchdowns and another first down.
12.	Nick Mullens	SF	30/46	414	2	1	3	58	64	-5	SEA
Conversely, Mullens went 5-of-9 for 40 yards with one touchdown, one other first down, one sack, and one pick-six in the red zone.
Rk	Player	Team	CP/AT	Yds	TD	INT	Sacks	Total DYAR	Pass DYAR	Rush DYAR	Opp
13.	Aaron Rodgers	GB	31/50	233	1	0	1	40	34	6	ARI
With 7 yards or less to go, Rodgers went 10-of-15 for 95 yards and 10 first downs, including a touchdown. But with 8 yards or more to go, he went 21-of-35 for only 138 yards, plus a 9-yard DPI, for six total first downs.
14.	Case Keenum	DEN	12/21	151	1	0	2	16	10	5	CIN
Throws to receivers within 8 yards of the line of scrimmage: 6-of-12, 22 yards, one first down. Throws to receivers 9 or more yards downfield: 6-of-7, 129 yards, five first downs, including a touchdown. (He also had two passes where he was hit as he released that were listed with no receiver.)
15.	Josh Allen	BUF	18/33	231	2	2	2	16	-37	53	MIA
League-wide this season, only 19 percent of all passes have qualified as deep balls (intended for receivers more than 15 yards downfield). Allen is an outlier -- 33 percent of his passes have been deep balls. And against Miami this week, his rate was right at 50 percent. He threw 17 deep balls against the Dolphins, going 5-of-16 for 116 yards, plus a 14-yard DPI, with one touchdown and two interceptions (including a Hail Mary at the end of the first half).
16.	Eli Manning	NYG	19/35	170	1	1	3	12	12	0	CHI
Manning gains 69 DYAR due to opponent adjustments, most of any quarterback this week. His best results came on midrange throws to receivers 6 to 15 yards downfield: 10-of-13 for 124 yards, with all 10 completions going for first downs, with an 8-yard DPI and one interception.
17.	Dak Prescott	DAL	24/28	248	1	0	7	6	-9	15	NO
Third downs: 6-of-6 for 60 yards and four conversions, but also four sacks and two fumbles.
18.	Matthew Stafford	DET	20/33	245	1	1	4	5	10	-5	LAR
On first downs, Stafford went 9-of-13 for 176 yards with nine first downs, plus a 12-yard DPI, two sacks, and one fumble. He only had six first downs on 23 second- and third-down plays.
19.	Matt Ryan	ATL	16/26	131	1	0	3	-18	-23	6	BAL
Midway through the fourth quarter, Ryan was sacked and fumbled, and the Ravens recovered the ball and returned it for a touchdown and a 26-10 lead. Up to that point, he had played a nightmare game, one of the worst of the week, going 12-of-21 for 94 yards with only two first downs and three sacks. At that point, with the game effectively over, he caught fire, going 4-of-5 for 37 yards with all four completions going for first downs (including his one touchdown), plus a 23-yard DPI.
20.	Marcus Mariota	TEN	20/35	282	2	1	3	-18	-11	-7	NYJ
Mariota's last pass of the game was a game-winning touchdown to Corey Davis. That was his only third-down conversion of the game. Up to that point, he had gone 2-of-9 for 3 yards (not a typo) with a sack and a pick-six.
21.	Josh Rosen	ARI	11/26	149	0	0	2	-30	-27	-3	GB
Inside the Green Bay 40, Rosen went 0-for-4 with a sack. No, really.
22.	Jeff Driskel	CIN	26/38	236	1	1	4	-38	-27	-12	DEN
Driskel was very good throwing up the middle: 9-of-13, 150 yards, seven first downs, one touchdown. But he was very bad throwing to his left: 7-of-11 for only 26 yards with one first down and one interception.
Rk	Player	Team	CP/AT	Yds	TD	INT	Sacks	Total DYAR	Pass DYAR	Rush DYAR	Opp
23.	Andrew Luck	IND	33/52	248	0	1	3	-42	-48	6	JAX
Inside the Jacksonville 40, Luck went 9-of-17 for just 46 yards and two first downs with a sack. Remember, Indianapolis lost this game 6-0.
24.	Jared Goff	LAR	17/33	207	1	1	2	-49	-49	0	DET
Deep balls: 2-of-9 for 45 yards with one interception.
25.	Cody Kessler	JAX	18/24	150	0	0	3	-55	-49	-6	IND
Kessler's best and worst plays came on third downs. He completed 6-of-7 passes for 73 yards and four first downs, and also had a 15-yard DPI for another first down. But he was also sacked three times, fumbling once.
26.	Lamar Jackson	BAL	12/21	125	0	0	2	-69	-29	-40	ATL
Jackson is now up to 76 non-kneeldown carries this season, just three behind Cam Newton for the most among quarterbacks. The results, however, have been bad -- he's worst among quarterbacks with -62 rushing DYAR. He ran for five first downs against Atlanta, with four gains of 10 yards or more, but also fumbled twice and had a zero-yard gain on third-and-3.
27.	Josh McCown	NYJ	17/30	128	0	1	2	-70	-69	-1	TEN
McCown had nine plays at the Tennessee 28-yard line or deeper. One went forwards: a 2-yard gain on first-and-10 from the 18. Five, all incomplete, went nowhere. Three -- a completion for a 4-yard loss on first-and-20 and a pair of sacks -- went backwards.
28.	Kirk Cousins	MIN	32/44	201	1	2	2	-82	-82	0	NE
Cousins loses more than 60 DYAR for his last three passes, including two interceptions. It's not like he was lighting the world on fire up to that point though -- only two of his completions gained more than 10 yards, and they both came in the second quarter. In the second half, he went 17-of-25 for 92 yards with four first downs, two interceptions, and a sack. He finished with 16 failed completions, five more than any other quarterback this week.
29.	Mark Sanchez	WAS	13/21	100	0	1	2	-104	-107	3	PHI
30.	Drew Brees	NO	18/28	127	1	1	2	-105	-109	4	DAL
If Brees didn't get the job done on first down, he usually didn't get it done on second or third down either: 12-of-18 for 78 yards with only three conversions (including a 30-yard touchdown), one sack-fumble, and one interception.
31.	Cam Newton	CAR	28/41	300	2	4	4	-147	-154	7	TB
The Buccaneers defense only had three interceptions in their first 11 games. Newton threw four interceptions in one stretch of about 47 minutes on Sunday. Two of them came with the Panthers down seven in the fourth quarter -- one on first-and-10, one on second-and-5.
32.	Chase Daniel	CHI	26/39	285	1	2	5	-179	-179	0	NYG
Daniels had four fumbles against the Giants, three of them on aborted snaps, and three on Chicago's one drive in overtime. In the red zone, he went 3-of-8 for 7 yards with one touchdown, plus a DPI for 8 yards. With more than 10 yards to go for a first down, he went 4-of-9 for 11 yards with no conversions, two sacks, and one pick-six.

Five Best Running Backs by DYAR (Total)
Rk	Player	Team	Runs	Rush Yds	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	Total DYAR	Rush DYAR	Rec DYAR	Opp
1.	Ezekiel Elliott	DAL	23	76	0	6/6	60	1	49	20	29	NO
Five first downs on the ground, the longest a 21-yarder, while getting stuffed four times. Three of his six catches gained 10 yards or more, with two first downs.
2.	Chase Edmonds	ARI	5	53	2	2/2	13	0	48	39	9	GB
A fourth-round rookie out of Fordham, Edmonds had five carries against Green Bay, and four gained at least 6 yards and a first down, with two touchdowns and a 29-yard gain. His two catches also both went for first downs.
3.	Justin Jackson	LAC	8	63	1	1/1	19	0	47	37	10	PIT
A seventh-round rookie out of Northwestern, Jackson ran for four first downs against Pittsburgh, with four gains of 9 yards or more. His one catch was a 19-yard gain on first-and-10.
4.	Tarik Cohen	CHI	8	30	0	12/14	156	0	45	-8	52	NYG
Cohen only ran for one first down against the Giants, and was stuffed twice. But his catches produced four first downs, including gains of 14, 23, 32, and 46 yards.
5.	Nick Chubb	CLE	9	31	1	3/3	41	0	42	23	19	HOU
Thirteen of Chubb's DYAR come from opponent adjustments. He ran for three first downs against Houston, with a long gain of 11 yards, while getting stuffed three times. His best catch was a 24-yard gain on first-and-13.

Five Best Running Backs by DYAR (Rushing)
Rk	Player	Team	Runs	Rush Yds	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	Total DYAR	Rush DYAR	Rec DYAR	Opp
1.	Phillip Lindsay	DEN	19	157	2	1/1	2	0	38	43	-5	CIN
Lindsay ran for seven first downs against Cincinnati, with five runs of 10 yards or more, including a 65-yarder.
2.	Chase Edmonds	ARI	5	53	2	2/2	13	0	48	39	9	GB
3.	Justin Jackson	LAC	8	63	1	1/1	19	0	47	37	10	PIT
4.	Rashaad Penny	SEA	7	65	1	0/0	0	0	37	37	0	SF
Penny was stuffed once, but each of his other carries gained at least 3 yards. His three first downs came on runs of 15, 19, and 20 yards.
5.	Todd Gurley	LAR	23	132	2	3/5	33	0	41	33	8	DET
Gurley ran for eight downs against Detroit, with four runs of 10 yards or more, the longest a 36-yarder. He was stuffed four times.

Worst Running Back by DYAR (Total)
Rk	Player	Team	Runs	Rush Yds	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	Total DYAR	Rush DYAR	Rec DYAR	Opp
1.	Chris Thompson	WAS	3	3	0	4/6	18	0	-47	-27	-19	PHI
Thompson's three runs: 7-yard gain on second-and-22; no gain on first-and-10; 4-yard loss and a fumble on first-and-10. His receiving highlights included a 9-yard gain on third-and-15, an 8-yard gain on third-and-14, and a 2-yard gain on second-and-15.

Worst Running Back by DYAR (Rushing)
Rk	Player	Team	Runs	Rush Yds	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	Total DYAR	Rush DYAR	Rec DYAR	Opp
1.	Chris Ivory	BUF	6	4	0	0/0	0	0	-35	-35	0	MIA
None of Ivory's runs gained more than 4 yards, none resulted in a first down, none counted as a successful play. Three were stuffed, including a 4-yard loss and a fumble on second-and-13.

Five Best Wide Receivers and Tight Ends by DYAR
Rk	Player	Team	Rec	Att	Yds	Avg	TD	Total DYAR	Opp
1.	Antonio Brown	PIT	10	13	154	15.4	1	61	LAC
Eight of Brown's catches went for first downs, including a 28-yard touchdown and a gain of 46.
2.	Tyler Lockett	SEA	1	2	52	52.0	1	54	SF
Lockett's totals include 44 DYAR receiving, 10 DYAR rushing for his one carry for 10 yards. They also gives him credit for a third target that is not listed here: a 43-yard DPI. This is offense only, though, not special teams, so it does not include his 84-yard kickoff return to open the second half.
3.	Keenan Allen	LAC	14	19	148	10.6	1	54	PIT
Ten of Allen's receptions produced first downs, including three third-down conversions.
4.	Jaron Brown	SEA	3	3	67	22.3	2	53	SF
Brown's three targets against San Francisco: 45-yard gain on second-and-6; 4-yard touchdown on third-and-goal; 18-yard touchdown on second-and-17. As pointed out by Bob Condotta of the Seattle Times, Brown now has 11 catches this season, and five have resulted in touchdowns -- that's more touchdowns than players such as Julio Jones, JuJu Smith-Schuster, Amari Cooper, or Brandin Cooks have this season.
5.	Chris Godwin	TB	5	6	101	20.2	1	47	CAR
Four of Godwin's catches resulted in first downs, including a 48-yard gain and three third-down conversions. The other was a 12-yard gain on second-and-17.

Worst Wide Receiver or Tight End by DYAR
Rk	Player	Team	Rec	Att	Yds	Avg	TD	Total DYAR	Opp
1.	Taylor Gabriel	CHI	3	7	17	5.7	0	-51	NYG
Gabriel's three catches: 6-yard gain on first-and-10; 7 yards and a lost fumble on first-and-10 from the Bears' 2-yard line; 4-yard gain on second-and-5.

4 Dec 2018, 03:27am by Vincent Verhei

Comments

69 comments, Last at 07 Dec 2018, 1:31pm

1 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Mountain Time ---- formerly Ninjalectual // Dec 04, 2018 - 4:32am

Do the Broncos have both 2018 Rookies of the Year in Philip Lindsay and Bradley Chubb?

It's a really strong rookie class this year though, with at least a dozen guys around the league who could really claim they deserve it.

28 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by theslothook // Dec 04, 2018 - 1:02pm

I think Leyton Vander Esh is probably the front runner for DROY. I personally am a fan of Darius Leonard. Were he surrounded by more talent, he'd look even better.

As for offense, Lindsay has a case, but so does Calvin Ridley. Poor Mike McGlinchey deserves some love but likely won't get any. Nelson has been damn good too.

37 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Raiderfan // Dec 04, 2018 - 2:13pm

I think the DROY is James from LAC. And I doubt anyone will beat out Barkley for OROY.

41 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by theslothook // Dec 04, 2018 - 3:19pm

Totally forgot about Derwin James. Yeah hes been a beast.

48 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Mountain Time ---- formerly Ninjalectual // Dec 04, 2018 - 5:48pm

Yep, all those guys are deserving. I was unaware of the Colts LB though; if offensive linemen were actually eligible for these awards they would also have a chance of pulling a Saints this year!

I think Chubb, who is 4.5 sacks away from Jevon Kearse's rookie sack record (14.5), should be the frontrunner. Not that I would complain (much) if James wins, but I think Chubb is having a better season however you measure it.

For OROY, Lindsay has been the better runner than Saquon (identical traditional stats, but on 50 fewer carries), but Barkley's been a much better receiver than Lindsay, by 500 yards and 3 TDs. That's pretty close, if you ask me.

51 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by BJR // Dec 04, 2018 - 6:08pm

If he can sustain his current pace and end with ~500 DYAR and positive DVOA, I'd give it to Baker Mayfield without much thought. That's miles more valuable than any running back. And this year's other rookie QBs illustrate just how difficult life can be for young QBs thrown onto bad teams.

59 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by theslothook // Dec 04, 2018 - 10:48pm

I've been seriously impressed with Baker. He's inherited the worst situation and hasbeen by far the best rookie.

This totally changes the outlook for the Browns. And yet, the Browns aura of suckitude gives me heavy pause before making any such proclamations.

61 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by BJR // Dec 05, 2018 - 10:24am

I don't know about the worst situation - the Bills and Jets offenses are almost totally devoid of talent around their rookie QBs. Let's just say none of them are good situations, but Mayfield has produced by far the best performance.

When you factor in the narrative that he has breathed life into a previously woebegone franchise, he's a pretty obvious selection for OROTY IMO.

2 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Raiderfan // Dec 04, 2018 - 7:47am

Your Gurley blurb calls him Ridley.

19 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Aaron Schatz // Dec 04, 2018 - 11:55am

Fixed!

21 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ammek // Dec 04, 2018 - 12:09pm

The one that stood out to me was "the birth of the NFL in the 1930s". Just like that, one half of the Cardinals' trophy cabinet is erased from history!

26 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Aaron Brooks Good Twin // Dec 04, 2018 - 12:41pm

They stole that one anyway.

3 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by FizzDude // Dec 04, 2018 - 8:04am

So, he's not a running back so he doesn't qualify for the list, but the best rushing DYAR for the week was actually... Josh Allen?

7 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Mike B. In Va // Dec 04, 2018 - 9:29am

His runs were ridiculously successful.

22 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ChrisS // Dec 04, 2018 - 12:27pm

And the worst was a QB, Lamar Jackson. Although he may be getting graded harshly since his runs are more similar to a RB's (harder to attack the LOS) than a typical QB (easier to scramble for more yards). He has is averaging about 5 yards per run which is bad for a QB but OK for a RB

25 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Mike B. In Va // Dec 04, 2018 - 12:40pm

Still humorous given his draft status as a rushing threat.

27 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Aaron Brooks Good Twin // Dec 04, 2018 - 12:42pm

If you can get 5 yards, and only 5 yards, with every rush, you'll never lose.

29 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Noah Arkadia // Dec 04, 2018 - 1:07pm

But only if your drives start at the 20, 25, 30, etc.

35 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Mike B. In Va // Dec 04, 2018 - 1:54pm

Always take the touchback.

4 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Will Allen // Dec 04, 2018 - 8:18am

There ought to be a United Nations investigation, in regard to the war crimes being visited on Chase Daniel! 60-plus pass attempts, not in the span of 8 years, BUT IN THE SPAN OF 8 DAYS!!!!!

OH, THE HUMANITY!!!!!

5 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by big10freak // Dec 04, 2018 - 8:56am

I am legit stunned Rodgers came out positive for Sunday. And between his long scramble and converting the 3rd and 23 Rosen made the big plays that GB was lacking

6 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by cstoos // Dec 04, 2018 - 9:26am

Surprised Kelce isn't on the top 5 DYAR list for the week. Was it the fumble that killed him?

13 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by barf // Dec 04, 2018 - 10:37am

Came here to ask the same thing. The fumble must have done it, because that was a great game by Kelce otherwise.

23 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by PTLove // Dec 04, 2018 - 12:27pm

Gotta figure opponent adjustment plays a big role here as well...

8 So...

by RobotBoy // Dec 04, 2018 - 9:42am

You're telling me that Mark Sanchez is still in the NFL? And not only that but he started a game? The same Mark Sanchez who played for the Jets? San-Chize Mark Sanchez? Butt Fumble Sanchez? Rex tattoo Sanchez? Get outta here.

9 Re: So...

by RobotBoy // Dec 04, 2018 - 9:45am

It's a shame that there are no unemployed quarterbacks out there who could give you a better chance. A guy with real talent who almost won a superbowl. A guy who...oh, forget it.

39 Re: So...

by Steve in WI // Dec 04, 2018 - 3:09pm

Yeah, but the guy you're thinking of hasn't thrown a pass in the NFL since 2016. Clearly Sanchez is a better option at this point, since he [checks notes]...hadn't thrown a pass in the NFL since 2016 before last night.

43 Re: So...

by Scott P. // Dec 04, 2018 - 3:59pm

If Sanchez isn't the answer, Matt Leinert surely is.

55 Re: So...

by RobotBoy // Dec 04, 2018 - 7:10pm

In all fairness, Sanchez has been able to really polish his clipboard handling experience since 2016.

60 Re: So...

by RobotBoy // Dec 05, 2018 - 4:31am

Coach Gruden seems to feel the same way: https://www.sbnation.com/2018/12/4/18126109/colin-kaepernick-washington-...

11 Re: So...

by cstoos // Dec 04, 2018 - 9:51am

He didn't start. Colt McCoy broke his leg.

Redskins now have had two QBs break legs in one season. Rough go for a team that was in first place, what? Last week?

15 Re: So...

by RobotBoy // Dec 04, 2018 - 10:42am

It was too good to be true, unless...
He'll start this week, right?

20 Re: So...

by DavidL // Dec 04, 2018 - 12:09pm

If that's your reaction, then you'll probably be interested to know that, in a sign that his appearance last night was divinely ordained, Sanchez fumbled on MNF but recovered the ball by pinning it against his butt.

10 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by andrew // Dec 04, 2018 - 9:49am

How much DYAR was Brady's final completion of the first half worth? The dump off with almost no time remaining that netted 42 yards but never had a prayer of scoring or setting up a field goal? Is that a failed completion? Is it treated the same as a hail mary?

57 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Lost Ti-Cats Fan // Dec 04, 2018 - 10:03pm

Should be zero from a predictive basis. Tossing the ball into the stands had only a marginally less chance of changing the score.

12 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ammek // Dec 04, 2018 - 10:26am

The sacks-completions-interceptions trend is interesting: good work picking it out. I'm not quite swayed by any of the hypotheses presented though. In fact, the sack rate has climbed a little over the last decade, and it now looks as though 2016 (the lowest sack rate ever) is the outlier. The lowest sack rate over a three-year period is 2007-09. The likely explanation for why the sack numbers are ticking back up is the emergence of the Rushing Quarterback who extends plays for as long as possible, as exemplified by Robert Griffin, who ranked fifth in completion percentage in 2012 but got sacked a ton. Griffin's yards per completion were also well above average, which is another aspect of this pass-wacky season: not only are QBs completing many more passes, but each completion is gaining as many or more yards than has been the case for most of this century.

The Rushing QB hypothesis is boosted by the fact that yards per sack seem to have declined this year, and that QB fumbles don't appear to be increasing at the same rate as QB sacks.

Another (probably related) trend to note is the huge leap in rushing yards per carry this season (and first downs gained on the ground). Are defenses blitzing more, and getting killed by RPOs? How much of the difference is down to QB runs? What proportion of the extra yards are coming in the 'open field', and why aren't nickel and dime defenses doing better at preventing these longer runs?

This all intrigues me greatly, as you can probably tell!

14 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by aces4me // Dec 04, 2018 - 10:40am

I was wondering if the new rules about what can be done to a QB during a sack (no body weight and such) is effecting this by allowing more quarter back to take more sacks without getting knocked out of the game. How many guys in the past would have gotten sacked 7 times but got knocked out of the game on sack 3 or 4.

46 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Eddo // Dec 04, 2018 - 4:59pm

Interesting. At first I was nodding along, that QBs might let themselves be sacked more. But your last sentence made me stop, because it would imply the sack rate would stay the same, you'd just see fewer backup quarterbacks playing.

58 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Lost Ti-Cats Fan // Dec 04, 2018 - 10:05pm

QBs could also hang in there, taking the sack more often because they're not as afraid of getting hurt.

I doubt that's it, though. Takes a long time to re-write years of habit.

16 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Aaron Brooks Good Twin // Dec 04, 2018 - 10:59am

I think some of what you're seeing is that defense now is only about pass defense. Some defenses don't even bother with run-stopping.

17 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Will Allen // Dec 04, 2018 - 11:17am

That's what makes the Cowboys' offense viable.

34 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by dank067 // Dec 04, 2018 - 1:50pm

I suppose it does, but ultimately the Dallas offense is still not very good - 24th in both offensive DVOA and total scoring, 16th in points per drive. Maybe those numbers look better since the beginning of the season, but if I were putting together a defense I wouldn't worry too much about teams like Dallas in the big picture.

44 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Will Allen // Dec 04, 2018 - 4:47pm

Which is why I didn't write "good". Still, as Darth Hoodie has shown on a number of occasions, there is considerable value to be extracted from defenses not being ready to stop the run.

49 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by dank067 // Dec 04, 2018 - 6:02pm

For sure. Actually, the team that I think is exploiting this better than anyone this year is the Rams. While still being as pass-oriented as anyone (especially considering how frequently they've been playing with the lead), in a league that has gone shotgun-crazy, they stand out by running so many plays from under center. Along with the fact that a huge proportion of their passing game is play-action (which is probably the foundation of the entire thing), they've created just a hyper efficient running game. Gurley and the OL are great, but they mostly aren't running over people - they're running past them and into huge amounts of space.

52 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by LyleNM // Dec 04, 2018 - 6:10pm

Carroll and Schottenheimer say hello.

24 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by big10freak // Dec 04, 2018 - 12:33pm

Agreed.

32 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ChrisS // Dec 04, 2018 - 1:33pm

I think you are correct and this probably explains the success (win loss based) of the Lamar Jackson led 1950's offense of the Ravens.

18 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ChrisS // Dec 04, 2018 - 11:37am

Part of it may be that this is reflecting a somewhat different regime and that it is being masked by looking at too long of a historical period. The problem with this is that if it is a new regime it is difficult to be certain with so few data points. Perhaps a small part of is that the sacks are coming on plays that are likely to have lower completion percentages. Now many QB's are substituting a sack for a long incompletion. This is even harder to determine since I don't know if the information on play calls is available.

36 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Dan_L // Dec 04, 2018 - 2:05pm

Also related to the read option comments. If a QB runs an RPO and is tackled for a 1 yard loss, is that counted as a sack in the statistics?

38 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ammek // Dec 04, 2018 - 2:50pm

Whatever the causes, we need to note the difference between a DAK (high completion rate, high sack rate) and a JOEY (low completion rate, low sack rate, plus a ton of picks).

30 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Sixknots // Dec 04, 2018 - 1:09pm

Colt McCoy is missing from QR. Or are his numbers in with Sanchez? Not enough snaps to qualify?

42 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by DraftMan // Dec 04, 2018 - 3:43pm

McCoy only threw 4 passes, and it takes 8 to qualify as a QB.

31 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by AnonyRuss // Dec 04, 2018 - 1:19pm

"Wilson only threw one pass to his right: a completion at the line of scrimmage to Chris Carson, who then gained 27 yards on first-and-20. In related news, Richard Sherman usually stays to that side of the field for San Francisco"

Pretty sure Wilson threw to his right for a touchdown to Jaron Brown to make it 34-10. Who was in coverage? Richard Sherman.

Sherman also missed a tackle on a Doug Baldwin slant that went for a first down.

Not dogging Sherman at all, just saying Wilson didn't avoid him like the comment implies

33 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Cuenca Guy // Dec 04, 2018 - 1:48pm

The first thing I did after reading the blurb on Wilson's day was check if anyone else had pointed that out. As you wrote, there were at least three passes that went to the right side: the throw to Carson, the throw to Brown for a TD, and the throw to Baldwin.

That's not a ton of throws, but Wilson only attempted 17 passes total. The fact that he finished 7th in DYAR, a counting stat, with only 17 throws and that he threw three TDs on his first four completions (six attempts) are what I think should be the story about his day.

40 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Steve in WI // Dec 04, 2018 - 3:13pm

I'm gratified to see how bad Daniel's day was according to FO, because I'm hearing a lot of people in Chicago excuse it as "sure, it wasn't good, but remember that he's just a backup." Or, worse, "look how good he was at the end of the 4th quarter to get them to overtime." He wasn't the only problem Sunday, but he was clearly the biggest. Now, it's one game, and I hope not to see him take the field in a meaningful game ever again, but that was a really disappointing game from a supposedly good backup.

45 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Eddo // Dec 04, 2018 - 4:57pm

I agreed with you about that in the Audibles thread, and I'll agree again here. With their defense, the Bears literally need their veteran replacement QB to play at replacement level. If Daniel had been at that level, the Bears probably win a close one. If Trubisky had played, I don't think the game is especially close.

53 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by tuluse // Dec 04, 2018 - 6:34pm

Replacement level would move [Bears QB] from last place to 19th and I'm not sure the game would be close. 180 DYAR has to be worth like 14 points.

47 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by E // Dec 04, 2018 - 5:11pm

Curious to know where Odell Beckham's DYAR came out this week. Only 3 catches for 35 yards but one was a TD, plus he had the long TD pass. After factoring in opponent adjustments (for which Eli Manning was granted 69 DYAR! most of any quarterback this week) I'm surprised that OBJ didn't crack the top 5 WRs in a relatively weak week.

50 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by BJR // Dec 04, 2018 - 6:03pm

How does DYAR rate Adrian Peterson's night? 9 carries for 98 yards, featuring a 90 yard TD. Interesting case study for how much the system values boom/bust vs. steady gains.

54 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Vincent Verhei // Dec 04, 2018 - 6:51pm

Your Gurley blurb calls him Ridley.

The one that stood out to me was "the birth of the NFL in the 1930s". Just like that, one half of the Cardinals' trophy cabinet is erased from history!

These have been fixed. Thank you.

So, he's not a running back so he doesn't qualify for the list, but the best rushing DYAR for the week was actually... Josh Allen?

Yup. Each of his nine runs counted as a successful play, seven picked up first downs, six went for 10 yards or more, three went for 25 yards or more.

Surprised Kelce isn't on the top 5 DYAR list for the week. Was it the fumble that killed him?

Fifteenth among WR/TEs with 28 DYAR. The fumble hurt him, and so did an incomplete pass on second-and-goal from the 2, but he still would have been first without opponent adjustments -- the Raiders have been impossibly bad against tight ends this year. The average pass to a tight end against Oakland has gained 11.5 yards. Nobody else is even in double-digits.

25 DYAR.

Also related to the read option comments. If a QB runs an RPO and is tackled for a 1 yard loss, is that counted as a sack in the statistics?

These can be tricky. It's up to the judgment of the official PBP scorer whether the QB was trying to run or pass.

Whatever the causes, we need to note the difference between a DAK (high completion rate, high sack rate) and a JOEY (low completion rate, low sack rate, plus a ton of picks).

Sounds like an idea for a future essay! Though I'm not sure who a current example would be -- Joe Flacco maybe?

Colt McCoy is missing from QR. Or are his numbers in with Sanchez? Not enough snaps to qualify?

He only threw four passes. I actually don't get Quick Reads numbers for Monday Night players who don't qualify for the tables, but if you ask me next week I'll look them up.

Pretty sure Wilson threw to his right for a touchdown to Jaron Brown to make it 34-10. Who was in coverage? Richard Sherman.

Play by play lists that throw as deep middle. Here's the video of the play:

https://www.seahawks.com/video/russell-wilson-connects-with-jaron-brown-...

Looks like he catches it just inside the numbers in the end zone. A lot of scorers use the numbers as designation for left/middle/right.

43 DYAR passing, -12 DYAR receiving, 31 total. Only had the three receptions (plus a DPI for 8 yards) and three total first downs in ten targets.

How does DYAR rate Adrian Peterson's night? 9 carries for 98 yards, featuring a 90 yard TD. Interesting case study for how much the system values boom/bust vs. steady gains.

See my earlier note about Monday Night players. I can only tell you he didn't make the top 20 overall running backs.

I am legit stunned Rodgers came out positive for Sunday. And between his long scramble and converting the 3rd and 23 Rosen made the big plays that GB was lacking

No interceptions, no fumbles, only one sack. And he picked up a bunch of first downs in the first half, just not much explosiveness.

56 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Vincent Verhei // Dec 04, 2018 - 8:50pm

End zone cam of the Brown "deep middle" touchdown.

https://twitter.com/benbbaldwin/status/1070117243806248961

62 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ammek // Dec 06, 2018 - 10:12am

Thank you, Vincent, for replying as always.

A sort of side angle to the Prescott question: one of the reasons the defensive numbers seem to be bunched so tightly this year is that teams who play solid pass defense aren't taking the ball away. The top quartile of defenses as measured by passing yardage has a cumulative 58 interceptions; the second quartile has 82; the third, 99; and the bottom quartile 85. There appears to be an almost inverse correlation between (lower) yardage conceded and (more) takeaways. Presumably defenses are aiming for one or the other: stops or picks.

In this rather broad analysis, sack numbers correspond closely to yardage, and therefore inversely with interceptions. It seems that pass pressure is not leading Qbs to throw more picks, at least not in any straightforward way, and from that I think we can argue that Qbs are being coached to eat the football when there's nothing open rather than fling a fanciful Favre.

63 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Will Allen // Dec 06, 2018 - 11:23am

Which suggests that coaches very much believe, even moreso than previously, that turning the ball over, with something less than a 40 or so yard change in field position, harms the chance to win more than anything else. That may explain their reluctance to adopt a four down strategy until late in the game; they are too heavily discounting the reward obtained by keeping possession. Also, as interceptions are reduced, the percentage of which which are caused by factors not related to qb performance; like receivers tipping balls or running routes poorly, may be climbing, and given the outsized deleterious effect a single int can have on qb metrics, those metrics may be less useful in evaluating the most important position on the field, even with a season's worth of pass attempts.

Yes, measuring individual football player performance is a hard task.

64 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ammek // Dec 06, 2018 - 4:52pm

That's a good point about metrics. It's one of the most frustrating things about DVOA in small-sample-size contexts (eg, ALEX, or the breakdown of pass defense by type of receiver): a couple of interceptions can skew the numbers so greatly that they tell you nothing beyond "QB threw a pick in this situation". And as you say the fewer interceptions there are, the less they can be considered a 'repeatable' event, rendering the numbers ever more worthless.

65 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Will Allen // Dec 06, 2018 - 5:05pm

I don't know the solution to this, given the undeniable effect of an interception, on a team's chances of winning. The NFL may benefit, in terms of measuring performance, by having baseball-like scorekeepers, who, as best possible, assign responsibility for interceptions and should have been intercepted. That's another conumdrum, however, given the vested interests players and coaches have in the assignments.

66 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ammek // Dec 06, 2018 - 6:01pm

Of course you're right, an interception has a substantial effect on win probability. Even so, the metrics may be overvaluing it in an era where, for example, the Packers have thrown two picks in 12 games while turning the ball over on downs eight times. If we were to attribute all those failed fourth downs to Rodgers, he'd have 12 giveaways instead of 4, and his raw numbers would look a lot worse – especially as those 'hidden' turnovers might be more costly in terms of field position than, say, a pick on a deep throw on third down.

But I'm not sure, from the point of view of repeatable events, that an incomplete pass on 4th down is any different from any other incomplete pass. And for me that's the root of the problem with interceptions and DVOA: aside from a Nathan Peterman or a 'QB Buccaneers', interceptions have a huge effect on the descriptive numbers, but not on the prescriptive ones.

68 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Will Allen // Dec 06, 2018 - 6:57pm

It really causes me to question the validity of our qb rankings, certainly in a season, and perhaps even a career. I could certainly envision two qbs, who performed nearly identically in every respect during a season, with one having 8 interceptions, and the other 16, and that extra 8 ints having nothing to do with how the qb performed, relative to the other qb's performance. Our metrics would view them very, very, differently, however.

69 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by ammek // Dec 07, 2018 - 1:31pm

Yeah, I'm not sure that "how the qb performed" is really what the metrics are trying to measure, at least not the 'advanced', event-based ones like DVOA. But it certainly is how those metrics get read and talked about, even among the smarter posters on here, as a kind of shorthand for "production versus average of an offense when the quarterback drops back to pass". That longer description leaves open the question of who or what was responsible for an interception; it simply states that an interception occurred, docking the offense for it in the name of the quarterback. (Maybe that last bit is easier to understand when you're catholic!) I think the problem is more that, in our oh so cartesian way, we desperately want to be able to isolate each individual's contributions to a play, and have a hard time accepting that it can only be understood in the context of the network of relations between players and as a sum of their (variously weighted) actions.

The main problem with VOA – as opposed to, say, ANY/A or Expected Points, or even the blessed passer rating – is that it's hard to break down the headline figure. A fuller (and dare I say more transparent) treatment might show how much DVOA a QB accumulated on plays that were neither sacks nor turnovers; what proportion was accumulated on DPIs and free plays; how much was added on TD passes; how much was lost on incompletions. Essentially this is similar information to that which is given in the various elements of passer rating, or visible in the differences between AY/A, NY/A and ANY/A. It would certainly make DVOA less of a blur if such information were readily available.

67 Re: Week 13 Quick Reads

by Mountain Time ---- formerly Ninjalectual // Dec 06, 2018 - 6:07pm

If you sort by yards allowed per attempt, the ints per quartile from lowest ya/a to highest are: 93, 65, 73, 94

That's pretty weird. I'm not sure there's any meaning at all here.

ETA: which is exactly the conclusion you came to above :)